Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 26
Filtrar
1.
Int J Hyperthermia ; 37(1): 897-902, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32689832

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been shown to provide benefits in the management of peritoneal metastasis. Cisplatin (CDDP) is one of the most frequently used drugs for peritoneal infusion. A major restriction is that CDDP causes renal toxicity and acute renal failure, sometimes leading to chronic renal failure. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of sodium thiosulfate (ST) in preventing renal impairment (RI) following HIPEC with CDDP. METHODS: This prospective study assessed the RI rates for all patients who underwent HIPEC with CDDP during two successive periods: without ST (nST Period; from November 2016 to September 2017) and with ST (ST Period; from October 2017 to March 2018). During the ST Period, patients received an ST infusion at 9 mg/m2 prior to HIPEC and at 12 mg/m2 at the end of the procedure. RI was defined by postoperative serum creatinine >1.6 times elevation of baseline value. The impact of ST treatment was evaluated by comparison of the RI rates between the two periods. RESULTS: During ST Period, none of 38 patients (0%) developed RI versus 11/35 patients (31.4%) during the nST Period (p < .005); 2 of whom required definitive hemodialysis. Baseline characteristics, background circumstances, indications and laboratory parameters before HIPEC were comparable between the two groups, as well as CDDP dose use during HIPEC. CONCLUSION: ST appears to be an effective drug for the prevention of the renal toxicity of CDDP used for HIPEC and should be used for all such procedures.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Hipertermia Inducida , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Humanos , Hipertermia Inducida/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica , Estudios Prospectivos , Tiosulfatos
2.
Br J Surg ; 105(6): 668-676, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29412465

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of the primary neoplasm responsible for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) remains poorly studied. The aim of this study was to determine the prognosis for patients with extra-appendicular PMP (EA-PMP) treated optimally with complete cytoreductive surgery (CCRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHODS: All patients treated for PMP with CCRS and HIPEC between 1994 and 2016 were selected retrospectively from a French multicentre database. Patients with EA-PMP had pathologically confirmed non-neoplastic appendices and were matched in a 1 : 4 ratio with patients treated for appendicular PMP (A-PMP), based on a propensity score. RESULTS: Some 726 patients were identified, of which 61 (EA-PMP group) were matched with 244 patients (A-PMP group). The origins of primary tumours in the EA-PMP group included the ovary (45 patients), colon (4), urachus (4), small bowel (1), pancreas (1) and unknown (6). The median peritoneal carcinomatosis index was comparable in EA-PMP and A-PMP groups (15·5 versus 18 respectively; P = 0·315). In-hospital mortality (3 versus 2·9 per cent; P = 1·000) and major morbidity 26 versus 25·0 per cent; P = 0·869) were also similar between the two groups. Median follow-up was 66·9 months. The 5-year overall survival rate was 87·8 (95 per cent c.i. 83·2 to 92·5) per cent in the A-PMP group and 87 (77 to 96) per cent in the EA-PMP group. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 66·0 (58·7 to 73·4) per cent and 70 (53 to 83) per cent respectively. CONCLUSION: Overall and disease-free survival following treatment with CCRS and HIPEC is similar in patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei of appendicular or extra-appendicular origin.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Apéndice/terapia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Seudomixoma Peritoneal/terapia , Neoplasias del Apéndice/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Apéndice/patología , Neoplasias del Apéndice/cirugía , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Pronóstico , Seudomixoma Peritoneal/diagnóstico , Seudomixoma Peritoneal/patología , Seudomixoma Peritoneal/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia
5.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 19(13): 4052-8, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22825772

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Epithelial ovarian carcinoma is the main cause of death from gynaecological cancers in the western world. The initial response rate to the frontline therapy is high. However, the prognosis of persistent and recurrent disease remains poor. During the two past decades, a new therapeutic approach to peritoneal carcinomatosis has been developed, combining maximal cytoreductive effort with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHODS: A retrospective, multicentric study of 246 patients with recurrent or persistent ovarian cancer, treated by cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC in two French centers between 1991 and 2008, was performed. RESULTS: An optimal cytoreductive surgery was possible in 92.2 % of patients. Mortality and morbidity rates were 0.37 % and 11.6 %, respectively. The overall median survival was 48.9 months. There was no significant difference in overall survival in patients with persistent or recurrent disease. In multivariate analysis, performance status was a significant prognostic factor in patients with extensive peritoneal carcinomatosis (peritoneal cancer index >10). CONCLUSIONS: Salvage therapy combining optimal cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC is feasible and may achieve long-term survival in highly selected patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma, including those with platinum resistant disease, with acceptable morbidity.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Hipertermia Inducida , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/terapia , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
6.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 47(2): 214-221, 2019 02.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30712963

RESUMEN

Intraperitoneal drug delivery in first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer have been widely studied. After a complete primary surgery or with residual disease<1cm, intraperitoneal chemotherapy significantly improves disease-free and overall survival (NP1), but with more local and systemic toxicities. Whenever this therapeutic option is under consideration, the ratio efficacy/toxicity must be carefully discussed. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy has to be considered after complete or optimal primary surgery in ovarian, tubal or primitive peritoneal carcinomatosis FIGO IIIC. This treatment must be performed by trained teams and after an assessment of the ratio efficacy/toxicity. In one randomized study, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) using cisplatinum at interval surgery demonstrated an improvement in recurrence free and overall survival compared to surgery alone, in patients initially not resectable and with residual tumor less than 1cm (complete or optimal surgery) (NP1). HIPEC has to be considered after a complete or optimal interval surgery (residu<10mm) in patients with ovarian, tubal or primitive carcinomatosis FIGO IIIC, initially not resectable (Grade B).


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/terapia , Hipertermia Inducida , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Neoplasias Peritoneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/mortalidad , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/patología , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/secundario , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Calidad de Vida , Sociedades Médicas
7.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 48(6): 379-386, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30936025

RESUMEN

Adjuvant chemotherapy by carboplatin and paclitaxel is recommended for all high-grade ovarian and tubal cancers (FIGO stages I-IIA) (grade A). After primary surgery is complete, 6 cycles of intravenous chemotherapy (grade A) are recommended, or a discussion with the patient about intraperitoneal chemotherapy, according to her risk-benefit ratio. After complete interval surgery for FIGO stage III, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can be proposed, in accordance with the modalities of the OV-HIPEC trial (grade B). In cases of postoperative tumor residue or in FIGO stage IV tumors, chemotherapy associated with bevacizumab is recommended (grade A).


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Carboplatino/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Preservación de la Fertilidad , Francia , Humanos , Hipertermia Inducida , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/tratamiento farmacológico
8.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 48(6): 369-378, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30936027

RESUMEN

An MRI is recommended for an ovarian mass that is indeterminate on ultrasound. The ROMA score (combining CA125 and HE4) can also be calculated (grade A). In presumed early-stage ovarian or tubal cancers, the following procedures should be performed: an omentectomy (at a minimum, infracolic), an appendectomy, multiple peritoneal biopsies, peritoneal cytology (grade C), and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomies (grade B) for all histologic types, except the expansile mucinous subtypes, for which lymphadenectomies can be omitted (grade C). Minimally invasive surgery is recommended for early-stage ovarian cancer, when there is no risk of tumor rupture (grade B). For FIGO stages III or IV ovarian, tubal, and primary peritoneal cancers, a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan of the thorax/abdomen/pelvis is recommended (grade B), as well as laparoscopic exploration to take multiple biopsies (grade A) and a carcinomatosis score (Fagotti score at a minimum) (grade C) to assess the possibility of complete surgery (i.e., leaving no macroscopic tumor residue). Complete surgery by a midline laparotomy is recommended for advanced ovarian, tubal, or primary peritoneal cancer (grade B). For advanced cancers, para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomies are recommended when metastatic adenopathy is clinically or radiologically suspected (grade B). When adenopathy is not suspected and when complete peritoneal surgery is performed as the initial surgery for advanced cancer, the lymphadenectomies can be omitted because they do not modify either the medical treatment or overall survival (grade B). Primary surgery (before other treatment) is recommended whenever it appears possible to leave no tumor residue (grade B).


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Peritoneales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/patología , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Laparoscopía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/patología , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Atención Perioperativa , Neoplasias Peritoneales/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
9.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 47(2): 111-119, 2019 02.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30704955

RESUMEN

Adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel is recommended for all high-grade ovarian or Fallopian tube cancers, stage FIGO I-IIA (grade A). After a complete first surgery, it is recommended to deliver 6 cycles of intravenous (grade A) or to propose intraperitoneal (grade B) chemotherapy, to be discussed with patient, according to the benefit/risk ratio. After a complete interval surgery for a FIGO III stage, the hyperthermic intra peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can be proposed in the same conditions of the OV-HIPEC trial (grade B). In case of tumor residue after surgery or FIGO stage IV, chemotherapy associated with bevacizumab is recommended (grade A). For BRCA mutated patient, Olaparib is recommended (grade B).


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/terapia , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Factores de Edad , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/patología , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/patología , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/terapia , Femenino , Preservación de la Fertilidad , Francia , Humanos , Hipertermia Inducida , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/patología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Sociedades Médicas
10.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 47(2): 100-110, 2019 02.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30686724

RESUMEN

Faced to an undetermined ovarian mass on ultrasound, an MRI is recommended and the ROMA score (combining CA125 and HE4) can be proposed (grade A). In case of suspected early stage ovarian or fallopian tube cancer, omentectomy (at least infracolonic), appendectomy, multiple peritoneal biopsies, peritoneal cytology (grade C) and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy are recommended (grade B) for all histological types, except for the expansive mucinous subtype where lymphadenectomy may be omitted (grade C). Minimally invasive surgery is recommended for early stage ovarian cancer, if there is no risk of tumor rupture (grade B). Laparoscopic exploration for multiple biopsies (grade A) and to evaluate carcinomatosis score (at least using the Fagotti score) (grade C) are recommended to estimate the possibility of a complete surgery (i.e. no macroscopic residue). Complete medial laparotomy surgery is recommended for advanced cancers (grade B). It is recommended in advanced cancers to perform para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in case of clinical or radiological suspicion of metastatic lymph node (grade B). In the absence of clinical or radiological lymphadenopathy and in case of complete peritoneal surgery during an initial surgery for advanced cancer, it is possible not to perform a lymphadenectomy because it does not modify the medical treatment and the overall survival (grade B). Primary surgery is recommended when no tumor residue is possible (grade B).


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/terapia , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Algoritmos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Antígeno Ca-125/análisis , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/patología , Terapia Combinada , ADN de Neoplasias/sangre , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/patología , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/terapia , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Laparoscopía , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Proteínas de la Membrana/análisis , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/terapia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Atención Perioperativa , Neoplasias Peritoneales/patología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Proteínas/análisis , Sociedades Médicas , Proteína 2 de Dominio del Núcleo de Cuatro Disulfuros WAP
11.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 236: 214-223, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30905627

