ESHO 1-85. Hyperthermia as an adjuvant to radiation therapy in the treatment of locally advanced breast carcinoma. A randomized multicenter study by the European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology.

BACKGROUND: The ESHO protocol 1-85 is a multicenter randomized trial initiated by the European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology with the aim to investigate the value of hyperthermia (HT) as an adjuvant to radiotherapy (RT) in treatment of locally advanced breast carcinoma. The trial is one of the largest studies of hyperthermia in radiotherapy but has not been previously published. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 1987 and November 1993, 155 tumors in 151 patients were included. Tumors were stratified according to institution and size (T2-3/T4) and randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy alone (2 Gy/fx, 5 fx/wk) to a total dose of 65-70 Gy, incl. boost, or the same radiotherapy followed once weekly by hyperthermia (aimed for 43 °C for 60 min). Radiation was given with high voltage photons or electrons. The primary endpoint was persistent complete response (local control) in the treated area. RESULTS: A total of 146 tumors in 142 patients were evaluable, with a median observation time of 19 (range 1-134) months. Seventy tumors were randomized to RT alone and 76 to RT + HT. Size was T4 in 92, and T2-3 in 54 tumors, respectively. The compliance to RT was good with all but 4 patients fulfilling the planned RT treatment. The tolerance to HT was fair, but associated with moderate to severe pain and discomfort in 15 % of the treatments. In 84 % of the heated patients a least one heat treatment achieved the target temperature, but the temperature variation was large. Addition of heat did not significantly increase the acute nor late radiation reactions. Overall, the 5-year actuarial local failure rate was 57 %. Univariate analysis showed a significant influence of hyperthermia (RT alone 68 % versus RT + HT 50 %, p = 0.04, and T-size (T4 75 % versus T2-3 36 %, p < 0.01). A Cox multivariate analysis showed the same factors to be the only significant prognostic parameters: hyperthermia (HR: 0.61 [0.38-0.98], and small tumor strata (HR: 0.46 [0.26-0.92]. Consequentially, more patients given RT + HT (36 %) survived without disease (DFS), than after RT alone (19 %), p = 0.021) CONCLUSION: A randomized multicenter trial investigating the addition of a weekly hyperthermia treatment to radiotherapy of patients with locally advanced breast cancer significantly enhanced the 5-year tumor control and yielded more patients surviving free from cancer. The results substantiate the potential clinical benefit of hyperthermic oncology.

Performance of auto-planning for VMAT hypofractionated left whole-breast irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost.

Retrospective analysis of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans for hypofractionated left whole-breast irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost to assess the performance of the auto-planning (AP) engine. Fifteen treatment plans, produced using manual optimization planning approach (MP) were replanned using (AP) approach. Dose-volume parameters were defined to quantify the quality of concurrent treatment plans assessing target coverage and sparing organs at risk (OARs). The Wilcoxon Signed Rank test was used for statistical comparison of all results obtained from the use of the 2 approaches. Dose coverage for both PTVs, PTVbreast, and PTVboost, were similar with AP showing slightly significantly better results for the homogeneity index for both PTVs, for D98% of PTVbreast and D2% of PTVboost. AP plans provided a significant reduction of dose for ipsilateral lung and contralateral lung. No significant differences were observed for heart and contralateral breast. A percentage difference of -14.0% was found for the mean dose of left coronary artery between AP plans and MP plans. Despite increase of total MU by 4.3% for AP plans, planning time resulted about half of that of the MP approach. Although PTVs doses were similar between MP and AP plans, AP plans generally spared OARs significantly better than MP plans. Furthermore, the shortest AP treatment plan time approach was attractive with respect to the workload.

Hypofractionated Conformal Radiotherapy (HCRT) for primary and metastatic lung cancers with small dimension : efficacy and toxicity.

PURPOSE: : To report on the clinical outcome of hypofractionated conformal radiotherapy (HCRT) for medically inoperable stage I non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) or limited pulmonary metastases or = 4 months were considered suitable for analysis. Local response was evaluated with CT imaging 4 months after the end of HCRT and every 3 months thereafter. Local relapse-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: : Local response to the treatment was complete response, partial response, no change, and progressive disease as seen in 29%, 43%, 14%, and 7% of tumors, respectively. LRFS at 1 year and 3 years was 76% and 63%, respectively. Lung toxicities > or = grade 2 were observed in 4/40 patients, but no grade 4. Pericardial effusion occurred in one patient. In stage I NSCLC patients (n = 15) with a median follow-up of 25 months, the 1-year LRFS and OS rates were 88% and 81%, respectively, and the 3-year rates 72% and 61%, respectively. CONCLUSION: : HCRT is an effective and low-toxic treatment for medically inoperable early-stage lung cancers and pulmonary metastases for all clinicians lacking the aid of a dedicated stereotactic system.

