Affinity of FVIII-specific antibodies reveals major differences between neutralizing and nonneutralizing antibodies in humans.

Recently, we reported that distinct immunoglobulin (Ig) isotypes and IgG subclasses of factor VIII (FVIII)-specific antibodies are found in different cohorts of patients with hemophilia A and in healthy individuals. Prompted by these findings, we further investigated the distinguishing properties among the different populations of FVIII-specific antibodies. We hypothesized that the affinity of antibodies would discriminate between the neutralizing and nonneutralizing antibodies found in different study cohorts. To test this idea, we established a competition-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technology to assess the apparent affinities for each isotype and IgG subclass of FVIII-specific antibodies without the need for antibody purification. We present a unique data set of apparent affinities of FVIII-specific antibodies found in healthy individuals, patients with congenital hemophilia A with and without FVIII inhibitors, and patients with acquired hemophilia A. Our data indicate that FVIII-specific antibodies found in patients with FVIII inhibitors have an up to 100-fold higher apparent affinity than that of antibodies found in patients without inhibitors and in healthy individuals. High-affinity FVIII-specific antibodies could be retrospectively detected in longitudinal samples of an individual patient with FVIII inhibitors 543 days before the first positive Bethesda assay. This finding suggests that these antibodies might serve as potential biomarkers for evolving FVIII inhibitor responses.

The Mystery of Antibodies Against Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) - What do we Know?

PURPOSE: Recent findings demonstrated anti-PEG antibody formation in some healthy individuals and patients who have not received PEGylated biotherapeutics. Some of these findings evoked criticism because of shortcomings in the antibody assays used. To better understand this topic, we established robust antibody analytics and screened two cohorts of healthy individuals and one cohort of hemophilia patients for the expression of anti-PEG antibodies. METHODS: A flow cytometry approach and a fully validated ELISA platform were established to detect specific anti-PEG antibodies. Immunohistochemistry was used to test for potential binding of anti-PEG antibodies to human tissues. RESULTS: IgM and/or IgG anti-PEG antibodies are expressed by some healthy individuals and by some patients with hemophilia who have not received PEGylated biotherapeutics. These antibodies can be either transient or persistent and recognize PEGs of different sizes with or without terminal methoxy groups. Age and location of healthy individuals influence the prevalence of IgG but not of IgM antibodies. Anti-PEG antibodies do not cross-react with human tissues supporting the safety of the antibodies. CONCLUSION: We confirm that some healthy individuals and some patients with hemophilia express specific antibodies against PEG which are not associated with any pathology and do not bind to human tissues.

Distinct characteristics of antibody responses against factor VIII in healthy individuals and in different cohorts of hemophilia A patients.

Neutralizing antibodies against factor VIII (FVIII) remain the major complication in the replacement therapy of hemophilia A patients. To better understand the evolution of these antibodies it is important to generate comprehensive datasets which include both neutralizing and nonneutralizing antibodies, their isotypes, and IgG subclasses. We developed sensitive ELISAs to analyze FVIII-binding antibodies in different cohorts of hemophilia A patients and in healthy individuals. Our data reveal the prevalence of FVIII-binding antibodies among healthy individuals (n = 600) to be as high as 19%, with a prevalence of antibody titers > or =1:80 of 2%. The prevalence of FVIII-binding antibodies was 34% (5% for titers > or =1:80) in patients without FVIII inhibitors (n = 77), 39% (4% for titers > 1:80) in patients after successful immune tolerance induction therapy (n = 23), and 100% (n = 20, all titers > or =1:80) in patients with FVIII inhibitors. We found significant differences for IgG subclasses of FVIII-binding antibodies between the different study cohorts. IgG4 and IgG1 were the most abundant IgG subclasses in patients with FVIII inhibitors. Strikingly, IgG4 was completely absent in patients without FVIII inhibitors and in healthy subjects. These findings point toward a distinct immune regulatory pathway responsible for the development of FVIII-specific IgG4 associated with FVIII inhibitors.

Immunogenicity profile of rurioctocog alfa pegol in previously treated patients with severe congenital hemophilia A.

ABSTRACT: Rurioctocog alfa pegol is an extended-half-life full-length recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) bound to 20-kDa polyethylene glycol (PEG) that has been shown to be well tolerated and efficacious in the treatment and prevention of bleeding events in previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A. Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of immunogenicity data collected during 6 clinical studies of rurioctocog alfa pegol, including a total of 360 unique previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A. The analysis included treatment-emerging FVIII-neutralizing antibodies (FVIII inhibitors); preexisting and treatment-emerging antibodies binding to FVIII, PEG-FVIII, or PEG; and treatment-emerging antibodies binding to Chinese hamster ovary host cell proteins. Moreover, the potential association between the presence of these binding antibodies and adverse events (AEs) observed in patients was investigated, and the potential impact of these antibodies on the incremental recovery of rurioctocog alfa pegol in patients was analyzed. Overall, the data indicate that rurioctocog alfa pegol is not associated with any unexpected immunogenicity characteristics. Of 360 patients, 1 patient developed a transient FVIII inhibitor with a titer of 0.6 Bethesda units per mL, which was not associated with any serious AEs. Antibodies binding to FVIII, PEG-FVIII, or PEG were not detected at the time when the inhibitor was present. Moreover, 54 of 360 patients either entered the clinical studies with preexisting binding antibodies or developed these antibodies after exposure to rurioctocog alfa pegol. These antibodies were transient in most patients and did not show any causal relationship to either AEs or spontaneous bleeding episodes.

The spectrum of neutralizing and non-neutralizing anti-FVIII antibodies in a nationwide cohort of 788 persons with hemophilia A.

Objectives: Anti-factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies have been reported to exhibit both neutralizing and non-neutralizing characteristics. This is the first study investigating the full spectrum of FVIII-specific antibodies, including non-neutralizing antibodies, very-low titer inhibitors, and inhibitors, in a large nationwide population of persons with hemophilia A of all severities. Methods: All persons with hemophilia A (mild (FVIII > 5-40 IU/dL)/moderate [FVIII 1-5 IU/dL)/severe (FVIII < 1 IU/dL)] with an available plasma sample who participated in the sixth Hemophilia in the Netherlands study between 2018 and 2019 were included. The presence of anti-FVIII antibodies of the immunoglobulin A, M, and G isotypes and IgG subclasses, along with antibody titer levels, were assessed using direct-binding ELISAs. FVIII specificity was assessed using a competition-based ELISA approach. The inhibitor status was determined using the Nijmegen ultra-sensitive Bethesda assay (NusBA) and the Nijmegen Bethesda assay (NBA). Results: In total, 788 persons with hemophilia A (336 (42.6%) mild, 123 (15.6%) moderate, 329 (41.8%) severe hemophilia) were included. The median age was 45 years (IQR 24-60), and the majority (50.9%) had over 150 exposure days to FVIII concentrates. Within our population, 144 (18.3%) individuals had non-neutralizing FVIII-specific antibodies, 10 (1.3%) had very low-titer inhibitors (NusBA positive; NBA negative), and 13 (1.6%) had inhibitors (both NusBA and NBA positive). IgG1 was the most abundant FVIII-specific antibody subclass, and the highest titer levels were found for IgG4. In individuals without a reported history of inhibitor development, no clear differences were observed in antibody patterns between those who were minimally or highly exposed to FVIII concentrates. IgG4 subclass antibodies were only observed in persons with a reported history of FVIII inhibitor or in those with a currently detected (very low-titer) inhibitor. Conclusion: In this cross-sectional study, we identified non-neutralizing antibodies in a relatively large proportion of persons with hemophilia A. In contrast, in our population, consisting of persons highly exposed to FVIII concentrates, (very low-titer) inhibitors were detected only in a small proportion of persons, reflecting a well-tolerized population. Hence, our findings suggest that only a small subpopulation of non-neutralizing FVIII-specific antibodies is associated with clinically relevant inhibitors.

Stimulation and inhibition of FVIII-specific memory B-cell responses by CpG-B (ODN 1826), a ligand for Toll-like receptor 9.

Factor VIII (FVIII)-specific memory B cells are essential components for regulating anamnestic antibody responses against FVIII in hemophilia A with FVIII inhibitors. We asked how stimulation and inhibition of FVIII-specific memory B cells by low and high concentrations of FVIII, respectively, are affected by concurrent activation of the innate immune system. Using CD138(-) spleen cells from hemophilic mice treated with FVIII to study restimulation and differentiation of memory B cells in vitro, we tested modulating activities of agonists for Toll-like receptors (TLRs) 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 9. Ligands for TLR7 and 9 were most effective. They not only amplified FVIII-specific memory responses in the presence of stimulating concentrations of FVIII, but also countered inhibition in the presence of inhibitory concentrations of FVIII. Notably, CpG oligodeoxynucleotide (CpG-ODN), a ligand for TLR9, expressed biphasic effects. It amplified memory responses at low concentrations and inhibited memory responses at high concentrations, both in vitro and in vivo. Both stimulatory and inhibitory activities of CpG-ODN resulted from specific interactions with TLR9. Despite their strong immunomodulatory effects in the presence of FVIII, ligands for TLR induced negligible restimulation in the absence of FVIII in vitro and no restimulation in the absence of FVIII in vivo.

T cell-independent restimulation of FVIII-specific murine memory B cells is facilitated by dendritic cells together with toll-like receptor 7 agonist.

Memory B cells are involved in long-term maintenance of antibody-dependent immunologic disorders. Therefore, it is essential to understand how the restimulation of FVIII-specific memory B cells in hemophilia A with FVIII inhibitors is regulated. We asked whether concurrent activation of the innate immune system by an agonist for toll-like receptor (TLR) 7 is able to facilitate the differentiation of FVIII-specific memory B cells in the absence of T-cell help. TLR7 recognizes single-stranded RNA as contained in RNA viruses such as influenza, Sendai, and Coxsackie B viruses. Our results indicate that highly purified murine memory B cells do not differentiate into FVIII-specific antibody-secreting cells in the presence of FVIII and the TLR7 agonist when cultured in the absence of CD4(+) T cells. However, CD11c(+) dendritic cells facilitate the T cell-independent differentiation of FVIII-specific memory B cells but only in the presence of FVIII and the TLR7 agonist. In contrast to T cell-dependent restimulation, the antibody response after T cell-independent restimulation of FVIII-specific memory B cells is skewed toward IgG2a, an antibody subclass that is efficient in activating the complement system and in inducing Fc-receptor-mediated effector functions, both are required for effective immune responses against pathogens.

Nonneutralizing FVIII-specific antibody signatures in patients with hemophilia A and in healthy donors.

Previous studies identified nonneutralizing FVIII-specific antibodies in the circulation of severe and nonsevere hemophilia A (sHA and nsHA) patients without FVIII inhibitors and also in some healthy individuals. To gain a better understanding of the nature of these nonneutralizing antibody responses, we analyzed and compared anti-FVIII antibody signatures in 3 study cohorts: previously treated sHA as well as nsHA patients without FVIII inhibitors, and healthy donors. FVIII-binding IgM, IgG1-4, and IgA antibodies were differentiated, FVIII-specificity was assessed, and associated apparent affinity constants were determined. Our results indicate that the nonneutralizing FVIII-specific antibody response in all study cohorts is dominated by IgG1 and IgA. Prevalences, titers, and affinities of these nonneutralizing antibodies were higher in the hemophilia A cohorts than in healthy donors. Stratification for the anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody status demonstrated the presence of FVIII-specific IgA with elevated titers in sHA patients with an active or past HCV infection when compared with HCV antibody-positive nsHA patients or HCV antibody-negative patients and healthy donors. Increased titers and affinities of FVIII-specific IgG1 antibodies were observed in a considerable number of hemophilia A patients as opposed to healthy subjects independently of the patients' anti-HCV antibody status. Overall, our findings support the hypothesis that the generation of nonneutralizing anti-FVIII antibodies in healthy individuals and in noninhibitor hemophilia A patients might be based on similar immune mechanisms. However, differences in prevalences, titers, and affinities of these antibodies indicate distinct differences in the antibody evolution between healthy individuals and patients.

A false sense of security? Can tiered approach be trusted to accurately classify immunogenicity samples?

Detecting and characterizing of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) against a protein therapeutic are crucially important to monitor the unwanted immune response. Usually a multi-tiered approach that initially rapidly screens for positive samples that are subsequently confirmed in a separate assay is employed for testing of patient samples for ADA activity. In this manuscript we evaluate the ability of different methods used to classify subject with screening and competition based confirmatory assays. We find that for the overall performance of the multi-stage process the method used for confirmation is most important where a t-test is best when differences are moderate to large. Moreover we find that, when differences between positive and negative samples are not sufficiently large, using a competition based confirmation step does yield poor classification of positive samples.

A comparison of methods for classifying samples as truly specific with confirmatory immunoassays.

Biotechnology-derived therapeutics may induce an unwanted immune response leading to the formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) which can result in altered efficacy and safety of the therapeutic protein. Anti-drug antibodies may, for example, affect pharmacokinetics of the therapeutic protein or induce autoimmunity. It is therefore crucial to have assays available for the detection and characterization of ADAs. Commonly, a screening assay is initially used to classify samples as either ADA positive or negative. A confirmatory assay, typically based on antigen competition, is subsequently employed to separate false positive samples from truly positive samples. In this manuscript we investigate the performance of different statistical methods classifying samples in competition assays through simulation and analysis of real data. In our evaluations we do not find a uniformly best method although a simple t-test does provide good results throughout. More crucially we find that very large differences between uninhibited and inhibited measurements relative to the assay variability are required in order to obtain useful classification results questioning the usefulness of competition assays with high variability.

A formal comparison of different methods for establishing cut points to distinguish positive and negative samples in immunoassays.

Biotechnology derived therapeutics may induce an unwanted immune response leading to the formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). As a result the efficacy and safety of the therapeutic protein could be impaired. Neutralizing antibodies may, for example, affect pharmacokinetics of the therapeutic protein or induce autoimmunity. Therefore a drug induced immune response is a major concern and needs to be assessed during drug development. It is therefore crucial to have assays available for the detection and characterization of ADAs. These assays are used to classify samples in positive and negative samples based on a cut point. In this manuscript we investigate the performance of established and newly developed methods to determine a cut point in immunoassays such as ELISA through simulation and analysis of real data. The different methods are found to have different advantages and disadvantages. A robust parametric approach generally resulted in very good results and can be recommended for many situations. The newly introduced method based on mixture models yields similar results to the robust parametric approach but offers some additional flexibility at the expense of higher complexity.