Fluoroquinolone-resistant strains in cirrhotic patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: microbiological and molecular aspects.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the causative bacterial agents of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) in patients with cirrhosis and to define antibiotic-resistance patterns in addition to identifying the genetic mutations in the quinolone resistance determining regions (QRDRs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty milliliters of ascetic fluid was obtained from 51 patients with SBP. The antibiotic-sensitivity patterns of different strains were determined by the Kirby-Bauer method. Extracted bacterial DNA was used to determine the mutations in four different genes in QRDRs (gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE) by sequencing after gene amplification by PCR. RESULTS: Gram-negative bacilli were detected in 60.7% of the patients. Escherichia coli was detected in 33.3% of the patients, and Staphylococcus aureus was detected in 21.6%. Gram-negative bacilli showed the best sensitivity to meropenem (90.3%), followed by amikacin (83.9%). Gram-positive cocci were sensitive to vancomycin and oxacillin at 90 and 80%, respectively. Fluoroquinolone resistance was detected in 27% of the bacterial strains. Mutations in the gyrA and parC genes were detected in quinolone-resistant strains (64.3 and 35.7%, respectively). Several mutations were found in the gyrA gene (Ser83Leu, Ser81Phe, and Ser-84Leu). Ser80Ile and Ser79Tyr mutations were detected in the parC gene. No mutation was detected in the parE gene. CONCLUSION: Frequent use of antibiotics as prophylaxis against SBP leads to an increase in antibiotic resistance and changes the microbial pattern of causative agents. The gyrA gene mutation was the most common mutation detected in fluoroquinolone-resistant strains.

Therapeutic efficacy of macrolides in management of patients with mild COVID-19.

Evidence on the efficacy of adding macrolides (azithromycin or clarithromycin) to the treatment regimen for COVID-19 is limited. We testify whether adding azithromycin or clarithromycin to a standard of care regimen was superior to standard of supportive care alone in patients with mild COVID-19.This randomized trial included three groups of patients with COVID-19. The azithromycin group included, 107 patients who received azithromycin 500 mg/24 h for 7 days, the clarithromycin group included 99 patients who received clarithromycin 500 /12 h for 7 days, and the control group included 99 patients who received standard care only. All three groups received only symptomatic treatment for control of fever and cough .Clinical and biochemical evaluations of the study participants including assessment of the symptoms duration, real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR), C-reactive protein (CRP), serum ferritin, D-dimer, complete blood count (CBC), in addition to non-contrast chest computed tomography (CT), were performed. The overall results revealed significant early improvement of symptoms (fever, dyspnea and cough) in patients treated with either azithromycin or clarithromycin compared to control group, also there was significant early conversion of SARS-CoV-2 PCR to negative in patients treated with either azithromycin or clarithromycin compared to control group (p < 0.05 for all).There was no significant difference in time to improvement of fever, cough, dyspnea, anosmia, gastrointestinal tract "GIT" symptoms and time to PCR negative conversion between patients treated with azithromycin compared to patients treated with clarithromycin (p > 0.05 for all). Follow up chest CT done after 2 weeks of start of treatment showed significant improvement in patients treated with either azithromycin or clarithromycin compared to control group (p < 0.05 for all).Adding Clarithromycin or azithromycin to the therapeutic protocols for COVID-19 could be beneficial for early control of fever and early PCR negative conversion in Mild COVID-19.Trial registration: (NCT04622891) www.ClinicalTrials.gov retrospectively registered (November 10, 2020).

The seropervelance of infectious hepatitis viruses (HBV, HCV and HEV) among blood donors and their correlation to risk factors in Qena governorate, Upper Egypt.

This study was performed to determine the prevalence of HBV and HCV infection among blood donors and the occurrence of HEV in hepatitis viruses seropositive blood donors. Also, to investigate the correlation between the occurrence of hepatitis viruses and other risk factors (gender, age, occupation, educational level, residency and donors' types). A total of 11,604 blood samples from apparently healthy blood donors of age range 18-60 years old were collected. The blood donors were categorized as voluntary and replacement donors. Blood samples from donors were tested for the presence of HBsAg, HCV and HEV antibodies by using Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The overall results indicated that 671 out of 11,604 blood donors; 370 persons (3.188%) HCV, 295 persons (2.542%) HBV and 6 persons (0.052%) HCV and HBV; were hepatitis viruses seropositive donors. The prevalence of HEV were 193 (28.76%) among these seropositive blood donors. There is a highly significant correlation among HCV, HBV and other risk factors. Also, the HEV showed high significant with age and educational level and significant with donor types and locations. All investigated virus combinations (HEV/HCV, HEV/HBV and HEV/HCV/HBV) were highly significant with the risk factors except for occupation. In conclusion, the HEV is significantly correlated to HCV and HBV seropositive donors and should be screened among blood donors.

Characteristics, Outcomes and Indicators of Severity for COVID-19 Among Sample of ESNA Quarantine Hospital's Patients, Egypt: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: The risk factors, disease characteristics, severity, and mortality of COVID-19 are unclear, particularly in Egypt. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to analyze the patients' characteristics, hematological, biochemical, and chest imaging findings among the cohort of patients with COVID-19 in Egypt and also to shed light on the predictors of COVID-19 severity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 66 patients with COVID-19 in Egypt. Medical history, imaging data (CT chest findings), and measured hematological and biochemical parameters at diagnosis were recorded in the form of complete blood counts and differential counts; CRP, ESR, serum ferritin, creatinine, and liver function tests . Results of real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA at diagnosis and during follow up of these patients were also recorded. RESULTS: The study included 36 patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 and 30 patients with severe/critical infection. There was a significant older age among severe (62.6 years old ±10.1SD) than mild to moderate infection (55.5 ± 10.1) (p˂0.05). Fever, dry cough, dyspnea, and sore throat malaise were highly frequent among COVID-19 patients, while headache and diarrhea were the least frequently occurring manifestations. All included cases (30 patients, 100%) with severe COVID-19 showed crazy-paving appearance (in the form of reticular and/or interlobular septal thickening) with or without GGO. There were significantly lower mean values of WBCs, lymphocytic count, total protein, and albumin among the severely infected than those who had mild to moderate COVID-19 infection, p˂0.05 for all. Additionally, there were significantly higher mean values of CRP, ESR, ferritin, ALT, and AST among patients with severe/critical COVID-19 when compared with those having mild to moderate COVID-19, p˂0.05 for all. CONCLUSION: Among the studied demographic, clinical, hematological, biochemical, and imaging data, dyspnea, diabetes mellitus, lymphopenia, raised CRP, ESR, ferritin, ALT, AST, low albumin, and presence of CT chest findings could be considered as predictors for COVID-19 severity using binary logistic regression analysis.