Limited Incision Rhinoplasty: An Approach for All Primary and Revision Cases.

INTRODUCTION: Rhinoplasty was one of the most frequently performed aesthetic surgeries in the USA in 2022. Traditionally, the open approach has been preferred by the majority of surgeons often due to familiarity and ease of visualization. However, patient interest in closed and preservation rhinoplasty is driving a resurgence in the popularity of endonasal techniques. We present a series of 100 consecutive endonasal primary and revision rhinoplasty cases using bilateral isolated modified rim incisions. METHODS: One-hundred consecutive patients underwent closed rhinoplasty via isolated modified rim incisions at a single-surgeon private practice. The senior author performs 100% endonasal rhinoplasty. A retrospective chart review was performed from 06/25/20 to 09/21/22. Information on demographics, complications, and need for revision was collected. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients underwent primary rhinoplasty, 11 underwent secondary rhinoplasty, 4 underwent tertiary rhinoplasty, and 1 underwent quaternary rhinoplasty. Isolated modified rim incisions were used in all cases except in cases of septoplasty when a unilateral Killian incision was added, or in cases of lateral osteotomy when vestibular stab incisions were added. Post-operatively, six (6.0%) patients required revision, all of which were performed under local anesthesia. CONCLUSION: Limited incision rhinoplasty is a reliable surgical approach that produces predictable results with a low revision rate. This technique is highly effective in minimizing soft tissue disruption to ensure safe, reliable, and effective outcomes in primary and revision rhinoplasty. It is an easier technique to learn compared to traditional endonasal and even arguably open rhinoplasty, thus lending itself to widespread adoption especially among novice rhinoplasty surgeons. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The Principles and Practice of Primary Endonasal Rhinoplasty.

ABSTRACT: The purpose of this article is to provide a guide for plastic surgeons, regardless of experience level, seeking to improve his/her endonasal rhinoplasty skills and comfort level. We have presented the advantages of our technique and its unifying principles and demonstrated how endonasal rhinoplasty can be used to achieve safe, anatomical, and predictable outcomes. Endonasal rhinoplasty is a separate thought process from open rhinoplasty and should not be viewed as a competing but rather parallel technique that is broadly applicable to many nasal deformities.We have described the basic goals of all rhinoplasties and highlighted 2 false assumptions that are responsible for most adverse rhinoplasty outcomes and 4 anatomical deficits that surgeons must recognize preoperatively to maximize function, proportion, and contour. Finally, the majority of primary rhinoplasties can be performed with 1 of 2 operative strategies that depend on the relationship of the dorsum to the lower nose. Because surgeons often presume that they will not be able to "see well enough" in endonasal rhinoplasty or worry they have not been adequately trained in the technique, we have provided a step-by-step guide to help overcome such fears and help these surgeons to achieve results that will exceed their patients' goals.

1000 Consecutive Cases of Laser-Assisted Liposuction Utilizing the 1440 nm Wavelength Nd:YAG Laser: Assessing the Safety and Efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Liposuction remains one of the most popular aesthetic surgery procedures performed today, and it has undergone continuous refinements over the past four decades. Advancements in anesthesia, improvements in instrumentation, better understanding of fluid dynamics and the addition of energy to liposuction have led to better outcomes with improved safety and efficacy. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to review 1000 consecutive laser-assisted liposuction (LAL) cases utilizing the 1440 nm wavelength. Emphasis was placed on complication rates and the need for revision procedures. METHODS: The charts of 611 patients who underwent 1000 consecutive LAL operations were reviewed. All cases were performed either under general anesthesia or under local with sedation, and the cases were performed alone or in conjunction with other procedures. All patients went to presurgical testing and had preoperative laboratory and additional clearance by a specialist when indicated. Before and after medical photographs were obtained of all patients. All operations were done in an accredited office-based operating room. Demographic information, tumescent volume, aspirate volume, surgical time, complications and other data were reviewed. RESULTS: There were one minor complication and no major complications such as burns, hospitalizations or mortalities. One patient developed a small hematoma, which was likely caused by the patient self-aspirating edema fluid during the immediate post-op period. The hematoma resolved with non-surgical management. The average laser energy applied was 15,756 J with an average total aspirate volume of 1256 cc. Fourteen anatomic areas were treated with LAL, and 59 operations were combination cases. CONCLUSION: Energy-assisted liposuction using the 1440 nm wavelength has been shown in this series to have a very low complication rate when performed alone or in combination with other aesthetic operations under local and general anesthesia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Impact of FDA Updates on Public Interest in Breast Implant-associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma.

In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible for protecting the public health by assuring the safety, efficacy, and security of drugs, biological products, and medical devices. In that role, FDA releases timely updates with regard to medical devices and their possible adverse effects. However, the impact of such FDA updates on public interest has not been studied. The timing of multiple FDA updates regarding Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) was noted from September 2014 to September 2019. Impact on Public interest related to ALCL was measured using Google Trends and the number of YouTube video uploads. These objective markers were used to compare the public interest during FDA updates versus weeks with no FDA updates. Five major updates were released by FDA regarding BIA-ALCL during the past 5 years. Google Trends demonstrated a significant increase in public interest regarding ALCL during the week of FDA release, with a mean score of 69 ± 20.82 when compared with a mean score of 10.68 ± 4.71 (P < 0.001) during weeks with no FDA release. The mean number of YouTube videos uploaded during the period of FDA release was 11.8 ± 9.42, which was significantly higher than the mean of 2.42 ± 1.31 videos (P < 0.001) during the period of no FDA updates. FDA updates correlates with temporal increase in public interest. Plastic surgeons should be aware of FDA information releases on BIA-ALCL and anticipate an increased interest in additional information from patients and the public.

Operating room waste reduction in plastic and hand surgery.

BACKGROUND: Operating rooms (ORs), combined with labour and delivery suites, account for approximately 70% of hospital waste. Previous studies have reported that recycling can have a considerable financial impact on a hospital-wide basis; however, its importance in the OR has not been demonstrated. OBJECTIVE: To propose a method of decreasing cost through judicious selection of instruments and supplies, and initiation of recycling in plastic and hand surgery. METHODS: The authors identified disposable supplies and instruments that are routinely opened and wasted in common plastic and hand surgery procedures, and calculated the savings that can result from eliminating extraneous items. A cost analysis was performed, which compared the expense of OR waste versus single-stream recycling and the benefit of recycling HIPAA documents and blue wrap. RESULTS: Fifteen total items were removed from disposable plastic packs and seven total items from hand packs. A total of US$17,381.05 could be saved per year from these changes alone. Since initiating single-stream recycling, the authors' institution has saved, on average, US$3,487 per month at the three campuses. After extrapolating at the current savings rate, one would expect to save a minimum of US$41,844 per year. DISCUSSION: OR waste reduction is an effective method of decreasing cost in the surgical setting. By revising the contents of current disposable packs and instrument sets designated for plastic and hand surgery, hospitals can reduce the amount of opened and unused material. CONCLUSIONS: Significant financial savings and environmental benefit can result from this judicious supply and instrument selection, as well as implementation of recycling.

HISTORIQUE: Les salles d'opération (SO) et les blocs de travail et d'accouchement produisent environ 70 % des déchets hospitaliers. Selon des études antérieures, le recyclage a des conséquences financières importantes pour l'ensemble de l'hôpital. Cependant, son importance n'a pas été démontrée en SO. OBJECTIF: Proposer une méthode pour réduire les coûts grâce à un choix judicieux d'instruments et de fournitures et au recyclage dans le cadre des chirurgies plastiques et de la main. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Les auteurs ont ciblé les fournitures jetables et les instruments qui sont ouverts systématiquement et gaspillés lors des interventions courantes en chirurgie plastique et de la main et ont calculé les économies qui peuvent découler de l'élimination d'articles superflus. Ils ont procédé à une analyse des coûts, dans laquelle ils ont comparé la dépense de déchets en SO au recyclage à flux unique et l'avantage de recycler les documents et les emballages bleus conformément à la HIPAA. RÉSULTATS: Quinze objets ont été retirés des emballages jetables pour la chirurgie plastique et sept autres, des emballages pour la chirurgie de la main. Au total, on pourrait épargner 17 381,05 $US chaque année grâce à ces seuls changements. Depuis le début du recyclage à flux unique, l'hôpital des auteurs a épargné en moyenne 3 487 $US par mois sur ses trois campus. Après extrapolation aux taux d'économie actuels, on s'attendrait à épargner au moins 41 844 $US par année. EXPOSÉ: La réduction des déchets en SO est une méthode efficace pour réduire les coûts en milieu chirurgical. En révisant le contenu des emballages jetables et des emballages d'instruments conçus pour la chirurgie plastique et la chirurgie de la main, les hôpitaux peuvent réduire la quantité d'équipement ouvert et inutilisé. CONCLUSIONS: D'importantes économies et des avantages environnementaux marqués peuvent découler d'un approvisionnement judicieux et d'un choix d'instruments, de même que de l'adoption du recyclage.