Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Asunto principal
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
Clin Transl Allergy ; 9: 14, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30891182

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Skin prick testing is the first-line interventional method to diagnose IgE mediated allergic diseases. Methodological differences in manufacturing processes and extract standardization may lead to variations in the reagent quality and potency. The current study evaluates sixteen commercially available Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Blomia tropicalis extracts for allergy diagnosis from different European manufacturers regarding allergen composition and content and whether these differences could influence their biological activity. METHODS: Mite-allergic subjects (n = 21) were skin-tested with the extracts and studied for immunoglobulin E reactivity. Nine extracts from D. pteronyssinus and seven from B. tropicalis were analysed for total protein content by Bradford and ELISA double sandwich was used to quantify specific antibodies for D. pteronyssinus and B. tropicalis major allergens from nine different manufacturers. RESULTS: Mite extracts showed a 10-60 fold variation regarding the total protein content. The contents of the major allergens of D. pteronyssinus and B. tropicalis differed considerably (30-53 fold change) among the extracts. Blo t 5 was quantitatively present in < 50% of the of the B. tropicalis reagents and could not be clearly detected by immunoblotting in the majority of the B. tropicalis commercial extracts. CONCLUSIONS: Certain natural D. pteronyssinus and B. tropicalis extracts lack important allergens showing a considerable variability in composition and content. A closer collaboration among clinicians, allergen manufacturing companies and regulatory agencies to improve the quality and consistency of D. pteronyssinus and B. tropicalis extracts is warranted to achieve a more precise diagnosis and treatment of house dust mite allergy.

2.
Villegas Martín, Eduardo; Julià Benique, M Rosa; Martínez García, Pedro; Carrasco Sayalero, Ángela; Sánchez Ibarrola, Alfonso; Ocaña Pérez, Esther; Marcaida Benito, Goitzane; Rodríguez Delgado, Juana; Martínez Becerra, María José; Laporta Martín, Paz; Fernández Pereira, Luis; Aránzazu Pacho de Lucas, María; Jiménez Garófano, Carmen; Vinyas Gomis, Odette; Garcia, Mila; Dieli Crimi, Romina; Eiras Martínez, Pablo; Bas, Jordi; Muñoz Calleja, Cecilia; García Marcos, Margarita; Calleja Antolín, Sara; López Hoyos, Marcos; Espárrago Rodilla, Manuel; Gelpí Sabater, Carmen; Prada Iñurrategui, Álvaro; Raquel Sáez, J; Ontañón Rodríguez, Jesús; Alcalá Peña , M Inmaculada; Vargas Pérez, M Luisa; Jurado Roger, Aurora; Vlagea, Alexandru; Pastor Barellas, Rosa María; Roy Ariño, Garbiñe; Jiménez Jiménez, Juana; Muñoz Vico, Francisco Javier; Martínez Cáceres, Eva M; Pascual-Salcedo Pascual, Dora; Álvarez Doforno, Rita; Serrano, Antonio; Paz Artal, Estela; Torio Gómez, Silvina; Cid Fernández, José Javier; Mozo Avellaned, Lourdes; Barrios del Pino, Yvelise; Alarcón Torres, Inmaculada; Rodríguez Mahou, Margarita; Montes Ares, Olga; Torio Ruiz, Alberto; Almeida González, Delia; Plaza López , Aresio; Rodríguez Hernández, Carmen; Aparicio Hernández, María Belén; Sánchez , Ana Marín; García Pacheco, José Marcos; Montes Cano, Marco Antonio; González Rodríguez, Concepción; Jaimez Gámiz, Laura; Rodríguez Gutiérrez, Juan Francisco; Alsina Donadeu, Montserrat; Pujalte Mora, Francisco; Amengual Guedan, María José.
Inmunología (1987) ; Inmunología (1987);32(4): 148-156, oct.-dic. 2013. ilus, tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS (España) | ID: ibc-117493
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda