Seropersistence and booster response following vaccination with FSME-IMMUN in children, adolescents, and young adults.

BACKGROUND: Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is a viral disease that can have a severe clinical course and considerable long-term morbidity. As no curative treatment exists, vaccination is the primary means of prevention. Long-term antibody seropersistence 2-5 years after the 3-dose primary immunization and 3-10 years after first booster was evaluated, as well as booster responses in children, adolescents and young adults. METHODS: Subjects who participated in these phase 4 prospective, open-label follow-up studies received all vaccinations with FSME-IMMUN. After 3-dose primary immunization, subjects were followed for 2-5 years. Overall, 205 out of 358 subjects (57%) received the first booster and 179 of these subjects (87%) enrolled in a further 10-year follow-up. Antibody seropersistence was assessed annually. Subjects with a TBE antibody titer below a pre-specified cut-off at the yearly blood draw received a booster. Seropositivity rates and geometric mean fold rises (GMFRs) were assessed. RESULTS: In children who received their 3-dose primary immunization between 1 and 15 years of age, the seropositivity rate 5 years after the 3rd dose was 84.9% by NT and 72.0% by ELISA. One month post-first booster, all subjects were seropositive by NT and 98.5% by ELISA. Response to first booster by GMFR ranged from 3.7 to 11.4. At 5 years post-first booster, seropositivity was 99.4% by NT and 97.5% by ELISA, and at 10 years, was 90.3% by NT and 87.7% by ELISA. Although seropositivity rates differed between age groups, all subjects (100%) who received a second booster responded with a robust increase of TBEV antibodies. DISCUSSION: Long-lasting seropersistence of TBEV antibodies after the 3-dose primary immunization and first booster was demonstrated as well as a competent immune memory response in those who received a first or second booster at any time during the 15-year follow-up. Therefore, an extension of FSME-IMMUN booster interval up to 10 years after the 3-dose primary immunization seems warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00894686.

Zanamivir for treatment of symptomatic influenza A and B infection in children five to twelve years of age: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Influenza infection rates are higher in children than in other age groups. This study evaluated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of a 5-day course of twice daily inhaled zanamivir, 10 mg, compared with placebo in the treatment of symptomatic influenza A and B viral infections among children 5 to 12 years of age. METHODS: This double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multicenter study conducted in the Northern Hemisphere during the 1998 and 1999 influenza season enrolled 471 patients with influenza-like symptoms for < or = 36 h. Patients were randomly assigned to zanamivir (n = 224) or placebo (n = 247). Symptoms were recorded on diary cards twice daily during treatment, for 9 days after treatment and for 14 additional days (if still reporting moderate/severe cough and/or taking relief medication). FINDINGS: A total of 346 (73%) patients were influenza-positive by culture, serology or polymerase chain reaction (65% influenza A, 35% influenza B). Zanamivir reduced the median time to symptom alleviation by 1.25 days compared with placebo among patients with confirmed influenza infection (P < 0.001). Zanamivir-treated patients returned to normal activities significantly faster and took significantly fewer relief medications than placebo-treated patients. Zanamivir was well-tolerated, demonstrating adverse event profiles similar to those of placebo and no clinically significant changes in laboratory findings. Viral susceptibility testing revealed no zanamivir-resistant strains of influenza A or B. CONCLUSIONS: Zanamivir was effective in shortening the duration and severity of influenza symptoms and was well-tolerated among children 5 to 12 years of age.

Initial treatment of symptomatic mild to moderate bronchial asthma with the salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (50/250 microg) combination product (SAS 40023).

BACKGROUND: Chronic controller therapy, particularly with inhaled corticosteroids, is required in patients with persistent bronchial asthma. Long-acting beta agonists provide prolonged bronchodilatation, improve symptoms and reduce exacerbations. A powder inhaler containing both fluticasone propionate and salmeterol xinafoate combines anti-inflammatory treatment and bronchodilatation in a single user-friendly device (Diskus). OBJECTIVE: The goal of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of salmeterol/ fluticasone (50/250 microg twice daily) as initial treatment for symptomatic patients with mild to moderate bronchial asthma who had not previously received appropriate anti-asthma medication. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted in 17 study centres located predominantly in private practices. 127 patients with mild to moderate asthma (FEV(1) >60% of predicted) aged 12 years and older were recruited into a one-week screening phase. If they used rescue medication on > or =3 of 7 days or had a total asthma symptom score of > or =5 points, they were admitted to the treatment phase and received salmeterol xinafoate (50 microg) and fluticasone propionate (250 microg) in a single dry powder inhaler (Diskus) for four weeks. RESULTS: Combined salmeterol/fluticasone therapy improved morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) as measured by patients and reported in asthma diaries within the first week of treatment (by 35 and 28 L/min, respectively). At week 4, morning PEFR had increased by 57 L/min or 13.0 % predicted compared to baseline, and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) had improved by 12.5% of predicted (p<0.001). Use of rescue medication declined by 1.9 puffs per day. Both patients and physicians regarded treatment as a major benefit: two thirds assessed treatment as "excellent". The combination was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The combined inhalation of salmeterol and fluticasone from a single dry powder inhaler (DiskuS) was an effective initial treatment for patients with mild to moderate asthma. Improvements of symptoms and lung function were documented by the first week of treatment. This combination provides rapid and effective asthma control that is highly acceptable to both the patient and physician.

Prospective clinical trial on the efficacy of amoxycillin administered twice or four times daily in children with respiratory tract infections.

Thirty-four children with upper or lower respiratory tract infections were randomly allocated to receive either a twice daily or four times daily dose of 50 mg amoxycillin/kg body-weight/day. Mean duration of therapy was identical in both groups. Peak and trough antibiotic concentrations were determined. Eradication of bacteria, clinical improvement and side-effects were comparable in both groups.

Immunogenicity and safety of AS03-adjuvanted H1N1 pandemic vaccines in children and adolescents.

Vaccines with acceptable efficacy profile against the H1N1 A/California/7/2009 virus are needed for use in children. The two studies presented here evaluated the immunogenicity and the reactogenicity/safety of A/H1N1/2009 vaccines containing either 3.75 µg haemagglutinin antigen (HA) and AS03(A)-adjuvant (3.75 µg HA/AS03(A) study) (N=210 [53, 57 and 100 in the 3-5, 6-9 and 10-17 years age strata, respectively]) or 1.9 µg HA and AS03(B)-adjuvant (1.9 µg HA/AS03(B) study) (N=244 [61, 65 and 118 in the 3-5, 6-9 and 10-17 years age strata, respectively]), given as two-dose series. Although the haemagglutination inhibition antibody titres were higher in the 3.75 µg HA/AS03(A) study, both vaccine dosages were highly immunogenic and exceeded regulatory acceptance criteria after the first and the second doses. Seroprotection rates reached 100% and seroconversion rates ranged from 98.2% to 99.1% after each dose of both vaccine dosages. Geometric mean titres increased from 456.5 to 1538.5 and from 297.9 to 1106.7 between the first and the second doses in the 3.75 µg HA/AS03(A) study and the 1.9 µg HA/AS03(B) study, respectively. Despite an observed slight increase of the reactogenicity following the second dose in the 3.75 µg HA/AS03(A) study, the vaccines safety profiles were considered clinically acceptable. In conclusion, both dosages of the AS03-adjuvanted A/H1N1/2009 pandemic influenza vaccines were highly immunogenic and well-tolerated in children and adolescents.

Immunogenicity and safety of measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMRV) vaccine followed by one dose of varicella vaccine in children aged 15 months-2 years or 2-6 years primed with measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine.

In this open, randomized, comparative study (105908/NCT00353288), 458 age-stratified children (15 months-2 years and 2-6 years) previously primed with MMR received one dose of either a combined MMRV vaccine (Priorix-Tetra, MMRV group) or concomitant MMR and varicella vaccines (Priorix and Varilrix, MMR+V group), followed 42-56 days later by another dose of varicella vaccine (Varilrix) in both groups. Post-vaccination measles, mumps and rubella seropositivity rates and antibody geometric mean titers (GMTs) were high (99.5% for anti-measles and 100% for anti-mumps and anti-rubella) in both vaccine groups. In the two age strata, varicella seroconversion rates were, post-dose 1: > or =97.6% (MMRV), > or =96.6% (MMR+V) and, post-dose 2: 100% in both groups. Post-dose 2, anti-varicella GMTs increased respectively 14.1- and 12.6-fold (MMRV), and 9.8- and 13.1-fold (MMR+V). Both vaccine regimens were well-tolerated. Post-dose 1, the incidence of any solicited local symptom during the 4-days follow-up was < or =28.2% (MMRV) and < or =19.8% (MMR+V) and the incidence of fever >39.5 degrees C (rectal temperature) within 15 days was < or =2.8% (MMRV) and < or =2.6% (MMR+V). This MMRV vaccine appears an immunogenic and safe substitute for a second dose of MMR vaccine in young children. The increase in anti-varicella antibodies observed after a second dose of varicella vaccine supports a two-dose schedule for varicella-containing vaccine.

Tacrolimus ointment does not affect the immediate response to vaccination, the generation of immune memory, or humoral and cell-mediated immunity in children.

BACKGROUND: Concern exists that the prolonged application of immunomodulators to treat atopic dermatitis may cause systemic immunosuppression. AIMS: In a 7-month, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial, we investigated the equivalence of response to vaccination against meningococcal serogroup C disease with a protein-conjugate vaccine in children (2-11 years) with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis, by applying either 0.03% tacrolimus ointment (TAC-O; n = 121[corrected]) or a hydrocortisone ointment regimen (HC-O; n = 111). METHODS: TAC-O was applied twice daily (bid) for 3 weeks, and thereafter daily until clearance. 1% hydrocortisone acetate (HA) for head/neck and 0.1% hydrocortisone butyrate ointment for trunk/limbs was applied bid for 2 weeks; thereafter HA was applied bid to all affected areas. At week 1, patients were vaccinated with protein-conjugate vaccine against meningococcal serogroup C, and challenged at month 6 with low dose meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine. The control group (44 non-atopic dermatitis children) received the primary vaccination and challenge dose. Assessments were made at baseline, weeks 1 and 5, and months 6 and 7. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with a serum bactericidal antibody (SBA) titre > or = 8 at the week 5 visit. RESULTS: The response rate (patients with SBA titre > or = 8) was 97.5% (confidence interval (CI) approximately 97.3 to 100), 99.1% (94.8 to 100) and 97.7% (93.3 to 100) in the TAC-O, HC-O and control groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The immune response to vaccination against meningococcal serogroup C in children with atopic dermatitis applying either 0.03% TAC-O or HC is equivalent. Ointment application does not affect the immediate response to vaccination, generation of immune memory or humoral and cell-mediated immunity.

Efficacy of twice-daily dosing of amoxycillin/clavulanate in acute otitis media in children.

Children with acute otitis media (AOM), aged 2-12 years, were randomised to 10 days treatment with amoxycillin/clavulanate (A/C) 70/10 mg/kg/day given b.i.d. (231 patients) or to A/C 60/15 mg/kg/day given t.i.d. (232 patients). Clinical success rates at end of therapy (10-17 days) were 91.8% for the b.i.d. group and 90.5% for the t.i.d. group and at follow-up (28-42 days) were 80.1% for the b.i.d. group and 77.6% for the t.i.d. group, indicating that the b.i.d. regimen was as effective as the t.i.d. regimen. There was no statistically significant difference in incidence of adverse experiences between the two groups. The overall incidence of protocol defined diarrhoea assessed from diary booklets was low, with a lower incidence in the b.i.d. group (6.7%) than in the t.i.d. group (10.3%). Significantly more patients in the b.i.d. group (83.1%) than in the t.i.d. group (72.8%) had at least 80% compliance over a 7-10 day treatment period. A/C given twice or three-times daily was highly effective in the treatment of AOM in children. The two regimens showed equivalent clinical efficacy, both were well tolerated, and there was evidence of improved compliance with the b.i.d. regimen.