Outcomes of early hospital readmission after kidney transplantation: Perspectives from a Canadian transplant centre.

BACKGROUND: Early hospital readmissions (EHRs) after kidney transplantation range in incidence from 18%-47% and are important and substantial healthcare quality indicators. EHR can adversely impact clinical outcomes such as graft function and patient mortality as well as healthcare costs. EHRs have been extensively studied in American healthcare systems, but these associations have not been explored within a Canadian setting. Due to significant differences in the delivery of healthcare and patient outcomes, results from American studies cannot be readily applicable to Canadian populations. A better understanding of EHR can facilitate improved discharge planning and long-term outpatient management post kidney transplant. AIM: To explore the burden of EHR on kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and the Canadian healthcare system in a large transplant centre. METHODS: This single centre cohort study included 1564 KTRs recruited from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2017, with a 1-year follow-up. We defined EHR as hospitalizations within 30 d or 90 d of transplant discharge, excluding elective procedures. Multivariable Cox and linear regression models were used to examine EHR, late hospital readmissions (defined as hospitalizations within 31-365 d for 30-d EHR and within 91-365 d for 90-d EHR), and outcomes including graft function and patient mortality. RESULTS: In this study, 307 (22.4%) and 394 (29.6%) KTRs had 30-d and 90-d EHRs, respectively. Factors such as having previous cases of rejection, being transplanted in more recent years, having a longer duration of dialysis pretransplant, and having an expanded criteria donor were associated with EHR post-transplant. The cumulative probability of death censored graft failure, as well as total graft failure, was higher among the 90-d EHR group as compared to patients with no EHR. While multivariable models found no significant association between EHR and patient mortality, patients with EHR were at an increased risk of late hospital readmissions, poorer kidney function throughout the 1st year post-transplant, and higher hospital-based care costs within the 1st year of follow-up. CONCLUSION: EHRs are associated with suboptimal outcomes after kidney transplant and increased financial burden on the healthcare system. The results warrant the need for effective strategies to reduce post-transplant EHR.

A Systematic Review of Sex-Specific Reporting in Heart Failure Clinical Trials: Trial Flow and Results.

Background: Females are historically underenrolled in heart failure (HF) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) relative to disease prevalence. Sex differences in trial flow, including withdrawals and losses to follow up, may further limit the generalizability of results. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the frequency of sex-specific reporting of trial flow, treatment efficacy, and adverse events in HF RCTs. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL for HF RCTs published between 2000 and 2020 in journals with an impact factor ≥10. We assessed whether trial flow, treatment effect, and adverse events were disaggregated by sex. We used multivariable regression to assess associations between trial characteristics and sex subgroup analysis. We analyzed temporal trends in sex-specific reporting. Results: We included 224 RCTs with 228,801 total participants (28.2% female). No RCT reported sex-disaggregated screening, consent, or withdrawal rates; and 2 (0.9%) reported sex-disaggregated losses to follow-up. Seventy-five RCTs (33.4%) presented sex subgroup analysis, and 63 (28.3%) reported sex-treatment interaction. No RCT reported sex-specific adverse events. Large trial size (odds ratio: 13.16, 95% CI: 5.67-30.52; P < 0.001) and device/procedure interventions (odds ratio: 5.13, 95% CI: 1.55-16.95; P < 0.007) were independently associated with sex subgroup analysis. Over the study period, there was an increase in sex subgroup analysis (P < 0.001) and testing for sex-treatment interaction (P < 0.001). Conclusions: HF RCTs rarely reported sex differences in trial flow or adverse events and uncommonly performed sex subgroup analysis. Improved sex-disaggregated reporting could highlight the causes and extent of sex differences in trial participation and facilitate appropriate inferences about treatment effect.

What Are the Burden, Causes, and Costs of Early Hospital Readmissions After Kidney Transplantation?

INTRODUCTION: Kidney transplant recipients are at risk for complications resulting in early hospital readmission. This study sought to determine the incidences, risk factors, causes, and financial costs of early readmissions. DESIGN: This single-centre cohort study included 1461 kidney recipients from 1 Jul 2004 to 31 Dec 2012, with at least 1-year follow-up. Early readmission was defined as hospitalization within 30 or 90-days postdischarge from transplant admission. Associations between various parameters and 30 and 90-days posttransplant were determined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. The hospital-associated costs of were assessed. RESULTS: The rates of early readmission were 19.4% at 30 days and 26.8% at 90 days posttransplant. Mean cost per 30-day readmission was 11 606 CAD. Infectious complications were the most common reasons and resulted in the greatest cost burden. Factors associated with 30 and 90-days in multivariable models were recipient history of chronic lung disease (hazard ratio or HR 1.78 [95%CI: 1.14, 2.76] and HR 1.68 [1.14, 2.48], respectively), median time on dialysis (HR 1.07 [95% CI: 1.01, 1.13]and HR 1.06 [95% CI: 1.01, 1.11], respectively), being transplanted preemptively (HR 1.75 [95% CI: 1.07, 2.88] and HR 1.66 [95% CI: 1.07, 2.57], respectively), and having a transplant hospitalization lasting of and more than 11 days (HR 1.52 [95% CI: 1.01, 2.27] and HR 1.65 [95% CI: 1.16, 2.34], respectively). DISCUSSION: Early hospital readmission after transplantation was common and costly. Strategies to reduce the burden of early hospital readmissions are needed for all patients.

Optimal therapy for desmoid tumors: current options and challenges for the future.

Desmoid tumors, or aggressive fibromatosis, are rare, locally infiltrative neoplasms caused by mutations that activate ß-catenin. Although these tumors do not metastasize, they are difficult to manage due to variability in tumor presentation and behavior. A variety of treatment options exist, including surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hormone therapy, isolated limb perfusion, cryoablation and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Treatment-induced morbidity and poor local control rates, combined with spontaneous stabilization of some desmoid tumors, have allowed watchful waiting to recently emerge as a front-line management option. This has emphasized the need to better understand tumor behavior in order to differentiate between tumors that may stabilize and those that may progress. Here, we review the most recent findings in desmoid tumor biology and treatment options for this enigmatic disease.