RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Composite Autonomic Symptom Score-31 (COMPASS-31) is an easy-to-use screening tool for the evaluation of autonomic dysfunction in various diseases affecting neural function but has rarely been used in the assessment of long coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the COMPASS-31 score in detecting dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system in patients 3 months after COVID-19 infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine subjects were recruited and grouped into 2: (a) controls (n = 31) who had never had positive polymerase chain reaction results for COVID-19 before and (b) the post-COVID-19 patients (n = 28) who had confirmed COVID-19 infection 3-6 months before recruitment. COMPASS-31 questionnaire was utilized to evaluate subjective symptoms or evidence of autonomic dysfunction. Autonomic dysfunction was assessed objectively by cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests (CARTs) and heart rate variability (HRV). For comparison of quantitative variables between two groups, t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate, were used. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), negative likelihood ratio (LR), and positive LR were used as measures of diagnostic accuracy. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis determined the overall accuracy of COMPASS-31. RESULTS: The median COMPASS score was found to be significantly higher in post-COVID-19 participants than controls (15.5 vs. 10, P = 0.021). The median total CART score was also significantly higher in post-COVID-19 participants (0 vs. 1, P < 0.001). Out of 6 domains of the COMPASS score, the median value for orthostatic dysfunction was found to be significantly higher in post-COVID-19 participants than controls (12 vs. 0, P = 0.008). There was significantly fair accuracy of the COMPASS score with an area under the receiver operating curve 0.68 (0.54-0.82) following the total CART score ≥2 as the gold standard in the diagnosis of autonomic dysfunction (P = 0.021). The best cutoff point of the total COMPASS score was 12.5, where the optimal values of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were achieved. Nonsignificant and weak correlations between CARTs, HRV parameters, and COMPASS score were found. CONCLUSION: COMPASS-31 could be used as a user-friendly screening tool to detect autonomic dysfunction in post-COVID-19 cases with acceptable sensitivity and specificity.
RESUMEN
Sildenafil is a medication used for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. It was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1998. Several articles have raised concerns regarding the use of sildenafil and the occurrence of serious adverse events, such as myocardial ischemia, stroke, and even death. Our aim is to systematically review the existing literature on mortality associated with sildenafil use. The method used for this systematic review was completed by searching three databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Articles were screened and assessed for eligibility. This review uses the articles found to address the concerns associated with sildenafil and mortality. A total of 19 reports were used in our systematic review, in which there were 10 case reports, two case series, three systematic reviews, one narrative review, one retrospective study, one article in the British Medical Journal, and one commentary article. One FDA article in particular included case reports and reports to the FDA on the use of sildenafil eight months after its introduction to the market in 1998, with 522 deaths reported. Another retrospective study examined the use of sildenafil on infants below the age of 1 who did not have congenital heart disease but did suffer from severe pulmonary hypertension. The study found a mortality rate of 29%, which increased with sildenafil dosage. A case series examined six deaths related to non-prescription use of sildenafil. All these cases were subjected to autopsies and related to sexual activity. The study suggests that phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors induced the deaths, and the concentration of sildenafil in the femoral blood was found to be between 0.032and0.087 µg. To conclude, the literature available on this topic is deemed insufficient to provide enough data to establish a direct link of causality between sildenafil and mortality. Although some studies paint sildenafil as the culprit behind these deaths, further studies and research are needed to explain the unexpected deaths following sildenafil use.