Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 104
Filtrar
1.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 102(3): 403-414, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37473420

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are limited national-level data on the contemporary practices of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) use in acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS). METHODS: We utilized the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-National/Nationwide Inpatient Sample data (2005-2017) to identify adult admissions (>18 years) with AMI-CS. MCS devices were classified as intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (pLVAD), or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We evaluated trends in the initial device used (IABP alone, pLVAD alone or ≥2 MCS devices), device escalation, bridging to durable LVAD/heart transplantation, and predictors of in-hospital mortality and device escalation. RESULTS: Among 327,283 AMI-CS admissions, 131,435 (40.2%) had an MCS device placed with available information on timing of placement. IABP, pLVAD, and ≥2 MCS devices were used as initial device in 120,928 (92.0%), 8202 (6.2%), and 2305 (1.7%) admissions, respectively. Most admissions were maintained on the initial MCS device with 1%-1.5% being escalated (IABP to pLVAD/ECMO, pLVAD to ECMO). Urban, medium, and large-sized hospitals and acute multiorgan failure were significant independent predictors of MCS escalation. In admissions receiving MCS, escalation of MCS device was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 1.56, 95% confidence interval:  1.38-1.75; p < 0.001). Admissions receiving durable LVAD/heart transplantation increased over time in those initiated on pLVAD and ≥2 MCS devices, resulting in lower in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In this 13-year study, escalation of MCS in AMI-CS was associated with higher in-hospital mortality suggestive of higher acuity of illness. The increase in number of durable LVAD/heart transplantations alludes to the role of MCS as successful bridge strategies.


Asunto(s)
Corazón Auxiliar , Infarto del Miocardio , Adulto , Humanos , Choque Cardiogénico/diagnóstico , Choque Cardiogénico/etiología , Choque Cardiogénico/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico
2.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 99(1): 181-192, 2022 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34402588

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to compare outcomes of redo-aortic valve replacement (AVR) via surgical or transcatheter approach in prior surgical AVR with large percentage of prior stentless surgical AVR. BACKGROUND: With the introduction of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), patients with increased surgical risks now have an alternative to redo surgical AVR (SAVR), known as valve-in-valve (ViV) TAVR. Stentless prosthetic aortic valves present a more challenging implantation for ViV-TAVR given the lack of structural frame. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 173 subjects who have undergone SAVR (N = 100) or ViV-TAVR (N = 73) in patients with prior surgical AVR at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center from 2009 to 2019. Our study received the proper ethical oversight. RESULTS: The average ages in redo-SAVR and ViV-TAVR groups were 58.03 ± 13.86 and 66.57 ± 13.44 years, respectively (p < 0.0001). The redo-SAVR had significantly lower STS (2.78 ± 2.09 and 4.68 ± 5.51, p < 0.01) and Euroscores (4.32 ± 2.98 and 7.51 ± 8.24, p < 0.05). The redo-SAVR group had higher percentage requiring mechanical support (8% vs. 0%, p < 0.05) and vasopressors (53% vs. 0%, p < 0.0001), longer length of stay (13.65 ± 11.23 vs. 5.68 ± 7.64 days, p < 0.0001), and inpatient mortality (16% vs. 2.78%, p < 0.005). At 30-day follow-up, redo-SAVR group had higher rates of acute kidney injury (10% vs. 0%, p < 0.01), however ViV-TAVR group had more new left bundle branch blocks (6.85% vs. 0%, p < 0.05). No significant differences regarding re-hospitalization rates, stroke, or death up to 1-year. CONCLUSION: Although the ViV-TAVR group had higher risk patients, there were significantly fewer procedural complications, shorter length of stay, and similar mortality outcomes up to 1-year follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Bioprótesis , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Adulto , Anciano , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 97(5): 905-909, 2021 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33098361

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of a novel percutaneous postprocedure closure technique for large arterial sheath removal with the use of two Perclose ProGlide (Abbott Vascular Devices, Redwood City, CA) devices. BACKGROUND: Postprocedural closing of large-bore arteriotomies using the Perclose system can be difficult given the subsequent inability of the device to capture sufficient wall tissue. METHODS: Our study was a single-center retrospective analysis of 22 consecutive patients who underwent large arteriotomy closure via the postclosure technique with a 12-16-Fr sheath. Efficacy endpoints included successful deployment of the system and hemostasis. Safety endpoints included the incidence of major or minor vascular complications as defined by the Vascular Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) definitions at 30-day follow-up. RESULTS: The postclosure technique resulted in 100% technical success rate and no postprocedural bleeding or vascular complications. CONCLUSION: Postclosure technique is a safe, highly effective, and feasible percutaneous method to achieve large-bore arteriotomy hemostasis with low rates of major bleeding or vascular complications and favorable early outcome.


Asunto(s)
Arteria Femoral , Dispositivos de Cierre Vascular , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Hemorragia/etiología , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Técnicas Hemostáticas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares
4.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 96(5): 997-1005, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32767717

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the effect of COVID-19 related reduction in elective cardiac procedures and acute coronary syndrome presentations on interventional cardiology (IC) training. BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted healthcare in the United States, including cardiovascular services. The impact of COVID-19 on IC fellow training in the United States has not been assessed. METHODS: The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) surveyed IC fellows training in both accredited and advanced non-accredited programs, as well as their program directors (PD). RESULTS: Responses were received from 135 IC fellows and 152 PD. All respondents noted reductions in procedural volumes beginning in March 2020. At that time, only 43% of IC fellows had performed >250 PCI. If restrictions were lifted by May 15, 2020 78% of IC fellows believed they would perform >250 PCI, but fell to only 70% if restrictions persisted until the end of the academic year. 49% of IC fellows felt that their procedural competency was impaired by COVID-19, while 97% of PD believed that IC fellows would be procedurally competent at the end of their training. Most IC fellows (65%) noted increased stress at work and at home, and many felt that job searches and/or existing offers were adversely affected by the pandemic. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has substantially affected IC training in the United States, with many fellows at risk of not satisfying current program procedural requirements. These observations support a move to review current IC program requirements and develop mitigation strategies to supplement gaps in education related to reduced procedural volume.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Becas/organización & administración , Internado y Residencia/organización & administración , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/educación , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Cirugía Torácica/educación , Adulto , COVID-19 , Competencia Clínica , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos
5.
Echocardiography ; 37(6): 815-821, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32427382

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Accurate calculation of stroke volume (SV) by Doppler echocardiography is important for the assessment of aortic stenosis (AS), which may be impacted by anatomical variations of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT). METHODS: Patients with AS (n = 64) were studied using computed tomography (CT) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Anatomical variations of LVOT areas were measured at (a) the aortic annulus (Aa ); (b) 5 mm (A5 ); and (c) 10 mm below the annulus (A10 ) by CT. LVOT diameters were also measured by 2D TTE at these three levels for calculation of LVOT areas. Stroke volumes (SV) were calculated using continuity equation. The impacts of anatomical variations of LVOT on SV calculation were evaluated. RESULTS: Anatomical LVOT area increased from Aa to A10 (5.0 ± 0.9 cm2 vs 5.8 ± 1.9 cm2 , P < .01). Differences between TTE-calculated LVOT areas and anatomical areas were most significant at A10 due to elongation of mediolateral diameters with variable changes in anteroposterior diameters (5.8 ± 1.9 cm2 vs 3.4 ± 1.1 cm2 , P < .001). Although mean calculated SV by TTE was not significant at different LVOT levels (Aa 69 ± 22 mL, vs A5 66 ± 21 mL, vs A10 66 ± 28 ± 22 mL, P > .05), the most significant variations in individuals were at A10 levels (ΔSV: 8.2 ± 6.4 mL, 12 ± 9%). CONCLUSION: Variations of LVOT anatomy in individuals with AS significantly impact the SV calculated by Doppler echocardiography. These features should be taken into account for AS diagnosis and a clinical decision-making for intervention.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Ecocardiografía Tridimensional , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Ecocardiografía Doppler , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Volumen Sistólico
6.
Echocardiography ; 37(1): 14-21, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31990437

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of low gradient severe aortic stenosis (LG SAS) and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with the integration of echocardiographic and clinical data. METHODS: The study included 172 patients with LG SAS (AVAi ≤ 0.6 cm2 /m2 , mean aortic pressure gradient < 40 mm Hg) and LVEF (≥ 50%). LV outflow tract diameters were measured at both the aortic valve annulus and 5 mm below the annulus for the measurement consistency. Patients were divided into the low flow LG SAS (LF/LG SAS: SVi < 35mL/m2 and AVAi ≤ 0.6 cm2 /m2 ) and normal-flow LG SAS groups (NF/LG SAS: SVi ≥ 35mL/m2 and AVAi ≤ 0.6 cm2 /m2 ). Echocardiographic findings and clinical data were systematically analyzed with mean follow-up of 3.0 ± 1.6 years. RESULTS: LF/LG SAS had significantly smaller AVAi, lower SVi, a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (28% vs 12% P = .01) and diabetes (47% vs 27% P = .007) and lower 3-year cumulative survival than NF/LG SAS. Multivariable analysis showed that dyspnea, renal dysfunction (CI 1.42-3.99, P < .01), left atrial diameter, and SVi were independently associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality. Aortic valve intervention (AVI) improved survival in LF/LG SAS (68% vs 48%, P < .05) in comparison with medical management (HR: 4.20, CI: 1.12-15.76, P = .03), but only modestly in NF/LG SAS (75% vs 65% P > .05). CONCLUSION: Outcome of LG SAS was independently associated with clinical characteristics. AVI likely improved outcome of LF/LG SAS who had high-risk clinical characteristics and unfavorable echocardiographic findings.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/mortalidad , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Volumen Sistólico , Análisis de Supervivencia , Función Ventricular Izquierda
7.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 93(6): 1106-1115, 2019 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30588736

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to compare short- and intermediate-term clinical outcomes, procedural complications, TAVR prosthesis hemodynamics, and paravalvular leak (PVL) in stentless and stented groups. BACKGROUND: Valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an alternative to surgical redo for bioprosthetic valve failure. There have been limited data on ViV in stentless surgical valves. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 40 patients who underwent ViV TAVR in prior surgical bioprosthetic valves at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center from October 2014 to September 2017. Eighty percent (32/40) ViV TAVRs were in stentless, while 20% (8/40) were in stented bioprosthetic valves. RESULTS: The primary mode of bioprosthetic valve failure for ViV implantation in the stentless group was aortic insufficiency (78%, 25/32), while in the stented group was aortic stenosis (75%, 6/8). The ViV procedure success was 96.9% (31/32) in stentless group and 100% in stented group (8/8). There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality at 30 days between stentless and stented groups (6.9%, 2/31 versus 0%, 0/8, P = 0.33) and at 1 year (0%, 0/25 versus 0%, 0/5). In the stentless group, 34.4% (11/32) required a second valve compared to the stented group of 0% (0/8). There was a significant difference in the mean aortic gradient at 30-day follow-up (12.33 ± 6.33 mmHg and 22.63 ± 8.45 mmHg in stentless and stented groups, P < 0.05) and at 6-month follow-up (9.75 ± 5.07 mmHg and 24.00 ± 11.28 mmHg, P < 0.05), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ViV in the stentless bioprosthetic aortic valve has excellent procedural success and intermediate-term results. Our study shows promising data that may support the application of TAVR in stentless surgical aortic valve. However, further and larger studies need to further validate our single center's experience.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Bioprótesis , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/instrumentación , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Falla de Prótesis , Stents , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/mortalidad , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/mortalidad , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Femenino , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/mortalidad , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diseño de Prótesis , Recuperación de la Función , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 92(5): 972-980, 2018 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29726601

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Temporally quantify and localize paravalvular aortic leak (PVL) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in the Medtronic CoreValve (MCV) versus the Edwards Sapien Valve (ESV). BACKGROUND: In order to increase the precision of THV selection and PVL intervention, an understanding of PVL characteristics is essential. METHODS: The frequency, severity, and location of post-TAVR PVL were evaluated with transthoracic echocardiography pre-discharge, one month, and one-year post-procedure in 202 patients receiving a MCV (N = 120) or ESV (N = 81). This was done through application of a clock face to the short axis of the aortic valve in order to divide the area into three tertiles. RESULTS: Pre-discharge differences between PVL frequency and severity in the MCV and ESV lost significance over time. Localizing these trends, MCV PVL frequency and severity significantly decreased in the first and third tertiles during most time periods while PVL in the second tertile of the MCV or in any of the tertiles of the ESV failed to improve. Presence of pre-discharge PVL was predictive of 30-day HF readmission and/or death (OR = 3.16, 95% CI: 0.99-10.12). Presence of pre-discharge and 30-day PVL was predictive of 1-year HF readmissions and/or death (OR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.09-4.13 and OR = 1.99, 95% CI: 0.96-4.12). CONCLUSIONS: When comparing the MCV and ESV, not all locations of PVL improve equally over time, which has implications for heart failure readmissions. This could be used to influence valve selection and to identify cases in which earlier intervention on PVL may be appropriate.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/etiología , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Bioprótesis , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/instrumentación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Diseño de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 91(7): 1354-1362, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29024382

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The objective is to compare the short-term (30 days) and late (12 months) vascular adverse events in patients undergoing transfemoral (TF)-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) by surgical cut-down (SC) vs. percutaneous (PC) approaches. BACKGROUND: Programs continue to utilize both approaches in TF-TAVR. There are limited data comparing outcomes by SC vs. PC approaches and long-term effects of endovascular intervention facilitated hemostasis on late vascular adverse events. METHODS: A total of 146 men and women aged 79.7 ± 10.0 years with severe aortic stenosis deemed extreme or high risk for surgery underwent TAVR via TF access. 61 had SC and 85 had PC approaches. Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) outcomes were assessed at an average of 12.1 months after TAVR. RESULTS: Hospital length of stay (LOS) post-TAVR was shorter for the PC group compared to the SC group (5.1 ± 3.9 vs. 8.2 ± 6.6 days; P < 0.001). More patients were discharged directly to home in the PC than the SC group (85.9% vs. 68.9%, P < 0.05). At 30 days, there were 13/61 (21.3%) and 16/85 (18.8%; P < 0.05) of any vascular events, and 2/61 (3.3%) and 2/85 (2.4%; P = 0.73) major vascular events in the SC and PC groups, respectively. There was no difference in all-cause mortality between the SC (14/61; 23%) and PC groups [17/85 (20%); P = 0.34]. There was no difference in any [4/33 (12%) vs. 3/43 (7%); P = 0.84] or major vascular adverse events [1/33 (3%) vs. 1/43 (2%); P = 0.79] in subjects that underwent adjunctive endovascular intervention compared to those who did not, respectively. There were no statistically significant univariate or multivariate predictors of any vascular event at 12 months when comparing SC to PC groups. CONCLUSION: For TF TAVR, the PC approach, when compared to the SC approach, is associated with a shorter hospital LOS and higher rate of direct discharge to home with similar risk of vascular complications, late vascular adverse events, and all-cause mortality at 12 months.


Asunto(s)
Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/mortalidad , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Alta del Paciente , Punciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/instrumentación , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidad
10.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 88(1): 62-70, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26399687

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Xience V USA Study demonstrated safety and efficacy of the XIENCE V(®) everolimus-eluting stent (EES) in a large, prospective study of a real-world, unselected patient population. There is limited long-term data regarding EES performance in high risk patients with bifurcation lesions (BIF). The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of EES in patients with BIF from the XIENCE V USA study. METHODS: The Xience V USA Study was a single arm, prospective, multicenter, real-world study (n = 5,054) undergoing PCI with EES. Baseline data and clinical outcomes at 4 years were evaluated in the subgroup of patients with ≥ 1 BIF who did not undergo a staged procedure. Co-primary endpoints were ARC definite/probable stent thrombosis and a composite of cardiac death and ARC-defined myocardial infarction (MI). Endpoints were adjudicated by an independent CEC. RESULTS: Of 4,768 patients who did not undergo a staged procedure, there were 511 (10.7%) patients with BIF and 4,257 (89.3%) patients without BIF. Follow-up data was available in 4,459 patients (466 BIF, 3,993 non-BIF). Through binary outcome analysis, at 1 year the overall definite/probable stent thrombosis rates were higher in the BIF group (1.84% vs. 0.76%, P = 0.03). However, at 4 years, the difference in cumulative rates of ARC definite/probable stent thrombosis (BIF 2.3% vs. non-BIF 1.4%, P = 0.13) remained the same as that at 1 year, with no incremental definite/probable stent thrombosis in BIF patients from 2-4 years. The 4-year rates of composite cardiac death and MI were 13.5% for BIF vs. 14.1% for non-BIF (P = 0.78). At 4 years, target lesion failure (19.1% vs. 18.3%, P = 0.66) and ischemia driven-target lesion revascularization (10.2% vs. 10.1%, P = 0.89) were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This subgroup analysis of BIF lesions in a real world population receiving EES demonstrates continued low rates of clinical outcomes in the BIF subgroup at 4 years with no incremental stent thrombosis increase in BIF patients from 2 to 4 years. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Everolimus/administración & dosificación , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Anciano , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Trombosis Coronaria/etiología , Everolimus/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Estudios Prospectivos , Diseño de Prótesis , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
12.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 83(5): 748-52, 2014 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24395180
13.
Am J Cardiol ; 214: 1-7, 2024 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38110018

RESUMEN

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) provides an option for extreme-risk patients who underwent reoperation for a failed surgical aortic bioprosthesis. Long-term data on patients who underwent TAVR within a failed surgical aortic valve (TAV-in-SAV) are limited. The CoreValve Expanded Use Study evaluated patients at extreme surgical risk who underwent TAV-in-SAV. Outcomes at 5 years were analyzed by SAV failure mode (stenosis, regurgitation, or combined). Echocardiographic outcomes are site-reported. TAV-in-SAV was attempted in 226 patients with a mean age of 76.7 ± 10.8 years; 63.3% were male, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality score was 9.0 ± 6.7%, and 87.5% had a New York Heart Association classification III or IV symptoms. Most of the failed surgical bioprostheses were stented (81.9%), with an average implant duration of 10.2 ± 4.3 years. The 5-year all-cause mortality or major stroke rate was 47.2% in all patients; 54.4% in the stenosis, 37.6% in the regurgitation, and 38.0% in the combined groups (p = 0.046). At 5 years, all-cause mortality was higher in patients with versus without 30-day severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (51.7% vs 38.3%, p = 0.026). The overall aortic valve reintervention rate was 5.9%; highest in the regurgitation group (12.6%). The mean aortic valve gradient was 14.1 ± 9.8 mm Hg and effective orifice area was 1.57 ± 0.70 at 5 years. Few patients had >mild paravalvular regurgitation at 5 years (5.5% moderate, 0.0% severe). TAV-in-SAV with supra-annular, self-expanding TAVR continues to represent a safe and lasting intermediate option for extreme-risk patients who have appropriate sizing of the preexisting failed surgical valve. Clinical and hemodynamic outcomes were stable through 5 years.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Bioprótesis , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Constricción Patológica/etiología , Constricción Patológica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos , Diseño de Prótesis , Factores de Riesgo
14.
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv ; 3(7): 101980, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39131996

RESUMEN

The field of interventional cardiology (IC) has evolved dramatically over the past 40 years. Training and certification in IC have kept pace, with the development of accredited IC fellowship training programs, training statements, and subspecialty board certification. The application process, however, remained fragmented with lack of a universal process or time frame. In recent years, growing competition among training programs for the strongest candidates resulted in time-limited offers and high-pressure situations that disadvantaged candidates. A grassroots effort was recently undertaken by a Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions task force, to create equity in the system by establishing a national Match for IC fellowship. This manuscript explores the rationale, process, and implications of this endeavor.

15.
Circulation ; 126(2): 189-95, 2012 Jul 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22665718

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite national guidelines calling for timely coronary artery reperfusion, treatment is often delayed, particularly for patients requiring interhospital transfer. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred nineteen North Carolina hospitals developed coordinated plans to rapidly treat patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction according to presentation: walk-in, ambulance, or hospital transfer. A total of 6841 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (3907 directly presenting to 21 percutaneous coronary intervention hospitals, 2933 transferred from 98 non-percutaneous coronary intervention hospitals) were treated between July 2008 and December 2009 (age, 59 years; 30% women; 19% uninsured; chest pain duration, 91 minutes; shock, 9.2%). The rate of patients not receiving reperfusion fell from 5.4% to 4.0% (P=0.04). Treatment times for hospital transfer patients substantially improved. First-hospital-door-to-device time for hospitals that adopted a "transfer for percutaneous coronary intervention" reperfusion strategy fell from 117 to 103 minutes (P=0.0008), whereas times at hospitals with a mixed strategy of transfer or fibrinolysis fell from 195 to 138 minutes (P=0.002). Median door-to-device times for patients presenting directly to PCI hospitals fell from 64 to 59 minutes (P<0.001). Emergency medical services-transported patients were most likely to reach door-to-device goals, with 91% treated within 90 minutes and 52% being treated with 60 minutes. Patients treated within guideline goals had a mortality of 2.2% compared with 5.7% for those exceeding guideline recommendations (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Through extension of regional coordination to an entire state, rapid diagnosis and treatment of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction has become an established standard of care independently of healthcare setting or geographic location.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/tendencias , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Electrocardiografía , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Anciano , Ambulancias , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/normas , Atención a la Salud/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina , Transferencia de Pacientes , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
16.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 82(4): E375-84, 2013 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23074085

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of diagnostic cardiac catheterizations (CATH) and coronary interventions (PCI) performed using radial artery (RA) access compared to femoral artery (FA) access. BACKGROUND: CATH and PCI performed from the RA reduce access site complications compared to FA, but can increase procedure duration, and equipment and contrast use. Whether resulting increases in utilization costs are offset by reduced costs of complications is uncertain. METHODS: In all, 6,726 CATH and PCI (RA, 3,368; FA, 3,358) were performed from January 2009 to December 2011. Procedural costs and cost of access site complications were compared for propensity-matched CATH (RA and FA, 1,222) and PCI (RA and FA, 570) throughout a complete transition of the lab from a preferred FA to preferred RA strategy. RESULTS: Adjusted mean total costs were $10 more (95% confidence interval $613 less to $610 more) for RA-CATH versus FA-CATH and $732 less ($1,345 less to $156 less) for RA-PCI versus FA-PCI. The incremental cost per vascular or bleeding complication avoided with RA-CATH was $1,265, whereas RA was economically dominant with lower costs and fewer complications compared to FA for PCI and all procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Radial access for CATH and PCI reduced access site complications and overall costs compared to FA procedures with similar baseline clinical and procedural characteristics, making it an economically advantageous strategy.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco/economía , Arteria Femoral , Costos de Hospital , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/economía , Arteria Radial , Centros Médicos Académicos/economía , Anciano , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Recursos en Salud/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Anal Chem ; 84(4): 1831-9, 2012 Feb 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22239072

RESUMEN

Flow cytometry can simultaneously measure and analyze multiple properties of single cells or particles with high sensitivity and precision. Yet, conventional flow cytometers have fundamental limitations with regards to analyzing particles larger than about 70 µm, analyzing at flow rates greater than a few hundred microliters per minute, and providing analysis rates greater than 50,000 per second. To overcome these limits, we have developed multinode acoustic focusing flow cells that can position particles (as small as a red blood cell and as large as 107 µm in diameter) into as many as 37 parallel flow streams. We demonstrate the potential of such flow cells for the development of high throughput, parallel flow cytometers by precision focusing of flow cytometry alignment microspheres, red blood cells, and the analysis of a CD4+ cellular immunophenotyping assay. This approach will have significant impact toward the creation of high throughput flow cytometers for rare cell detection applications (e.g., circulating tumor cells), applications requiring large particle analysis, and high volume flow cytometry.


Asunto(s)
Acústica , Eritrocitos , Citometría de Flujo/instrumentación , Citometría de Flujo/métodos , Microesferas , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/inmunología , Recuento de Eritrocitos , Humanos , Inmunofenotipificación , Técnicas Analíticas Microfluídicas
18.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 80(2): 247-57, 2012 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22162430

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate procedural and safety metrics of transradial (TR) versus transfemoral (TF) cardiac catheterization (CATH) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) during a complete institutional transition from TF to TR as the preferred access. BACKGROUND: The TR approach has been shown to reduce complications compared to TF for CATH and PCI, but concerns of longer procedure times have limited utilization in the United States. METHODS: 4,172 consecutive CATH and PCI procedures were performed (2,665 TF; 1,507 TR) at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center from January 2009 to November 2010. We assessed in-hospital procedural and safety metrics. RESULTS: After 6 months of a preferred TR strategy, TR to TF crossover rate was 9.1%, and 65% of all cases were TR procedures. For the cath lab (all TF + TR), we observed small but significant increases in procedural metrics for Preferred TR (last third) compared to Preferred TF (first third). This appeared to be due to increased access times, procedure length, fluoroscopy times, and contrast use for TR versus TF (propensity score matched). Nonetheless, over the course of the study, there was a trend for a decrease in all procedural metrics with TR use. Access site complications (2.3% TF, 1.2% TR) and bleeding (2.5% TF, 2.1% TR), both P < 0.05, decreased over the course of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Our observations support the concept that complete transition of a cath lab to a preferred TR strategy is feasible, achieves lower rates of vascular and bleeding complications but with modest increases in overall procedural metrics.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Arteria Femoral , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Arteria Radial , Centros Médicos Académicos , Anciano , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/normas , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina , Seguridad del Paciente , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/normas , Puntaje de Propensión , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades Vasculares/etiología
19.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 79(1): 158-65, 2012 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21542107

RESUMEN

Retroperitoneal hemorrhage remains one of the major complications of cardiac and peripheral vascular catheterization. Its high associated morbidity and mortality require vigilance and early intervention. We report six cases of retroperitoneal hemorrhage featuring a "bladder sign." The compression of the bladder described in this series can be visualized on the incidental cystogram that results from contrast given during catheterization. Its significance as a highly specific marker of retroperitoneal hemorrhage should be appreciated.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Hemorragia/diagnóstico por imagen , Espacio Retroperitoneal/diagnóstico por imagen , Vejiga Urinaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Medios de Contraste , Diagnóstico Precoz , Resultado Fatal , Femenino , Hemorragia/etiología , Hemorragia/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Radiografía Intervencional , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Am J Cardiol ; 177: 7-13, 2022 08 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35701236

RESUMEN

The impact of socioeconomic status on care and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) remains understudied. Hence, adult admissions with AMI-CS were identified from the National Inpatient Sample database (2005 to 2017) and were divided into quartiles on the basis of median household income for zip code (0 to 25th, 26th to 50th, 51st to 75th, and 76th to 100th). In-hospital mortality, use of cardiac and noncardiac procedures, and resource utilization were compared between all 4 income quartiles. Among a total of 7,805,681 AMI admissions, cardiogenic shock was identified in 409,294 admissions (5.2%) with comparable prevalence of cardiogenic shock across all 4 income quartiles. AMI-CS admissions belonging to the lowest income quartile presented more often with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and had comparable use of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention but lower use of early coronary angiography, early percutaneous coronary intervention, mechanical circulatory support devices, and pulmonary artery catheterization than higher income quartiles. In the adjusted analysis, admissions belonging to the 0 to 25th income quartile (odds ratio [OR] 1.17 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15 to 1.20], p <0.001), 26th to 50th quartile (OR 1.11 [95% CI 1.09 to 1.14], p <0.001), and 51st to 75th income quartile (OR 1.06 [95% CI 1.04 to 1.09], p <0.001) had higher adjusted in-hospital mortality than the highest income quartile (76th to 100th). Lowest income quartile admissions had lower rates of palliative care consultations and higher rates of do-not-resuscitate status than the higher income quartiles. Hospitalization charges and length of stay were higher for admissions belonging to the highest income quartile. In conclusion, lowest income quartile AMI-CS admissions were associated with higher rates of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, lower use of mechanical circulatory support devices, and higher in-hospital mortality.


Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Adulto , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/complicaciones , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Choque Cardiogénico/epidemiología , Choque Cardiogénico/etiología , Choque Cardiogénico/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda