RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Providing trauma services demands high personnel resources and structural costs. The goal of this study was to show if the assignment of trauma patients to a defined A or B resuscitation room treatment as a modified management concept is safe and feasible. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between May 2020 and January 2021, all resuscitation room trauma patients were included in this single center prospective observational study. All patients admitted to the resuscitation room underwent a classification according to the German S3 guidelines grade of recommendation GoR A and GoR B in polytrauma and the status of the ABCDE sequence to an A and B resuscitation room. The classification was performed by the senior consultant on call via telephone after consultation and discussion of clinical findings. RESULTS: All 135 resuscitation room patients were included in the study of whom 42 trauma patients were assigned to the A resuscitation room (A-SR) and 93 were assigned to the B resuscitation room (B-SR). The comparison of the two groups showed that patients in the ASR group are more likely to be accompanied by a prehospital emergency physician (80.5%) than patients in the BSR group (55.5%). Patients in the BSR group showed a significantly higher Glasgow coma scale (GCS). Using the eFAST emergency ultrasound protocol, 2.4% of the ASR and 4.3% of the BSR patients had trauma-associated pathologies, 26% of the ASR and only 3.2% of the BSR patients had to be admitted to the ICU, 21.4% of the ASR and 1% of the BSR patients died within 30 days after trauma. The injury severity scores (ISS) of the ASR patients were significantly higher than in the BSR group (ISS 28.3 vs. 6.8). CONCLUSION: The study confirmed that the assignment by the emergency department consultant according to the German S3 guideline in combination with the ABCDE sequence into resuscitation room A or B treatment is feasible, does not compromise the quality of care and is efficient in the use of the personnel resources.