Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País como asunto
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
J Small Anim Pract ; 49(5): 233-9, 2008 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18373540

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Low-field magnetic resonance imaging machines are being used more often in veterinary practice for the investigation of sinonasal disease. The aim of this retrospective study was to describe and characterise the low-field magnetic resonance imaging features of nasal tumours in dogs. METHODS: The Queen's Veterinary School Hospital magnetic resonance imaging database (2001-2005) was searched for dogs with a magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of a nasal tumour. Fifty cases with histological diagnosis of nasal tumour were found. The appearance and extent of the nasal tumour as well as the involvement of adjacent anatomic structures were examined against a checklist. RESULTS: The most common magnetic resonance imaging findings were as follows. (1) Soft tissue mass replacing the destroyed nasal conchae and/or ethmoturbinates (98 per cent of cases). (2) Nasal septum destruction (68 per cent of cases). (3) Retained secretions with or without mass caudally in frontal sinuses (62 per cent of cases). (4) Nasal/frontal bone destruction (52 per cent of cases). Low-field magnetic resonance imaging allowed differentiation of tumour tissue from retained secretions or necrotic tissue. Magnetic resonance imaging was invaluable in assessing the extension of the tumour into the maxillary recesses, caudal recesses, nasopharynx, adjacent bones and cranial cavity. The tumour often extended caudally into the frontal sinuses, nasopharynx and perhaps most importantly into the caudal recesses. Tumour extension into the cranial cavity was not common (16 per cent), and only three of these cases showed neurological signs. However, 54 per cent of cases showed focal meningeal (dural) hyperintensity, although the significance of this is unclear. A significant difference (P<0.05) in tumour signal intensity between the sarcomas and carcinomas was found. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The use of a low-field magnetic resonance imaging technique is excellent for the diagnosis and determination of extent of sinonasal tumours.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Perros/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/veterinaria , Neoplasias Nasales/veterinaria , Animales , Carcinoma/patología , Carcinoma/veterinaria , Bases de Datos Factuales , Perros , Inglaterra , Femenino , Seno Frontal , Masculino , Tabique Nasal , Neoplasias Nasales/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/patología , Sarcoma/veterinaria
2.
J Small Anim Pract ; 46(10): 491-8, 2005 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16245664

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of different radiographic projections on thoracic width, as well as position and visibility of the trachea, principal bronchi, cardiac silhouette, aorta, caudal vena cava (CVC) and oesophagus. METHODS: Right lateral recumbency (RLR), left lateral recumbency (LLR), dorsoventral (DV) and ventrodorsal (VD) thoracic radiographs of 42 dogs were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: In 78 per cent of cases the thoracic width was significantly larger on the VD projection than on the DV projection. The angle of divergence formed by the principal bronchi was significantly larger on the VD projection than on the DV projection in 80 per cent of dogs. A cardiac silhouette bulge at 1 to 2 o'clock was apparent on the VD projection in 22 per cent of dogs but was never seen on DV projections. The descending aorta was more visible at the 4 to 5 o'clock cardiac silhouette level on the DV projection and laterally at the T8 level on LLR projections. The CVC was better seen on VD and LLR projections. The oesophagus was visible as a soft tissue opacity in LLR in large dogs with normal thoracic conformation in 35 per cent of cases. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The DV projection appears to be more reliable for assessing the cardiac silhouette, the descending aorta and the angle of divergence of the principal bronchi. The VD projection should be considered for evaluating the CVC. LLR should be used for assessing the descending aorta and CVC.


Asunto(s)
Perros/anatomía & histología , Radiografía Torácica/veterinaria , Tórax/anatomía & histología , Vísceras/diagnóstico por imagen , Animales , Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Biometría , Broncografía/veterinaria , Esófago/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Masculino , Postura , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , Radiografía Torácica/normas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vértebras Torácicas/anatomía & histología , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Tráquea/diagnóstico por imagen , Venas Cavas/diagnóstico por imagen , Vísceras/anatomía & histología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda