Volume of ropivacaine 0.2% and common peroneal nerve block duration: a randomised, double-blind cohort trial in healthy volunteers.

The volume-duration relationship using low concentrations of ropivacaine for peripheral nerve blocks is unknown, even though low concentrations of ropivacaine are increasingly used clinically. We investigated the effect of ropivacaine 0.2% on common peroneal nerve block duration. With ethical committee approval, 60 consenting, healthy volunteers were randomly allocated to receive one of five volumes of ropivacaine 0.2% (2.5, 5.0, 10, 15 or 20 ml) administered by ultrasound-guided, catheter-based injection (at 10 ml.min-1 ) near the common peroneal nerve. Our primary outcome was duration of sensory block, defined by insensitivity to a cold stimulus. Our secondary outcome was duration of motor block. Outcomes were assessed every hour from onset of block to complete remission. Intergroup differences were tested using one-way ANOVA followed by regression analyses using the 20 ml intervention group as reference. Block durations varied significantly (p < 0.0001) between groups. Mean (SD) sensory block durations were 9.2 (3.3), 12.5 (3.0), 15.5 (4.4), 17.3 (3.5) and 17.3 (4.6) h. Mean (SD) motor block durations were 3.3 (2.1), 7.2 (2.5), 9.2 (2.2), 12.7 (2.5) and 12.5 (2.5) h. Regression analysis showed that the effect of volume on block duration was progressively smaller with increasing volume, reaching a threshold volume above which there was no effect on nerve block duration (10 ml for sensory block and 15 ml for motor block). We conclude that there is a ceiling effect of increasing volume of ropivacaine 0.2% on both sensory and motor block duration of the common peroneal nerve.

Initial placement and secondary displacement of a new suture-method catheter for sciatic nerve block in healthy volunteers: a randomised, double-blind pilot study.

We performed a randomised double-blind pilot study in 16 healthy volunteers to investigate the success rate for placing a new suture-method catheter for sciatic nerve block. A catheter was inserted into both legs of volunteers and each was randomly allocated to receive 15 ml lidocaine 2% through the catheter in one leg and 15 ml saline in the other leg. Successful placement of the catheter was defined as a 20% decrease in maximum voluntary isometric contraction for dorsiflexion of the ankle. Secondary outcomes were maximum voluntary isometric contraction for plantar flexion at the ankle, surface electromyography and cold sensation. After return of motor and sensory function, volunteers performed standardised physical exercises; injection of the same study medication was repeated in the same leg and followed by motor and sensory assessments. Fifteen of 16 (94%; 95%CI 72-99%) initial catheter placements were successful. The reduction in maximum voluntary isometric contraction and surface electromyography affected the peroneal nerve more often than the tibial nerve. Eleven of 15 (73%; 95%CI 54-96%) catheters remained functional with motor and sensory block after physical exercise, and the maximal displacement was 5 mm. Catheters with secondary block failure were displaced between 6 and 10 mm. One catheter was displaced 1.8 mm that resulted in a decrease in maximum voluntary isometric contraction of less than 20%. After repeat test injection, 14 of the 16 volunteers had loss of cold sensation. Neither motor nor sensory functions were affected in the legs injected with placebo. We conclude that the suture-method catheter can be placed with a high success rate, but that physical exercise may cause displacement.

Heparin binding and augmentation of C1 inhibitor activity.

Heparin and other glycosaminoglycans have profound activity in vitro on the regulation of complement activity. The studies reported here examined the mechanism whereby heparin enhances C1 esterase inhibitor (C1INH) activity on C1 esterase (C1). The interaction of heparin and heparan sulfate with C1INH was first examined using surface plasmon resonance. Heparin was immobilized on a biosensor chip in two orientations, at its reducing end and in midchain, and heparan sulfate was immobilized at its reducing end. Heparin immobilized at its reducing end interacted with C1INH, giving an association constant (Ka) value of 1.43 x 10(7) M-1, whereas heparin immobilized in midchain afforded a Ka value of 7 x 10(6) M-1. No interaction between C1INH and heparan sulfate could be observed. Next, the augmentation of C1INH by heparin (Mr (av) 13,000), low-molecular-weight (LMW) heparin (Mr (av) 5000), and heparan sulfate (Mr (av) 11,000) was determined. C1INH alone was at least 10, 000 times more active in inhibiting fluid phase C1 compared with erythrocyte-bound C1 (EAC1). When C1 was in the fluid phase, both heparin and LMW heparin were relatively ineffective at augmenting C1INH activity on C1. In contrast, when C1 was present as EAC1, heparin augmented C1INH activity at all C1INH concentrations examined and LMW heparin was up to 1.3 times more effective than heparin. This augmentation only occurred when both C1INH and heparin were present together with the EAC1. Hence, although surface plasmon resonance shows that heparin binds to C1INH, heparin augmentation of C1INH activity appears to require a terniary complex in which cell bound C1 interacts with both heparin and C1INH. This is the first report of LMW heparin augmenting C1INH activity. Heparan sulfate neither interacted with C1INH nor did it augment C1INH activity.