Treatment and outcome of advanced external auditory canal and middle ear squamous cell carcinoma.

This is a retrospective study to evaluate the outcomes and complications of combined treatment, surgery with or without adjunctive intraoperative radiotherapy, of locally advanced temporal bone squamous cell carcinoma. A series of 17 patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the temporal bone were treated between September 2002 and February 2007. Eleven patients had primary tumors, and 6 patients had recurrences. According to the University of Pittsburgh staging system, 5 patients were stage II (T2 N0), 6 patients were stage III (5, T3 N0 and 1, T1 N1), and 6 patients were stage IV (5, T3 N2b and 1, T4 N0). All patients underwent lateral temporal bone resection and pedicle flap reconstruction. Eight patients received intraoperative and postoperative radiotherapies, 4 patients underwent postoperative radiation alone, whereas 5 patients did not receive any adjunctive treatment. Median follow-up was 29.5 months. No major complications were observed. No patients were found to have residual gross tumor. Disease-free survival was 73.3%, and overall survival was 75.6%. Radical external auditory canal and/or middle ear canal resection is of utmost importance to obtain a good surgical outcome. Postoperative radiotherapy is necessary to obtain good local control; no major adverse effects were observed in the intraoperative radiotherapy patients. The incidence of major complication is minimal after pedicle flap reconstruction.

Leukotoxicity after moderately Hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated dose escalated radiotherapy for localized prostate Cancer: a secondary analysis from a randomized study.

BACKGROUND: To compare WBC counts during treatment of localized prostate cancer with either conventionally fractionated (CF) or moderately hypofractionated (HYPO) radiotherapy. METHODS: Weekly blood test results were extracted from the charts of patients treated within a phase III study comparing HYPO to CF. In order to compare WBC counts at the same nominal dose in both arms and thus to tease out the effect of fractionation, for each recorded WBC value the corresponding cumulative total dose was extracted as well. WBC counts were binned according to percentiles of the delivered dose and three dose levels were identified at median doses of 16, 34.1 and 52 Gy, respectively. A General Linear Model based on mixed design Analysis Of Variance (ANOVA) was used to test variation of WBC counts between the two treatment arms. RESULTS: Out of 168 randomized patients, 140 (83.3%) had at least one observation for each one of the selected dose levels and were included in the analysis. Mean counts were lower in the CF than the HYPO arm at all selected dose levels, reaching a statistically significant difference at dose level #3 (5397/mm3 vs 6038/mm3 for CF and HYPO, respectively, p = 0.004). The GLM model confirms that the impact of dose on WBC counts is significantly lower in the HYPO arm over the CF one (Greenhouse-Geisser test, p = 0.04). Interestingly, while WBC counts tend to drop throughout all dose levels in the CF arm, this is the case only in the earlier part of treatment in the HYPO arm. CONCLUSION: This secondary analysis of a phase III study shows that dose fractionation is correlated to WBC drop during treatment of localized prostate cancer, favoring HYPO over CF.

Phase I-II study of intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Recent studies have suggested an alpha/beta ratio in prostate cancer of 1.5-3 Gy, which is lower than that assumed for late-responsive normal tissues. Therefore the administration of a single, intraoperative dose of irradiation should represent a convenient irradiation modality in prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 2002 and June 2004, 34 patients with localized prostate cancer with only one risk factor (Gleason score > or =7, Clinical Stage [cT] > or =2c, or prostate-specific antigen [PSA] of 11-20 ng/mL) and without clinical evidence of lymph node metastases were treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) and intraoperative radiotherapy on the tumor bed. A dose-finding procedure based on the Fibonacci method was employed. Dose levels of 16, 18, and 20 Gy were selected, which are biologically equivalent to total doses of about 60-80 Gy administered with conventional fractionation, using an alpha/beta ratio value of 3. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 41 months, 24 (71%) patients were alive with an undetectable PSA value. No patients died from disease, whereas 2 patients died from other malignancies. Locoregional failures were detected in 3 (9%) patients, 2 in the prostate bed and 1 in the common iliac node chain outside the radiation field. A PSA rise without local or distant disease was observed in 7 (21%) cases. The overall 3-year biochemical progression-free survival rate was 77.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Our dose-finding study demonstrated the feasibility of intraoperative radiotherapy in prostate cancer also at the highest administered dose.

Color Doppler quantitative measures to predict outcome of biopsies in prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim was to correlate the color Doppler flow activity pre- and postradiotherapy, using transrectal color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) and the 2 year positive biopsy rate after radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Analysis was carried out in 69 out of 160 patients who had undergone treatment with 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) to prostate and seminal vesicles. Patients were randomized to receive 80 Gy in 40 fractions in 8 weeks (arm A) and 62 Gy in 20 fractions in 5 weeks, 4 fractions per week (arm B). Color Doppler flow activity (CDFA) was evaluated calculating the vascularization index (VI), defined as the ratio between the colored and total pixels in the whole and peripheral prostate, delineated by a radiation oncologist on CDUS images, using EcoVasc a home-made software. The difference between the 2 year post- and pre-3D-CRT maximum VI (VImax), named deltaVImax, was calculated in the whole and peripheral prostate for each patient. Then, deltaVImax and the detected 2 year biopsy outcome were analyzed using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) technique. RESULTS: The VImax increased or decreased in patients with positive or negative biopsies, respectively, compared to the value before RT in both arms. The area under the ROC curve for deltaVImax in the whole and peripheral prostate is equal to 0.790 and 0.884, respectively. CONCLUSION: The AVImax index, comparing CDFA at 2 years compared to that before RT, allows the 2 year postradiotherapy positive biopsy rate to be predicted.

Optimal scheduling of hypofractionated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: A systematic review and metanalysis of randomized clinical trials.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the optimal hypofractionated regimens of moderately hypofractionated (HFRT) versus conventionally fractionated (CFRT) external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer (LPCA), having as primary endpoints the 5-year biochemical failure (BF) and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a systematic literature review of the Medline and National Library of Medicine databases according to the PRISMA guidelines. Only phase III trials of CFRT versus moderate HFRT for LPCa, reporting 5-year BF and/or minimum 3-year late ≥G2 toxicity rates were considered. RESULTS: A total of 11 manuscripts reporting the outcomes of 8145 patients gathered from 9 randomized trials met the eligibility criteria. No significant difference between CFRT and HFRT was found in any of the investigated outcome measures. 80%, 15% and 29% isolevel curves for freedom from BF (FFBF), GI and GU toxicity, respectively, resulting from grouping the median values of all endpoints, were calculated as a function of both total dose (Dtot) and dose per fraction (d). Trials using fractionation schedules (d × n) lying above the FFBF and below toxicity isolevels are expected to produce the best therapeutic ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis indicates an optimal therapeutic window within which Dtot, d and n can be safely adjusted. Owing to both the risks of uncertainty due to inclusion of trials with d up to 3.5 Gy, and the exploitation of different cell killing mechanisms associated to larger d, the extrapolation to extremely hypo-fractionated regimens is not warranted.

Relationships between rectal wall dose-volume constraints and radiobiologic indices of toxicity for patients with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article was to investigate how exceeding specified rectal wall dose-volume constraints impacts on the risk of late rectal bleeding by using radiobiologic calculations. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Dose-volume histograms (DVH) of the rectal wall of 250 patients with prostate cancer were analyzed. All patients were treated by three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, receiving mean target doses of 80 Gy. To study the main features of the patient population, the average and the standard deviation of the distribution of DVHs were generated. The mean dose , generalized equivalent uniform dose formulation (gEUD), modified equivalent uniform dose formulation (mEUD)(0), and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) distributions were also produced. The DVHs set was then binned into eight classes on the basis of the exceeding or the fulfilling of three dose-volume constraints: V(40) = 60%, V(50) = 50%, and V(70) = 25%. Comparisons were made between them by , gEUD, mEUD(0), and NTCP. RESULTS: The radiobiologic calculations suggest that late rectal toxicity is mostly influenced by V(70). The gEUD and mEUD(0) are risk factors of toxicity always concordant with NTCP, inside each DVH class. The mean dose, although a reliable index, may be misleading in critical situations. CONCLUSIONS: Both in three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and particularly in intensity-modulated radiation therapy, it should be known what the relative importance of each specified dose-volume constraint is for each organ at risk. This requires a greater awareness of radiobiologic properties of tissues and radiobiologic indices may help to gradually become aware of this issue.

Analysis of toxicity in patients with high risk prostate cancer treated with intensity-modulated pelvic radiation therapy and simultaneous integrated dose escalation to prostate area.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To report the treatment-related morbidity in patients with prostate cancer treated with an optimized pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and simultaneous integrated dose escalation to prostate/prostate bed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 2003 and May 2006, 55 patients with localized prostate cancer and >15% risk of lymph node involvement were treated with pelvic IMRT and simultaneous dose escalation to prostate area. Twenty-four patients received a radical radiation therapy program, and the remaining thirty-one patients received a postoperative irradiation as adjuvant treatment or after biochemical or macroscopic local/regional relapse. After a customized immobilization all patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT. On the CT slices CTV1 and CTV2 were delineated. CTV(1) included the prostate and seminal vesicles or prostate bed. CTV(2) consisted of CTV(1) plus pelvic nodes. CTV(1) and CTV(2) were then expanded by 0.5 and 1cm, respectively, to generate the planning target volumes. IMRT treatment plans were generated using commercial inverse planning software. Total doses of 66-80 Gy and 50-59 Gy in 33-40 fractions were prescribed to the prostate area and pelvis, respectively. The worst acute and late rectal, intestinal and GU toxicities during and after treatment were scored according to the EORTC/RTOG scales. RESULTS: The IMRT dose distribution provided excellent PTV coverage and satisfying sparing of all the organs at risk, with no patient experiencing >grade 2 acute or late toxicities. Patients without acute grade 2 intestinal, rectal, and GU toxicity were 91%, 71%, and 63%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 19 months (interquartile range of 9 to 28 months), late grade 2 toxicity was detected only for rectum, with an actuarial 2-year rate of freedom from G2 rectal bleeding of 92%. (CI 95% 0.83-0.99.) CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic IMRT and simultaneous dose escalation to prostate area is a well-tolerated technique in patients with prostate cancer requiring treatment of pelvic lymph nodes, and seems to be associated with a lower frequency and severity of side effects when compared with conventional techniques reported in other series.

Setup verification and in vivo dosimetry during intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) for prostate cancer.

The purpose of this study was to check the setup and dose delivered to the patients during intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy (IORT) for prostate cancer. Twenty eight patients underwent IORT after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer by means of a dedicated mobile accelerator, Novac7 (by Hitesys, SpA, Italy). A 9 MeV electron beam at high dose per pulse was used. Eighteen patients received IORT at escalating doses of 16, 18, and 20 Gy at 85% isodose, six patients for each dose level. Further, ten patients received 20 Gy at 85% isodose. The electron applicator position was checked in all cases by means of two orthogonal images obtained with brilliance intensifier. Target and organ at risk doses were measured in vivo by a MOSFETs dosimetry system. MOSFETs and microMOSFET dosimeters were inserted into sterile catheters and directly positioned into the rectal lumen, for ten patients, and into the bladder to urethra anastomosis, in the last 14 cases. Verification at 0 degree led to very few adjustments of setup while verifications at 90 degrees often suggested to bring the applicator closer to the target. In vivo dosimetry showed an absorbed dose into the rectum wall < or =1% of the total dose. The average dose value inside the anastomosis, for the 12 patients analyzed, was 23.7 Gy with a standard deviation of +/-7.6%, when the prescription was 20 Gy at 85% isodose. Using a C-arm mobile image intensifier, it is possible to assess if the positioning is correct and safe. Radio-opaque clips and liquid were necessary to obtain good visible images. In vivo MOSFETs dosimetry is feasible and reliable. A satisfactory agreement between measured and expected doses was found.

Moderate Hypofractionation in High-Risk, Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer: Final Results of a Phase III Randomized Trial.

Purpose To report the final results on treatment outcomes of a randomized trial comparing conventional and hypofractionated radiotherapy in high-risk, organ-confined prostate cancer (PCa). Patients and Methods This single-institution, randomized clinical trial, conducted from January 2003 to December 2007, enrolled 168 patients with high-risk PCa who were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to conventional (80 Gy in 40 fractions in 8 weeks) or hypofractionated radiotherapy (62 Gy in 20 fractions in 5 weeks) to prostate and seminal vesicles. The primary outcome measure was late toxicity. Additional outcomes were freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCaSS), and overall survival (OS), evaluated on an intention-to-treat basis. Results A total of 85 patients were assigned to conventional and 83 to hypofractionated radiotherapy. At a median follow-up of 9 years (interquartile range, 7.5 to 10.1 years), no differences was observed in physician-assessed late gastro intestinal and genitourinary toxicity greater than or equal to grade 2 ( P = .68 and .57, respectively) were found between the two arms. The 10-year FFBF rate was 72% in the hypofractionation group and 65% in the conventional fractionation group ( P = .148). Ten-year OS rates were 75% in the hypofractionation group and 64% in the conventional group, respectively ( P = .22). The same features for 10-year PCaSS were 95% and 88%, respectively ( P = .066). Hypofractionation, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level, Gleason score, and clinical tumor stage for FFBF, and hypofractionation and Gleason score for PCaSS were significant prognostic variables on the multivariate analysis. Conclusion Long-term findings showed that hypofractionated radiotherapy failed the intent of either reducing physician-assessed late toxicity or maintaining the same efficacy. A postrandomization analysis, however, revealed that hypofractionation was a significant prognostic factor for FFBF and PCaSS, when adjusted for clinical prognostic variables.

A phase III randomized study on the sequencing of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in the conservative management of early-stage breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare two different timings of radiation treatment in patients with breast cancer who underwent conservative surgery and were candidates to receive adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 206 patients who had quadrantectomy and axillary dissection for breast cancer and were planned to receive adjuvant CMF chemotherapy were randomized to concurrent or sequential radiotherapy. Radiotherapy was delivered only to the whole breast through tangential fields to a dose of 50 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks, followed by an electron boost of 10-15 Gy in 4-6 fractions to the tumor bed. RESULTS: No differences in 5-year breast recurrence-free, metastasis-free, disease-free, and overall survival were observed in the two treatment groups. All patients completed the planned radiotherapy. No evidence of an increased risk of toxicity was observed between the two arms. No difference in radiotherapy and in the chemotherapy dose intensity was observed in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with negative surgical margins receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy can be delayed to up to 7 months. Concurrent administration of CMF chemotherapy and radiotherapy is safe and might be reserved for patients at high risk of local recurrence, such as those with positive surgical margins or larger tumor diameters.

A study of the effect of setup errors and organ motion on prostate cancer treatment with IMRT.

PURPOSE: To assess the influence of setup errors and organ motion in terms of the probability of tumor control and normal-tissue complications by tumor control probability and normal-tissue complication probability. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twelve patients were treated for prostate cancer with intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Two orthogonal portal images were taken daily. All patients underwent three computed tomography scans during the 8-week treatment time (i.e., baseline, intermediate, and final). The original treatment plans were re-evaluated, taking into account setup errors and organ motion. RESULTS: The mean shifts +/- standard deviation of the whole patient population in the lateral, anterior-posterior, and craniocaudal direction were 1.0 +/- 1.5 mm, 0.9 +/- 2.1 mm, and 1.9 +/- 2.1 mm, respectively. In most of the recalculated dose-volume histograms, the coverage of clinical target volume was granted despite organ motion, whereas the rectal wall histograms were often very different from the planned ones. CONCLUSION: We have studied the impact of prostate and rectum motion, as well as setup errors, on dose-volume histograms. The estimate of these effects may have implications for predictive indications when planning intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments on prostate.

Tp53-gene transfer induces hypersensitivity to low doses of X-rays in glioblastoma cells: a strategy to convert a radio-resistant phenotype into a radiosensitive one.

Tp53 is frequently mutated or inactivated in glioblastomas. Due to the impairment of p53 activity, glioblastomas show a high degree of radioresistance. In an attempt to convert the radioresistant phenotype to a more radiosensitive one, we evaluated the efficacy of the combination of Adp53 gene transfer and X-ray irradiation. The combination of Adp53, at low multiplicity in order to mimic the low in vivo efficiency of virus-mediated gene delivery, with X-ray irradiation resulted in a marked decrease of glioblastoms cell survival. Interestingly, Adp53 was able to induce low dose (<2Gy) hypersensitivity. The data suggest the possibility for the development of new therapeutic strategies.

