RESUMEN
The majority of tinnitus patients are affected by chronic idiopathic tinnitus, and almost 60 different treatment modalities have been reported. The present study is a multidisciplinary systematic analysis of the evidence for the different forms of treatment for chronic tinnitus. The results are used to form the basis of an S3 guideline. A systematic search was carried out in PubMed and the Cochrane Library. The basis for presenting the level of evidence was the evidence classification of the Oxford Centre of Evidence-based Medicine. Whenever available, randomised controlled trials were given preference for discussing therapeutic issues. All systematic reviews and meta-analyses were assessed for their methodological quality, and effect size was taken into account. As the need for patient counselling is self-evident, specific tinnitus counselling should be performed. Due to the high level of evidence, validated tinnitus-specific, cognitive behavioural therapy is strongly recommended. In addition, auditory therapeutic measures can be recommended for the treatment of concomitant hearing loss and comorbidities; those should also be treated with drugs whenever appropriate. In particular, depression should be treated, with pharmacological support if necessary. If needed, psychiatric treatment should also be given on a case-by-case basis. With simultaneous deafness or hearing loss bordering on deafness, a CI can also be indicated. For auditory therapeutic measures, transcranial magnetic or direct current stimulation and specific forms of acoustic stimulation (noiser/masker, retraining therapy, music, and coordinated reset) for the treatment of chronic tinnitus the currently available evidence is not yet sufficient for supporting their recommendation.
Asunto(s)
Estimulación Acústica/métodos , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Acúfeno , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Pérdida Auditiva/diagnóstico , Humanos , Acúfeno/diagnóstico , Acúfeno/fisiopatología , Acúfeno/psicología , Acúfeno/terapiaRESUMEN
Tinnitus is defined as the perception of noise without an external acoustic stimulus. Due to the heterogeneity of tinnitus, no treatment has proven equally beneficial to every single of these patients. Previous studies have shown that trigeminal input can interfere with the perception of tinnitus. Therefore, we aimed to explore the therapeutic potential of lidocaine injections in trigeminal structures. We conducted a pilot study with 19 participants to explore feasibility and tolerability of this approach. The intervention consisted of three injections of lidocaine in the anatomical area of the trigeminal ganglion and the ganglion oticum via an oral approach corresponding to the affected side of tinnitus. We performed an assessment that included the Mini-TQ, CGII, and numeric rating scales of tinnitus loudness and severity at different time points over a follow-up period of 12 weeks. In addition to changes of subjective tinnitus complaints, potential adverse events were documented. Patients were treated at the Centre of Otorhinolaryngology in Traunstein, Germany, and data were analyzed at the University of Regensburg, Germany. We did not observe any relevant side effects. There was a significant reduction of tinnitus distress (Mini-TQ, Tinnitus severity) and loudness (measured subjectively) over time. Our pilot data suggests that lidocaine injections targeting trigeminal structures may be able to reduce tinnitus complaints. Future studies should investigate the effects of lidocaine injections in placebo-controlled trials in an extended sample size to further explore the potential benefits of this therapeutic approach on tinnitus.
Asunto(s)
Acúfeno , Alemania , Humanos , Lidocaína , Proyectos Piloto , Acúfeno/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
As for hypertension, chronic pain, epilepsy and other disorders with particular symptoms, a commonly accepted and unambiguous definition provides a common ground for researchers and clinicians to study and treat the problem. The WHO's ICD11 definition only mentions tinnitus as a nonspecific symptom of a hearing disorder, but not as a clinical entity in its own right, and the American Psychiatric Association's DSM-V doesn't mention tinnitus at all. Here we propose that the tinnitus without and with associated suffering should be differentiated by distinct terms: "Tinnitus" for the former and "Tinnitus Disorder" for the latter. The proposed definition then becomes "Tinnitus is the conscious awareness of a tonal or composite noise for which there is no identifiable corresponding external acoustic source, which becomes Tinnitus Disorder "when associated with emotional distress, cognitive dysfunction, and/or autonomic arousal, leading to behavioural changes and functional disability.". In other words "Tinnitus" describes the auditory or sensory component, whereas "Tinnitus Disorder" reflects the auditory component and the associated suffering. Whereas acute tinnitus may be a symptom secondary to a trauma or disease, chronic tinnitus may be considered a primary disorder in its own right. If adopted, this will advance the recognition of tinnitus disorder as a primary health condition in its own right. The capacity to measure the incidence, prevalence, and impact will help in identification of human, financial, and educational needs required to address acute tinnitus as a symptom but chronic tinnitus as a disorder.
Asunto(s)
Acúfeno , Nivel de Alerta , Estado de Conciencia , Humanos , Acúfeno/complicacionesRESUMEN
Since somatic or somatosensory tinnitus (ST) was first described as a subtype of subjective tinnitus, where altered somatosensory afference from the cervical spine or temporomandibular area causes or changes a patient's tinnitus perception, several studies in humans and animals have provided a neurophysiological explanation for this type of tinnitus. Due to a lack of unambiguous clinical tests, many authors and clinicians use their own criteria for diagnosing ST. This resulted in large differences in prevalence figures in different studies and limits the comparison of clinical trials on ST treatment. This study aimed to reach an international consensus on diagnostic criteria for ST among experts, scientists and clinicians using a Delphi survey and face-to-face consensus meeting strategy. Following recommended procedures to gain expert consensus, a two-round Delphi survey was delivered online, followed by an in-person consensus meeting. Experts agreed upon a set of criteria that strongly suggest ST. These criteria comprise items on somatosensory modulation, specific tinnitus characteristics, and symptoms that can accompany the tinnitus. None of these criteria have to be present in every single patient with ST, but in case they are present, they strongly suggest the presence of ST. Because of the international nature of the survey, we expect these criteria to gain wide acceptance in the research field and to serve as a guideline for clinicians across all disciplines. Criteria developed in this consensus paper should now allow further investigation of the extent of somatosensory influence in individual tinnitus patients and tinnitus populations.
Asunto(s)
Consenso , Trastornos Somatosensoriales/diagnóstico , Acúfeno/diagnóstico , Técnica Delphi , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Trastornos Somatosensoriales/complicaciones , Acúfeno/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Tinnitus is a frequent disorder which is very difficult to treat. Qigong is a mindful exercise and an important constituent of traditional Chinese medical practice. Here we performed a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of a Qigong intervention on patients with tinnitus. We hypothesized that especially tinnitus patients with somatosensoric components may benefit from the mind-body technique of Qigong. METHODS: Eighty patients with tinnitus of at least 3 months duration were randomly assigned to an intervention group (n=40) consisting of 10 Qigong training sessions in 5 weeks or a waiting-list control group (n=40). Tinnitus severity was assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS) and with a tinnitus questionnaire (TBF-12) before treatment, immediately after treatment, and 1 and 3 months after treatment. RESULTS: Qigong did not cause any side effects and was completed by 80% of the assigned patients. Compared with the control group, Qigong participants experienced improvement in tinnitus severity, as reflected by a significant reduction in both the VAS and the TBF-12. In the subgroup of patients with somatosensoric tinnitus, Qigong effects were more pronounced, resulting in a highly significant improvement in both scales compared to the waiting-list group. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that Qigong interventions could be a useful complement to the therapeutic management of patients with tinnitus and especially for those with somatosensoric components. Satisfaction with the intervention, a high degree of completion, and stability of the effects for at least 3 months after the intervention further underscore the potential of Qigong in the treatment of tinnitus.