Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Publication year range
1.
China Pharmacist ; (12): 135-144, 2024.
Artículo en Zh | WPRIM | ID: wpr-1025929

RESUMEN

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of polyene phosphatidylcholine injection in the treatment of liver disease.Methods Pubmed,Embase,The Cochrane Library,ClinicalTrial.gov,CNKI,SinoMed,VIP,and WanFang Data were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials(RCTs)of polyene phosphatidylcholine injection in the treatment of liver disease from inception to December 31st,2022.Two researchers independently screened literature,extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies.The Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 17.0 software.Results A total of 10 RCTs were included,including 809 patients.Meta-analysis showed that the effective rate in the polyene phosphatidylcholine injection group was higher than that in the control group(RR=1.12,95%CI 1.04 to 1.20,P=0.003 8).Compared with the control group,polyene phosphatidylcholine injection could decrease ALT level(MD=-18.92 U/L,95%CI-27.75 to-10.09,P<0.001),AST level(MD=-31.19 U/L,95%CI-46.27 to-16.11,P=0.000 1),TBiL level(MD=-7.31 μmol/L,95%CI-10.75 to-3.88,P<0.001),and GGT levels(MD=-48.93 U/L,95%CI-54.64 to-43.21,P<0.001).Only one study reported mild adverse events,and six studies reported no severe adverse events in patients.Conclusion Current evidence shows that polyene phosphatidylcholine injection in the treatment of alcoholic liver disease can increase the effective rate,improve the levels of liver function indicators(ALT,AST,TBiL,and GGT),and has less adverse events.Due to the limited number and quality of included studies,the above conclusions need to be verified by more high-quality studies.

2.
Preprint en Inglés | PREPRINT-MEDRXIV | ID: ppmedrxiv-21264048

RESUMEN

BackgroundIt was urgent and necessary to synthesize the evidence for vaccine effectiveness (VE) against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide a comprehensive overview of the effectiveness profile of COVID-19 vaccines against VOC. MethodsPublished and preprinted randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case-control studies that evaluated the VE against VOC (Alpha, Beta, Gamma, or Delta) were searched until 31 August 2021. Pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. VE was defined as (1- estimate). ResultsSeven RCTs (51,169 participants), 10 cohort studies (14,385,909 participants) and 16 case-control studies (734,607 cases) were included. Eight COVID-19 vaccines (mRNA-1273, BNT162b2, ChAdOx1, Ad26.COV2.S, NVX-CoV2373, BBV152, CoronaVac, and BBIBP-CorV) were included in this analysis. Full vaccination was effective against Alpha, Beta/Gamma, and Delta variants, with VE of 88.3% (95% CI, 82.4-92.2), 70.7% (95% CI, 59.9-78.5), and 71.6% (95% CI, 64.1-77.4), respectively. But partial vaccination was less effective, with VE of 59.0% (95% CI, 51.3-65.5), 49.3% (95% CI, 33.0-61.6), and 52.6% (95% CI, 43.3-60.4), respectively. mRNA vaccines seemed to have higher VE against VOC over others, significant interactions (pinteraction < 0.10) were observed between VE and vaccine type (mRNA vaccines vs. non-mRNA vaccines). ConclusionsFull vaccination of COVID-19 vaccines is highly effective against Alpha variant, and moderate effective against Beta/Gamma and Delta variants. Partial vaccination has less VE against VOC. mRNA vaccines seem to have higher VE against Alpha, Beta/Gamma, and Delta variants over others.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda