RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is more effective and longer lasting than short-acting methods, uptake remains low among post-abortion clients. Using a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial, we evaluate the impact of a provider-level peer-comparison intervention to encourage choice of LARC in Nepal among post-abortion clients. METHODS: The intervention used prominently displayed monthly posters comparing the health clinic's previous month performance on LARC uptake against peer clinics. To understand how the intervention affected behavior, while ensuring voluntarism and informed choice, we used mystery client visits, in-depth provider interviews, and client exit survey data. The trial examined 17,680 post-abortion clients in 36 clinics in Nepal from July 2016 to January 2017. The primary outcome was the proportion of clients receiving LARCs. Statistical analysis used ordinary least squares (OLS) regression with ANCOVA estimation to assess the intervention's impact on LARC uptake while controlling for client- and clinic-level characteristics. RESULTS: The intervention increased LARC use among post-abortion clients by 6.6% points [95% CI: 0.85 to 12.3, p-value < 0.05], a 29.5% increase in LARC use compared to control clinics. This effect persisted after the formal experiment ended. Analysis of provider and client experiences showed that the behavioral intervention generated significant change in providers' counseling practices, motivated the sharing of best practices. Quality of care indicators either remained stable or improved. CONCLUSION: We find that a provider-level behavioral intervention increases LARC uptake among post-abortion clients. This type of intervention represents a low-cost option to contribute to reducing unmet need for contraception through provider behavior change.
Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , Anticoncepción Reversible de Larga Duración , Humanos , Nepal , Femenino , Anticoncepción Reversible de Larga Duración/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Embarazo , Promoción de la Salud/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: When initiated in the Emergency Department (ED), medication for addiction treatment (MAT) with buprenorphine improves outcomes, increases engagement in addiction treatment and decreases the use of inpatient addiction treatment services. Unfortunately, initiating MAT in the ED is not yet standard practice. We assessed the impact of the addition of a multipart behavioral science-based intervention to increase opioid use disorder (OUD)-related treatments prescribed in the ED. METHODS: Our ED initiated a campaign to help ED faculty obtain their DEA-X waiver required to prescribe buprenorphine. In parallel, we implemented 2 ED-initiated buprenorphine treatment pathways. We then conducted a two-stage qualitative process informed by behavioral science to identify key barriers to physician use of the MAT protocol. Using these insights, we developed 4 behavioral science-based interventions. To assess the impact of the interventions on the number of OUD-related treatments per day among patients meeting the inclusion criteria we compared the number of OUD-related treatments per day before versus after the interventions began using t tests. Then, in our primary model, we estimated the causal effect of the behavioral interventions using a regression discontinuity in time approach. RESULTS: Across the entire year study period, there is an increase in OUD-related treatment after the interventions begin, driven by greater use of ambulatory referral orders. The unadjusted mean difference in any OUD treatments per day pre- versus post-intervention increased by 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.04, 1.56; P = 0.039) whereas the number of ambulatory referral orders placed increased by 0.82 (95% CI: 0.48,1.16; P < 0.001). Using the 120-day study window and an ordinary least squares regression discontinuity in time model, the 4-part intervention increased the number of patients receiving any opioid treatment in the ED by 1.6 additional treatments per day (95% CI: 0.04, 3.19; P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: To support our protocol and increase the provision of ED-MAT, we implemented 1 patient-facing and 3 provider-facing interventions rooted in behavioral science principles. Our results show that this pack of behavioral science interventions increased the likelihood that ED providers offer MAT to patients with OUD.
Asunto(s)
Buprenorfina , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Buprenorfina/uso terapéutico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos/métodos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Many countries have expanded insurance programmes in an effort to achieve universal health coverage (UHC). We assess a complementary path toward financial risk protection: increased access to technologies that improve health and reduce the risk of large health expenditures. Malawi has provided free HIV treatment since 2004 with significant US Government support. We investigate the impact of treatment access on medical spending, capacity to pay and catastrophic health expenditures at the population level, exploiting the phased rollout of HIV treatment in a difference-in-differences design. We find that increased access to HIV treatment generated a 10% decline in medical spending for urban households, a 7% increase in capacity to pay for rural households and a 3-percentage point decrease in the likelihood of catastrophic health expenditure among urban households. These risk protection benefits are comparable to that found from broad-based insurance coverage in other contexts. Our findings show that targeted treatment programmes that provide free care for high burden causes of death can provide substantial financial risk protection against catastrophic health expenditure, while moving developing nations toward UHC.