RESUMEN

An MRI is recommended for an ovarian mass that is indeterminate on ultrasound. The ROMA score (combining CA125 and HE4) can also be calculated (Grade A). In presumed early-stage ovarian or tubal cancers, the following procedures should be performed: an omentectomy (at a minimum, infracolic), an appendectomy, multiple peritoneal biopsies, peritoneal cytology (grade C), and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomies (Grade B) for all histologic types, except the expansile mucinous subtypes, for which lymphadenectomies can be omitted (grade C). Minimally invasive surgery is recommended for early-stage ovarian cancer, when there is no risk of tumor rupture (grade B). Adjuvant chemotherapy by carboplatin and paclitaxel is recommended for all high-grade ovarian and tubal cancers (FIGO stages I-IIA) (grade A). For FIGO stage III or IV ovarian, tubal, and primary peritoneal cancers, a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan of the thorax/abdomen/pelvis is recommended (Grade B), as well as laparoscopic exploration to take multiple biopsies (grade A) and a carcinomatosis score (Fagotti score at a minimum) (grade C) to assess the possibility of complete surgery (i.e., leaving no macroscopic tumor residue). Complete surgery by a midline laparotomy is recommended for advanced ovarian, tubal, or primary peritoneal cancers (grade B). For advanced cancers, para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomies are recommended when metastatic adenopathy is clinically or radiologically suspected (grade B). When adenopathy is not suspected and when complete peritoneal surgery is performed as the initial surgery for advanced cancer, the lymphadenectomies can be omitted because they do not modify either the medical treatment or overall survival (grade B). Primary surgery (before other treatment) is recommended whenever it appears possible to leave no tumor residue (grade B). After primary surgery is complete, 6 cycles of intravenous chemotherapy (grade A) are recommended, or a discussion with the patient about intraperitoneal chemotherapy, according to her risk-benefit ratio. After complete interval surgery for FIGO stage III disease, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can be proposed, in accordance with the modalities of the OV-HIPEC trial (grade B). In cases of postoperative tumor residue or in FIGO stage IV tumors, chemotherapy associated with bevacizumab is recommended (grade A).


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/terapia , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/terapia , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma/diagnóstico , Carcinoma/patología , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/patología , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/patología
12.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) ; 37(5): 517-20, 2008 Sep.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18313234

RESUMEN

We present two cases of severe hypertriglyceridemia (HTG>10g/l) in pregnancy. The first reports the case of a primigravida with mild HTG before conception. Triglycerides (TG) increased thereafter (20.9g/l) during pregnancy causing pancreatitis and in utero fetal death at 24 weeks' gestation (WG). The second deals with the de novo occurrence of a severe HTG (19g/l) diagnosed incidentally at 34 WG and complicated by acute renal failure. Severe HTG in pregnancy threatens maternal and fetal prognosis. We have summarized the curative and preventive management of gravidic HTG.


Asunto(s)
Hipertrigliceridemia/complicaciones , Hipertrigliceridemia/terapia , Pancreatitis/etiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Lesión Renal Aguda/etiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Adulto , Femenino , Muerte Fetal/etiología , Sufrimiento Fetal/etiología , Humanos , Pancreatitis/complicaciones , Pancreatitis/prevención & control , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , Tercer Trimestre del Embarazo
13.
Toxicol Lett ; 298: 171-176, 2018 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29852276

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been introduced over the last decade for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis. In this procedure, heated cytotoxic drugs are administered directly into the abdominal cavity, ensuring cancer cells to be exposed while reducing systemic toxicity. More recently, pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC), where the chemotherapeutic drug is injected into the peritoneal cavity as an aerosol under pressure, has been proposed to patients in palliative situation, as a new approach. The amount of drug used is up to 10 fold lower than in HIPEC. The use of cytotoxic drugs poses an occupational risk for the operating room personnel. This study investigated the potential exposure of the medical staff by biomonitoring and surface contamination measurements, during a HIPEC procedure and a PIPAC procedure. METHOD: Wipe samples were collected from various locations in operating rooms including gloves, hands, devices and floor. Urines samples were collected from 10 volunteers of the medical staff and from a control group. The platinum analysis was performed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Significant contaminations were observed on the floor, gloves, shoes and devices. However, urinary platinum was below the limit of quantification (<10 ng/L) for more than 50% of samples from the healthcare workers performing HIPEC and PIPAC. Concentrations did not differ significantly from those reported for the control group. CONCLUSION: There appears to be little risk of exposure to platinum drugs during HIPEC and PIPAC providing the adequate safety measures are implemented.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/orina , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Contaminación de Equipos , Personal de Salud , Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Exposición Profesional , Salud Laboral , Compuestos Organoplatinos/orina , Compuestos de Platino/orina , Aerosoles , Anestesiólogos , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Guantes Quirúrgicos , Humanos , Hipertermia Inducida/efectos adversos , Espectrometría de Masas , Enfermeras Anestesistas , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Compuestos Organoplatinos/administración & dosificación , Compuestos Organoplatinos/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Platino/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Platino/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo , Zapatos , Cirujanos , Equipo Quirúrgico , Urinálisis
14.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 42(6): 877-82, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27067193

RESUMEN

Based on the importance of assessing the true extent of peritoneal disease, PeRitOneal MalIgnancy Stage Evaluation (PROMISE) internet application (www.e-promise.org) has been developed to facilitate tabulation and automatically calculate surgically validated peritoneal cancer index (PCI), and other surgically validated scores as Gilly score, simplified peritoneal cancer index (SPCI), Fagotti and Fagotti-modified scores. This application offers computer-assistance to produce simple, quick but precise and standardized pre, intra and postoperative reports of the extent of peritoneal metastases and may help specialized and non-specialized institutions in their current practice but also facilitate research and multicentre studies on peritoneal surface malignancies.


Asunto(s)
Registros Médicos/normas , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/patología , Peritoneo/patología , Humanos , Internet , Estadificación de Neoplasias/tendencias , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Peritoneo/cirugía , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
15.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 40(8): 957-62, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24209429

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are considered the only curative treatment for many peritoneal surface malignancies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate feasibility and safety of CRS combined with HIPEC by laparoscopy for patients with limited peritoneal disease and to compare postoperative outcomes with those for an open procedure. METHODS: Between January 2011 and November 2012, all patients with low-grade pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) or multicystic mesothelioma (MM) and limited peritoneal disease (Peritoneal Cancer Index [PCI] less than 10) underwent CRS and HIPEC by a laparoscopic approach. The study cohort was matched with a historical cohort of patients with the same characteristics (completeness of cytoreduction, HIPEC agent, PCI ± 11 and age ± 20 years) treated with CRS and HIPEC by laparotomy. RESULTS: Eight patients (five low-grade PMP and three MM) treated by a laparoscopic approach were compared to eight patients treated by laparotomy. All patients underwent complete cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC, and no conversion to laparotomy was needed. The median surgical length was 210 min (150-300) vs 240 (210-360), with a median hospital stay of 12 days (9-18) vs 19 (13-33). One patient had a postoperative complication (intraperitoneal haematoma treated by radiological drainage) vs four in the laparotomy group. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic CRS combined with HIPEC is feasible and safe for curative treatment of strictly selected patients with peritoneal surface malignancy and might reduce postoperative complications and length of hospital stay.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional , Hipertermia Inducida , Laparoscopía , Laparotomía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Seudomixoma Peritoneal/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional/métodos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Seguridad del Paciente , Cavidad Peritoneal , Neoplasias Peritoneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Periodo Posoperatorio , Seudomixoma Peritoneal/tratamiento farmacológico , Seudomixoma Peritoneal/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos
16.
J Visc Surg ; 151(5): 347-53, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25168575

RESUMEN

Ovarian cancer remains the fourth leading cause of cancer death in women in France. It is all too often diagnosed at an advanced stage with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), but remains confined to the peritoneal cavity throughout much of its natural history. Because of cellular selection pressure over time, most tumor recurrences eventually develop resistance to systemic platinum. Options for salvage therapy include alternative systemic chemotherapies and further cytoreductive surgery (CRS), but the prognosis remains poor. Over the past two decades, a new therapeutic approach to PC has been developed that combines CRS with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). This treatment strategy has already been shown to be effective in non-gynecologic carcinomatosis in numerous reports. There is a strong rationale for the use of HIPEC for PC of ovarian origin. On the one hand, three prospective randomized trials have demonstrated the superiority of intraperitoneal chemotherapy (without hyperthermia) in selected patients compared to systemic chemotherapy. Moreover, retrospective studies and case-control studies of HIPEC have reported encouraging survival data, especially when used to treat chemoresistant recurrence. However, HIPEC has specific morbidity and mortality; this calls for very careful selection of eligible patients by a multidisciplinary team in specialized centers. HIPEC needs to be evaluated by means of randomized trials for ovarian cancer at different developmental stages: as first line therapy, as consolidation, and for chemoresistant recurrence. Several European phase III studies are currently ongoing.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Carcinoma/secundario , Carcinoma/terapia , Femenino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/terapia , Humanos , Hipertermia Inducida , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario
17.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 40(5): 529-535, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24370285

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) have demonstrated promising results in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of this combined procedure on quality of life (QoL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective single centre study of 216 consecutive patients treated with CRS and HIPEC was conducted using the Gastro-Intestinal Quality of Life Index questionnaire (GIQLI), completed preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: Questionnaire compliance was 81%, 90%, 89%, 89% and 74% at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months respectively. QoL was significantly decreased up to 6 months and returned to baseline at 12 months. In multivariate analysis, factors decreasing QoL were origin of PC at 3 months, presence of stoma at 6 months and length of surgery over 270 min and disease recurrence at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Despite morbidity associated with CRS and HIPEC, QoL returned to baseline at one year after surgery. This treatment strategy should be considered for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma/terapia , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Hipertermia Inducida , Neoplasias Primarias Múltiples/terapia , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Peritoneo/cirugía , Seudomixoma Peritoneal/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Camptotecina/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Carcinoma/secundario , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Irinotecán , Masculino , Mesotelioma/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mitomicina/administración & dosificación , Compuestos Organoplatinos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Oxaliplatino , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
Eur J Cancer ; 50(4): 722-30, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24295636

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is one of the most important angiogenic factors in solid tumours and plays an important role in ascites development in peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM). The main goal of this study was to determine the evolution and factors influencing intraperitoneal (IP) VEGF burden during cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with curative intent. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-seven consecutive patients with PSM were treated with CRS at a single centre with curative intent. Patient data were collected prospectively between February 2012 and October 2012. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique was used to assess VEGF levels in intravenous (IV) systemic blood samples before incision and after abdominal closure, and in IP samples during abdominal cavity exploration, after completion of CRS, after hyperthermic IP chemotherapy, and at 1 and 24h after abdominal closure. RESULTS: The IP VEGF burden increased significantly after CRS, and then decreased progressively (p<0.005). In multivariate analysis, neoadjuvant IV bevacizumab significantly decreased the preoperative IP VEGF burden, tumour load according to Peritoneal Cancer Index value increased significantly the preoperative IP VEGF burden and a low preoperative IP VEGF burden was associated with significantly increased postoperative complications. Neoadjuvant IV bevacizumab is the only factor that influences the preoperative IV VEGF concentration. CONCLUSION: For patients with PSM who were treated with curative intent, the IP VEGF burden increased after CRS, and was reduced prior to surgery by the administration of neoadjuvant IV bevacizumab.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Peritoneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/metabolismo , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/metabolismo , Ascitis/metabolismo , Bevacizumab , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/metabolismo , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/patología , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/cirugía , Humanos , Inyecciones Intraperitoneales , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Pronóstico , Seudomixoma Peritoneal/tratamiento farmacológico , Seudomixoma Peritoneal/metabolismo , Seudomixoma Peritoneal/patología , Seudomixoma Peritoneal/cirugía , Inducción de Remisión , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/análisis , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/inmunología
20.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 39(7): 742-7, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23510853

RESUMEN

AIM: Primary peritoneal serous carcinoma (PPSC) is a rare condition, histologically identical to ovarian serous carcinoma and often diagnosed at late stage. There is not any standardized treatment for PPSC. A retrospective multicentric study was performed in French speaking centers to evaluate cytoreduction surgery and Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from different origins. The manuscript's aim was to study the particular population with PPSC. METHODS: Between September 1997 and July 2007, 36 patients with PPSC from 9 institutions underwent 39 procedures. RESULTS: Mortality and morbidity rates were 5.6% and 20.6% respectively. The overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years are respectively 93.6, 71.5 and 57.4%. The median overall survival was not reached. By univariate analysis, the only factor that had prognostic value was PCI (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The therapeutic approach combining cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC may achieve long-term survival in patients with PPSC.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/mortalidad , Carcinoma/terapia , Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional/métodos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma/patología , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios de Cohortes , Terapia Combinada , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Hipotermia Inducida/métodos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Peritoneales/patología , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda