[Accumulated experience in the analysis of quality indicators in a haemodialysis unit]. / Experiencia acumulada en el análisis de indicadores de calidad en una unidad de hemodiálisis.

INTRODUCTION: The object of this work was to review our use of various indicators of haemodialysis within the guidelines of good clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study includes all patients from our haemodialysis program from June 2005 to February 2008. The indicators we evaluated included various areas: anaemia, bone-mineral metabolism, dialysis dose, cardiovascular risk, vascular access and morbidity/ mortality. The measurement intervals varied according to the parameter being evaluated. RESULTS: We gathered those indicators in which we found a difference between our results and the targets set. It is possible to reach a haemoglobin of > or = 11 g/dl in more than 85% of the patients, although more than 20% of them showed > 13 g/dl. We were able to stay on target with phosphorous (> 85%) but not with calcium (72.7%) or PTH (38.8%) although average values were improved. The incorporation of new patients to the haemodialysis programme, some previously unknown, limited our possibilities of achieving > or = 85% with a Kt/V > or = 1.3. Only 62.2% of the patients had a systolic blood pressure of < or = 140 mmHg. The percentage of patients dialysed by catheter (objective < 10%) was only achieved in five out of the eleven measures. The hospitalisation rate was between 0.49 and 0.71 episodes/patient/year. The patient survival rates coincide with those of the Comunidad Valenciana Register. CONCLUSION: the use of clinical performance measures has improved our results, whilst in some cases it has raised doubts over their definition and established targets. In general we feel that they should be revised and redefined where necessary in an attempt to avoid variability, iatrogenia, and increased costs. The use of only those indicators in which a clear scientific basis is evident, should be considered.

[Vascular access outcome in patients aged over 75 years]. / Resultados del acceso vascular en mayores de 75 anos.

UNLABELLED: We report a retrospective study on the results of 132 native fistulas, 12 grafts and 27 tunneled catheters followed during 30 months in 144 patients on hemodialysis. The results were compared according to patient age: 75 years or over (n = 58, 80.3 +/- 3.5) vs below 75 years (n = 86, 59.5 +/- 13.3). Gender, presence of diabetes and type of fistula were also included in the analysis. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between both groups in the use of tunneled catheters or grafts (8.6% vs 5.8% y 5.2% vs 10.5% respectively), primary failure of native fistulas (7.1% in those aged 75 years or over vs 25.5% in patients below 75 years), rate of thrombosis (0.03 vs 0.09/patient year at risk respectively) or number of percutaneous or surgical procedures in order to maintain the fistula patency (0.11 vs 0.16/patient year at risk respectively). At the same time no differences were seen in the primary, primary assisted and secondary patency of the native fistulas. The mean age of the patients when the first access fistula was created was different according to the area of surgery (74.9 +/- 9.3 for the elbow vs 64.9 +/- 16.2 years for the forearm, p < 0.005). Diabetes was an unfavourable factor for primary (HR Cox 2.08, p < 0.05) or secondary (Log Rank, p <0.05) patency. CONCLUSION: The vascular access for hemodialysis in elderly patients presents a similar evolution to that seen in younger populations if the access creation is based on an exhaustive study, including ecodoppler of the vascular map and the use of more proximal fistulas if necessary. Therefore the more frequent use of grafts or catheters in elderly patients is not justified.

[Enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry's disease]. / Terapia de sustitución enzimática en la enfermedad de Fabry: evaluación clínico-histológica tras 18 meses de terapia.

We report a 56-year-old man with history of chronic renal failure, who was diagnosed to have Fabry's disease after performing a percutaneous kidney biopsy. The diagnosis was confirmed by the deficient level of activity of alpha-galactosidase A and by the identification of the mutation. A enzime replacement therapy with alpha-galactosidase A was administered. After 18 months of treatment, a second kidney biopsy was performed showing renal deposits of globotriaosylceramide (we did not evaluate the percentage of histologic clearance of the deposits). Six months after the end of the therapy, a reduction in the impairment of renal function is observed, and the classic manifestations of the disease are absent.

[G-CSF versus GM-CSF in the treatment of neutropenia in a patient with Felty's syndrome on hemodialysis]. / G-CSF versus GM-CSF en el tratamiento de la neutropenia de un paciente con síndrome de Felty en hemodiálisis.

We describe a patient with Felty's syndrome and chronic renal failure due to secondary amyloidosis in a periodic haemodialysis programme, who was successfully treated for neutropenia with sequential administration of colony-stimulating factors: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor.

Change from conventional haemodiafiltration to on-line haemodiafiltration.

BACKGROUND: On-line haemodiafiltration (HDF) is a technique which combines diffusion with elevated convection and uses pyrogen-free dialysate as a replacement fluid. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference between conventional HDF (1-3 l/h) and on-line HDF (6-12 l/h). METHODS: The study included 37 patients, 25 males and 12 females. The mean age was 56.5 +/- 13 years and duration of dialysis was 62.7 +/- 49 months. Three patients dropped out for transplantation, three patients died and three failed to complete the study period. Initially all patients were on conventional HDF with high-flux membranes over the preceding 34 +/- 32 months. Treatment was performed with blood flow (QB) 402 +/- 41 ml/min, dialysis time (Td) 187 min, dialysate flow (QD) 654 +/- 126 ml/min and replacement fluid (Qi) 4.0 +/- 2 l/session. Patients were changed to on-line HDF with the same filtre and dialysis time, QD 679 +/- 38 ml/min (NS), QB 434 +/- 68 ml/min (P < 0.05) and post-dilutional replacement fluid 22.5 +/- 4.3 l/session (P < 0.001). We compared conventional HDF with on-line HDF over a period of 1 year. Dialysis adequacy was monitored according to standard clinical and biochemical criteria. Kinetic analysis of urea and beta2-micro-globulin (beta2m) was performed monthly. RESULTS: Tolerance was excellent and no pyrogenic reactions were observed. Pre-dialysis sodium increased 2 mEq/l during on-line HDF. Plasma potassium, pre- and post-dialysis bicarbonate, uric acid, phosphate, calcium, iPTH, albumin, total proteins, cholesterol and triglycerides remained stable. The mean plasma beta2m reduction ratio increased from 56.1 +/- 8.7% in conventional HDF to 71.1 +/- 9.1% in on-line HDF (P < 0.001). The pre-dialysis plasma beta2m decreased from 27.4 +/- 8.1 to 24.2 +/- 6.5 mg/l (P < 0.01). Mean Kt/V (Daugirdas 2nd generation) was 1.35 +/- 0.21 in conventional HDF compared with 1.56 +/- 0.29 in on-line HDF (P < 0.01), Kt/Vr (Kt/V taking into consideration post-dialysis urea rebound) 1.12 +/- 0.17 vs 1.26 +/- 0.20 (P < 0.01), BUN time average concentration (TAC) 44.4 +/- 9 vs 40.6 +/- 10 mg/dl (P < 0.05) and protein catabolic rate (PCR) 1.13 +/- 0.22 vs 1.13 +/- 0.24 g/kg (NS). There was a significant increase in haemoglobin (10.66 +/- 1.1 vs 11.4 +/- 1.5) and haematocrit (32.2 +/- 2.9 vs 34.0 +/- 4.4%), P < 0.05, during the on-line HDF period, which allowed a decrease in the erythropoietin doses (3861 +/- 2446 vs 3232 +/- 2492 UI/week), (P < 0.05). Better blood pressure control (MAP 103.8 +/- 15 vs 97.8 +/- 11 mmHg, P < 0.01) and a lower percentage of patients requiring antihypertensive drugs were also observed. CONCLUSION: The change from conventional HDF to on-line HDF results in increased convective removal and fluid replacement (18 l/session). During on-line HDF treatment, dialysis dose was increased for both small and large molecules with a decrease in uraemic toxicity level (TAC). On-line HDF provided a better correction of anaemia with lower dosages of erythropoietin. Finally, blood pressure was easily controlled.