3D printed PLGA implants: How the filling density affects drug release.

Different types of ibuprofen-loaded, poly (D,L lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA)-based implants were prepared by 3D printing (Droplet Deposition Modeling). The theoretical filling density of the mesh-shaped implants was varied from 10 to 100%. Drug release was measured in agarose gels and in well agitated phosphate buffer pH 7.4. The key properties of the implants (and dynamic changes thereof upon exposure to the release media) were monitored using gravimetric measurements, optical microscopy, Differential Scanning Calorimetry, Gel Permeation Chromatography, and Scanning Electron Microscopy. Interestingly, drug release was similar for implants with 10 and 30% filling density, irrespective of the experimental set-up. In contrast, implants with 100% filling density showed slower release kinetics, and the shape of the release curve was altered in agarose gels. These observations could be explained by the existence (or absence) of a continuous aqueous phase between the polymeric filaments and the "orchestrating role" of substantial system swelling for the control of drug release. At lower filling densities, it is sufficient for the drug to be released from a single filament. In contrast, at high filling densities, the ensemble of filaments acts as a much larger (more or less homogeneous) polymeric matrix, and the average diffusion pathway to be overcome by the drug is much longer. Agarose gel (mimicking living tissue) hinders substantial PLGA swelling and delays the onset of the final rapid drug release phase. This improved mechanistic understanding of the control of drug release from PLGA-based 3D printed implants can help to facilitate the optimization of this type of advanced drug delivery systems.

3D printed PLGA implants: APF DDM vs. FDM.

3D Printing offers a considerable potential for personalized medicines. This is especially true for customized biodegradable implants, matching the specific needs of each patient. Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) is frequently used as matrix former in biodegradable implants. However, yet relatively little is known on the technologies, which can be used for the 3D printing of PLGA implants. The aim of this study was to compare: (i) Arburg Plastic Freeforming Droplet Deposition Modeling (APF DDM), and (ii) Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) to print mesh-shaped, ibuprofen-loaded PLGA implants. During APF DDM, individual drug-polymer droplets are deposited, fusing together to form filaments, which build up the implants. During FDM, continuous drug-polymer filaments are deposited to form the meshes. The implants were thoroughly characterized before and after exposure to phosphate buffer pH 7.4 using optical and scanning electron microscopy, GPC, DSC, drug release measurements and monitoring dynamic changes in the systems' dry & wet mass and pH of the bulk fluid. Interestingly, the mesh structures were significantly different, although the device design (composition & theoretical geometry) were the same. This could be explained by the fact that the deposition of individual droplets during APF DDM led to curved and rather thick filaments, resulting in a much lower mesh porosity. In contrast, FDM printing generated straight and thinner filaments: The open spaces between them were much larger and allowed convective mass transport during drug release. Consequently, most of the drug was already released after 4 d, when substantial PLGA set on. In the case of APF DDM printed implants, most of the drug was still entrapped at that time point and substantial polymer swelling transformed the meshes into more or less continuous PLGA gels. Hence, the diffusion pathways became much longer and ibuprofen release was controlled over 2 weeks.

How agarose gels surrounding PLGA implants limit swelling and slow down drug release.

The aim of this study was to better understand to which extent and in which way the presence of an agarose gel (mimicking living tissue) around a PLGA [poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)] implant affects the resulting drug release kinetics. Ibuprofen-loaded implants were prepared by hot melt extrusion. Drug release was measured upon exposure to phosphate buffer pH 7.4 in Eppendorf tubes, as well as upon inclusion into an agarose gel which was exposed to phosphate buffer pH 7.4 in an Eppendorf tube or in a transwell plate. Dynamic changes in the implants' dry & wet mass and dimensions were monitored gravimetrically and by optical macroscopy. Implant erosion and polymer degradation were observed by SEM and GPC. Different pH indicators were used to measure pH changes in the bulk fluids, gels and within the implants during drug release. Ibuprofen release was bi-phasic in all cases: A zero order release phase (~20% of the dose) was followed by a more rapid, final drug release phase. Interestingly, the presence of the hydrogel delayed the onset of the 2nd release phase. This could be attributed to the sterical hindrance of implant swelling: After a certain lag time, the degrading PLGA matrix becomes sufficiently hydrophilic and mechanically instable to allow for the penetration of substantial amounts of water into the system. This fundamentally changes the conditions for drug release: The latter becomes much more mobile and is more rapidly released. A gel surrounding the implant mechanically hinders system swelling and, thus, slows down drug release. These observations also strengthen the hypothesis of the "orchestrating" role of PLGA swelling for the control of drug release and can help developing more realistic in vitro release set-ups.

PLGA implants for controlled drug release: Impact of the diameter.

The aim of this study was to better understand the importance of the diameter of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA)-based implants on system performance, in particular the control of drug release. Different types of ibuprofen-loaded implants were prepared by hot melt extrusion using a Leistritz Nano 16 twin-screw extruder. Drug release was measured in well agitated phosphate buffer pH7.4 bulk fluid and in agarose gels in Eppendorf tubes or transwell plates. Dynamic changes in the implants' dry & wet mass, volume, polymer molecular weight as well as inner & outer morphology were monitored using gravimetric analysis, optical macroscopy, gel permeation chromatography and scanning electron microscopy. The physical states of the drug and polymer were determined by DSC. Also pH changes in the release medium were investigated. Irrespective of the type of experimental set-up, the resulting absolute and relative drug release rates decreased with increasing implant diameter (0.7-2.8 mm). Bi-phasic drug release was observed in all cases from the monolithic solutions (ibuprofen was dissolved in the polymer): A zero order release phase was followed by a final, rapid drug release phase (accounting for 80-90% of the total drug dose). The decrease in the relative drug release rate with increasing system diameter can be explained by the increase in the diffusion pathway lengths to be overcome. Interestingly, also the onset of the final rapid drug release phase was delayed with increasing implant diameter. This can probably be attributed to the higher mechanical stability of thicker devices, offering more resistance to substantial entire system swelling.

How bulk fluid renewal can affect in vitro drug release from PLGA implants: Importance of the experimental set-up.

The aim of this study was to better understand the potential impact of partial vs. complete renewal of the bulk fluid during drug release measurements from poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA)-based implants. A "standard experimental set-up", in which the implants were directly exposed to well agitated phosphate buffer pH 7.4 was used, as well as set-ups, in which the implants were embedded within agarose hydrogels (mimicking living tissue). The gels were exposed to well agitated phosphate buffer pH 7.4. Ibuprofen-loaded implants were prepared by hot melt extrusion. The systems were thoroughly characterized before and during drug release by optical and scanning electron microscopy, gravimetric analysis, pH and solubility measurements as well as gel permeation chromatography. The bulk fluid was either completely or partially replaced by fresh medium at each sampling time point. In all cases, sink conditions were provided in the agitated bulk fluids throughout the experiments. Interestingly, the agarose set-ups did not show any noteworthy impact of the bulk fluid sampling volume on the observed drug release patterns, whereas complete fluid renewal in the "standard set-up" led to accelerated drug release. This could be explained by the considerable fragility of the implants once substantial polymer swelling set on, transforming them into PLGA gels: Complete fluid renewal caused partial disintegration and damage of the highly swollen systems, decreasing the lengths of the diffusion pathways for the drug. The mechanical stress is very much reduced at low sampling volumes, or if the implants are embedded within agarose gels. Thus, great care must be taken when defining the conditions for in vitro drug release measurements from PLGA-based implants: Once substantial system swelling sets on, the devices become highly fragile.

Mechanistic explanation of the (up to) 3 release phases of PLGA microparticles: Monolithic dispersions studied at lower temperatures.

The aim of this study was to better understand the underlying drug release mechanisms in poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) microparticles in which the drug is dispersed in the form of tiny particles ("monolithic dispersions"). Differently sized diprophylline-loaded microparticles were prepared using a solid-in-oil-in-water solvent extraction/evaporation technique. The microparticles were characterized before and after exposure to phosphate buffer pH 7.4 at 4, 20 and 37 °C. In vitro drug release was measured from ensembles and single microparticles. GPC, DSC, SEM, gravimetric analysis, drug solubility measurements and optical microscopy were used to elucidate the importance of polymer swelling & degradation, drug dissolution and diffusion. The diprophylline was initially homogeneously distributed throughout the microparticles in the form of tiny crystals. The burst release (1st phase) was strongly temperature-dependent and likely attributable to the dissolution of drug crystals with direct surface access (potentially via tiny pores). The about constant release rate during the 2nd phase also strongly depended on the temperature. It can probably be explained by the dissolution of drug crystals in surface near regions undergoing local swelling. During the observation period, the 3rd (again rapid) drug release phase was only observed at 37 °C, and seems to be caused by substantial PLGA swelling throughout the entire microparticles. This phase starts as soon as a critical polymer molecular weight of about 25 kDa is reached: Significant amounts of water penetrate into the systems, dissolving the remaining diprophylline crystals and substantially increasing the mobility of the dissolved drug molecules. Thus, this study provides additional experimental evidence (obtained at lower temperatures) confirming the hypothesized root causes for drug release from PLGA microparticles containing dispersed drug particles.

Mechanistic explanation of the (up to) 3 release phases of PLGA microparticles: Diprophylline dispersions.

The aim of this study was to better understand the root causes for the (up to) 3 drug release phases observed with poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) microparticles containing diprophylline particles: The 1st release phase ("burst release"), 2nd release phase (with an "about constant release rate") and 3rd release phase (which is again rapid and leads to complete drug exhaust). The behavior of single microparticles was monitored upon exposure to phosphate buffer pH 7.4, in particular with respect to their drug release and swelling behaviors. Diprophylline-loaded PLGA microparticles were prepared with a solid-in-oil-in-water solvent extraction/evaporation method. Tiny drug crystals were rather homogeneously distributed throughout the polymer matrix after manufacturing. Batches with "small" (63 µm), "medium-sized" (113 µm) and "large" (296 µm) microparticles with a practical drug loading of 5-7% were prepared. Importantly, each microparticle releases the drug "in its own way", depending on the exact distribution of the tiny drug crystals within the system. During the burst release, drug crystals with direct surface access rapidly dissolve. During the 2nd release phase tiny drug crystals (often) located in surface near regions which undergo swelling, are likely released. During the 3rd release phase, the entire microparticle undergoes substantial swelling. This results in high quantities of water present throughout the system, which becomes "gel-like". Consequently, the drug crystals dissolve, and the dissolved drug molecules rather rapidly diffuse through the highly swollen polymer gel.

In-situ forming implants for the treatment of periodontal diseases: Simultaneous controlled release of an antiseptic and an anti-inflammatory drug.

Different types of in-situ forming implants based on poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) for the controlled dual release of an antiseptic drug (chlorhexidine) and an anti-inflammatory drug (ibuprofen) were prepared and thoroughly characterized in vitro. N-methyl-pyrrolidone (NMP) was used as water-miscible solvent, acetyltributyl citrate (ATBC) as plasticizer and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) was added to enhance the implants' stickiness/bioadhesion upon formation within the periodontal pocket. Different drug forms exhibiting substantially different solubilities were used: chlorhexidine dihydrochloride and digluconate as well as ibuprofen free acid and lysinate. The initial drug loadings were varied from 1.5 to 16.1%. In vitro drug release, dynamic changes in the pH of the surrounding bulk fluid and in the systems' wet mass as well as polymer degradation were monitored. Importantly, the release of both drugs, chlorhexidine and ibuprofen, could effectively be controlled simultaneously during several weeks. Interestingly, the tremendous differences in the drug forms' solubilities (e.g., factor >5000) did not translate into major differences in the resulting release kinetics. In the case of ibuprofen, this can likely (at least in part) be attributed to significant drug-polymer interactions (ibuprofen acts as a plasticizer for PLGA). In the case of chlorhexidine, the release of the much less soluble dihydrochloride was even faster compared to the more soluble digluconate (when combined with ibuprofen free acid). In the case of ibuprofen, at higher initial drug loadings also limited solubility effects within the implants seem to play a role, in contrast to chlorhexidine. In the latter case, instead, increased system porosity effects likely dominate at higher drug loadings.