Phase II study of a four-week hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy regimen for prostate cancer: report on acute toxicity.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the early side effects of a short course hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen in prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three institutions (IRE, AZ VUB, GUH) included 36 patients with T1-T3N0M0 prostate cancer in a phase II study. Patients were treated with 56 Gy in 16 fractions over 4 weeks. Early side effects were scored using the RTOG/EORTC criteria and the international prostate symptom index (IPSI) weekly during treatment and 1 and 2 months afterwards. The results were compared with two control groups of patients previously treated with conventional fractionation at AZ VUB (238 patients) and GUH (114 patients). RESULTS: None of the patients experienced grade 3-4 toxicity. Grade 1-2 Gastro-intestinal (GI), grade 2 GI, grade 1-2 Genito-urinary (GU) and grade 2 GU toxicity occurred in 75%, 36%, 75% and 44% for the hypofractionation schedule. The corresponding figures were 25-44%, 6-29%, 47-53% and 16-44% for the control groups (p<0.01 for grade 1-2 GI and GU toxicity). Two months after treatment all GU and the majority of GI symptoms had resolved. The IPSI increased from (average +/-1 SD) 5.6+/-4 pre-treatment to 10.0+/-6 during week 2-4 and had normalized (5.2+/-4) two months after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Though no grade 3-4 side effects were observed, the investigated schedule results in a marked increase of grade 1-2 early side effects as compared to a conventional regimen. Side effects resolved within two months post-treatment.

Macroscopic Hematuria After Conventional or Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy: Results From a Prospective Phase 3 Study.

PURPOSE: To assess the macroscopic hematuria rates within a single-institution randomized phase 3 trial comparing dose-escalated, conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (CFRT) and moderately hypofractionated radiation therapy (MHRT) for localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with intermediate- to high-risk localized prostate cancer were treated with conformal RT and short-course androgen deprivation. Both the prostate and the entire seminal vesicles were treated to 80 Gy in 40 fractions over 8 weeks (CFRT) or 62 Gy in 20 fractions over 5 weeks (MHRT). The endpoint of the present study was the development of any episode or grade of macroscopic hematuria. The median follow-up period was 93 months (range 6-143). RESULTS: Macroscopic hematuria was reported by 25 of 168 patients (14.9%). The actuarial estimate of hematuria at 8 years was 17.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.7%-23.3%). The number of patients with hematuria was 6 and 19 in the CFRT and MHRT arms, respectively, for an actuarial 8-year estimate of 9.7% and 24.3%, respectively (hazard ratio 3.468, 95% CI 1.385-8.684; P=.008). Overall, 8 of 25 patients were found to have biopsy-proven urothelial carcinoma (3 in the CFRT arm and 5 in the MHRT arm; P=.27). Thus, the 8-year actuarial incidence of macroscopic hematuria (after censoring urothelial cancer-related episodes) was 4.1% and 18.2% after CFRT and MHRT, respectively (hazard ratio 4.961, 95% CI 1.426-17.263; P=.012). The results were confirmed by multivariate analysis after accounting for several patient-, treatment-, and tumor-related covariates. CONCLUSIONS: MHRT was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of macroscopic hematuria compared with CFRT.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials of bladder-sparing trimodality treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

PURPOSE: Despite the numerous prospective and retrospective studies published during the last 2 decades aiming at testing the safety and the efficacy of trimodality therapy (TMT) as a conservative treatment, an optimal therapeutic strategy has not yet been identified. We made a systematic overview of the 5-year outcomes from 31 trials of combined chemotherapy and radiation (CRT) after transurethral resection of muscle-infiltrating bladder tumours (TURBT), the so-called trimodality therapy. We took into consideration the results of each trial i.e. the rate of complete response (CR), local muscle-invasive local failure (LF), salvage cystectomy (SC), 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year bladder intact survival (BIS) from 3315 patients. RESULTS: About half of the patients were treated with a preliminary induction followed by a consolidation CRT course in CR, or SC in non-CR patients (split treatment). The remaining half of the patients underwent an upfront full-dose CRT course (continuous treatment) with SC reserved to non-CR patients. Excellent results were obtained by trimodality therapy (TMT), with 78% CR, 28% muscle infiltrating LF and 21% SC in patients with MIBC. The 5-year OS and BIS rates were 56% and 42%, respectively. At univariate analysis, CR, and SC rates appeared to be significantly better in the continuous than in the split treatment group. Multivariate analysis confirmed the former regimen as a significant prognostic variables only for CR, while CP-based regimen was a significant prognostic factor for SC. The subgroup analysis revealed a significant improvement in 5-year OS rate of continuous over split treatment in later stage tumours. No relevant benefit was observed with the addition of other drugs to cisplatin (CP) or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NATC) to CRT, although, in patients receiving NACT, significantly better CR and OS rates were seen in the continuous than split treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this overview seem to indicate that TMT is able to produce excellent 5-year OS rates, no matter how it is done (continuous or split). No significant difference in 5-year OS rates could be observed between the two treatment regimens, although the continuous may offer some advantage compared to split treatment in terms of higher CR and, likely lower SC rates. The highest benefit might be achieved in later stage tumours, using a total radiation equivalent dose when delivered in 2Gy/fraction (EQD2) of more than 60Gy in combination with CP based regimes and preceded by 2-3 NACT cycles. Appropriate randomized trials should be addressed to confirm the results of the present review.

Postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation in completely resected locally advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: The 5-year survival of patients with completely resected node-positive gastric cancer ranges from 15% to 25%. We explored the feasibility of a chemoradiation regime consisting of concomitant hyperfractionated radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil protracted venous infusion (5-FU PVI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients received a total or partial gastrectomy operation and D2 nodal resection for Stage III gastric cancer; they were then irradiated by linac with 6-15-MV photons. The target included the gastric bed, the anastomosis, stumps, and regional nodes. A total dose of 55 Gy was given in 50 fractions using 1.1 Gy b.i.d. All patients received a concomitant 200 mg/m2/day 5-FU PVI. Patients were examined during the follow-up period as programmed. Toxicity was recorded according to RTOG criteria. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 75.6 months (range: 22-136 months), 24 (60%) patients had died, and 16 (40%) were alive and free of disease. The 5-year actuarial incidence of relapse was 39%, 22%, and 2% for distant metastases, out-field peritoneal seeding, and in-field local regional recurrences, respectively. The 5-year actuarial cause-specific survival was 43%. Three patients survived more than 11 years. Acute > or = Grade 3 toxicity consisted of hematologic (22.5%) and gastrointestinal toxicity (nausea and vomiting 22.5%, diarrhea 2.8%, and abdominal pain 2.6%). No late toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION: This regime of concomitant 5-FU PVI and hyperfractionated radiotherapy was well tolerated and resulted in successful locoregional control and satisfactory survival.

Accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy and concurrent protracted venous infusion chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy result in a significant benefit with respect to induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy or radiotherapy alone, although with a significant increase of toxicity. To discover a more tolerated and effective chemoradiation regimen, the feasibility and efficacy of a hyperfractionated accelerated irradiation with concurrent protracted venous infusion chemotherapy was investigated. Sixty-five patients with advanced head and neck cancer underwent a definitive (53 patients) or a postoperative adjuvant (12 patients) chemoradiation treatment. Chemotherapy consisted of an intravenous protracted infusion of 5 and 200 mg/m /d cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil, respectively. Radiotherapy consisted of a split-course accelerated hyperfractionation of two 150-cGy (split twice a day) or three 100-cGy fractions per day (split three times a day) at more than 6-hour intervals, for 2 weeks followed, after a 1-week interruption, by 2-to-3-week treatment, with the same fractionation schedule, to a total dose of 60 Gy to 69 Gy. Confluent mucositis was tolerable and was the cause of treatment delay of more than 10 days in only 20% of patients. Grade 3 or greater systemic toxicity occurred only in 9 of 65 (14%) patients and was never the cause of drug dose reduction. Complete responses were observed in 69% of patients with gross diseases. At a median follow-up of 43.5 months, 45% of patients were alive and free of disease and 38% died of cancer. The 5-year actuarial local regional failure was 35%. The 5-year actuarial disease-specific survival was 50%. Preservation of larynx function was achieved in 47% of living patients and in 74% of all patients, with advanced tumors of the laryngopharynx. The long-term results of this study suggest that this chemoradiation regimen has the potential of achieving a significant improvement over standard therapy while avoiding significant toxicity.