RESUMEN
Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease that shortly progressed into an unprecedented pandemic spreading all over the world and causing millions of deaths. Many new COVID-19-specific therapies were suggested for the treatment of the patients at increased risk of progression to severe disease, especially those who were unvaccinated and those with a likely inadequate vaccine response. One of the preferred therapies in this setting is Paxlovid, a combination of the oral protease inhibitors nirmatrelvir and ritonavir. Paxlovid was authorized by the Saudi Ministry of Health for the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19. This study aimed to report the effects of Paxlovid on the mortality of the COVID-19 patients at Dammam Medical Complex (DMC) and Qatif Complex Hospital (QCH), two hospitals in the Eastern Provence of Saudi Arabia, and compare the results with the international data. Methods The study was a retrospective study that included all the COVID-19 patients who were treated with Paxlovid at DMC and QCH between January and December 2022. Those patients were compared with control COVID-19 patients who did not receive Paxlovid. The patients were included irrespective of their COVID-19 vaccination status. All the patients were managed according to the Saudi Ministry of Health guidelines. They were followed up through the infectious disease virtual clinics and were monitored for ICU admissions and death of any cause for three months following their COVID-19 infections. Results A total of 92 COVID-19 patients were included. The patients consisted of 47 male and 45 female patients (51.09% and 48.91%, respectively). The mean ± standard deviation for the patients' age was 55.58±19.25 years. Twenty-eight patients were given Paxlovid (30.43%). Eighteen patients (19.57%) died. The use of Paxlovid was associated with lower ICU admissions (0.0% vs. 18.75%, P value <0.05) and with lower deaths (3.57% vs 26.56%, P value <0.05) but the Paxlovid group included less immunocompromised patients (7.14% vs. 60.94%, P value <0.001), cancer patients (0.0% vs. 42.19%, P value <0.001), and chronic kidney disease patients (7.14% vs. 29.69%, P value <0.05) than the control group. Conclusion This study suggests that Paxlovid is highly effective in reducing the risk of severe COVID-19 or mortality. However, larger studies with better qualities are needed for a full assessment of the role of Paxlovid in COVID-19 management in Saudi Arabia.
RESUMEN
Background In Saudi Arabia, sickle cell disease (SCD) is a major public health issue, especially in the eastern region. Sickle cell patients have major health-related issues, resulting in a poor quality of life and increased morbidity. Abnormal hemoglobin production in SCD causes various complications, such as vaso-occlusive crises, hemolytic episodes, and acute chest syndrome. These disease manifestations increase the need for hospital admission and long-term care. Most therapies for SCD are supportive and include episodic red blood cell transfusions, narcotics, antibiotics, and intravenous fluids. Hydroxyurea is a disease-modifying therapy. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of hydroxyurea therapy on reducing pain crises, hospital admissions, and length of stay for SCD patients and discern reasons that would prevent SCD patients from using hydroxyurea as a treatment option. Methodology We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study on SCD patients from the eastern Saudi Arabian province. The study included 202 SCD patients from hematology clinics and medical wards. We used a validated questionnaire tested for reliability after a pilot study of 15 randomly selected patients. We surveyed participants on demographic data, use of hydroxyurea, compliance with the regimen, hospitalization rates, durations, and complications. The study used IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) to analyze the data. All statistical analysis was done using two-tailed tests. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results The study included 202 participants who agreed to participate and completed the study questionnaire. The respondents comprised 150 SCD patients (74.3%) and 52 caregivers of SCD patients (25.7%). Patient ages ranged from one year to older than 36 years (mean age: 26.8 ± 12.3 years). The most common reason for not using hydroxyurea was that it was never offered to patients as a treatment option (40.9% of respondents), followed by respondents who had never heard of it (34.4%), think that they do not need it (24.7%), and fears of long-term consequences (23.7%). More hydroxyurea users (35.1%) suffered no acute painful crises during the last year than nonusers (32%), and more nonusers suffered more than four crises (20%) than hydroxyurea users (9.1%; p=.046). As for hospitalization due to SCD-related complications, 66.2% of hydroxyurea users were never hospitalized, while 51.2% of nonusers were never hospitalized. While 19.5% of hydroxyurea users were hospitalized one to two times, 28.8% of nonusers were hospitalized one to two times (p=.049). Conclusions The study revealed that hydroxyurea is effective in reducing painful vaso-occlusive crises and the number of hospital admissions. The prevalence of hydroxyurea use among SCD patients in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia remains low. Therefore, education campaigns and programs to increase awareness among health care providers regarding the benefits of hydroxyurea use are warranted in our region to help improve patient outcomes.
RESUMEN
The present survey assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practice of teledentistry (TD) among dental practitioners in Saudi Arabia. This questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted with dental interns and practicing dentists in Saudi Arabia. An online questionnaire was sent to all potential respondents. Questions related to knowledge, practice, attitudes, and training regarding TD were presented. A total of 603 (227 dental interns, 376 practicing dentists) completed the questionnaire. Generally, the participants revealed poor knowledge and practice of TD, with only 38% having heard about TD and only one-quarter of the sample (23.2%) reporting practicing TD at their current workplace. However, most of the participants expressed positive attitudes and a willingness to practice TD in the future. Specialists and those in practice for >5 years showed significantly better knowledge and practice of TD than general dentists and those with lesser clinical experience (p < 0.01). While only one-fifth of the participants (20.2%) reported having attended a workshop/lecture about TD, the majority (69.7%) felt that they needed training on TD. The results revealed poor knowledge, practice, and training with regard to TD among practicing dentists in Saudi Arabia. However, the positive attitude expressed by most of the participants towards practicing TD in the future is an encouraging sign for dental educators and planners of oral health care. Continuous education through periodic workshops and training courses on TD is crucial to improve dentists' knowledge, practice, and attitudes towards TD. Integration of TD topics into undergraduate/postgraduate curricula is highly recommended. Special attention should be directed to training general dental practitioners and junior dentists.