RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare outcomes after percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) for acute necrotizing pancreatitis versus those in a randomized controlled trial as a reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between September 2010 and August 2014, CT-guided PCD was the primary treatment for 39 consecutive patients with pancreatic necrosis. The indication for PCD was the clinical finding of uncontrolled pancreatic juice leakage rather than infected necrosis. Subsequent to PCD, the drains were proactively studied with fluoroscopic contrast medium every 3 days to ensure patency and position. Drains were ultimately maneuvered to the site of leakage. These 39 patients were compared with 43 patients from the Pancreatitis, Necrosectomy versus Step-up Approach (PANTER) trial. RESULTS: The CT severity index was similar between studies (median of 8 in each). Time from onset of acute pancreatitis to PCD was shorter in the present series (median, 23 d vs 30 d). The total number of procedures (PCD and subsequent fluoroscopic drain studies) per patient was greater in the present series (mean, 14 vs 2). More patients in the PANTER trial had organ failure (62% vs 84%), required open or endoscopic necrosectomy (0% vs 60%), and experienced in-hospital mortality (0% vs 19%; P < .05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Even though patients in the present series had a similar CT severity index as those in the PANTER trial, the former group showed lower incidences of organ failure, need for necrosectomy, and in-hospital mortality. The use of a proactive PCD protocol early, before the development of severe sepsis, appeared to be effective.
Asunto(s)
Drenaje/métodos , Pancreatectomía , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Catéteres , Drenaje/efectos adversos , Drenaje/instrumentación , Drenaje/mortalidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/etiología , Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreatectomía/mortalidad , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/diagnóstico por imagen , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/mortalidad , Radiografía Intervencional , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic duct disruption (PDD) after acute pancreatitis can cause pancreatic collections in the early phase and biliary stenosis (BS) or gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) in the late phase. We aimed to document those late complications after moderate or severe acute pancreatitis. METHODS: Between September 2010 and August 2014, 141 patients showed pancreatic collections on computed tomography. Percutaneous drainage was primarily performed for patients with signs or symptoms of uncontrolled pancreatic juice leakage. Pancreatic duct disruption was defined as persistent amylase-rich drain fluid or a pancreatic duct cut-off on imaging. Clinical course of the patients who developed BS or GOO was investigated. RESULTS: Among the 141 patients with collections, 33 patients showed PDD in the pancreatic head/neck area. Among them, 9 patients (27%) developed BS 65 days after onset and required stenting for 150 days, and 5 patients (15%) developed GOO 92 days after onset and required gastric decompression and jejunal tube feeding for 147 days (days shown in median). All 33 patients recovered successfully without requiring surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic proximity of the bile duct or duodenum to the site of PDD and severe inflammation seemed to contribute to the late onset of BS or GOO. Conservative management successfully reversed these complications.