Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Neuromodulation ; 11(4): 237-248, 2008 Oct 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20657728

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the potential efficacy of a presurgical behavioral medicine evaluation (PBME) screening algorithm with patients undergoing evaluation for implantable pain management devices. METHODS: Sixty patients were evaluated for prognostic recommendations regarding outcomes from surgery for spinal cord stimulators and intrathecal pumps. Diagnostic interviews, review of medical charts, and psychosocial and functional measures were used in the initial evaluation. RESULTS: Patients were classified into one of four prognostic groups, from low to increasing risks: Green, Yellow-I, Yellow-II, and Red. The Green group showed the most positive biopsychosocial profile, while the Red groups showed the worst profiles. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study suggests that the PBME algorithm may be an effective method for categorizing patients into prognostic groups. Psychological and adverse clinical features appear to have the most power in the classification of such patients.

2.
Pain Pract ; 8(2): 91-7, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18366464

RESUMEN

The present study was designed to evaluate the relative degree and type of emotional distress in high-risk acute low back pain (ALBP) subjects (defined as less than 3 months since initial injury) vs. high-risk chronic low back pain (CLBP) subjects (defined as greater than 3 months since initial injury). It is an extension of earlier findings that demonstrated the significant role that such emotional distress may play in the development of CLBP disability if not appropriately treated in the acute phase. This work stems from a conceptual three-stage model, which characterizes the progression from acute to chronic pain. Several psychosocial measures were administered that included information allowing for the classification of subjects as high-risk based upon an earlier developed screening algorithm. The ANCOVA procedure in SPSS was used to compare groups, controlling for gender, ethnicity, and age. Results revealed that CLBP subjects had higher rates of certain measures of emotional distress and depression relative to ALBP subjects. These findings further support the importance of effectively managing emotional distress factors early, when treating musculoskeletal disorders such as low back pain.


Asunto(s)
Emociones/fisiología , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/psicología , Enfermedad Aguda/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica/psicología , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Evaluación de Capacidad de Trabajo
3.
Pain Pract ; 7(2): 110-22, 2007 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17559480

RESUMEN

To reduce poor surgical outcomes, presurgical psychological evaluations are used to better predict prognosis. The current study investigated the utility of a revised Presurgical Behavioral Medicine Evaluation (PBME) algorithm, developed specifically for patients who were candidates for implantable devices. Patients were categorized into a Green, Yellow I, Yellow II, or Red prognosis group, with Green having the best, and Red having the worst, prognosis for good surgical outcomes. Variables, including gender, disability payment status, and involvement in pending litigation, were found to be significantly different among the groups in a sample of 95 consecutive patients. Analysis of data at the initial evaluation indicated that patients within the Red group endorsed significantly more physical/functional limitations, depressive symptomatology, and psychosocial distress than the Green group. In a 12-month follow-up analysis, significant differences among the four groups on various psychosocial measures were found. In addition, post-hoc tests revealed specific significant differences among the groups. A repeated measures analysis of the initial evaluation, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up data revealed that these measures were also significantly affected by the prognostic group. Lastly, nonparametric analysis indicated that there were significant differences among the groups on total risk factor scores as determined by the PBME algorithm.


Asunto(s)
Medicina de la Conducta/métodos , Dolor/psicología , Cuidados Preoperatorios/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Algoritmos , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Empleo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Dolor/cirugía , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Psicología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
4.
J Opioid Manag ; 3(5): 257-66, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18181380

RESUMEN

The Pain Medication Questionnaire (PMQ), initially developed by Adams et al. (J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004; 27: 440-459), is a 26-item self-report assessment to screen for opioid-medication misuse. The PMQ has demonstrated good reliability and validity, and was predictive of early termination from treatment and identified patients who demonstrated maximal benefit from interdisciplinary treatment (Holmes et al. Pain Pract. 2006; 6: 74-88). This study was designed to further evaluate the validity of the PMQ by exploring whether the initial PMQ score would accurately predict the development of aberrant opioid-medication use behaviors relative to specific behavioral indices (ie, request for early refills, use of a medication agreement) and a physician rating of medication misuse behaviors. Patients were grouped according to the initial score on the PMQ based on the median score of 25. Patients with higher PMQ (H-PMQ) scores reported greater levels of perceived disability and decreased physical and mental functioning. Similar to earlier studies, total scores on the PMQ were moderately correlated with initial measures of physical and psychosocial functioning, and observed problematic medication use behaviors observed by physicians during evaluation. Furthermore, excessively high PMQ scores (> or =30) were significantly associated with the need to use a medication agreement or requests for early refills. Five patients were identified from the H-PMQ group who demonstrated problematic opioid-medication use that fell outside of the realm of just early refill requests. Thus, although a PMQ total score > or =25 is indicative of problematic use, a score > or =30 suggests that a patient should be closely monitored when prescribed an opioid medication. Overall, this study again demonstrated that a patient's self-report is significantly correlated with problematic behaviors observed by physicians. Therefore, when utilized in a busy clinic setting, the PMQ will aide in the identification of specific problematic behaviors and beliefs at the outset of treatment that may hinder successful treatment of a patient's pain condition.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/psicología , Dimensión del Dolor/instrumentación , Dolor/diagnóstico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Conducta , Enfermedad Crónica , Recolección de Datos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/complicaciones , Dolor/psicología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Medición de Riesgo , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda