Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 76
Filtrar
1.
Mult Scler ; 28(4): 620-631, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34132141

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pain, fatigue, depression, and anxiety are common in multiple sclerosis, but little is known about the presence, co-occurrence, and trajectories of these symptoms in the year after multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis. OBJECTIVES: To determine, during the postdiagnosis year: (1) rates of pain, fatigue, depression, and anxiety; (2) rates of symptom co-occurrence; and (3) stability/change in symptom severity. METHODS: Newly diagnosed adults with MS/clinically isolated syndrome (N = 230) completed self-report measures of pain, fatigue, depression, and anxiety at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after MS diagnosis. Clinical significance was defined based on standardized cutoffs. Descriptive statistics and Sankey diagrams characterized rates and trajectories. RESULTS: Participants endorsed clinically significant symptoms at some point in the postdiagnosis year at rates of 50.9% for pain, 62.6% for fatigue, 47.4% for depression, and 38.7% for anxiety. A majority of patients exhibited co-occurring symptoms-21.3% with two, 19.1% with three, and 17.4% with four. The proportions of patients with clinically significant symptoms were generally stable over time; however, rates of symptom development/recovery revealed fluctuations at the individual level. CONCLUSIONS: Pain, fatigue, depression, and anxiety are prevalent in newly diagnosed MS. Prompt screening and evidence-based interventions are necessary if quality of life is to be optimized.


Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple , Adulto , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Ansiedad/etiología , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/etiología , Fatiga/diagnóstico , Fatiga/epidemiología , Fatiga/etiología , Humanos , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Esclerosis Múltiple/diagnóstico , Esclerosis Múltiple/epidemiología , Dolor/diagnóstico , Dolor/epidemiología , Dolor/etiología , Prevalencia , Calidad de Vida
2.
J Sex Med ; 19(5): 719-728, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35367163

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sexual dysfunction is a common symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS). Clinically meaningful and psychometrically sound measures of sexual function validated in people with MS are necessary to identify people with MS who experience problems with sexual function. AIM: To evaluate the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sexual Function and Satisfaction (SexFS) v2.0 measure in people with MS and to extend the PROMIS SexFS Brief and Full Profiles to include additional aspects of sexual function relevant to people living with MS. METHODS: A convenience sample of MS clinicians and sexually active individuals with MS ranked relevance of 26 items that listed specific factors that interfere with sexual function. Rankings were used to select items to include in the modified SexFS for Multiple Sclerosis (SexFS-MS) profiles. Sex-FS Brief and Full profiles along with the top 22 ranked interfering factor items underwent cognitive interviews (CI) to assess whether the items were understandable and meaningful. OUTCOMES: The SexFS as originally published functioned well in people with MS after minor modifications. RESULTS: Twelve MS clinicians and 26 people with MS ranked items. The 10 highest ranked questions about factors that interfere with sexual function most relevant to people with MS were added to the SexFS-MS Brief profiles and 18 to the Full profiles. Ten men and 12 women with MS participated in CIs and found most items to be clear and meaningful. However, important changes were made to the profile instructions, some response sets, and to some items to improve clarity and function. New items to assess numbness and reasons why sexually active people choose at times not to engage in sexual activity were added. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Brief and Full profiles are freely available and are recommended for research and clinical practice that include people with MS. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: This study is the first to provide validity evidence for the PROMIS SexFS in people living with MS. Though the PROMIS SexFS was tested in people who identify as lesbian, gay, or bisexual, only individuals who identified as heterosexual participated in this study. Results may not represent views of people with MS who identify as other sexual orientations who may have different concerns and priorities related to sexual function. CONCLUSION: This study extended the PROMIS SexFS Brief and Full profiles to create the SexFS-MS by adding items that measure most relevant issues related to sexual function in individuals living with MS. Amtmann D, Bamer AM, Salem R, et al. Extension and Evaluation of the PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measures for Use in Adults Living With Multiple Sclerosis. J Sex Med 2022;19:719-728.


Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Satisfacción Personal , Autoinforme , Conducta Sexual/psicología , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/diagnóstico , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/etiología
3.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 103(8): 1684-1692, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35307343

RESUMEN

Conducting high-quality clinical research is dependent on merging scientific rigor with the clinical environment. This is often a complex endeavor that may include numerous barriers and competing interests. Overcoming these challenges and successfully integrating clinical research programs into clinical practice settings serving rehabilitation outpatients is beneficial from both a logistical perspective (eg, supports efficient and successful research procedures) and the establishment of a truly patient-centered research approach. Leveraging our experience with navigating this research-clinical care relationship, this article (1) proposes the Patient-Centered Framework for Rehabilitation Research, a model for integrating patient-centered research in an outpatient clinical setting that incorporates a collaborative, team-based model encompassing patient-centered values, as well as strategies for recruitment and retention, with a focus on populations living with disabilities or chronic diseases; (2) describes application of this framework in a comprehensive specialty multiple sclerosis center with both general strategies and specific examples to guide adaptation and implementation in other settings; and (3) discusses the effect of the framework as a model in 1 center, as well as the need for additional investigation and adaptation for other populations. The 5 interconnected principles incorporated in the Framework and which prioritize patient-centeredness include identifying shared values, partnering with the clinical setting, engaging with the population, building relationships with individuals, and designing accessible procedures. The Patient-Centered Framework for Rehabilitation Research is a model presented as an adaptable roadmap to guide researchers in hopes of not only improving individual patients' experiences but also the quality and relevance of rehabilitation research as a whole. Future investigation is needed to test the Framework in other settings.


Asunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Enfermedad Crónica , Humanos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Investigación en Rehabilitación
4.
Ann Behav Med ; 55(9): 833-843, 2021 08 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33196779

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Depression, fatigue, and pain commonly co-occur in multiple sclerosis (MS) and are positively associated with one another. However, it is unclear whether treatment-related improvement in one of these symptoms is associated with improvements in the other two symptoms. PURPOSE: This study examined whether early improvements in depressive symptoms, fatigue impact, and pain interference during a multisymptom intervention in persons with MS were associated with overall improvements in the other two symptoms. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial in which both treatments improved depressive symptoms, fatigue, and pain interference. Adults with MS experiencing chronic pain, chronic fatigue, and/or moderate depressive symptoms (N = 154, 86% women) participated in an 8-week, telephone-delivered intervention: self-management (n = 69) or education (n = 85); intervention groups were combined for the current study. Outcome measures were depressive symptoms (PHQ-9), fatigue impact (Modified Fatigue Impact Scale), and pain interference (Brief Pain Inventory). Path analysis examined associations between pre-to-mid intervention improvement in one symptom (i.e., depression, fatigue, pain interference) and pre-to-post (overall) improvement in the other two symptoms. RESULTS: Early reduction in depressive symptoms was associated with an overall reduction in pain interference and fatigue impact (p's < .01). Early reduction in fatigue impact was associated with an overall reduction in depressive symptom severity (p = .04) but not pain interference. Early reduction in pain interference was not associated with reductions in fatigue impact or depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest the potential importance of reducing depressive symptoms to overall improvement in fatigue and pain interference in persons with MS. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: NCT00944190.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/etiología , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Depresión/etiología , Depresión/terapia , Fatiga/etiología , Fatiga/terapia , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Adulto , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Fatiga/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Automanejo
5.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 102(10): 1959-1964, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34048792

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe pain intensity and interference in people with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS), compare these with people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), and identify common and unique factors associated with pain intensity in people with progressive MS and RRMS. DESIGN: Observational, cross-sectional analysis using baseline data from a longitudinal survey on quality of life in participants with MS. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 573 adults with MS (N=573; progressive MS, n=142; RRMS, n=431). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Average pain intensity was measured by an 11-point numeric rating scale, and pain interference was measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference Short Form. RESULTS: Participants with progressive MS reported moderate average pain intensity (3.22±2.50) and elevated pain interference (T score of 55.55±9.13). They did not differ significantly from those with RRMS in average pain intensity or pain interference. Common factors associated with higher average pain intensity were more severe disability, lower education level, unemployment, and current smoking. In those with progressive MS, older age was associated with lower average pain intensity. CONCLUSIONS: Pain intensity and interference are similar across MS types. In addition to assessing and treating pain, it is important to screen for modifiable pain-related factors, such as smoking cessation, in this population.


Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple Crónica Progresiva/fisiopatología , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/fisiopatología , Dolor/fisiopatología , Actividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
6.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 102(4): 694-701, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33080210

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To (1) describe depressive symptom severity and suicidal ideation (SI) in persons with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS); (2) compare depressive symptom severity and SI in persons with progressive MS and persons with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS); and (3) identify common and unique risk factors for greater depressive symptom severity and SI in persons with progressive MS compared with individuals with RRMS. DESIGN: Observational, cross-sectional survey study. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with MS (N=573). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The dependent variables were depression symptoms and any SI measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Comparisons between groups used t tests and chi-square analyses, and risk factors were tested by examining the interaction of MS subtype (progressive MS and RRMS) and each risk factor in multiple regression models with bootstrapping. RESULTS: Persons with progressive MS did not differ from persons with RRMS in levels of depressive symptoms or SI. Both groups reported mild depressive symptoms and approximately 10% endorsed SI. Common risk factors for greater depressive symptom severity were younger age, greater disability, greater speech and swallowing problems, and lower household income. Common risk factors for SI were shorter disease duration, greater disability, and greater speech and swallowing problems. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, there were no group differences between persons with progressive MS and persons with RRMS in depressive symptom severity and SI. Although both groups reported mild depressive symptoms on average, nearly 1 in 4 persons met criteria for probable major depression, which underscores the importance of screening for and treating depressive disorders in all persons with MS.


Asunto(s)
Depresión , Esclerosis Múltiple Crónica Progresiva/psicología , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/psicología , Ideación Suicida , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
Wilderness Environ Med ; 31(2): 144-150, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32229171

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The present study followed an individual's successful, record-setting, solo, unsupported row across the North Atlantic Ocean to gain an understanding of the physical and psychological experience of this extreme endurance feat. METHODS: The participant was a 37-y-old male endurance athlete. Over the course of his nearly 39-d row, he provided daily ratings of effort, physical symptoms, and psychological experiences via a self-report questionnaire. Quantitative data were analyzed using simulation modelling analysis to examine within-day and cross-lagged correlations between perceived exertion and all other variables. Qualitative data were examined via thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Results showed that, on average, the participant experienced low levels of pain intensity, pain interference, fatigue interference, sleepiness, loneliness, boredom, anxiety, and frustration, in contrast to moderate scores for fatigue, restfulness, positive emotions, calmness, and confidence. There were statistically significant correlations between higher levels of perceived exertion and higher same-day levels of pain interference, fatigue, and fatigue interference, as well as lower same-day levels of calmness, loneliness, and boredom. Qualitative responses revealed 3 primary stressor types (internal physical, internal psychological, and external stressors) and 5 coping responses (acceptance/mindfulness, active response/problem solving, adjusting expectations/goal setting, distraction, and resignation). CONCLUSIONS: Study findings indicate that the extreme athlete experienced physical and emotional challenges, but he demonstrated positive adjustment via the frequent experience of positive emotions and proficient use of a broad set of coping strategies matched to the daily stressor being addressed.


Asunto(s)
Atletas/psicología , Deportes Acuáticos/fisiología , Deportes Acuáticos/psicología , Adulto , Océano Atlántico , Humanos , Masculino
8.
Wilderness Environ Med ; 31(1): 23-30, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32044211

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Ultramarathon runners commonly endure musculoskeletal pain during endurance events. However, the effect of pain coping skills on performance has not been examined. METHODS: A prospective observational study during three 250 km (155 mi), 6 stage ultramarathons was conducted. Finish line surveys were completed after each of the four 40 km (25 mi) and one 80 km (50 mi) stages of racing. Variables gathered included pain intensity, pain coping strategy use, pain interference, finishing position (quintile), and successful race completion. RESULTS: A total of 204 participants (age 41.4±10.3 y; 73% male) reported average pain intensity of 3.9 (±2.0 SD) and worst pain intensity of 5.3 (±2.3) on a 0 to 10 scale. They used greater adaptive pain coping strategies (3.0±1.3) relative to maladaptive strategies (1.3±1.1). Worst pain and pain interference increased over each stage of the race for all runners (P<0.001), with worst pain being significantly different by finishing status (P=0.02). Although all runners endured increased pain and interference, the nonfinishers (28 [14%]) had significantly greater differences in changes in pain intensity (P<0.01) and pain interference (P<0.001). Maladaptive pain coping strategies were more common in nonfinishers; with each 1-point increase (0-6 scale), there was a 3 times increase in odds of not finishing the race. CONCLUSIONS: Although increased pain intensity and pain interference was found in all multistage ultramarathon runners, successful event completion was significantly associated with less maladaptive pain coping. Training in coping with pain may be a beneficial part of ultramarathon preparation.


Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Manejo del Dolor/psicología , Dolor/psicología , Carrera/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resistencia Física , Estudios Prospectivos
9.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 99(7): 1265-1272, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29337024

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine moderators of treatment effects in a randomized controlled trial comparing a telehealth self-management intervention with a telehealth multiple sclerosis (MS) education intervention for fatigue, pain, and mood in adults with MS. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a single-blind randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with MS and chronic fatigue, chronic pain, and/or moderate depressive symptoms (N=163) recruited from across the United States. INTERVENTIONS: Two 8-week, telephone-delivered symptom interventions delivered 1:1: a self-management intervention (n=75) and an MS education intervention (n=88). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures were fatigue impact pain interference, and depressive symptom severity assessed at baseline and posttreatment. Potential moderators of treatment effects assessed at baseline were demographics (age, sex, and education), clinical characteristics (disease duration and disability severity), symptoms (perceived cognitive impairment and pain intensity), baseline levels of the treatment outcomes (pain interference, fatigue impact and depressive symptom severity), and cognitive behavioral factors (pain catastrophizing, fatigue catastrophizing, self-efficacy, and patient activation). RESULTS: Moderation analyses found significant moderation for fatigue impact but not for pain intensity or depressive symptom severity. Baseline patient activation interacted with treatment group to predict fatigue impact at posttreatment (P=.049). Among participants with high baseline patient activation, the self-management group reported significantly less fatigue at posttreatment than the education group. No other variables moderated the study outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: At the group level, participants responded to both interventions, regardless of disease characteristics, demographics, symptom levels, and cognitive behavioral factors. Self-management and education are both potentially beneficial symptom treatments that may be recommended to individuals with MS and chronic pain, fatigue, and/or depressive symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple/terapia , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Automanejo/métodos , Telemedicina/métodos , Adulto , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Depresión/etiología , Depresión/terapia , Fatiga/etiología , Fatiga/psicología , Fatiga/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Esclerosis Múltiple/psicología , Automanejo/psicología , Método Simple Ciego , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Behav Sleep Med ; 16(1): 79-91, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27167969

RESUMEN

Sleep problems are highly prevalent among individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS); however, the relationship between sleep problems and cognitive dysfunction is poorly understood in this population. In the present study, 163 individuals with MS and depression, fatigue, or pain completed self-report measures of sleep, cognitive dysfunction, and relevant demographic and clinical characteristics (e.g., disability severity, depressive symptomatology, pain intensity, fatigue impact) at four time points over 12 months. Mixed-effects regression demonstrated that poorer sleep was independently associated with worse perceived cognitive dysfunction (ß = -0.05, p = .001), beyond the influence of depressive symptomatology. Fatigue impact was found to partially mediate this relationship. Results suggest that for individuals with MS and depression, fatigue, or pain, self-reported sleep problems are related to perceived cognitive dysfunction, and that fatigue impact accounts for part of this relationship.


Asunto(s)
Disfunción Cognitiva/complicaciones , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Esclerosis Múltiple/psicología , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/complicaciones , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Depresión/complicaciones , Fatiga/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/complicaciones , Autoinforme , Sueño , Factores de Tiempo
11.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 98(6): 1139-1148, 2017 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27789238

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the longitudinal relationships between social support and subsequent mental health outcomes in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS), and to examine resilience as a mediator between social support and subsequent mental health outcomes in this population. DESIGN: Observational, longitudinal cohort study. Participants were assessed at 4 time points over 12 months in the context of a previously reported randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Telephone-based measures administered to community-based participants. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (N=163) with MS and 1 or more of the following symptoms: depression, fatigue, and pain. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mental health outcomes included (1) depressive symptomatology, assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9; (2) anxious symptomatology, assessed using the short form of the Emotional Distress-Anxiety Scale from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System; and (3) general mental health status, assessed using the Mental Component Summary score from the Short Form-8 Health Survey. Resilience was assessed using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. RESULTS: At any given time, social support from significant others, family members, and friends was significantly associated with subsequent mental health outcomes for all 3 measures assessed (all P values <.05). Resilience measured concomitantly with social support significantly mediated the relationships between social support and subsequent mental health outcomes. After controlling for resilience, most of the direct relationships between social support and mental health outcomes were no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant longitudinal relationships between social support, resilience, and mental health outcomes for people with MS. Given the mediating role of resilience in supporting better mental health outcomes, future clinical research and practice may benefit from an emphasis on resilience-focused psychological interventions.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/psicología , Depresión/psicología , Salud Mental , Esclerosis Múltiple/psicología , Resiliencia Psicológica , Apoyo Social , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Fatiga/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerosis Múltiple/epidemiología , Esclerosis Múltiple/rehabilitación , Dolor/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Sexuales , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología
12.
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep ; 16(12): 106, 2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27848174

RESUMEN

Among individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS), mental health comorbidities play a significant role in contributing to secondary disability and detracting from quality of life. This review examines current evidence surrounding three mental health issues of particular relevance to MS: depression, anxiety, and bipolar disorder. We review what is known of the prevalence, correlates, screening mechanisms, and current treatment of each issue and provide recommendations for future areas of research.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Trastorno Bipolar/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Esclerosis Múltiple/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida , Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/terapia , Trastorno Bipolar/diagnóstico , Trastorno Bipolar/terapia , Comorbilidad , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Humanos , Salud Mental , Prevalencia
13.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 96(7): 1262-8, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25757790

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the links between resilience and depressive symptoms, social functioning, and physical functioning in people aging with disability and to investigate the effects of resilience on change in functional outcomes over time. DESIGN: Longitudinal postal survey. SETTING: Surveys were mailed to a community sample of individuals with 1 of 4 diagnoses: multiple sclerosis, muscular dystrophy, postpoliomyelitis syndrome, or spinal cord injury. The survey response rate was 91% at baseline and 86% at follow-up. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of community-dwelling individuals (N=1594; age range, 20-94y) with multiple sclerosis, muscular dystrophy, postpoliomyelitis syndrome, or spinal cord injury. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (to assess depressive symptoms) and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (to assess social role satisfaction and physical functioning). RESULTS: At baseline, resilience was negatively correlated with depressive symptoms (r=-.55) and positively correlated with social and physical functioning (r=.49 and r=.17, respectively). Controlling for baseline outcomes, greater baseline resilience predicted a decrease in depressive symptoms (partial r=-.12) and an increase in social functioning (partial r=.12) 3 years later. CONCLUSIONS: The findings are consistent with a view of resilience as a protective factor that supports optimal functioning in people aging with disability.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Envejecimiento/psicología , Personas con Discapacidad/psicología , Relaciones Interpersonales , Resiliencia Psicológica , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/psicología , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Características de la Residencia , Factores Socioeconómicos
14.
Neurodegener Dis Manag ; : 1-7, 2024 Jul 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39054910

RESUMEN

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This summary describes how researchers worked with people with multiple sclerosis (MS), neurologists and measurement experts to create an easy-to-use questionnaire to measure the physical function of people with MS. This questionnaire covers topics that are relevant and important to people with MS and their doctors.The ability to do what you want to do, when you want to do it, is one of the most important concerns for people with MS. This questionnaire could help doctors to record and manage how much MS affects people's lives.MS can bring a range of challenging symptoms such as 'brain fog', tiredness, and problems with movement and balance. Many of these symptoms can make day-to-day activities, like working, very difficult for people with MS. Doctors currently use examinations like the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and the MS Functional Composite (MSFC), but these do not fully consider what is important to people living with MS. A questionnaire that specifically measures physical functioning of people with MS could help doctors and people with MS to better understand, communicate and manage the physical effects of MS. In this study, people with MS were asked to help create a questionnaire about physical function that reflects topics that are important to them. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: The PROMIS®nq physical function - Multiple Sclerosis 15a (the PROMIS® PF MS questionnaire) was successfully created with the help of people with MS. People with MS thought that the PROMIS® PF MS questionnaire covered issues important to their physical function. Scores were in line with results of other physical symptom measurement scales like the EDSS. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: The PROMIS® PF MS questionnaire could be used to meaningfully record physical function among people with MS.

16.
J Spinal Cord Med ; 36(5): 483-91, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23941796

RESUMEN

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE: To describe the relationship of pain and fatigue with physical and psychological functioning in adults with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Community-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of individuals with SCI. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. OUTCOME MEASURES: Physical functioning (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Functioning item bank items), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)), pain severity (0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)), and fatigue (0-10 NRS). RESULTS: Pain and fatigue were independently associated with depression, but only pain was associated with physical functioning. Additionally, depression was more severe among middle-aged participants relative to younger or older participants. Physical functioning declined with increasing age, as well as with higher level of injury. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the need for continued development of effective treatments for both pain and fatigue in order to prevent and mitigate the negative effects these symptoms can have on functioning.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/complicaciones , Depresión/etiología , Fatiga/complicaciones , Estado de Salud , Actividad Motora , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Adulto , Afecto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Dolor Crónico/rehabilitación , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/psicología , Depresión/rehabilitación , Fatiga/etnología , Fatiga/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Análisis de Regresión , Características de la Residencia , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/psicología , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/rehabilitación , Adulto Joven
17.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 75: 104742, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37156034

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although cannabis has become an increasingly common method for pain management among people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), there is a dearth of knowledge regarding the types of cannabis products used as well as the characteristics of cannabis users. The current study aimed to (1) describe the prevalence of cannabis use and the routes of administration of cannabis products in adults with an existing chronic pain condition and MS, (2) to examine differences in demographic and disease-related variables between cannabis users and non-users, and (3) to examine differences between cannabis users and non-users in pain-related variables, including pain intensity, pain interference, neuropathic pain, pain medication use, and pain-related coping. METHODS: Secondary analysis of baseline data from participants with multiple sclerosis (MS) and chronic pain (N = 242) enrolled in an RCT comparing mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), and usual care for chronic pain. Statistical methods included t-tests, Mann-Whitney tests, chi-square tests, and Fisher's exact tests to assess for differences in demographic, disease-related, and pain-related variables between cannabis users and non-users. RESULTS: Of the 242 participants included in the sample, 65 (27%) reported the use of cannabis for pain management. The most common route of administration was oil/tincture (reported by 42% of cannabis users), followed by vaped (22%) and edible (17%) products. Cannabis users were slightly younger than non-users (Medage 51.0 vs 55.0, p = .019) and reported higher median pain intensity scores (6.0 vs 5.0, p = .022), higher median pain interference scores (5.9 vs 5.4, p = .027), and higher median levels of neuropathic pain (20.0 vs 16.0, p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: The current study identified factors that may intersect with cannabis use for pain management and adds to our current knowledge of the types of cannabis products used by PwMS. Future research should continue to investigate trends in cannabis use for pain management, especially as the legality and availability of products continue to shift. Additionally, longitudinal studies are needed to examine the effects of cannabis use on pain-related outcomes over time.


