Outcomes of Augmented Dual Mobility Acetabular Cups.

INTRODUCTION: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with acetabular bone defects is associated with a high risk of dislocation and aseptic loosening. No studies to date have examined the use of uncemented and augmented dual mobility cups (DMC) in patients with acetabular defects. We hypothesized that the use of augmented DMC under these conditions would reduce the dislocation rate and lead to satisfactory bone integration in the medium term despite acetabular bone defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This continuous multicenter study included all cases of augmented DMC performed between 2010 and 2017 in patients with acetabular bone loss (Paprosky 2A: 46%, 2B: 32%, 2C: 15% and 3A: 6%). The indications for implantation were revisions for cup aseptic loosening (AL) (n=45), femoral stem AL (n=3), bipolar AL (n=11), septic loosening (n=10), periprosthetic fracture (n=5), chronic dislocation (n=4), intraprosthetic dislocation (n=2), cup impingement (n=1), primary posttraumatic arthroplasty (n=8), and acetabular dysplasia (n=4). The clinical assessment consisted of the Harris hip score (HHS) and Merle d'Aubigné Postel score (MDP), along with preoperative and final follow-up radiographs. The primary endpoint was surgical revision for aseptic acetabular loosening or the occurrence of dislocation. RESULTS: Overall, 93 patients were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 5.3 ± 2.3 years [0, 10]. As of the last follow-up, the acetabular cup had been changed in five cases: 3 AL (3.2%) and 2 infections (2.1%). Thus the overall survivorship of the cup was 94.6% and the survivorship for AL was 96.8%. Three patients (3%) suffered a dislocation. At the last follow-up visit, the mean MDP and HHS scores were 14.75 and 72.15, respectively, which reflected significant improvements relative to the preoperative scores (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Use of an uncemented and augmented DMC in cases of acetabular bone defect leads to satisfactory medium-term results with low dislocation and loosening rates. We recommend its use in these cases.

Influence of Posture on Gait Parameters in Severe Symptomatic Lumbar Stenosis Before and After Decompression Surgery.

BACKGROUND: We searched to quantify the influence of sagittal vertical axis (SVA) on the improvement of spatiotemporal gait parameters using a gait motion analysis (GMA) before and after decompression surgery in patients suffering from lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with severe LisSS planned for lumbar decompression underwent a full-body biplanar radiographs (EOS) to quantify the SVA and have benefited from a 3-dimensional GMA 1 month before surgery (M0) and 6 month (M6) after surgery. The first step of this study was to confirm the validation of 3-dimensional sagittal vertical axis (3D SVA) for posture analysis. An analysis of modification of the 3D SVA and spatiotemporal gait parameters was then carried out in order to identify any correlation. RESULTS: Decompression surgery did not significantly improve 3D SVA between M0 and M6 (respectively 49.1 [50.3] vs. 49.84 [19.02], P = 0.42). Concerning spatiotemporal parameters, we found significant difference for all parameters between M0 and M6. A strong correlation (R2 > 0.65) between static SVA (EOS) and 3D SVA was demonstrated using a statistical regression equation. There was also a statistically significant correlation between SVA (static and 3-dimension) and improvement in spatiotemporal gait parameters after decompression surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study analyses the relationship between postural change (SVA) and improvement in gait parameters measured during GMA before and after decompression surgery for LSS. This specific analysis of gait parameters may represent a prognostic assessment tool for the recovery of patients undergoing surgery for a LSS.

Intradural extramedullary metastasis of oncocytic carcinoma of the parotid gland: A first case report and review of the literature.

We present an extremely infrequent case of intradural metastasis of a parotid tumour, responsible for motor deficit in legs. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of an intradural metastasis of a malignant and rare parotid tumour, oncocytic carcinoma. It accounts for less than 1% of salivary gland tumours. Its management is not codified and its prognosis seems to be poor. Local recurrences are common, as are regional metastases. Distant metastases are present in less than 30% of cases and are poorly described, mainly involving the lung. Thanks to the surgical treatment, our patient has partially recovered his motor and sensory functions.