Asunto(s)
Antirretrovirales/economía , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Catastrófica/economía , Financiación Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por VIH/economía , Humanos , Malaui , Población Rural , Población UrbanaRESUMEN
Safety-net programs improve health for low-income children over the short and long term. In September 2018 the Trump administration announced its intention to change the guidance on how to identify a potential "public charge," defined as a noncitizen primarily dependent on the government for subsistence. After this change, immigrants' applications for permanent residence could be denied for using a broader range of safety-net programs. We investigated whether the announced public charge rule affected the share of children enrolled in Medicaid, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children, using county-level data. Results show that a 1-percentage-point increase in a county's noncitizen share was associated with a 0.1-percentage-point reduction in child Medicaid use. Applied nationwide, this implies a decline in coverage of 260,000 children. The public charge rule was adopted in February 2020, just before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic began in the US. These results suggest that the Trump administration's public charge announcement could have led to many thousands of eligible, low-income children failing to receive safety-net support during a severe health and economic crisis.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud del Niño/organización & administración , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Asistencia Alimentaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Medicaid/economía , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Pobreza/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , COVID-19 , Niño , Salud Infantil , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Miedo , Femenino , Política de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Innovación Organizacional , Pandemias/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Formulación de Políticas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/organización & administración , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Background: Contraceptive prevalence in Ethiopia jumped from 6% in 2000 to 36% in 2016, mainly due to increased injectable method use. However, discontinuation rates among injectable users were high (38%). Given that the public sector is the major source for injectable contraceptives, John Snow Inc. (JSI) in collaboration with ideas42 worked with Ethiopia's flagship Health Extension Program to apply behavioral design to mitigate discontinuation of injectable contraceptives. Methods: We applied behavioral economics insights to mitigate the discontinuation of injectable contraceptives. This process created an intervention package, consisting of a health worker planning calendar, a client counseling job aid, and client appointment cards. A stratified-pair cluster-randomized field trial tested the effectiveness of the intervention. The study area included two districts from the four regions where JSI was implementing a family planning program. One district from each region was randomly allocated to the intervention arm. Women visiting health posts to use injectable contraceptives were enrolled in the study. Regression methods, adjusted for study design, participants' backgrounds, and contextual factors, estimated the intervention's effect on discontinuation rates. Results: A behavioral design methodology was feasibly implemented in a rural, low-resource setting in Ethiopia. The resultant intervention package was successfully delivered in 19 satellite health posts in four districts. Intervention adherence was high for the appointment cards and counseling job aid, but not for the planning calendar. The injectable discontinuation rate was 10.8 % (95% confidence interval: 2.2, 19.3) points lower in the intervention area compared to the control area during the post-intervention follow-up survey. Conclusion: The use of two tools informed by behavioral economics -the appointment card and counseling job aid-effectively decreased injectable discontinuation even with the presence of other health system bottlenecks. Behavioral economics insights and the behavioral design methodology have the potential to enhance family planning programs in Ethiopia and elsewhere.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cause-of-death data for many developing countries are not available. Information on deaths in hospital by cause is available in many low- and middle-income countries but is not a representative sample of deaths in the population. We propose a method to estimate population cause-specific mortality fractions (CSMFs) using data already collected in many middle-income and some low-income developing nations, yet rarely used: in-hospital death records. METHODS AND FINDINGS: For a given cause of death, a community's hospital deaths are equal to total community deaths multiplied by the proportion of deaths occurring in hospital. If we can estimate the proportion dying in hospital, we can estimate the proportion dying in the population using deaths in hospital. We propose to estimate the proportion of deaths for an age, sex, and cause group that die in hospital from the subset of the population where vital registration systems function or from another population. We evaluated our method using nearly complete vital registration (VR) data from Mexico 1998-2005, which records whether a death occurred in a hospital. In this validation test, we used 45 disease categories. We validated our method in two ways: nationally and between communities. First, we investigated how the method's accuracy changes as we decrease the amount of Mexican VR used to estimate the proportion of each age, sex, and cause group dying in hospital. Decreasing VR data used for this first step from 100% to 9% produces only a 12% maximum relative error between estimated and true CSMFs. Even if Mexico collected full VR information only in its capital city with 9% of its population, our estimation method would produce an average relative error in CSMFs across the 45 causes of just over 10%. Second, we used VR data for the capital zone (Distrito Federal and Estado de Mexico) and estimated CSMFs for the three lowest-development states. Our estimation method gave an average relative error of 20%, 23%, and 31% for Guerrero, Chiapas, and Oaxaca, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Where accurate International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-coded cause-of-death data are available for deaths in hospital and for VR covering a subset of the population, we demonstrated that population CSMFs can be estimated with low average error. In addition, we showed in the case of Mexico that this method can substantially reduce error from biased hospital data, even when applied to areas with widely different levels of development. For countries with ICD-coded deaths in hospital, this method potentially allows the use of existing data to inform health policy.
Asunto(s)
Causas de Muerte , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Mortalidad , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Recolección de Datos , Países en Desarrollo , Salud Global , Hospitales , Humanos , Modelos Estadísticos , Modelos Teóricos , Población , Sistema de Registros , Proyectos de InvestigaciónRESUMEN
Absence of financial protection in health is a recently diagnosed "disease" of health systems. The most obvious symptom is that families face economic ruin and poverty as a consequence of financing their health care. Mexico was one of the first countries to diagnose the problem, attribute it to lack of financial protection, and propose systemic therapy through health reform. In this article we assess how Mexico turned evidence on catastrophic and impoverishing health spending into a catalyst for institutional renovation through the reform that created Seguro Popular (Popular Health Insurance). We present 15-year trends on the evolution of catastrophic and impoverishing health spending, including evidence on how the situation is improving. The results of the Mexican experience suggest an important role for the organisation and financing of the health system in reducing impoverishment and protecting households during periods of individual and collective financial crisis.
Asunto(s)
Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Política de Salud/tendencias , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Pobreza , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Femenino , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/economía , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud/tendencias , Política de Salud/economía , Humanos , Masculino , México , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Since 2001, Mexico has been designing, legislating, and implementing a major health-system reform. A key component was the creation of Seguro Popular, which is intended to expand insurance coverage over 7 years to uninsured people, nearly half the total population at the start of 2001. The reform included five actions: legislation of entitlement per family affiliated which, with full implementation, will increase public spending on health by 0.8-1.0% of gross domestic product; creation of explicit benefits packages; allocation of monies to decentralised state ministries of health in proportion to number of families affiliated; division of federal resources flowing to states into separate funds for personal and non-personal health services; and creation of a fund to protect families against catastrophic health expenditures. Using the WHO health-systems framework, we used a wide range of datasets to assess the effect of this reform on different dimensions of the health system. Key findings include: affiliation is preferentially reaching the poor and the marginalised communities; federal non-social security expenditure in real per-head terms increased by 38% from 2000 to 2005; equity of public-health expenditure across states improved; Seguro Popular affiliates used more inpatient and outpatient services than uninsured people; effective coverage of 11 interventions has improved between 2000 and 2005-06; inequalities in effective coverage across states and wealth deciles has decreased over this period; catastrophic expenditures for Seguro Popular affiliates are lower than for uninsured people even though use of services has increased. We present some lessons for Mexico based on this interim evaluation and explore implications for other countries considering health reforms.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud , Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Atención a la Salud/normas , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/economía , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , MéxicoRESUMEN
The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) has provided billions of US tax dollars to expand HIV treatment, care, and prevention programs in sub-Saharan Africa. This investment has generated significant health gains, but much less is known about PEPFAR's population-level economic effects. We used a difference-in-differences approach to compare employment trends between ten countries that received a large amount of PEPFAR funding (focus countries) and eleven countries that received little or no funding (control countries). We found that PEPFAR was associated with a 13 percent differential increase in employment among males in focus countries, compared to control countries. However, we observed no change in employment among females. In addition, we found that increasing PEPFAR per capita funding by $100 was associated with a 9.1-percentage-point increase in employment among males. This rise in employment generates economic benefits equal to half of PEPFAR's cost. These findings suggest that PEPFAR's economic impact should be taken into account when making aid allocation decisions.
Asunto(s)
Empleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Global , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Cooperación Internacional , Adolescente , Adulto , África del Sur del Sahara/epidemiología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Países en Desarrollo , Empleo/economía , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Política de Salud/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
This study evaluates the economic consequences of a 1959-1960 malaria eradication campaign in southwestern Uganda. The effort constitutes a rare, large-scale, and well-documented attempt to eliminate malaria in sub-Saharan Africa and produced an immediate disease reduction. We use this quasi-experimental health shock to identify long-term changes in educational and economic outcomes. Comparing the treatment district to a similar synthetic control, we find malaria eradication raised educational attainment by about a half year for both males and females, increased primary school completion among females and generated an almost 40% rise in the likelihood of male wage employment.
Asunto(s)
Mortalidad del Niño/tendencias , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/etiología , Erradicación de la Enfermedad/economía , Desarrollo Económico/tendencias , Mortalidad Infantil/tendencias , Malaria/prevención & control , Control de Mosquitos/métodos , África del Sur del Sahara/epidemiología , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/economía , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/prevención & control , Erradicación de la Enfermedad/métodos , Escolaridad , Empleo/tendencias , Enfermedades Endémicas/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Malaria/complicaciones , Malaria/economía , Malaria/epidemiología , Masculino , Edad Materna , Control de Mosquitos/estadística & datos numéricos , Uganda/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Absence of financial protection in health is a recently diagnosed "disease" of health systems. The most obvious symptom is that families face economic ruin and poverty as a consequence of financing their health care. Mexico was one of the first countries to diagnose the problem, attribute it to lack of financial protection, and propose systemic therapy through health reform. In this article we assess how Mexico turned evidence on catastrophic and impoverishing health spending into a catalyst for institutional renovation through the reform that created Seguro Popular de Salud (Popular Health Insurance). We present 15-year trends on the evolution of catastrophic and impoverishing health spending, including evidence on how the situation is improving. The results of the Mexican experience suggest an important role for the organisation and financing of the health system in reducing impoverishment and protecting households during periods of individual and collective financial crisis.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/economía , Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Gastos en Salud/tendencias , Política de Salud , Enfermedad Catastrófica/economía , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/economía , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro , México , Pobreza , Seguridad SocialRESUMEN
Since 2001, Mexico has been designing, legislating, and implementing a major health-system reform. A key component was the creation of Seguro Popular, which is intended to expand insurance coverage over seven years to uninsured people, nearly half the total population at the start of 2001. The reform included five actions: legislation of entitlement per family affiliated which, with full implementation, will increase public spending on health by 0.8-1.0% of gross domestic product; creation of explicit benefits packages; allocation of monies to decentralised state ministries of health in proportion to number of families affiliated; division of federal resources flowing to states into separate funds for personal and non-personal health services; and creation of a fund to protect families against catastrophic health expenditures. Using the WHO health-systems framework, a wide range of datasets to assess the effect of this reform on different dimensions of the health system was used. Key findings include: affiliation is preferentially reaching the poor and the marginalised communities; federal non-social security expenditure in real per-head terms increased by 38% from 2000 to 2005; equity of public-health expenditure across states improved; Seguro Popular affilates used more inpatient and outpatient services than uninsured people; effective coverage of 11 interventions has improved between 2000 and 2005-06; inequalities in effective coverage across states and wealth deciles has decreased over this period; catastrophic expenditures for Seguro Popular affiliates are lower than for uninsured people even though use of services has increased. We present some lessons for Mexico based on this interim evaluation and explore implications for other countries considering health reforms.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Política de Salud , Recolección de Datos , Atención a la Salud/economía , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/economía , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro , México , Seguridad Social , Organización Mundial de la SaludRESUMEN
La falta de protección financiera en salud es una enfermedad recientemente diagnosticada de los sistemas de salud. El síntoma más obvio es que las familias enfrentan la ruina económica y el empobrecimiento por financiar su atención médica. México fue uno de los primeros países en diagnosticar el problema, atribuirlo a la falta de protección financiera y proponer una terapia sistémica a través de la reforma del sistema de salud. Este trabajo analiza la manera en que México convirtió las evidencias sobre los gastos catastróficos y empobrecedores en salud en un catalizador de la renovación institucional a través de la reforma que creó el Seguro Popular de Salud (SPS). Presentamos tanto las tendencias de los últimos 15 años sobre la evolución de los gastos catastróficos y emprobrecedores en salud, como las evidencias recientes sobre el mejoramiento en estos indicadores con la expansión del SP. Los resultados de la experiencia mexicana sugieren que la organización y el financiamiento del sistema de salud han jugado un papel muy importante en la reducción del empobrecimiento y en la protección de los hogares durante los periodos de crisis financiera individual y colectiva.
Absence of financial protection in health is a recently diagnosed "disease" of health systems. The most obvious symptom is that families face economic ruin and poverty as a consequence of financing their health care. Mexico was one of the first countries to diagnose the problem, attribute it to lack of financial protection, and propose systemic therapy through health reform. In this article we assess how Mexico turned evidence on catastrophic and impoverishing health spending into a catalyst for institutional renovation through the reform that created Seguro Popular de Salud (Popular Health Insurance). We present 15-year trends on the evolution of catastrophic and impoverishing health spending, including evidence on how the situation is improving. The results of the Mexican experience suggest an important role for the organisation and financing of the health system in reducing impoverishment and protecting households during periods of individual and collective financial crisis.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Atención a la Salud/economía , Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Gastos en Salud/tendencias , Política de Salud , Enfermedad Catastrófica/economía , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/economía , Cobertura del Seguro , México , Pobreza , Seguridad SocialRESUMEN
A partir de 2001 se inicia en México un proceso de diseño, legislación e implementación de la Reforma Mexicana de Salud. Un componente clave de ésta fue la creación del Seguro Popular, que pretende extender la cobertura de aseguramiento médico por siete años a la población que no cuenta con seguridad social, la cual constituía en ese momento casi la mitad de la población total. La reforma incluyó cinco acciones: modificar la ley para garantizar el derecho a la protección a la salud para las familias afiliadas, lo cual al ser implantado completamente incrementará el gasto público en salud entre 0.8 y 1.0 por ciento del PIB; la creación de un paquete de servicios de salud explícito; la asignación de recursos a secretarías estatales de salud descentralizadas, proporcional al número de familias incorporadas; la división de los recursos federales destinados a los estados en fondos independientes para servicios de salud personales y no personales; así como la creación de un fondo para garantizar recursos cuando se presentan eventos catastróficos en salud. Mediante el uso del marco conceptual de los sistemas de salud de la OMS, se han examinado diversos conjuntos de datos para evaluar el impacto de esta reforma en distintas dimensiones del sistema de salud. Entre los principales hallazgos clave se encuentran que: la afiliación alcanza de manera preferente a las comunidades pobres y marginadas; el gasto federal no correspondiente a la seguridad social aumentó 38 por ciento de 2000 a 2005 en términos reales; ha mejorado la equidad del gasto público entre los estados; los afiliados al Seguro Popular presentan una mayor utilización de servicios, tanto a nivel ambulatorio como para pacientes externos y pacientes hospitalarios en comparación con los no asegurados; la cobertura efectiva de 11 intervenciones en salud ha mejorado entre 2000 y 2005; han disminuido las desigualdades en cobertura efectiva durante este periodo en todos los estados y deciles...
Since 2001, Mexico has been designing, legislating, and implementing a major health-system reform. A key component was the creation of Seguro Popular, which is intended to expand insurance coverage over seven years to uninsured people, nearly half the total population at the start of 2001. The reform included five actions: legislation of entitlement per family affiliated which, with full implementation, will increase public spending on health by 0.8-1.0 percent of gross domestic product; creation of explicit benefits packages; allocation of monies to decentralised state ministries of health in proportion to number of families affiliated; division of federal resources flowing to states into separate funds for personal and non-personal health services; and creation of a fund to protect families against catastrophic health expenditures. Using the WHO health-systems framework, a wide range of datasets to assess the effect of this reform on different dimensions of the health system was used. Key findings include: affiliation is preferentially reaching the poor and the marginalised communities; federal non-social security expenditure in real per-head terms increased by 38 percent from 2000 to 2005; equity of public-health expenditure across states improved; Seguro Popular affiliates used more inpatient and outpatient services than uninsured people; effective coverage of 11 interventions has improved between 2000 and 2005-06; inequalities in effective coverage across states and wealth deciles has decreased over this period; catastrophic expenditures for Seguro Popular affiliates are lower than for uninsured people even though use of services has increased. We present some lessons for Mexico based on this interim evaluation and explore implications for other countries considering health reforms.