Canadian Headache Society systematic review and recommendations on the treatment of migraine pain in emergency settings.

BACKGROUND: There is a considerable amount of practice variation in managing migraines in emergency settings, and evidence-based therapies are often not used first line. METHODS: A peer-reviewed search of databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL) was carried out to identify randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials of interventions for acute pain relief in adults presenting with migraine to emergency settings. Where possible, data were pooled into meta-analyses. RESULTS: Two independent reviewers screened 831 titles and abstracts for eligibility. Three independent reviewers subsequently evaluated 120 full text articles for inclusion, of which 44 were included. Individual studies were then assigned a US Preventive Services Task Force quality rating. The GRADE scheme was used to assign a level of evidence and recommendation strength for each intervention. INTERPRETATION: We strongly recommend the use of prochlorperazine based on a high level of evidence, lysine acetylsalicylic acid, metoclopramide and sumatriptan, based on a moderate level of evidence, and ketorolac, based on a low level of evidence. We weakly recommend the use of chlorpromazine based on a moderate level of evidence, and ergotamine, dihydroergotamine, lidocaine intranasal and meperidine, based on a low level of evidence. We found evidence to recommend strongly against the use of dexamethasone, based on a moderate level of evidence, and granisetron, haloperidol and trimethobenzamide based on a low level of evidence. Based on moderate-quality evidence, we recommend weakly against the use of acetaminophen and magnesium sulfate. Based on low-quality evidence, we recommend weakly against the use of diclofenac, droperidol, lidocaine intravenous, lysine clonixinate, morphine, propofol, sodium valproate and tramadol.

Canadian Headache Society Guideline: acute drug therapy for migraine headache.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this guideline is to assist the practitioner in choosing an appropriate acute medication for an individual with migraine, based on current evidence in the medical literature and expert consensus. It is focused on patients with episodic migraine ( headache on ≤ 14 days a month). METHODS: A detailed search strategy was used to find a relevant meta-analyses, systematic reviews and randomized double-blind controlled trials. Recommendations were graded with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group, using a consensus group. In addition, a general literature review and expert consensus were used for aspects of acute therapy for which randomized controlled trials were not available. RESULTS: Twelve acute medications received a strong recommendation for use in acute migraine therapy (almotriptan, eletriptan, frovatriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan, zomitriptan, ASA, ibuprofen, naproxen sodium, diclofenac potassium, and acetaminophen). Four received a weak recommendation for use (dihydroergotamine, ergotamine, codeine-containing combination analgesics, and tramadol- containing medications). Three of these were NOT recommended for routine use (ergotamine and codeine- and tramadol- containing medications). Strong recommendations were made to avoid use of butorphanol and butalbital- containing medications. Metoclopramide and domperidone were strongly recommended for use when necessary. Our analysis also resulted in the formulation of eight general acute migraine management strategies. These were grouped into: 1) two mild-moderate attack strategies, 2) two moderate-severe attack or NSAID failure strategies, 3) three refractory migraine strategies, and 4) a vasoconstrictor unresponsive-contraindicated strategy. Additional were developed for menstrual migraine during pregnancy, and migraine during lactation. CONCLUSION: This guideline provides evidence-based advice on acute pharmacological migraine therapy, and should be helpful to both health professionals and patients, The available medications have been organized into a series of strategies based on patient clinical features. These strategies may help practitioners make appropriate acute medication choices for patients with migraine.

Canadian Headache Society guideline for migraine prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this guideline is to assist the practitioner in choosing an appropriate prophylactic medication for an individual with migraine, based on current evidence in the medical literature and expert consensus. This guideline is focused on patients with episodic migraine (headache on ≤ 14 days a month). METHODS: Through a comprehensive search strategy, randomized, double blind, controlled trials of drug treatments for migraine prophylaxis and relevant Cochrane reviews were identified. Studies were graded according to criteria developed by the US Preventive Services Task Force. Recommendations were graded according to the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group. In addition, a general literature review and expert consensus were used for aspects of prophylactic therapy for which randomized controlled trials are not available. RESULTS: Prophylactic drug choice should be based on evidence for efficacy, side-effect profile, migraine clinical features, and co-existing disorders. Based on our review, 11 prophylactic drugs received a strong recommendation for use (topiramate, propranolol, nadolol, metoprolol, amitriptyline, gabapentin, candesartan, butterbur, riboflavin, coenzyme Q10, and magnesium citrate) and 6 received a weak recommendation (divalproex sodium, flunarizine, pizotifen, venlafaxine, verapamil, and lisinopril). Quality of evidence for different medications varied from high to low. Prophylactic treatment strategies were developed to assist the practitioner in selecting a prophylactic drug for specific clinical situations. These strategies included: first time strategies for patients who have not had prophylaxis before (a beta-blocker and a tricyclic strategy), low side effect strategies (including both drug and herbal/vitamin/mineral strategies), a strategy for patients with high body mass index, strategies for patients with co-existent hypertension or with co-existent depression and /or anxiety, and additional monotherapy drug strategies for patients who have failed previous prophylactic trials. Further strategies included a refractory migraine strategy and strategies for prophylaxis during pregnancy and lactation. CONCLUSIONS: There is good evidence from randomized controlled trials for use of a number of different prophylactic medications in patients with migraine. Medication choice for an individual patient requires careful consideration of patient clinical features.

Differential effects of a complex organochlorine mixture on the proliferation of breast cancer cell lines.

Organochlorine compounds (OCs) are a group of persistent chemicals that accumulate in fatty tissues with age. Although OCs has been tested individually for their capacity to induce breast cancer cell proliferation, few studies examined the effect of complex mixtures that comprise compounds frequently detected in the serum of women. We constituted such an OC mixture containing 15 different components in environmentally relevant proportions and assessed its proliferative effects in four breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7, T47D, CAMA-1, MDAMB231) and in non-cancerous CV-1 cells. We also determined the capacity of the mixture to modulate cell cycle stage of breast cancer cells and to induce estrogenic and antiandrogenic effects using gene reporter assays. We observed that low concentrations of the mixture (100 × 10(3) and 50 × 10(3) dilutions) stimulated the proliferation of MCF-7 cells while higher concentrations (10 × 10(3) and 5 × 10(3) dilutions) had the opposite effect. In contrast, the mixture inhibited the proliferation of non-hormone-dependent cell lines. The mixture significantly increased the number of MCF-7 cells entering the S phase, an effect that was blocked by the antiestrogen ICI 182,780. Low concentrations of the mixture also caused an increase in CAMA-1 cell proliferation but only in the presence estradiol and dihydrotestosterone (p<0.05 at the 50 × 10(3) dilution). DDT analogs and polychlorinated biphenyls all had the capacity to stimulate the proliferation of CAMA-1 cells in the presence of sex steroids. Reporter gene assays further revealed that the mixture and several of its constituents (DDT analogs, aldrin, dieldrin, ß-hexachlorocyclohexane, toxaphene) induced estrogenic effects, whereas the mixture and several components (DDT analogs, aldrin, dieldrin and PCBs) inhibited the androgen signaling pathway. Our results indicate that the complex OC mixture increases the proliferation of MCF-7 cells due to its estrogenic potential. The proliferative effect of the mixture on CAMA-1 cells in the presence of sex steroids appears mostly due to the antiandrogenic properties of p,p'-DDE, a major constituent of the mixture. Other mixtures of contaminants that include emerging compounds of interest such as brominated flame retardants and perfluoroalkyl compounds should be tested for their capacity to induce breast cancer cell proliferation.

1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethylene (p,p'-DDE) disrupts the estrogen-androgen balance regulating the growth of hormone-dependent breast cancer cells.

INTRODUCTION: Estrogen and androgen signalling pathways exert opposing influences on the proliferation of mammary epithelial and hormone-dependent breast cancer cells. We previously reported that plasma concentrations of 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethylene (p,p'-DDE), the main metabolite of the insecticide DDT (1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis [p-chlorophenyl]ethane) and a potent androgen antagonist, were associated with tumor aggressiveness in women diagnosed with breast cancer. We sought to examine the biological plausibility of this association by testing the effect of p,p'-DDE on the proliferation of CAMA-1 cells, a human breast cancer cell line that expresses the estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) and the androgen receptor (AR), in the presence of physiological concentrations of estrogens and androgens in the cell culture medium. METHODS: The proliferation of CAMA-1 cells was determined in 96-well plates following a 9-day treatment with p,p'-DDE alone (0.1 to 10 muM) or in combination with 17beta-estradiol (E2) (100 pM) and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) (100, 500, or 1,000 pM). We also assessed p,p'-DDE-induced modifications in cell cycle entry and the expression of the sex-steroid-dependent genes ESR1, AR, CCND1, and TFF1 (pS2) (mRNA and/or protein). RESULTS: We found that treatment with p,p'-DDE induced a dose-response increase in the proliferation of CAMA-1 cells when cultivated in the presence of physiological concentrations of estrogens and androgens, but not in the absence of sex steroids in the cell culture medium. A similar effect of p,p'-DDE was noted on the proliferation of MCF7-AR1 cells, an estrogen-responsive cell line that was genetically engineered to overexpress the AR. DHT added together with E2 to the cell culture medium decreased the recruitment of CAMA-1 cells in the S phase and the expression of ESR1 and CCND1 by comparison with cells treated with E2 alone. These androgen-mediated effects were blocked with similar efficacy by p,p'-DDE and the potent antiandrogen hydroxyflutamide. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that p,p'-DDE could increase breast cancer progression by opposing the androgen signalling pathway that inhibits growth in hormone-responsive breast cancer cells. The potential role of environmental antiandrogens in breast carcinogenesis deserves further investigation.

Migraine prevalence, diagnosis, and disability.

The goal of the Canadian Migraine Forum was to work towards improving the lives of Canadians with migraine by reducing their migraine-related disability. This paper reviews the epidemiology and diagnosis of migraine, and the effects of migraine on health related quality of life. Many patients with migraine do not consult a physician for their headaches, and when they do they often do not receive a correct diagnosis. The discussion at the Forum concluded that better education, both for physicians and the public, on issues relating to migraine was a necessary step in improving migraine diagnosis. The degree of disability caused by migraine is often not recognized by society, and can be substantial for individuals with migraine. Once again, education of the public and of the health professionals who see these patients is key, so that the best migraine management can be instituted to minimize the impact of migraine on the individual, the family, and society at large.

Fanconi anemia genes are highly expressed in primitive CD34+ hematopoietic cells.

BACKGROUND: Fanconi anemia (FA) is a complex recessive genetic disease characterized by progressive bone marrow failure (BM) and a predisposition to cancer. We have previously shown using the Fancc mouse model that the progressive BM failure results from a hematopoietic stem cell defect suggesting that function of the FA genes may reside in primitive hematopoietic stem cells. METHODS: Since genes involved in stem cell differentiation and/or maintenance are usually regulated at the transcription level, we used a semiquantitative RT-PCR method to evaluate FA gene transcript levels in purified hematopoietic stem cells. RESULTS: We show that most FA genes are highly expressed in primitive CD34-positive and negative cells compared to lower levels in more differentiated cells. However, in CD34- stem cells the Fancc gene was found to be expressed at low levels while Fancg was undetectable in this population. Furthermore, Fancg expression is significantly decreased in Fancc -/- stem cells as compared to wild-type cells while the cancer susceptibility genes Brca1 and Fancd1/Brac2 are upregulated in Fancc-/- hematopoietic cells. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that FA genes are regulated at the mRNA level, that increased Fancc expression in LTS-CD34+ cells correlates with a role at the CD34+ differentiation stage and that lack of Fancc affects the expression of other FA gene, more specifically Fancg and Fancd1/Brca2, through an unknown mechanism.

Improving patient compliance to prophylactic migraine therapy.

As in many other chronic conditions, adherence to prophylactic treatment in migraine is probably poor. In chronic diseases, compliance at one year does not exceed 50%. That could explain the low therapeutic gain seen with migraine preventive medications. It also renders difficult the evaluation of clinical trials on migraine prophylaxis since in most of these trials compliance is not properly assessed. From the patients' perspective, there are several factors that could explain poor adherence to recommended treatments. Essentially, these factors are the expression of the patients' subjective perception of their disease and potential remedies in a context of a positive patient-physician relationship. When migraine prophylactic treatment is considered, patients should be informed of the natural history of their disease and a diagnosis of an accelerated form of migraine should be confirmed. Prophylactic treatment at best would reduce by 50% the frequency of migraine attacks. In most studies, however, the therapeutic gain is in the order of 30-40%. Treatment should be instituted for a minimum time of two to three months and if effective maintained for 6-12 months. The outcome of prophylaxis can rarely be determined in a prospective way. The choice of prophylactic regimens remains empirical, often based on the physician's experience and perception of the mechanism of migraine. A better adherence to prophylactic treatment of migraine could possibly improve outcomes but current methods of improving adherence for chronic health problems are mostly complex and not very effective.

A clinical study of migraine evolution.

BACKGROUND: The buildup time of migraine headaches has not been well delineated in publications to date and we are aware of patients whose migraines last well over 72 hours. More concentration on these factors in the assessment of patients might lead to more appropriate therapeutic choices. METHOD: Prospective ascertainment of such data through a questionnaire completed by 253 informed and willing patients with IHS migraine with or without aura consulting Canadian headache specialists. Data were electronically sent to a central computer from each center, tabulated and analyzed using standard statistical parameters. RESULTS: In 253 patients with migraine ascertained using applied IHS criteria, nausea was a feature in over 90% of cases, especially in those with aura. This inhibited the ingestion of oral medications in about a quarter of all subjects. The time to build from no pain to moderate/severe pain was shorter in subjects with auras and was less than 2 hours in 97% of those with and 86% of those without auras. However, we also identified a group of subjects with migraine (over 10% of all) in whom the build time to maximum pain is delayed for over 2 hours. Nausea was experienced by 91.7% of subjects, slightly but significantly later in those without auras. While most headaches in each group lasted from 4 to 72 hours, 24.3% of those with and 20.6% of those without aura expected to experience pain for more than 72 hours, while in untreated cases disability due to pain, nausea, or malaise usually persisted for over 3 days in 24.3% and 16.7% of those with and without aura, respectively. One-fifth of migraineurs may be in pain and/or disabled by accompanying symptoms for over 3 days in a typical migraine attack. Over half of our subjects reported that their medications worked well or excellently. CONCLUSIONS: Attacks of migraine in real-life clinical situations vary somewhat from the IHS criteria in that they are more often associated with nausea that interferes with oral therapy; can persist for over 72 hours; may have slow (>2 hours) buildup to maximum pain in 10% of cases; and may cause disability for over 3 days. Nevertheless, current therapeutic regimens (including prescribed medications) work well for a substantial majority.

A headache diagnosis project.

BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of objective criteria, the diagnosis of migraine is thought to be missed frequently in primary practice. OBJECTIVE: To determine the most important questions assisting in the clinical diagnosis of migraine headache. METHODS: A cohort of 461 patients referred to headache specialists in Canada was assessed using a pro-forma questionnaire that was completed by the patients alone or administered by the physicians themselves. A final clinical diagnosis was recorded after a complete clinical evaluation. In a subsequent validation study, three questions derived from the results of the first phase of the study were administered to a new cohort of 128 patients, and diagnoses of "migraine" or "not migraine" were recorded according to the decision generated in the first part of the study. The final clinical diagnosis was taken as the "gold standard" for diagnosis, and the results from the two independently derived diagnostic methods were compared. RESULTS: Statistical analysis of the responses from part 1 of the study yielded three questions (related to daily occurrence, unilaterally, and functional impairment) that distinguished between pure migraine and other headache diagnoses with high reliability and validity. The sensitivity and selectivity of the three-question protocol exceeded 91%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of three questions related to headache frequency, laterality, and impact on functioning may represent an attractive screening instrument in primary care practice, alerting physicians to the diagnosis of migraine in patients or to the possibility of a second or alternative headache diagnosis in patients in whom their diagnosis of migraine previously has been made. The presence of multiple headache syndromes in individual patients, as is common in tertiary referral practice, may reduce the discriminating power of the three-question protocol.

Melatonin as adjunctive therapy in the prophylaxis of cluster headache: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The periodicity of cluster headache suggests involvement of the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus, the biological clock. The secretion of melatonin, a hormone produced by the pineal gland and regulated by the suprachiasmatic nucleus, is altered in patients with cluster headache. Melatonin shifts circadian rhythms. A previous study of melatonin for primary prophylaxis of cluster headache demonstrated a 50% response rate. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of melatonin as adjunctive therapy in patients with cluster headache who have incomplete relief of their headaches on conventional therapy. METHODS: Nine patients participated in the study, six with chronic cluster headache and three with episodic cluster headache. Patients with chronic cluster headache completed a baseline diary for 1 month, followed by 1 month of melatonin treatment, then 1 month of placebo. Patients with episodic cluster headache received placebo for 1 month, then melatonin for 1 month. Patients continued their usual prophylactic and abortive treatments during the study. Headache frequency, intensity, and use of analgesics were recorded. The primary endpoint of the study was the mean number of headaches per day, with mean daily analgesic consumption and percentage of mild, moderate, and severe headaches as secondary endpoints. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between means on analysis of variance and t testing for the melatonin, placebo, and baseline months for all primary and secondary endpoints. There were no side effects reported. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with chronic cluster headache or patients with episodic cluster headache whose headaches are uncontrolled on conventional therapy do not appear to gain therapeutically from the addition of melatonin to their usual treatment regimens. It is perhaps the phase-shifting properties of melatonin that mediate its effect in patients with episodic cluster headache, and it may be necessary to treat from the beginning of the cluster bout to reset the circadian pacemaker, thus producing a more positive outcome.

Hematopoietic stem cells from fancc(-/-) mice have lower growth and differentiation potential in response to growth factors.

Fanconi anemia (FA) is a complex recessive genetic disease characterized by progressive bone marrow (BM) failure. We have previously shown that stem cells from the FA group C mouse model have lower long-term primary and secondary reconstitution ability, and that bone marrow of Fancc(-/-) mice contained fewer lineage-negative (Lin(-))Thy1.2(low)Sca-1(+)c-kit(+) CD34(+) cells but normal levels of Lin(-)Thy1.2(low)Sca-1(+)c-kit(+)CD34(-) primitive cells. These data suggest that CD34(+) primitive cells have either a lower growth or differentiation potential, or that these cells have greater apoptosis levels. To investigate the role Fancc might have on the growth and differentiation potentials of primitive hematopoietic stem cells, we used a single-cell culture system and monitored cell viability, doubling potential, and apoptosis levels of Fancc(-/-) primitive Lin(-)Thy1.2(-)Sca-1(+) (LTS)-CD34(+) and LTS-CD34(-) stem cells. Results showed that Fancc(-/-) LTS-CD34(-) and LTS-CD34(+) cells had altered growth and apoptosis responses to combinations of stimulatory cytokines, most dramatically in response to a combination of factors that included interleukin-3 (IL-3) and IL-6. In addition, Fancc(-/-) LTS-CD34(-) and LTS-CD34(+) cells showed a lower differentiation potential than Fancc(+/+) cells. These results support a role for Fancc in the growth and differentiation of primitive hematopoietic cells and suggest that an altered response to stimulatory cytokines may contribute to BM aplasia in FA patients.