Trends in utilization, outcomes, and readmissions after transcatheter mitral valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of real-world data regarding the temporal trends and outcomes of trans-septal transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TS-TMVR) in the United States (US). METHODS: We queried the Nationwide Readmissions Database (October 2015 to December 2018) for patients undergoing TS-TMVR procedures. We reported the temporal trends in the utilization, in-hospital outcomes and 30-day readmissions after TS-TMVR. The main study outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: There was an increase in the number of TS-TMVR procedures over time (48 in 2015 vs. 978 in 2018, Ptrend < 0.001), with a notable increase in the proportion of women (Ptrend  = 0.04) and the prevalence of diabetes (Ptrend  = 0.03). There was an increase in the number of centers performing TS-TMVR (21 in 2015 vs. 164 in 2018, Ptrend < 0.001). The overall in-hospital mortality was 7.2% with no change over time (6.3% in 2015 vs. to 5.2% in 2018, Ptrend  = 0.67). There was no change in the frequency of in-hospital complications after TS-TMVR; however, the median length of stay has decreased over time. The overall 30-day readmission rate was 17.8%, with no change during the study years. The most frequent cause for 30-day readmission after TS-TMVR was acute heart failure followed by bleeding and infection-related complications. Prior coagulopathy and small-sized hospitals were independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmissions. CONCLUSION: This nationwide observational analysis of real-world data showed an increase in the number of TS-TMVR procedures over time, which is now performed at a greater number of centers. There was no change in the rate of in-hospital mortality, complications or 30-day readmissions; but a significant reduction in the length of hospital stay over time was noted. As the number of TS-TMVR continue to expand, these data provide a perspective on the early experience with this procedure.

Outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement for degenerated bioprostheses, failed annuloplasty rings, and mitral annular calcification.

Aims: We sought to evaluate the outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) for patients with degenerated bioprostheses [valve-in-valve (ViV)], failed annuloplasty rings [valve-in-ring (ViR)], and severe mitral annular calcification [valve-in-mitral annular calcification (ViMAC)]. Methods and results: From the TMVR multicentre registry, procedural and clinical outcomes of ViV, ViR, and ViMAC were compared according to Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium (MVARC) criteria. A total of 521 patients with mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of 9.0 ± 7.0% underwent TMVR (322 patients with ViV, 141 with ViR, and 58 with ViMAC). Trans-septal access and the Sapien valves were used in 39.5% and 90.0%, respectively. Overall technical success was excellent at 87.1%. However, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction occurred more frequently after ViMAC compared with ViR and ViV (39.7% vs. 5.0% vs. 2.2%; P < 0.001), whereas second valve implantation was more frequent in ViR compared with ViMAC and ViV (12.1% vs. 5.2% vs. 2.5%; P < 0.001). Accordingly, technical success rate was higher after ViV compared with ViR and ViMAC (94.4% vs. 80.9% vs. 62.1%; P < 0.001). Compared with ViMAC and ViV groups, ViR group had more frequent post-procedural mitral regurgitation ≥moderate (18.4% vs. 13.8% vs. 5.6%; P < 0.001) and subsequent paravalvular leak closure (7.8% vs. 0.0% vs. 2.2%; P = 0.006). All-cause mortality was higher after ViMAC compared with ViR and ViV at 30 days (34.5% vs. 9.9% vs. 6.2%; log-rank P < 0.001) and 1 year (62.8% vs. 30.6% vs. 14.0%; log-rank P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, patients with failed annuloplasty rings and severe MAC were at increased risk of mortality after TMVR [ViR vs. ViV, hazard ratio (HR) 1.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27-3.12; P = 0.003; ViMAC vs. ViV, HR 5.29, 95% CI 3.29-8.51; P < 0.001]. Conclusion: The TMVR provided excellent outcomes for patients with degenerated bioprostheses despite high surgical risk. However, ViR and ViMAC were associated with higher rates of adverse events and mid-term mortality compared with ViV.

