Comparison of 10 efficient protocols for photodynamic therapy of actinic keratosis: How relevant are effective light dose and local damage in predicting the complete response rate at 3 months?

BACKGROUND: Topical photodynamic therapy is an established treatment modality for various dermatological conditions, including actinic keratosis. In Europe, the approved protocols for photodynamic therapy of actinic keratosis involve irradiation with either an Aktilite CL 128 lamp or daylight, whereas irradiation with the Blu-U illuminator is approved in the United States. Many other protocols using irradiation by a variety of light sources are also clinically efficient. OBJECTIVES: This paper aims to compare 10 different protocols with clinically proven efficacy for photodynamic therapy of actinic keratosis and the available spectral irradiance of the light source. Effective irradiance, effective light dose, and local damage are compared. We also investigate whether there is an association between the complete response rate at 3 months and the effective light dose or local damage. METHODS: The effective irradiance, also referred to as protoporphyrin IX-weighted irradiance, is obtained by integrating the spectral irradiance weighted by the normalized absorption spectrum of protoporphyrin IX over the wavelength. Integrating the effective irradiance over the irradiation time yields the effective light dose, which is also known as the protoporphyrin IX-weighted light dose. Local damage, defined as the total cumulative singlet oxygen molecules produced during treatment, is estimated using mathematical modeling of the photodynamic therapy process. This modeling is based on an iterative procedure taking into account the spatial and temporal variations in the protoporphyrin IX absorption spectrum during treatment. RESULTS: The protocol for daylight photodynamic therapy on a clear sunny day, the protocol for daylight photodynamic therapy on an overcast day, the photodynamic therapy protocol for a white LED lamp for operating rooms and the photodynamic therapy protocol for the Blu-U illuminator perform better than the six other protocols-all involving red light illumination-in terms of both effective light dose and local damage. However, no association between the complete response rate at 3 months and the effective light dose or local damage was found. CONCLUSIONS: Protocols that achieve high complete response rates at 3 months and low pain scores should be preferred regardless of the effective light dose and local damage. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:576-589, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Red light photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis using 37 J/cm2 : Fractionated irradiation with 12.3 mW/cm2 after 30 minutes incubation time compared to standard continuous irradiation with 75 mW/cm2 after 3 hours incubation time using a mathematical modeling.

OBJECTIVE AND STUDY DESIGN: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an emerging treatment modality for various diseases, especially for dermatological conditions. Although, the standard PDT protocol for the treatment of actinic keratoses in Europe has shown to be effective, treatment-associated pain is often observed in patients. Different modifications to this protocol attempted to decrease pain have been investigated. The decrease in fluence rate seems to be a promising solution. Moreover, it has been suggested that light fractionation significantly increases the efficacy of PDT. Based on a flexible light-emitting textile, the FLEXITHERALIGHT device specifically provides a fractionated illumination at a fluence rate more than six times lower than that of the standard protocol. In a recently completed clinical trial of PDT for the treatment of actinic keratosis, the non-inferiority of a protocol involving illumination with the FLEXITHERALIGHT device after a short incubation time and referred to as the FLEXITHERALIGHT protocol has been assessed compared to the standard protocol. In this paper, we propose a comparison of the two above mentioned 635 nm red light protocols with 37 J/cm2 in the PDT treatment of actinic keratosis: the standard protocol and the FLEXITHERALIGHT one through a mathematical modeling. METHODS: This mathematical modeling, which slightly differs from the one we have already published, enables the local damage induced by the therapy to be estimated. RESULTS: The comparison performed in terms of the local damage induced by the therapy demonstrates that the FLEXITHERALIGHT protocol with lower fluence rate, light fractionation and shorter incubation time is somewhat less efficient than the standard protocol. Nevertheless, from the clinical trial results, the FLEXITHERALIGHT protocol results in non-inferior response rates compared to the standard protocol. CONCLUSION: This finding raises the question of whether the PDT local damage achieved by the FLEXITHERALIGHT protocol (respectively, the standard protocol) is sufficient (respectively, excessive) to destroy actinic keratosis cells. Lasers Surg. Med. 49:686-697, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Interstitial Photodynamic Therapy for Glioblastomas: A Standardized Procedure for Clinical Use.

Glioblastomas (GBMs) are high-grade malignancies with a poor prognosis. The current standard of care for GBM is maximal surgical resection followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Despite all these treatments, the overall survival is still limited, with a median of 15 months. For patients harboring inoperable GBM, due to the anatomical location of the tumor or poor general condition of the patient, the life expectancy is even worse. The challenge of managing GBM is therefore to improve the local control especially for non-surgical patients. Interstitial photodynamic therapy (iPDT) is a minimally invasive treatment relying on the interaction of light, a photosensitizer and oxygen. In the case of brain tumors, iPDT consists of introducing one or several optical fibers in the tumor area, without large craniotomy, to illuminate the photosensitized tumor cells. It induces necrosis and/or apoptosis of the tumor cells, and it can destruct the tumor vasculature and produces an acute inflammatory response that attracts leukocytes. Interstitial PDT has already been applied in the treatment of brain tumors with very promising results. However, no standardized procedure has emerged from previous studies. Herein, we propose a standardized and reproducible workflow for the clinical application of iPDT to GBM. This workflow, which involves intraoperative imaging, a dedicated treatment planning system (TPS) and robotic assistance for the implantation of stereotactic optical fibers, represents a key step in the deployment of iPDT for the treatment of GBM. This end-to-end procedure has been validated on a phantom in real operating room conditions. The thorough description of a fully integrated iPDT workflow is an essential step forward to a clinical trial to evaluate iPDT in the treatment of GBM.

Is interstitial photodynamic therapy for brain tumors ready for clinical practice? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Interstitial photodynamic therapy (iPDT), inserting optical fibers inside brain tumors, has been proposed for more than 30 years. While a promising therapeutic option, it is still an experimental treatment, with different ways of application, depending on the team performing the technique. OBJECTIVE: In this systematic review, we reported the patient selection process, the treatment parameters, the potential adverse events and the oncological outcomes related to iPDT treatment applied to brain tumors. METHODS: We performed a search in PubMed, Embase and Medline based on the following Mesh terms: "interstitial" AND "photodynamic therapy" AND "brain tumor" OR "glioma" OR glioblastoma" from January 1990 to April 2020. We screened 350 studies. Twelve matched all selection criteria. RESULTS: 251 patients underwent iPDT. Tumors were mainly de novo or recurrent high-grade gliomas (171 (68%) of glioblastomas), located supratentorial, with a median volume of 12 cm3. Hematoporphyrin derive agent (HpD) or protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) induced by 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) was used as a photosensitizer. Up to 6 optical fibers were introduced inside the tumor, delivering 200 mW/cm at a wavelength of 630 nm. Overall mortality was 1%. Transient and persistent morbidity were both 5%. No permanent deficit occurred using 5-ALA PDT. Tumor response rate after iPDT was 92% (IQR, 67; 99). Regarding glioblastomas, progression-free-survival was respectively 14.5 months (IQR, 13.8; 15.3) for de novo lesions and 14 months (IQR, 7; 30) for recurrent lesions, while overall survival was respectively 19 months (IQR, 14; 20) and 8 months (IQR, 6.3; 8.5). In patients harboring high-grade gliomas, 33 (13%) were considered long-term survivors (> 2 years) after iPDT. CONCLUSION: Regardless of heterogeneity in its application, iPDT appears safe and efficient to treat brain tumors, especially high-grade gliomas. Stand-alone iPDT (i.e., without combined craniotomy and intracavitary PDT) using 5-ALA appears to be the best option in terms of controlling side effects: it avoids the occurrence of permanent neurological deficits while reducing the risks of hemorrhage and sepsis.

A Warp-Knitted Light-Emitting Fabric-Based Device for In Vitro Photodynamic Therapy: Description, Characterization, and Application on Human Cancer Cell Lines.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) appears to be a promising strategy in biomedical applications. However, the complexity of its parameters prevents wide acceptance. This work presents and characterizes a novel optical device based on knitted light-emitting fabrics and dedicated to in vitro PDT involving low irradiance over a long illumination period. Technical characterization of this device, called CELL-LEF, is performed. A cytotoxic study of 5-ALA-mediated PDT on human cancer cell lines is provided as a proof of concept. The target of delivering an irradiance of 1 mW/cm2 over 750 cm2 is achieved (mean: 0.99 mW/cm2; standard deviation: 0.13 mW/cm2). The device can maintain a stable temperature with the mean thermal distribution of 35.1 °C (min: 30.7 °C; max: 38.4 °C). In vitro outcomes show that 5-ALA PDT using CELL-LEF consistently and effectively induced a decrease in tumor cell viability: Almost all the HepG2 cells died after 80 min of illumination, while less than 60% of U87 cell viability remained. CELL-LEF is suitable for in vitro PDT involving low irradiance over a long illumination period.

Parallelized Monte-Carlo dosimetry using graphics processing units to model cylindrical diffusers used in photodynamic therapy: From implementation to validation.

The Monte-Carlo method is the standard method for computing the dosimetry of both ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. Because this technique is highly time-consuming in conventional implementations, several improvements have recently been developed to speed-up simulations. Among the improvements, the use of graphics processing units (GPU) to parallelize algorithms provides a cost-efficient solution to accelerate the Monte-Carlo method. Parallel implementation of Monte-Carlo using GPU technology is described in the context of photodynamic therapy (PDT) dosimetry. This algorithm has been optimized to compute light emitted from optical fibers with cylindrical diffusers that are used in interstitial PDT applications. A comparison of the experimental measurements used to assess the results of the Monte-Carlo method is detailed. Illumination profiles of several commercially available diffusers are measured using an optical phantom that mimics the optical properties of the brain. Additionally, this Monte-Carlo method is compared to ex-vivo measurements made by a device dedicated to intraoperative PDT treatment of brain tumors. The results of the GPU Monte-Carlo validation are in accordance with the recommendations of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. The acceleration obtained with the GPU implementation is in accordance with the literature and is sufficiently fast to be integrated in a treatment planning system dedicated to planning routine clinical interstitial PDT treatments.

Can daylight-PDT be performed indoor?

Natural DayLight-mediated PhotoDynamic Therapy (NDL-PDT) is an efficacious treatment option for thin actinic keratosis that offers advantages over conventional PDT in terms of tolerability and cost. It is now accepted that the minimum criteria required for effective NDL-PDT is a dose of 4 J/cm² with a treatment time of 2 hours and a minimum temperature of 10 °C, corresponding to a minimum illuminance of 11,000 lux. This value is easily achievable: 20,000 lux can be obtained during a typical overcast day at midday. It can reach 110,000 lux with a bright sunlight. However, it is limited to certain times of the year at our latitude. However rain and cold temperatures appear the main limitations of NDL-PDT. Greenhouses make possible to perform the illumination even in harsh weather conditions. Furthermore, it is difficult to install a greenhouse everywhere. Several solutions are now proposed to carry out indoor illumination so-called artificial white light or simulated daylight (SDL-PDT). Illumination sources installed at the ceiling of the treatment room is one option. Several lamp pairs can be combined to illuminate groups of patients simultaneously. A surgical theatre light can be used or dedicated systems using white LEDs can be used to deliver the required illumination dose. In conclusion, Indoor lightning (or simulated daylight: SDL-PDT or Artificial White Light: AWL) could offer an interesting alternative to NDL-PDT.

Photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: Is the European consensus protocol for daylight PDT superior to conventional protocol for Aktilite CL 128 PDT?

BACKGROUND: Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an established treatment modality for various dermato-oncologic conditions. In Europe, initially requiring irradiation with red light, PDT of actinic keratosis (AK) can now also be carried out with exposure to daylight that has been clinically proven to be as effective as and less painful than red light. OBJECTIVES: In this paper, we propose a comparison between the conventional protocol for Aktilite CL 128 (red light source) PDT and the European consensus protocol for daylight PDT - with the exposure is assumed to be performed during either a clear sunny day or an overcast day - in the treatment of AK with methyl aminolevulinate through a mathematical modeling. METHOD: This already published modeling that is based on an iterative procedure alternating determination of the local fluence rate and updating of the local optical properties enables to estimate the local damage induced by the therapy. RESULTS: The European consensus protocol for daylight PDT during a sunny day and an overcast day provides, on average, 6.50 and 1.79 times higher PDT local damages at the end of the treatment than those obtained using the conventional protocol for Aktilite CL 128 PDT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Results analysis shows that, even performed during an overcast day, the European consensus protocol for daylight PDT leads to higher PDT local damages than the efficient conventional protocol for Aktilite CL 128.

Real-time light dosimetry for intra-cavity photodynamic therapy: Application for pleural mesothelioma treatment.

Complete and homogeneous illumination of the target is necessary for the success of a photodynamic therapy (PDT) procedure. In most applications, light dosimetry is done using detectors placed at strategic locations of the target. In this study we propose a novel approach based on the combination of light distribution modeling with spatial localization of the light applicator for real time estimation and display of the applied dose on medical images. The feasibility approach is demonstrated for intrapleural PDT of malignant pleural mesothelioma.