Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 47
Filtrar
1.
Clin Exp Dermatol ; 2024 Jan 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38270233

RESUMEN

Baricitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor which is now FDA approved for the treatment of severe alopecia areata (AA) in adults. However, the clinical trials which demonstrated the efficacy of baricitinib in the treatment of severe AA did not include men aged >60 years and women aged >70 years. We retrospectively assessed the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in 14 patients aged ≥65 years with moderate-to-severe AA. After a mean (SD) duration of 18.5 (11.9) months, a 72.0% reduction in the mean SALT score from baseline was observed. Partial or complete eyebrow and eyelash hair was observed in 57.1% and 42.9% of patients respectively. Adverse effects of baricitinib were mild. No cases of venous thromboembolism (VTE), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) or malignancy were reported.

2.
Clin Exp Dermatol ; 47(11): 2040-2041, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35980165

RESUMEN

Lichen planus pemphigoides is a rare autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease clinically and histopathologically characterized by features of lichen planus and bullous pemphigoid. We describe a case of refractory lichen planus pemphigoides successfully treated with the selective and reversible Janus kinase-1/2 inhibitor, baricitinib.


Asunto(s)
Azetidinas , Liquen Plano , Penfigoide Ampolloso , Enfermedades Cutáneas Vesiculoampollosas , Humanos , Liquen Plano/tratamiento farmacológico , Penfigoide Ampolloso/tratamiento farmacológico , Azetidinas/uso terapéutico , Quinasas Janus
3.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 84(6): 1644-1651, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33639244

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The major concern regarding the use of low-dose oral minoxidil (LDOM) for the treatment of hair loss is the potential risk of systemic adverse effects. OBJECTIVE: To describe the safety of LDOM for the treatment of hair loss in a large cohort of patients. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter study of patients treated with LDOM for at least 3 months for any type of alopecia. RESULTS: A total of 1404 patients (943 women [67.2%] and 461 men [32.8%]) with a mean age of 43 years (range 8-86) were included. The dose of LDOM was titrated in 1065 patients, allowing the analysis of 2469 different cases. The most frequent adverse effect was hypertrichosis (15.1%), which led to treatment withdrawal in 14 patients (0.5%). Systemic adverse effects included lightheadedness (1.7%), fluid retention (1.3%), tachycardia (0.9%), headache (0.4%), periorbital edema (0.3%), and insomnia (0.2%), leading to drug discontinuation in 29 patients (1.2%). No life-threatening adverse effects were observed. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design and lack of a control group. CONCLUSION: LDOM has a good safety profile as a treatment for hair loss. Systemic adverse effects were infrequent and only 1.7% of patients discontinued treatment owing to adverse effects.


Asunto(s)
Alopecia/tratamiento farmacológico , Minoxidil/efectos adversos , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Mareo/inducido químicamente , Mareo/epidemiología , Edema/inducido químicamente , Edema/epidemiología , Femenino , Cefalea/inducido químicamente , Cefalea/epidemiología , Humanos , Hipertricosis/inducido químicamente , Hipertricosis/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Minoxidil/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/inducido químicamente , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/epidemiología , Taquicardia/inducido químicamente , Taquicardia/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
4.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 84(6): 1594-1601, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32926985

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We previously reported the Alopecia Areata Consensus of Experts study, which presented results of an international expert opinion on treatments for alopecia areata. OBJECTIVE: To report the results of the Alopecia Areata Consensus of Experts international expert opinion on diagnosis and laboratory evaluation for alopecia areata. METHODS: Fifty hair experts from 5 continents were invited to participate in a 3-round Delphi process. Consensus threshold was set at greater than or equal to 66%. RESULTS: Of 148 questions, expert consensus was achieved in 82 (55%). Round 1 consensus was achieved in 10 of 148 questions (7%). Round 2 achieved consensus in 47 of 77 questions (61%). The final face-to-face achieved consensus in 25 of 32 questions (78%). Consensus was greatest for laboratory evaluation (12 of 14 questions [86%]), followed by diagnosis (11 of 14 questions [79%]) of alopecia areata. Overall, etiopathogenesis achieved the least category consensus (31 of 68 questions [46%]). LIMITATIONS: The study had low representation from Africa, South America, and Asia. CONCLUSION: There is expert consensus on aspects of epidemiology, etiopathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, laboratory evaluation, and prognostic indicators of alopecia areata. The study also highlights areas where future clinical research could be directed to address unresolved hypotheses in alopecia areata patient care.


Asunto(s)
Alopecia Areata/diagnóstico , Consenso , Dermatología/normas , Carga Global de Enfermedades , Alopecia Areata/epidemiología , Alopecia Areata/etiología , Alopecia Areata/terapia , Comorbilidad , Técnica Delphi , Dermatología/métodos , Dermoscopía , Folículo Piloso/diagnóstico por imagen , Folículo Piloso/crecimiento & desarrollo , Folículo Piloso/patología , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
5.
Contact Dermatitis ; 85(6): 693-697, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34418105

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: How many patients should we be patch testing? A previous study suggested that the minimum proportion of a population to be patch tested for allergic contact dermatitis was 1:700 annually. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if the current minimum rate for patch testing has changed over the 20 years since the previous study in order to maximize the value. METHODS: In cooperation with the British Society for Cutaneous Allergy, a proforma for collation of retrospective data between January 2015 and December 2017 was sent to patch-test centers in the United Kingdom (UK) and the Republic of Ireland (ROI). The number of positive tests was analyzed against the proportion of population tested to see what proportion of the population would yield the greatest number of positive results. RESULTS: Responses from 11 centers showed that the minimum number needed to patch test had increased to 1:550 per head of population per year using the current criteria. CONCLUSIONS: In agreement with previous studies, we should be patch testing more people than we are. We could reduce the threshold for referral of patients we patch test to derive the most benefit from this investigation.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Pruebas del Parche/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios , Humanos , Irlanda/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reino Unido/epidemiología
6.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 83(1): 123-130, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32165196

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A systematic review failed to identify any systemic therapy used in alopecia areata (AA) where use is supported by robust evidence from high-quality randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVE: To produce an international consensus statement on the use and utility of various treatments for AA. METHODS: Fifty hair experts from 5 continents were invited to participate in a 3-round Delphi process. Agreement of 66% or greater was considered consensus. RESULTS: In the first round, consensus was achieved in 22 of 423 (5%) questions. After a face-to-face meeting in round 3, overall, consensus was achieved for only 130 (33%) treatment-specific questions. There was greater consensus for intralesional treatment of AA (19 [68%]) followed by topical treatment (25 [43%]). Consensus was achieved in 45 (36%) questions pertaining to systemic therapies in AA. The categories with the least consensus were phototherapy and nonprescription therapies. LIMITATIONS: The study included a comprehensive list of systemic treatments for AA but not all treatments used. CONCLUSION: Despite divergent opinions among experts, consensus was achieved on a number of pertinent questions. The concluding statement also highlights areas where expert consensus is lacking and where an international patient registry could enable further research.


Asunto(s)
Alopecia Areata/terapia , Administración Oral , Administración Tópica , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Factores de Edad , Alopecia Areata/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Combinada , Terapias Complementarias , Técnica Delphi , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Testimonio de Experto , Humanos , Inyecciones Intralesiones , Fototerapia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
9.
Am J Dermatopathol ; 41(5): 382-385, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30308545

RESUMEN

Primary localized cutaneous amyloidosis is a group of rare conditions where amyloid deposition is limited to the skin without systemic manifestations. Most cases are sporadic; however, mutations in the oncostatin M receptor (OSMR) and interleukin-31 receptor A (IL31RA) genes can cause a familial form of the condition in up to 10% of cases. Here, we describe a family in which 8 female individuals are affected by either macular amyloidosis or amyloidosis cutis dyschromica. To the best of our knowledge, a sex-specific expression or the coexistence of 2 different phenotypes of primary localized cutaneous amyloidosis in 1 pedigree has not yet been reported.


Asunto(s)
Amiloidosis Familiar/patología , Enfermedades Cutáneas Genéticas/patología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Pakistán , Linaje , Fenotipo
10.
Contact Dermatitis ; 80(5): 286-290, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30460735

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Alkyl glucosides contitute a family of mild surfactants that are increasingly being used in a wide range of cosmetics and household products. Contact allergy to alkyl glucosides may be more frequent than previously suspected, especially in atopic patients. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the frequency of contact allergy to alkyl glucosides, and to identify concomitant reactivity. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of suspected allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) in which patients were patch tested with either a cosmetic series that includes five alkyl glucosides (decyl glucoside, lauryl glucoside, coco glucoside, cetearyl glucoside, and caprylyl/capryl glucoside) or a specific alkyl glucoside series from November 2013 to April 2017 in two UK centres. RESULTS: A total of 5775 patients were patch tested across the two centres. Twenty-nine (1.04%) of the 2796 patients tested with the cosmetic/alkyl glucoside series had a positive patch test reaction to at least one of the alkyl glucosides. Twenty-three (79.3%) patients were sensitized to multiple alkyl glucosides; 21 patients (72.4%) were female. The mean age was 43.5 years. Twelve patients (41.4%) had a background of atopic dermatitis. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of alkyl glucoside-induced ACD is relatively high, and there are frequent concomitant reactions between different alkyl glucosides. We recommend the inclusion of alkyl glucosides in all cosmetic series.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Glucósidos/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Cosméticos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Atópica/epidemiología , Femenino , Glucolípidos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas del Parche , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tensoactivos , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
11.
Contact Dermatitis ; 80(4): 217-221, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30430597

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Personal protective equipment (PPE) is defined as equipment that protects the wearer's body against health/safety risks at work. Gloves cause many dermatoses. Non-glove PPE constitutes a wide array of garments. Dermatoses resulting from these have hitherto not been documented. OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence and types of non-glove PPE-related dermatoses. PATIENTS/METHODS: We analysed incident case reports from dermatologists of non-glove PPE-related dermatoses to a UK-wide surveillance scheme (EPIDERM) between 1993 and 2013. RESULTS: The dermatoses associated with non-glove PPE accounted for 0.84% of all occupational skin disease. Of all PPE-related cases, 194 (9.2%) were attributable to non-glove PPE. Of these, 132 (68.0%) occurred in men, and the median age (both male and female) was 42 years (range 18-82 years). The non-glove PPE-related dermatoses were diagnosed as: allergic contact dermatitis (47.4%), irritant contact dermatitis (16.0%), friction (11.3%), occlusion (11.3%), unspecified dermatitis (8.8%), acne (3.1%), infections (1.5), and contact urticaria (0.52%). The industries most associated with non-glove PPE-related dermatoses were manufacturing (18.6%), public administration and defence (17.0%), health and social work (15.5%), and transport, storage, and communication (9.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Clothing, footwear, facemasks and headgear need to be recognized as causes of dermatoses occurring at body sites less commonly associated with occupational skin disease.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Guantes Protectores/estadística & datos numéricos , Equipo de Protección Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Profesional/diagnóstico , Femenino , Dermatosis de la Mano/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reino Unido/epidemiología
12.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 36(6): 906-908, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31576605

RESUMEN

Angiokeratoma corporis diffusum refers to symmetrical clusters of minute red papules in a "bathing trunk" distribution and is considered the cutaneous hallmark of Fabry disease. Acid sphingomyelinase deficiency is an autosomal recessive sphingolipidosis, which presents with massive hepatosplenomegaly, pulmonary infiltrates, and skeletal abnormalities. We present the unusual case of a 12-year-old girl with acid sphingomyelinase deficiency who developed characteristic lesions of angiokeratoma corporis diffusum.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Fabry/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Niemann-Pick Tipo A/diagnóstico , Niño , Dermoscopía , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos
19.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 33(12): 1969-1974, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29845642

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Vulval Crohn's disease (VCD) is a rare extra-intestinal cutaneous manifestation of Crohn's disease. VCD is often unrecognized and misdiagnosed and can be difficult to treat. The aim of the study was to describe the clinical presentation, associated features, and response to treatment modalities in patients with VCD. METHODS: A prospective review of patients with VCD who were referred to our specialist dermatology clinic from 2003 to 2017 was performed. Data on age at diagnosis, presenting signs, associated features, and response to treatment were collected. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients with a median age of 40 years (range 13-66 years) were identified. VCD manifested most frequently with vulval edema (77%), ulceration (35%), and fissures (39%). Eighty-one percent had active gastrointestinal disease. Oral involvement and pyoderma gangrenosum were present in 13% and 19%, respectively. Topical therapy was effective in mild VCD. Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors were the most effective second-line therapy, with 53% achieving complete clinical remission. Additionally, we have found compression garments and shorts to be useful adjuncts in treating vulval edema. CONCLUSIONS: Vulval Crohn's disease is a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. We recommend consideration of tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors at an early stage.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Crohn/complicaciones , Edema/etiología , Úlcera Cutánea/etiología , Enfermedades de la Vulva/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Productos Biológicos/administración & dosificación , Biopsia , Vendajes de Compresión , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Crohn/inmunología , Enfermedad de Crohn/terapia , Edema/diagnóstico , Edema/inmunología , Edema/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Inducción de Remisión , Úlcera Cutánea/diagnóstico , Úlcera Cutánea/inmunología , Úlcera Cutánea/terapia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/inmunología , Enfermedades de la Vulva/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Vulva/inmunología , Enfermedades de la Vulva/terapia , Adulto Joven
20.
Contact Dermatitis ; 78(6): 393-398, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29441604

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An initial study of patch testing practices across Wales, United Kingdom, showed wide variation in practice against a standardized set of guidelines and best practice recommendations. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate (i) current patch testing practice on a national level in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland (ROI), (ii) compliance with the current published guidelines, and (iii) the proportion of the catchment population tested by patch testing centres. METHODS: In consultation with the British Association of Dermatologists and British Society for Cutaneous Allergy, proformas addressing clinical guidelines and best practice recommendations were sent to all dermatology units in the United Kingdom and ROI. RESULTS: Ninety one of 325 centres (28%) performed patch testing. The optimum proportion of annual tests was not being achieved in the United Kingdom and ROI. The range tested varied between 1:1200 and 1:1600. CONCLUSIONS: Most centres achieved a high level of best practice outcomes. Shortcomings were found in the recording of minimum data, benchmarking, and attendance at meetings. We suggest that the findings of this study should be used as evidence to help improve services locally.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatología/normas , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Pruebas del Parche/normas , Dermatitis Atópica/diagnóstico , Humanos , Irlanda , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Reino Unido
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda