Plasma Drug Values of DOACs in Patients Presenting with Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Prospective Observational Study.

Background and Objectives: Anticoagulants are a well-known risk factor for gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). In recent years, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have taken a leading role in the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic incidents. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of DOAC-treated patients with GIB whose plasma drug concentrations exceeded the cut-off values reported in the literature and to evaluate their clinical characteristics. Materials and Methods: Patients who were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit in the period 2/2020-3/2022 due to GIB were prospectively included in the study and classified into three groups according to the prescribed type of DOAC (apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran). For all participants, it was determined if the measured plasma drug levels exceeded the maximum serum concentration (Cmax) or trough serum concentration (Ctrough) obtained from the available data. A comparison of clinical parameters between the patients with and without excess drug values was performed. Results: There were 90 patients (54.4% men) included in the study, of whom 27 were treated with dabigatran, 24 with apixaban, and 39 with rivaroxaban. According to Cmax, there were 34 (37.8%), and according to Ctrough, there were 28 (31.1%) patients with excess plasma drug values. A statistically significant difference regarding excess plasma drug values was demonstrated between DOACs according to both Cmax (p = 0.048) and Ctrough (p < 0.001), with the highest rate in the group treated with dabigatran (55.6% for Cmax and 59.3% for Ctrough). Multivariate logistic regression showed that age (OR 1.177, p = 0.049) is a significant positive and glomerular filtration rate (OR 0.909, p = 0.016) is a negative predictive factor for excess plasma drug values. A total of six (6.7%) patients had fatal outcomes. Conclusions: Plasma drug concentrations exceed cut-off values reported in the literature in more than one-third of patients with GIB taking DOAC, with the highest rate in the dabigatran group. Clinicians should be more judicious when prescribing dabigatran to the elderly and patients with renal failure. In these patients, dose adjustment, plasma drug monitoring, or substitution with other, more appropriate DOACs should be considered.

Assessment of Gallbladder Drainage Methods in the Treatment of Acute Cholecystitis: A Literature Review.

Gallbladder drainage is a treatment option in high-risk surgical patients with moderate or severe acute cholecystitis. It may be applied as a bridge to cholecystectomy or a definitive treatment option. Apart from the simple and widely accessible percutaneous cholecystostomy, new attractive techniques have emerged in the previous decade, including endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage. The aim of this paper is to present currently available drainage techniques in the treatment of AC; evaluate their technical and clinical effectiveness, advantages, possible adverse events, and patient outcomes; and illuminate the decision-making path when choosing among various treatment modalities for each patient, depending on their clinical characteristics and the accessibility of methods.

Urotensin II levels in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are associated with increased cardiovascular risk and have increased overall cardiovascular burden. On the other hand, urotensin II (UII) is one of the most potent vascular constrictors with immunomodulatory effect that is connected with a number of different cardiometabolic disorders as well. Furthermore, patients with ulcerative colitis have shown increased expression of urotensin II receptor in comparison to healthy controls. Since the features of IBD includes chronic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction as well, it is plausible to assume that there is connection between increased cardiac risk in IBD and UII. AIM: To determine serum UII levels in patients with IBD and to compare them to control subjects, as well as investigate possible associations with relevant clinical and biochemical parameters. METHODS: This cross sectional study consecutively enrolled 50 adult IBD patients (26 with Crohn's disease and 24 with ulcerative colitis) and 50 age and gender matched controls. Clinical assessment was performed by the same experienced gastroenterologist according to the latest guidelines. Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease were used for endoscopic evaluation. Serum levels of UII were determined using the enzyme immunoassay kit for human UII, according to the manufacturer's instructions. RESULTS: IBD patients have significantly higher concentrations of UII when compared to control subjects (7.57 ± 1.41 vs 1.98 ± 0.69 ng/mL, P < 0.001), while there were no significant differences between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients (7.49 ± 1.42 vs 7.65 ± 1.41 ng/mL, P = 0.689). There was a significant positive correlation between serum UII levels and high sensitivity C reactive peptide levels (r = 0.491, P < 0.001) and a significant negative correlation between serum UII levels and total proteins (r = -0.306, P = 0.032). Additionally, there was a significant positive correlation between serum UII levels with both systolic (r = 0.387, P = 0.005) and diastolic (r = 0.352, P = 0.012) blood pressure. Moreover, serum UII levels had a significant positive correlation with Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (r = 0.425, P = 0.048) and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (r = 0.466, P = 0.028) scores. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that serum UII levels retained significant association with high sensitivity C reactive peptide (ß ± standard error, 0.262 ± 0.076, P < 0.001) and systolic blood pressure (0.040 ± 0.017, P = 0.030). CONCLUSION: It is possible that UII is involved in the complex pathophysiology of cardiovascular complications in IBD patients, and its purpose should be investigated in further studies.