Asunto(s)
Cannabis , Dolor Crónico , Marihuana Medicinal , Esclerosis Múltiple , Neuralgia , Adulto , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Dolor Crónico/complicaciones , Marihuana Medicinal/uso terapéutico , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Esclerosis Múltiple/epidemiología , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Neuralgia/complicaciones
18.
Rehabil Psychol ; 68(2): 204-211, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36951739

RESUMEN

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: The first year following a new multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis may be a critical time for individuals as they learn to manage their disease. Effective self-management of MS likely requires healthy self-efficacy levels, yet little is known about self-efficacy in the postdiagnosis period. This study aims to improve our understanding of self-efficacy in individuals newly diagnosed with MS by examining self-efficacy trajectories and identifying patient characteristics associated with trajectories in the first postdiagnosis year. RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGN: Newly diagnosed adults with MS/clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) (N = 230) completed a battery of questionnaires, including the University of Washington Self-Efficacy Scale, at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, postdiagnosis. Sankey diagrams characterized self-efficacy trajectories and a multiple regression model tested patient characteristics as predictors of self-efficacy change scores. RESULTS: Mean self-efficacy T-scores ranged from 50.79 to 52.04 (SD = 9.40 and 10.12, respectively) across the postdiagnosis year. MS diagnosis (vs. CIS), higher disability levels, and higher MS symptom severity were associated with lower self-efficacy levels at baseline. Baseline symptom severity predicted change in self-efficacy levels from baseline to month 12 (B = -0.05, p = .030). CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Self-efficacy remains relatively stable in the first year following a MS diagnosis, though high symptom severity is associated with decreased self-efficacy at 12-months postdiagnosis. Clinical characteristics (e.g., MS diagnosis, disability level) also appear to play a role in setting the course of self-efficacy in this postdiagnosis year. Timely interventions that enhance self-efficacy and/or improve certain clinical characteristics may promote healthy self-management of MS that carries forward in disease course. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).


Asunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad , Esclerosis Múltiple , Automanejo , Adulto , Humanos , Autoeficacia , Estado de Salud
19.
Pain Med ; 13(12): 1648-57, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23137071

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To better understand the association of depression with pain treatment utilization in a multiple sclerosis (MS) population. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Community-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 117 individuals with MS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants provided demographic information, descriptive information on utilization of pain treatments, pain intensity ratings on a 0-10 numerical rating scale, and depressive symptoms on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). RESULTS: Participants reporting clinical levels of depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 ≥10) reported that they tried more pain treatments previously relative to participants with PHQ-9 <10; however, the two groups did not differ in the number of treatments they were currently using. Additionally, participants with PHQ-9 ≥10 had more visits to providers for pain treatment relative to the group with PHQ-9 <10. In subsequent analyses, results showed that these differences were no longer significant after controlling for level of pain intensity. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that depression is not associated with higher pain treatment utilization. These findings support the assertion in previous studies that the mechanism by which depression impacts medical utilization is through increased appointments for nonspecific complaints, not for specific medical problems. While this suggests that treating depression may not be helpful in reducing pain treatment utilization specifically, it remains important to treat depression to reduce pain-related suffering and medical utilization more broadly.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Depresión , Esclerosis Múltiple , Manejo del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/complicaciones , Depresión/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerosis Múltiple/psicología , Esclerosis Múltiple/terapia , Dimensión del Dolor , Análisis de Regresión , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
20.
Pain Med ; 13(10): 1358-65, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22925457

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify empirically derived cutoffs for mild, moderate, and severe pain in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). Design. Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: . Community-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 236 individuals with MS and pain. Intervention. Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Zero to 10 Numeric Rating Scale for pain severity (both average and worst pain) and Brief Pain Inventory for pain interference. RESULTS: The optimal classification scheme for average pain was 0-2 = mild, 3-5 = moderate, and 6-10 = severe. Alternatively, the optimal classification scheme for worst pain was 0-4 = mild, 5-7 = moderate, and 8-10 = severe. CONCLUSIONS: The present study furthers our ability to use empirically based cutoffs to inform the use of clinical guidelines for pain treatment as well as our understanding of the factors that might impact the cutoffs that are most appropriate for specific pain populations. The results of the present study also add to the existing literature by drawing similarities to studies of other populations, but also by highlighting that clear, between-condition differences may exist that warrant using different cutoffs for patients with different medical conditions. Specifically, the present study highlights that cutoffs may be lower for persons with MS than other populations of persons with pain.


Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Dolor/clasificación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/etiología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda