Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Ann Oncol ; 27(10): 1916-22, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27456299

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Central venous catheter (CVC)-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) are a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Chlorhexidine containing catheter securement dressings may prevent CRBSI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter randomized, controlled trial was conducted at 10 German hematology departments. We compared chlorhexidine-containing dressings with non-chlorhexidine control dressings in neutropenic patients. The primary end point was the incidence of definite CRBSI within the first 14 days (dCRBSI14) of CVC placement. Secondary end points included combined incidence of definite or probable CRBSI within 14 days (dpCRBSI14), overall (dpCRBSI), incidence of unscheduled dressing changes and adverse events. RESULTS: From February 2012 to September 2014, 613 assessable patients were included in the study. The incidence of dCRBSI14 was 2.6% (8/307) in the chlorhexidine and 3.9% (12/306) in the control group (P = 0.375). Both dpCRBSI14 and dpCRBSI were significantly less frequent in the study group with dpCRBSI14 in 6.5% (20/307) of the chlorhexidine group when compared with 11% (34/306) in the control group (P = 0.047), and dpCRBSI in 10.4% (32/307) versus 17% (52/306), respectively (P = 0.019). The frequency of dressing intolerance with cutaneous and soft tissue abnormalities at the contact area was similar in both groups (12.4% and 11.8%; P = 0.901). CONCLUSIONS: Although the trial failed its primary end point, the application of chlorhexidine containing catheter securement dressings reduces the incidence of definite or probable CRBSI in neutropenic patients. CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER: NCT01544686 (Clinicaltrials.gov).


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Neutropenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vendajes , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/complicaciones , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/patología , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia/patología
2.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 25(8): 1013-1020, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30641228

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Colonization and infection with third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli (3GCR-EC) are frequent in haematological and oncological patients. In this high-risk setting, German guidelines recommend single-room contact precautions (SCP) for patients with 3GCR-EC that are non-susceptible to fluoroquinolones (F3GCR-EC). However, this recommendation is controversial, as evidence is limited. METHODS: We performed a prospective, multicentre cohort study at four haematology and oncology departments assessing the impact of SCP on hospital-acquired colonization or bloodstream infection (BSI) with F3GCR-EC. Two sites performed SCP for F3GCR-EC patients including single rooms, gloves and gowns (SCP sites), and two did not (NCP sites). Active screening for 3GCR-EC was performed and isolates were characterized with molecular typing methods including whole genome sequencing and core genome multiple locus sequence typing to assess patient-to-patient transmission. Potential confounders were assessed by competing-risk regression analysis. RESULTS: Within 12 months, 1386 patients at NCP sites and 1582 patients at SCP sites were included. Hospital-acquisition of F3GCR-EC was observed in 22/1386 (1.59%) and 16/1582 (1.01%) patients, respectively (p 0.191). There were 3/1386 (0.22%) patients with BSI caused by F3GCR-EC at NCP sites and 4/1582 (0.25%) at SCP sites (p 1.000). Patient-to-patient transmission occurred in three cases at NCP and SCP sites each (p 1.000). The number of patients needed to screen in order to prevent one patient-to-patient transmission of F3GCR-EC was determined to be 3729. CONCLUSIONS: Use of SCP had no significant impact on hospital-acquisition or patient-to-patient transmission of F3GCR-EC in this high-risk setting.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Precauciones Universales , Adulto , Anciano , Bacteriemia/prevención & control , Bacteriemia/transmisión , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Guantes Protectores , Hematología , Unidades Hospitalarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Servicio de Oncología en Hospital , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda