ctDNA quantification improves estimation of outcomes in patients with high-grade osteosarcoma: a translational study from the OS2006 trial.

BACKGROUND: Osteosarcoma stratification relies on clinical parameters and histological response. We developed a new personalized stratification using less invasive circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) quantification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Plasma from patients homogeneously treated in the prospective protocol OS2006, at diagnosis, before surgery and end of treatment, were sequenced using low-passage whole-genome sequencing (lpWGS) for copy number alteration detection. We developed a prediction tool including ctDNA quantification and known clinical parameters to estimate patients' individual risk of event. RESULTS: ctDNA quantification at diagnosis (diagCPA) was evaluated for 183 patients of the protocol OS2006. diagCPA as a continuous variable was a major prognostic factor, independent of other clinical parameters, including metastatic status [diagCPA hazard ratio (HR) = 3.5, P = 0.002 and 3.51, P = 0.012, for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)]. At the time of surgery and until the end of treatment, diagCPA was also a major prognostic factor independent of histological response (diagCPA HR = 9.2, P < 0.001 and 11.6, P < 0.001, for PFS and OS). Therefore, the addition of diagCPA to metastatic status at diagnosis or poor histological response after surgery improved the prognostic stratification of patients with osteosarcoma. We developed the prediction tool PRONOS to generate individual risk estimations, showing great performance ctDNA quantification at the time of surgery and the end of treatment still required improvement to overcome the low sensitivity of lpWGS and to enable the follow-up of disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of ctDNA quantification to known risk factors improves the estimation of prognosis calculated by our prediction tool PRONOS. To confirm its value, an external validation in the Sarcoma 13 trial is underway.

Central nervous system relapse in high-risk stage 4 neuroblastoma: The HR-NBL1/SIOPEN trial experience.

BACKGROUND: There is rising concern on the impact of new strategies, such as high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and immunotherapy, on the pattern of relapse in high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NBL). Our aim is to evaluate the incidence and identify risk factors for first recurrence in the central nervous system (CNS) in HR-NBL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from patients with stage 4V HR-NBL included from February 2002 to June 2015 in the prospective HR-NBL trial of the European International Society of Pediatric Oncology Neuroblastoma Group were analysed. Characteristics at diagnosis, treatment and the pattern of first relapse were studied. CNS imaging at relapse was centrally reviewed. RESULTS: The 1977 included patients had a median age of 3 years (1 day-20 years); 1163 were boys. Among the 1161 first relapses, 53 were in the CNS, with an overall incidence of 2.7%, representing 6.2% of all metastatic relapses. One- and three-year post-relapse overall survival was 25 ± 6% and 8 ± 4%, respectively. Higher risk of CNS recurrence was associated with female sex (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.0 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.1-3.5]; P = 0.016), MYCN-amplification (HR = 2.4 [95% CI: 1.2-4.4]; P = 0.008), liver (HR = 2.5 [95% CI: 1.2-5.1]; P = 0.01) or >1 metastatic compartment involvement (HR = 7.1 [95% CI: 1.0-48.4]; P = 0.047) at diagnosis. Neither HDC nor immunotherapy was associated with higher risk of CNS recurrence. Stable incidence of CNS relapse was reported over time. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of CNS recurrence is linked to both patient and disease characteristics, with neither impact of HDC nor immunotherapy. These findings support the current treatment strategy and do not justify a CNS prophylactic treatment.

Survey on paediatric tumour boards in Europe: current situation and results from the ExPo-r-Net project.

BACKGROUND: Under the ExPO-r-NeT project (European Expert Paediatric Oncology Reference Network for Diagnostics and Treatment), we aimed to identify paediatric oncology tumour boards in Europe to investigate the kind of technologies and logistics that are in place in different countries and to explore current differences between regions. METHODS: A 20-question survey regarding several features of tumor boards was designed. Data collected included infrastructure, organization, and clinical decision-making information from the centres. The survey was distributed to the National Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Societies that forwarded the survey to the sites. For comparative analysis, respondents were grouped into four geographical regions. RESULTS: The questionnaire was distributed amongst 30 countries. Response was obtained from 23 (77%) that altogether have 212 paediatric oncology treating centres. A total of 121 institutions answered (57%). Ninety-one percent of the centres hold multidisciplinary boards; however, international second consultations are performed in 36% and only 15% participate on virtual tumor boards. Videoconferencing facilities and standard operational procedures (SOPs) are available in 49 and 43% of the centres, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between European regions concerning meeting infrastructure and organization/logistics: specific room, projecting equipment, access to medical records, videoconferencing facilities, and existence of SOPs. CONCLUSION: Paediatric tumor boards are a common feature in Europe. To reduce inequalities and have equal access to healthcare, a virtual network is needed. Important differences on the functioning and access to technology between regions in Europe have been observed and need to be addressed.

Cancer in children and adolescents in Spain: incidence, treatment setting and provider specialty.

PURPOSE: To analyze cancer incidence, distribution of malignancy, treatment setting and provider specialty of cancer patients, 0-19 years old, in the Comunitat Valenciana, Spain. METHODS/PATIENTS: All incident childhood and adolescent (0-19 years) cancer cases registered in the population-based Comunitat Valenciana Childhood Cancer Registry (RTICV) from 2007 to 2010 were included. Pathological and hematological diagnoses were recoded using the International Classification of Childhood Cancer Third Edition (ICCC-3). Treatment setting and provider specialty were analyzed. RESULTS: 696 patients <20 years were diagnosed with cancer: 513 cases were children (0-14 years) and 183 were adolescents (15-19 years). Overall age-adjusted incidence for 2007-2010 was 176.0 cases per million (95 % CI 162.8-189.2), with incidence being the highest among infants (287.4), followed by 1-4 years (205.5), adolescents (179.9), 10-14 years (150.2) and 5-9 years (140.6). Among adolescents aged 14-19 years, the treatment setting differed by cancer type; 87 % of them were never seen at pediatric oncology units, while 40 % were treated in up to 20 different medical oncology departments in institutions without pediatric oncology expertise. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first population-based epidemiological study carried out in Spain on children and adolescents with cancer. Centralization of care to a small number of specialized centers and thorough pediatric and oncology team collaboration are needed to improve care and survival for adolescents with cancer in our country. We suggest the creation of specific adolescent tumor boards in main tertiary care hospitals, in which adolescents with cancer can benefit from the shared expertise of medical and pediatric specialists.

Paediatric tumour boards in Spain: a national survey.

PURPOSE: Multidisciplinary tumour boards (MDTs) are conducted worldwide for the management of patients with cancer, and they deliver a higher standard of care by simultaneously involving different specialists in diagnosis and treatment planning. However, information of paediatric MDTs functioning is scarce. A pilot study was conducted in Spain in the frame of the European Expert Paediatric Oncology Reference Network for Diagnostics and Treatment (ExPO-r-Net). METHODS: A specific questionnaire was designed regarding various features of MDT practice. Data collected included information on the centres and the team, infrastructure for meetings, MDT organization/logistics and clinical decision-making. The survey was distributed to all Paediatric Oncology Units that register patients in the Spanish Registry of Childhood Tumours (RETI-SEHOP). RESULTS: 32 out of 43 contacted centres responded the questionnaire (74 % response rate; 88 % response rate for centres with >25 new patients/year). All units with >25 new patients/year have a dedicated Paediatric MDT compared to 76 % of units with ≤25 new patients/year. MDTs should be improved at institutional level by clear protected time in service planning for all specialists involved, incentives for attendance and attendance registration. Clinical decision-making process and follow-up of recommendation adherence should be assessed and potential legal responsibilities for physicians participating in Tumour Board defined. Network collaboration through virtual MDTs, using available videoconferencing tools, is an opportunity to share expertise among centres.

Survey on paediatric tumour boards in Europe: current situation and results from the ExPo-r-Net project

Background: Under the ExPO-r-NeT project (European Expert Paediatric Oncology Reference Network for Diagnostics and Treatment), we aimed to identify paediatric oncology tumour boards in Europe to investigate the kind of technologies and logistics that are in place in different countries and to explore current differences between regions. Methods: A 20-question survey regarding several features of tumor boards was designed. Data collected included infrastructure, organization, and clinical decision-making information from the centres. The survey was distributed to the National Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Societies that forwarded the survey to the sites. For comparative analysis, respondents were grouped into four geographical regions. Results: The questionnaire was distributed amongst 30 countries. Response was obtained from 23 (77%) that altogether have 212 paediatric oncology treating centres. A total of 121 institutions answered (57%). Ninety-one percent of the centres hold multidisciplinary boards; however, international second consultations are performed in 36% and only 15% participate on virtual tumor boards. Videoconferencing facilities and standard operational procedures (SOPs) are available in 49 and 43% of the centres, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between European regions concerning meeting infrastructure and organization/logistics: specific room, projecting equipment, access to medical records, videoconferencing facilities, and existence of SOPs. Conclusion: Paediatric tumor boards are a common feature in Europe. To reduce inequalities and have equal access to healthcare, a virtual network is needed. Important differences on the functioning and access to technology between regions in Europe have been observed and need to be addressed

No disponible

Cancer in children and adolescents in Spain: incidence, treatment setting and provider specialty

Purpose. To analyze cancer incidence, distribution of malignancy, treatment setting and provider specialty of cancer patients, 0-19 years old, in the Comunitat Valenciana, Spain. Methods/patients. All incident childhood and adolescent (0-19 years) cancer cases registered in the population-based Comunitat Valenciana Childhood Cancer Registry (RTICV) from 2007 to 2010 were included. Pathological and hematological diagnoses were recoded using the International Classification of Childhood Cancer Third Edition (ICCC-3). Treatment setting and provider specialty were analyzed. Results. 696 patients <20 years were diagnosed with cancer: 513 cases were children (0-14 years) and 183 were adolescents (15-19 years). Overall age-adjusted incidence for 2007-2010 was 176.0 cases per million (95 % CI 162.8-189.2), with incidence being the highest among infants (287.4), followed by 1-4 years (205.5), adolescents (179.9), 10-14 years (150.2) and 5-9 years (140.6). Among adolescents aged 14-19 years, the treatment setting differed by cancer type; 87 % of them were never seen at pediatric oncology units, while 40 % were treated in up to 20 different medical oncology departments in institutions without pediatric oncology expertise. Conclusions. This is the first population-based epidemiological study carried out in Spain on children and adolescents with cancer. Centralization of care to a small number of specialized centers and thorough pediatric and oncology team collaboration are needed to improve care and survival for adolescents with cancer in our country. We suggest the creation of specific adolescent tumor boards in main tertiary care hospitals, in which adolescents with cancer can benefit from the shared expertise of medical and pediatric specialists (AU)

No disponible

Paediatric tumour boards in Spain: a national survey

Purpose: Multidisciplinary tumour boards (MDTs) are conducted worldwide for the management of patients with cancer, and they deliver a higher standard of care by simultaneously involving different specialists in diagnosis and treatment planning. However, information of paediatric MDTs functioning is scarce. A pilot study was conducted in Spain in the frame of the European Expert Paediatric Oncology Reference Network for Diagnostics and Treatment (ExPO-r-Net). Methods: A specific questionnaire was designed regarding various features of MDT practice. Data collected included information on the centres and the team, infrastructure for meetings, MDT organization/logistics and clinical decision-making. The survey was distributed to all Paediatric Oncology Units that register patients in the Spanish Registry of Childhood Tumours (RETI-SEHOP). Results: 32 out of 43 contacted centres responded the questionnaire (74 % response rate; 88 % response rate for centres with [25 new patients/year). All units with [25 new patients/year have a dedicated Paediatric MDT compared to 76 % of units with B25 new patients/year. MDTs should be improved at institutional level by clear protected time in service planning for all specialists involved, incentives for attendance and attendance registration. Clinical decision-making process and follow-up of recommendation adherence should be assessed and potential legal responsibilities for physicians participating in Tumour Board defined. Network collaboration through virtual MDTs, using available videoconferencing tools, is an opportunity to share expertise among centres (AU)

No disponible

Methanesulfonyl fluoride (MSF): a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of safety and efficacy in the treatment of senile dementia of the Alzheimer type.

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate methanesulfonyl fluoride (MSF), a very long-acting CNS-selective acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor, as a palliative treatment for senile dementia of the Alzheimer type (SDAT). In experiment I, MSF (0.03-0.18 mg/kg) was administered orally to 10 normal volunteers to measure toxicity and establish dose/response function in erythrocyte AChE. MSF produced a dose-response function of %inhibition = (40)(Log10[MSF mg/kg] + 51.7) with no toxicity at these doses. Experiment II was a 16-week double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of MSF in doses of up to 0.18 mg/kg given three times per week in 5 men and 10 women (60-82 years), with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores of 9-24, who had SDAT. MSF produced a mean of 89.5% inhibition of erythrocyte AChE in patients and improved cognitive performance as measured by the MMSE, Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-COG), Global Deterioration Scale, and the Clinical Interview Based Impression of Change (CIBIC). Most of the improvement on the ADAS-COG was maintained 8 weeks after ending MSF. No patients left the study because of drug-related adverse events and there were no toxic effects. MSF may be a safe and effective palliative treatment for SDAT and further clinical trials in larger groups of patients are warranted.