Optimal positioning of self-expanding valves before deployment decreases paravalvular regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between measurements performed during Medtronic CoreValve (MCV) deployment and paravalvular leak (PVL). BACKGROUND: The MCV can be recaptured and repositioned, allowing the TAVR operator to implant at a more favorable position. The association between angiographic measurements of MCV position while the valve is recapturable and PVL post deployment has not been investigated. METHODS: 493 patients undergoing TAVR with MCV (January 2011-July 2017) were included. PVL was defined as intraprocedural aortic regurgitation that was judged clinically to require balloon postdilation. Depth of the valve at the left coronary cusp (LCC) and noncoronary cusp (NCC) were measured when the valve was 80% deployed. An optimal cutoff value for the ratio LCC/NCC for PVL was identified in 40 patients. Using this cutoff value, the association between LCC/NCC and PVL was then validated in 453 patients. RESULTS: The median LCC/NCC was 1.51 (interquartile range 1.06-1.89).The optimal cutoff value for LCC/NCC was 1.48 (93% sensitivity, 77% specificity, AUC0.85). In the validation group 112 (24.7%) patients had PVL. For LCC/NCC ≥ 1.48, the incidence of PVL was lower compared to LCC/NCC < 1.48 (9.58% vs. 41.78%, P < 0.0001). LCC/NCC of 1.48 had a sensitivity of 79.5% and specificity of 63.6% for PVL (AUC0.72). In a multivariate model, LCC/NCC < 1.48 independently predicted PVL (OR = 6.67, 95% CI 3.96-11.23, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Positioning the MCV such that the LCC/NCC is ≥1.48 may result in less PVL.

Clinical trials in transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Clinical trials in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have been essential in establishing the effectiveness as well as the limitations of this exciting and disruptive technology. This review will focus on clinical trials related to TAVR that have been presented in the past year or are currently enrolling, as well as future trials that are in the planning stages. RECENT FINDINGS: The currently available devices have gone through iterations to improve safety and outcomes, including lower profiles to reduce bleeding complications as well as adding a sealing skirt or allowing for re-positioning in order to decrease para-valvular regurgitation and need for a permanent pacemaker. The intermediate-risk clinical trials will be finishing soon and will be followed by low-risk trials. Ancillary devices will likely continue to expand the access to this therapy. One of the main challenges moving forward will be the post-TAVR pharmacotherapy. SUMMARY: Recently, improvements in first-generation devices have led to improved outcomes. Current trials evaluating novel TAVR platforms and lower risk patients as well as ancillary devices will likely continue to expand the access to this therapy.

Vascular complication can be minimized with a balloon-expandable, re-collapsible sheath in TAVR with a self-expanding bioprosthesis.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the feasibility and safety of a balloon-expandable, re-collapsible sheath for TAVR patients, including those with small iliofemoral access (≤5.0 mm). BACKGROUND: The recommended iliofemoral diameter for the CoreValve TAVR system is ≥6.0 mm, but the lowest limit has not been determined. METHODS: Of 322 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR from 1/2014 to 8/2015 at two institutions, 64 underwent transfemoral CoreValve implantation, using an 11/19-French balloon-expandable, re-collapsible sheath, which has a 4.45 mm outer diameter (OD) on arterial entry, expands to 7.67 mm, then re-collapses upon removal. Valve sizing and vascular access were determined by computed tomography, and outcomes were assessed using the Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 (VARC-2) definitions. RESULTS: Thirteen of 64 patients had a minimal iliofemoral artery luminal diameter (MLD) of ≤5.0 mm (mean 4.38+/-0.59 mm, range 3.1-5.0 mm), with vessel calcification ≤90° to 360° and tortuosity <45° to >90°. At the MLD point, the sheath-to-artery ratios, based on the fully expanded 7.67 mm OD, ranged 1.53-2.47, higher than previously reported ratios that risk vascular complications. Major comorbidities included chronic renal failure, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, extreme thrombocytopenia, cirrhosis, prior cardiac surgery, poor ventricular function, and frailty. All 64 patients had TAVR with IV sedation and local anesthesia, with 0% sheath malfunction, 0% vascular complications, and 0% bleeding in-hospital and at 30 days per VARC-2 definitions. CONCLUSIONS: TAVR using a balloon-expandable, re-collapsible sheath is safe, including in small iliofemoral access ≤5.0 mm, thus considerably expanding the population suitable for transfemoral approach. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Renal Denervation: Past, Present, and Future.

Hypertension remains a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide. It is estimated that 12.8% of hypertensive adults have resistant hypertension. The sympathetic nervous system is a well-known contributor to the pathophysiology of resistant hypertension. Renal denervation has emerged as an effective procedure to treat resistant hypertension by blocking the sympathetic nervous system. The medical device industry has developed various catheters in an effort to achieve better denervation in the absence of available testing to document adequate denervation. By adding a sham control group to the study design, researchers found that the results of the Renal Denervation in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension study (SYMPLICITY HTN-3) showed that renal denervation was not superior to placebo in decreasing systolic blood pressure. Although SYMPLICITY HTN-3 successfully addressed many issues that might have biased the previously published data, incomplete denervation caused by limited operator experience, catheter design, and the radiofrequency ablation technology may have accounted for the discrepancy of the results. This, along with differences in the study design and population, should direct future renal denervation studies. This article reviews the available literature and proposes future directions for renal denervation studies. It also provides a detailed comparison of the available catheters and their respective clinical data.

Direct Aortic Access Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Planning and Real-Time Fluoroscopic Image Guidance.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Direct aortic access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (DA-TAVR) is an important alternative approach in patients with hostile ileo-femoral vessels. Planning the transaortic puncture site and an 'ideal' trajectory towards the annulus plane is important for safe and successful valve implantation. The feasibility of three-dimensional (3D) planning and real-time fluoroscopic image guidance for DA-TAVR was evaluated using pre-procedural multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) and intra-procedural Dyna CT co-registration approaches. METHODS: Between May 2012 and August 2014, a total of 44 patients (40 mini-sternotomies, four mini-thoracotomies) was selected for DA-TAVR using the authors' MDCT-Dyna CT co-registration approach (32 CoreValve, 12 SAPIEN). Pre-procedural contrast-enhanced multi-slice CT (MSCT) and intra- procedural non-contrast Dyna CT images were co-registered based on cardiac outline and aortic root calcifications. Using a prototype software, the aortic root was segmented and relevant landmarks identified automatically. The intersection of a virtual perpendicular trajectory from the annulus with the greater curvature of the aorta was marked as the planned DA puncture site. The planned DA puncture site, trajectory and relevant landmarks were overlaid onto real-time fluoroscopic images for image guidance during DA-TAVR. RESULTS: Real-time fluoroscopic overlay of planned trajectory was feasible in all 44 cases of DA-TAVR. The mean 2D projection distance error between the actual and planned aortic puncture sites was 1.60 +/- 1.1 cm. The mean angular difference error (measure of co-axiality) between actual and planned DA trajectory was 11.86 +/- 9.3. Errors in distance and co-axiality were lower with the mini-thoracotomy than with the mini-sternotomy approach. The Multi-Slice CT (MSCT)-Dyna CT co-registration technique resulted in significantly less contrast usage, and trended towards shorter fluoroscopy and operative times. There was also a trend towards a reduction in acute kidney injury, but no difference was identified in the degree of paravalvular regurgitation or mortality. CONCLUSION: 3D access planning and real-time image guidance for DA-TAVR is feasible using an MDCT/non-contrast Dyna CT image co-registration-based approach. Such image co-registration strategies improve the accuracy of case planning and safety of valve deployment with a direct aortic approach. Further studies are necessary to determine if these enhancements translate into an improvement in clinical outcomes.

Invasive Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential.

BACKGROUND: Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) occurs due to acquired mutations in bone marrow progenitor cells. CHIP confers a 2-fold risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, there are limited data regarding specific cardiovascular phenotypes. The purpose of this study was to define the coronary artery disease phenotype of the CHIP population-based on coronary angiography. METHODS: We recruited 1142 patients from the Vanderbilt University Medical Center cardiac catheterization laboratory and performed DNA sequencing to determine CHIP status. Multivariable logistic regression models and proportional odds models were used to assess the association between CHIP status and angiography phenotypes. RESULTS: We found that 18.4% of patients undergoing coronary angiography had a CHIP mutation. Those with CHIP had a higher risk of having obstructive left main (odds ratio, 2.44 [95% CI, 1.40-4.27]; P=0.0018) and left anterior descending (odds ratio, 1.59 [1.12-2.24]; P=0.0092) coronary artery disease compared with non-CHIP carriers. We additionally found that a specific CHIP mutation, ten eleven translocase 2 (TET2), has a larger effect size on left main stenosis compared with other CHIP mutations. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first invasive assessment of coronary artery disease in CHIP and offers a description of a specific atherosclerotic phenotype in CHIP wherein there is an increased risk of obstructive left main and left anterior descending artery stenosis, especially among TET2 mutation carriers. This serves as a basis for understanding enhanced morbidity and mortality in CHIP.

Transcatheter Tricuspid Interventions: Past, Present, and Future.

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) etiologies include primary valve pathology or secondary (functional) regurgitation from increased hemodynamic pressure or volume on the right side of the heart. Patients with severe TR have a worse prognosis independent of all other variables. Surgical treatment for TR has mostly been limited to patients undergoing concomitant left-sided cardiac surgery. The results and durability of surgical repair or replacement are not well defined. For patients with significant and symptomatic TR, transcatheter techniques would be beneficial, but these techniques and devices have been slow to develop. Much of the delay is a result of neglect and challenges in defining the symptoms associated with TR. In addition, the anatomic and physiological aspects of the tricuspid valve apparatus present unique challenges. Several devices and techniques are in various phases of clinical investigation. This review highlights the current landscape of transcatheter tricuspid interventions and future opportunities. It is imminent that these therapies become commercially available and widely adopted to have a significant positive impact on millions of patients that have been neglected.

Impact of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair Availability on Volume and Outcomes of Surgical Repair.

BACKGROUND: The impact of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) on national surgical mitral valve repair (MVr) volume and outcomes is unknown. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the impact of TEER availability on MVr volumes and outcomes for degenerative mitral regurgitation. METHODS: MVr volume, 30-day and 5-year outcomes, including mortality, heart failure rehospitalization and mitral valve reintervention, were obtained from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database linked with Medicare administrative claims and were compared within TEER centers before and after the first institutional TEER procedure. A difference-in-difference approach comparing parallel trends in coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes was used to account for temporal improvements in perioperative care. RESULTS: From July 2011 through December 2018, 13,959 patients underwent MVr at 278 institutions, which became TEER-capable during the study period. There was no significant change in median annualized institutional MVr volume before (32 [IQR: 17-54]) vs after (29 [IQR: 16-54]) the first TEER (P = 0.06). However, higher-risk (Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality ≥2%) MVr procedures declined over the study period (P < 0.001 for trend). The introduction of TEER was associated with reduced risk-adjusted odds of mortality after MVr at 30 days (adjusted OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.54-0.99) and over 5 years (adjusted HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.66-0.86). These improvements in 30-day and 5-year mortality were significantly greater than equivalent trends in coronary artery bypass grafting. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of TEER has not significantly changed overall MVr case volumes for degenerative mitral regurgitation but is associated with a decrease in higher-risk surgical operations and improved 30-day and 5-year outcomes within institutions adopting the technology.

No-Implant Interatrial Shunt for HFpEF: 6-Month Outcomes From Multicenter Pilot Feasibility Studies.

BACKGROUND: Most approaches to the creation of an interatrial shunt require placement of a permanent implant to maintain patency. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of a no-implant interatrial shunt for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). METHODS: This was a multicenter, uncontrolled study of patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF and NYHA functional class ≥II, ejection fraction >40%, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) during supine exercise ≥25 mm Hg with PCWP-to-right atrial gradient ≥5 mm Hg. Follow-up was through 6 months with imaging to assess shunt durability. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients were enrolled: mean age was 68 ± 9 years, and 68% were female. Baseline resting and peak exercise PCWP were 19 ± 7 mm Hg and 40 ± 11 mm Hg, respectively. All procedures displayed technical success with confirmation of left-to-right flow (shunt diameter 7.1 ± 0.9 mm). At 1 month, peak exercise PCWP decreased 5.4 ± 9.6 mm Hg (P = 0.011) with no change in right atrial pressure. There were no serious device or procedure-related adverse events through 6 months. Mean 6-minute walk distance increased 101 ± 71 meters (P < 0.001); Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score increased 26 ± 19 points (P < 0.001); N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide decreased 372 ± 857 pg/mL (P = 0.018); and shunt patency was confirmed with unchanged diameter. CONCLUSIONS: In these feasibility studies of a no-implant interatrial shunt, HFpEF/HFmrEF shunts exhibited stability with favorable safety and early efficacy signals. The results show promise toward this new approach for treating patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF and an appropriate hemodynamic profile. (Evaluation of the Safety and Feasibility of a Percutaneously Created Interatrial Shunt to Alleviate Heart Failure Symptoms in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Preserved or Mid-Range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [ALLEVIATE-HF-1]; NCT04583527; Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of a Percutaneously Created Interatrial Shunt to Alleviate Heart Failure Symptoms in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Preserved or Mid-Range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [ALLEVIATE-HF-2]; NCT04838353).

Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair in 5,000 Patients With Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: COAPT Post-Approval Study.

BACKGROUND: Real-world applicability of the COAPT (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation) randomized controlled trial (RCT) has been debated because of careful patient selection and the contrasting results of the MITRA-FR (Multicentre Study of Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair MitraClip Device in Patients with Severe Secondary Mitral Regurgitation) RCT. OBJECTIVES: The COAPT-PAS (COAPT Post-Approval Study) was initiated to assess the safety and effectiveness of the MitraClip in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR). METHODS: COAPT-PAS is a prospective, single-arm, observational study of 5,000 consecutive patients with SMR treated with the MitraClip at 406 U.S. centers participating in the TVT (Transcatheter Valve Therapy) registry from 2019 to 2020. The 1-year outcomes from the COAPT-PAS full cohort and the COAPT-like and MITRA-FR-like subgroups who met RCT inclusion/exclusion criteria are reported. RESULTS: Patients in the COAPT-PAS had more comorbidities, more severe HF and functional limitations, and less guideline-directed medical therapy than those in the COAPT or MITRA-FR RCTs. Patients in the COAPT-PAS full cohort and the COAPT-like (n = 991) and MITRA-FR-like (n = 917) subgroups achieved a 97.7% MitraClip implant rate, a similar and durable reduction of mitral regurgitation to ≤2+ at 1 year (90.7%, 89.7%, and 86.6%, respectively), a large improvement in quality of life at 1 year (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire +29 COAPT-PAS, +27 COAPT-like, and +33 MITRA-FR-like), faster procedure times, similar or lower clinical event rates compared with the RCTs' MitraClip arms, and lower clinical event rates than the RCTs' guideline-directed medical therapy only arms. One-year heart failure hospitalizations was 18.9% in COAPT-PAS, 19.7% in COAPT-like compared with 24.9% in COAPT-RCT, and 28.7% in COAPT-PAS-MITRA-FR-like compared with 47.4% in MITRA-FR-RCT. CONCLUSIONS: This large, contemporary, real-world study reinforces the safety and effectiveness of the MitraClip System in patients with SMR, including those who met the COAPT or MITRA-FR RCT inclusion/exclusion criteria and patients excluded from the RCTs.

Ventricular Remodeling and Outcomes After Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair in Heart Failure: The COAPT Trial.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between left ventricular (LV) remodeling and clinical outcomes after treatment of severe mitral regurgitation (MR) in heart failure (HF) has not been examined. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between LV reverse remodeling and subsequent outcomes and assess whether transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) and residual MR are associated with LV remodeling in the COAPT (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation) trial. METHODS: Patients with HF and severe MR who remained symptomatic on guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) were randomized to TEER plus GDMT or GDMT alone. Baseline and 6-month core laboratory measurements of LV end-diastolic volume index and LV end-systolic volume index were examined. Change in LV volumes from baseline to 6 months and clinical outcomes from 6 months to 2 years were evaluated using multivariable regression. RESULTS: The analytical cohort comprised 348 patients (190 treated with TEER, 158 treated with GDMT alone). A decrease in LV end-diastolic volume index at 6 months was associated with reduced cardiovascular death between 6 months and 2 years (adjusted HR: 0.90 per 10 mL/m2 decrease; 95% CI: 0.81-1.00; P = 0.04), with consistent results in both treatment groups (Pinteraction = 0.26). Directionally similar but nonsignificant relationships were present for all-cause death and HF hospitalization and between reduced LV end-systolic volume index and all outcomes. Neither treatment group nor MR severity at 30 days was associated with LV remodeling at 6 or 12 months. The treatment benefits of TEER were not significant regardless of the degree of LV remodeling at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HF and severe MR, LV reverse remodeling at 6 months was associated with subsequently improved 2-year outcomes but was not affected by TEER or the extent of residual MR. (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation [The COAPT Trial] and COAPT CAS [COAPT]; NCT01626079).

Feasibility of a No-Implant Approach to Interatrial Shunts: Preclinical and Early Clinical Studies.

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction represents a major unmet clinical need with limited treatment options. Recent device therapies under investigation have focused on decompression of the left atrium through an implantable interatrial shunt. Although these devices have shown favorable safety and efficacy signals, an implant is required to maintain shunt patency, which may increase the patient risk profile and complicate subsequent interventions requiring transseptal access. Methods: The Alleviant System is a no-implant approach to creating an interatrial shunt using radiofrequency energy to securely capture, excise, and extract a precise disk of tissue from the interatrial septum. Acute preclinical studies in healthy swine (n = 5) demonstrated the feasibility of the Alleviant System to repeatably create a 7 mm interatrial orifice with minimal collateral thermal effect and minimal platelet and fibrin deposition observed histologically. Results: Chronic animal studies (n = 9) were carried out to 30- and 60-day time points and exhibited sustained shunt patency with histology demonstrating completely healed margins, endothelialization, and no trauma to adjacent atrial tissue. Preliminary clinical safety and feasibility were validated in a first-in-human study in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (n = 15). All patients demonstrated shunt patency by transesophageal echocardiographic imaging at 1, 3, and 6 months, as well as cardiac computed tomography imaging at 6-month follow-up timepoints. Conclusions: Combined, these data support the safety and feasibility of a novel no-implant approach to creating an interatrial shunt using the Alleviant System. Continued follow-up and subsequent clinical studies are currently ongoing.

Association of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Reimbursement, New Technology Add-on Payment, and Procedure Volumes With Embolic Protection Device Use.

Importance: In the setting of uncertain efficacy and additional, unreimbursed cost, use of an embolic protection device (EPD) during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has had variable uptake. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) instituted a new technology add-on payment to cover EPD use in October 2018. Objective: To evaluate the association between CMS TAVR reimbursement rates and EPD use. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used the Society for Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy registry to identify patients who underwent TAVR between January 2018 and September 2019. Analysis took place between July 2020 and February 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: The association between EPD use and CMS reimbursement was assessed using multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for patient characteristics (model 1) and patient/hospital (annualized TAVR volume and teaching status) characteristics (model 2). Results: Among 511 institutions, CMS reimbursement for TAVR ranged from $28 062 to $111 280 with a median (IQR) of $45 884 ($40 331-$53 627). Among 84 353 patients (median [IQR] age, 81.0 [75.0-86.0] years; 46 247 male individuals [54.8%]; 3958 [4.7%] of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity; 78 170 White individuals [92.7%]) treated at the sites, 6012 (7.1%) underwent TAVR with EPD. Patient characteristics associated with EPD use included prior stroke (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.13 [95% CI, 1.00-1.27]; P = .048), female sex (aOR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.78-0.93]; P < .001), hemodialysis (aOR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.40-0.68]; P < .001), and shock (aOR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.41-0.94]; P = .03). Higher CMS reimbursement up to $50 000 per TAVR was associated with greater likelihood of EPD use in model 1 (per $1000; aOR, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.01-1.16]; P = .02). However, this association was no longer apparent after adjusting for site characteristics (model 2; aOR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.96-1.11]; P = .38). Higher TAVR volume was associated with increased EPD use (per 25 TAVRs; aOR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.09-1.21]; P < .001). There was no significant change in the odds of EPD uptake before vs after institution of the CMS new technology add-on payment across tertiles of CMS TAVR reimbursement (Wald χ2 = 3.59; P = .17). Conclusions and Relevance: EPD use during TAVR remains infrequent and is associated with multiple patient and site characteristics. While CMS reimbursement varies significantly across institutions, TAVR case volume, rather than CMS TAVR reimbursement or the CMS new technology add-on payment, appears to be the predominant factor associated with EPD use. Ongoing work is needed to understand the economic drivers that contribute to the association between procedural volume and EPD use.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients with Aortic Insufficiency.

Background: Worsening aortic insufficiency (AI) is a known sequela of prolonged continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support with a significant impact on patient outcomes. While medical treatment may relieve symptoms, it is unlikely to halt progression. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are among non-medical interventions available to address post-LVAD AI. Limited data are available on outcomes with either SAVR or TAVR for the management of post-LVAD AI. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample data collected for hospital admissions between the years 2015 and 2018 for patients with pre-existing continuous-flow LVAD undergoing TAVR or SAVR for AI were queried. The primary outcome of interest was a composite of in-hospital mortality, stroke, transient ischaemic attack, MI, pacemaker implantation, need for open aortic valve surgery, vascular complications and cardiac tamponade. Results: Patients undergoing TAVR were more likely to receive their procedure during an elective admission (57.1 versus 30%, p=0.002), and a significantly higher prevalence of comorbidities, as assessed by the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, was observed in the SAVR group (29 versus 18; p=0.0001). We observed a significantly higher prevalence of the primary composite outcome in patients undergoing SAVR (30%) compared with TAVR (14.3%; p=0.001). Upon multivariable analysis adjusting for the type of admission and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, TAVR was associated with significantly lower odds of the composite outcome (odds ratio 0.243; 95% CI [0.06-0.97]; p=0.045). Conclusion: In this nationally representative cohort of LVAD patients with post-implant AI, it was observed that TAVR was associated with a lower risk of adverse short-term outcomes compared with SAVR.

Femoral Access, Hemostasis, and Complications for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Most transcatheter aortic valve replacement procedures are currently performed using a percutaneous transfemoral arterial retrograde approach. Complication rates can be minimized with thorough preprocedure planning, pristine technique, and increased team experience. Vascular complications will continue to happen and require early recognition and treatment.

Adjunctive Techniques for Repair of Ischaemic Mitral Regurgitation.

Ischaemic mitral regurgitation is a complex process with debate in the literature as to the optimal treatment pathway. Multiple therapies are available to alleviate mitral regurgitation including medical management, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, mitral valve repair and mitral valve replacement. Medical management with goal-directed therapy should be utilised in patients with heart failure and mild-to-moderate regurgitation. Transcatheter approaches are typically used in patients with prohibitive operative risk, although their use is expanding, especially in those with functional mitral regurgitation who are not responding to goal-directed medical therapy. It is generally accepted that patients with mild-to-moderate disease can avoid valve intervention if successful revascularisation is performed. A higher consideration should be given to valve replacement over repair in patients with severe mitral regurgitation in the setting of myocardial ischaemia. Operative course must be personalised to each patient, and continues to develop with improving technologies and ongoing research into optimal treatment.

The birth, decline, and contemporary re-emergence of endovascular brachytherapy for prevention of in-stent restenosis.

Despite the advent of drug-eluting stents and dual antiplatelet therapy in the interventional management of cardiovascular disease, restenosis rates remain high with significant sequelae. Endovascular brachytherapy-popular in the 1990s and early 2000s-has recently resurfaced as a cost-effective treatment option. In this work, we outline the history of endovascular brachytherapy starting with its earliest promise in the 1990s. We discuss the development of drug-eluting stents and dual antiplatelet strategies and their impact on the perceived benefit of endovascular brachytherapy. For the contemporary era, we propose novel roles for endovascular brachytherapy in complex coronary artery disease and in high-risk patients managed with drug-eluting stents. We discuss the impetus for reducing the requirement and duration of dual antiplatelet therapy using endovascular brachytherapy. We also review innovative opportunities for endovascular brachytherapy after bare-metal stent placement in both coronary and noncoronary territories and offer economic arguments in favor of endovascular brachytherapy. Trials of endovascular brachytherapy in these regimes are merited.