Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
BMC Fam Pract ; 17: 85, 2016 07 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27439610

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Low participation rates among ethnic minorities in preventive healthcare services are worrisome and not well understood. The objective of this study was to explore how adults of Turkish and Moroccan origin living in the Netherlands, aged 45 years and older, can be reached to participate in health checks for cardio-metabolic diseases and follow-up (lifestyle) advice. METHODS: This mixed-methods study used a convergent parallel design, to combine data of one quantitative study and three qualitative studies. Questionnaire data were included of 310 respondents, and interview data from 22 focus groups and four individual interviews. Participants were recruited via a research database, general practitioners and key figures. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and qualitative data were analysed using a thematic approach. RESULTS: Regarding health checks, 50 % (95 % CI 41;59) of the Turkish questionnaire respondents and 66 % (95 % CI 57;76) of the Moroccan questionnaire respondents preferred an invitation from their general practitioner. The preferred location to fill out the health check questionnaire was for both ethnic groups the general practitioner's office or at home, on paper. Regarding advice, both groups preferred to receive advice at individual level rather than in a group, via either a physician or a specialised healthcare professional. It was emphasised that the person who gives lifestyle advice should be familiar with the (eating) habits of the targeted individual. Sixty-one percent (95 % CI 53;69) of the Turkish respondents preferred to receive information in their native language compared to 37 % (95 % CI 29;45) of the Moroccan respondents. Several participants mentioned a low proficiency in the local language as an explanation for their preference to fill out the health check questionnaire at home, to receive advice from an ethnic-matched professional, and to receive information in their native language. CONCLUSIONS: The general practitioner is considered as a promising contact to reach adults of Turkish and Moroccan origin for health checks or (lifestyle) advice. It might be necessary to provide information in individuals' native language to overcome language barriers. In addition, (lifestyle) advice must be tailored. The obtained insight into preferences of Turkish and Moroccan adults regarding reach for preventive healthcare services could help professionals to successfully target these groups.


Asunto(s)
Consejo Dirigido , Medicina General/métodos , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Participación del Paciente , Examen Físico , Adulto , Competencia Cultural , Grupos Focales , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Estilo de Vida Saludable , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Lenguaje , Persona de Mediana Edad , Marruecos/etnología , Países Bajos , Prioridad del Paciente , Turquía/etnología
2.
BMC Public Health ; 15: 854, 2015 Sep 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26335782

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ethnic minority and native Dutch groups with a low socioeconomic status (SES) are underrepresented in cardiometabolic health checks, despite being at higher risk. We investigated response and participation rates using three consecutive inexpensive-to-costly culturally adapted invitation steps for a health risk assessment (HRA) and further testing of high-risk individuals during prevention consultations (PC). METHODS: A total of 1690 non-Western immigrants and native Dutch with a low SES (35-70 years) from six GP practices were eligible for participation. We used a 'funnelled' invitation design comprising three increasingly cost-intensive steps: (1) all patients received a postal invitation; (2) postal non-responders were approached by telephone; (3) final non-responders were approached face-to-face by their GP. The effect of ethnicity, ethnic mix of GP practice, and patient characteristics (gender, age, SES) on response and participation were assessed by means of logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Overall response was 70% (n = 1152), of whom 62% (n = 712) participated in the HRA. This was primarily accomplished through the postal and telephone invitations. Participants from GP practices in the most deprived neighbourhoods had the lowest response and HRA participation rates. Of the HRA participants, 29% (n = 207) were considered high-risk, of whom 59% (n = 123) participated in the PC. PC participation was lowest among native Dutch with a low SES. CONCLUSIONS: Underserved populations can be reached by a low-cost culturally adapted postal approach with a reminder and follow-up telephone calls. The added value of the more expensive face-to-face invitation was negligible. PC participation rates were acceptable. Efforts should be particularly targeted at practices in the most deprived areas.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etnología , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Indicadores de Salud , Enfermedades Metabólicas/etnología , Grupos Minoritarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Poblaciones Vulnerables/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Competencia Cultural , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedades Metabólicas/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Teléfono
3.
Patient Educ Couns ; 98(2): 234-44, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25457176

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Exploring determinants influencing vulnerable groups regarding (non-) participation in the Dutch two-stage cardiometabolic health check, comprising a health risk assessment (HRA) and prevention consultations (PCs) for high-risk individuals. METHODS: Qualitative study comprising 21 focus groups with non-Western (Surinamese, Turkish, Moroccan) immigrants aged 45-70, adult children from one of these descents, native Dutch with a lower socioeconomic status, and healthcare professionals working with these groups. RESULTS: Reasons for not completing the HRA included (flawed) risk perceptions, health negligence, (health) illiteracy, and language barriers. A face-to-face invitation from a reliable source and community outreach to raise awareness were perceived as facilitating participation. Reasons for not attending the PCs overlapped with completing the HRA but additionally included risk denial, fear about the outcome, its potential consequences (lifestyle changes and medication prescription), and disease-related stigma. CONCLUSION: Reasons for not completing the HRA were mainly cognitive, whereas reasons for not attending the PCs were also affective. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: When designing a two-stage health check, choice of invitation method seems important, as does training healthcare professionals in techniques to effectively handle patients' (flawed) risk perceptions and attitudinal ambivalence. Focus should be on promoting informed choices by providing accurate information.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Toma de Decisiones , Tamizaje Masivo , Poblaciones Vulnerables , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Etnicidad , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Investigación Cualitativa , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Clase Social , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda