Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País como asunto
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
Birth ; 50(3): 636-645, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36825853

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This quality improvement project aimed to create a decision aid for labor induction in healthy pregnancies at or beyond 39 weeks that met the needs of pregnant people least likely to experience shared decision-making and to identify and test implementation strategies to support its use in prenatal care. METHODS: We used quality improvement and qualitative methods to develop, test, and refine a patient decision aid. The decision aid was tested in three languages by providers across obstetrics, family medicine, and midwifery practices at a tertiary care hospital and two community health centers. Outcomes included patients' understanding of their choices, pros and cons of choices, and the decision being theirs or a shared one with their provider. RESULTS: Patient interview data indicated that shared decision-making on labor induction was achieved. Across three Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, we interviewed a diverse group of 24 pregnant people: 20 were people of color, 16 were publicly insured, and 15 were born outside the United States. All but one (23/24) reported feeling the decision was theirs or a shared one with their provider. The majority could name induction choices they had along with pros and cons. Interviewees described the decision-making experience as empowering and positive. Nine medical providers tested the decision aid and gave feedback. Providers stated the tool helped improve the quality of their counseling and reduce bias. CONCLUSION: This project suggests that using an evidence-based and well-tested decision aid can help achieve shared decision-making on labor induction for a diverse group of pregnant people.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Participación del Paciente , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Trabajo de Parto Inducido , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión
2.
Int J Infect Dis ; 99: 102-107, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32717396

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In Sierra Leone, very little data are available on hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence. Blood donor screening permits estimation of the prevalence of transfusion transmissible infections in a general open population. We analyzed blood donor data in Sierra Leone to estimate national viral hepatitis prevalence and identify risk factors for hepatitis infection among the donor population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective data analysis in five government hospitals. We collected HBV and HCV screening results, donor demographics, and donation type (family replacement or voluntary donor; first-time or repeat). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine associations between infections and socio-demographic factors. RESULTS: The number of donors screened was 29,713. The overall prevalence was: 10.8% (3200) for HBV and 1.2% (357) for HCV. HBV infection was most strongly associated with male sex (p: <0.0001) and younger age (p: <0.0004 for the 22-27 age group). Both HBV and HCV infection were higher in certain locations. CONCLUSION: Our findings stress the presence of viral hepatitis infection throughout the country and the need to invest in safe blood services, vaccination and treatment of viral hepatitis at the national level.


Asunto(s)
Donantes de Sangre , Hepatitis B/epidemiología , Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Adulto , Femenino , Hepacivirus , Virus de la Hepatitis B , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Sierra Leona/epidemiología , Reacción a la Transfusión , Vacunación , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda