Exposure-Response Efficacy Modeling to Support Trofinetide Dosing in Individuals with Rett Syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Trofinetide was recently approved for the treatment of Rett syndrome (RTT) on the basis of the efficacy and safety findings of the phase 3 LAVENDER study, which used a body weight-based dosing regimen. Exposure-response (E-R) efficacy modeling was used to characterize relationships between trofinetide exposure measures (maximum drug concentration and area under the concentration-time curve for the dosing interval of 0-12 h [AUC0-12]) and efficacy endpoints in RTT clinical studies to support the trofinetide dosing regimen. METHODS: Efficacy endpoints were modeled using trofinetide exposure measures predicted from the population pharmacokinetic model and Bayesian estimates. The analysis population for each E-R model comprised individuals receiving placebo or trofinetide who had available trofinetide exposure measures. Efficacy endpoints were scores from the Rett Syndrome Behaviour Questionnaire (RSBQ), the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement, the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile™ Infant-Toddler Checklist (CSBS-DP-IT) Social Composite, and the Rett Syndrome Clinician Rating of Ability to Communicate Choices (RTT-COMC). RESULTS: Higher trofinetide exposure was associated with improvements in RSBQ, CSBS-DP-IT Social Composite, and RTT-COMC scores. Assuming target trofinetide AUC0-12 values of 800-1200 µg·h/mL, the reductions in RSBQ total scores at week 12 were approximately five- to seven-fold greater with trofinetide (range 3.55-4.94) versus placebo (0.76). Significant E-R relationships were also found for the CSBS-DP-IT Social Composite and RTT-COMC scores. CONCLUSION: E-R efficacy modeling demonstrated significant relationships between trofinetide exposure and RSBQ, CSBS-DP-IT Social Composite, and RTT-COMC scores. Trofinetide is efficacious within the target exposure range, supporting the approved dosing regimen for trofinetide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01703533, NCT02715115, NCT04181723.

Trofinetide is the first approved treatment for people living with Rett syndrome, a rare genetic condition affecting brain development. This approval was based on the findings of clinical studies in which trofinetide showed significant improvements in the symptoms of Rett syndrome. In this study researchers were looking to see if the level of trofinetide in the blood was related to the level of improvement in symptoms observed in clinical studies. Information on the effectiveness of trofinetide was obtained from the phase 3 LAVENDER study which used doses of trofinetide according to body weight. Trofinetide's effectiveness was assessed on the basis of clinical measurements of key Rett syndrome symptoms. All the information on trofinetide dose, blood levels, and how much symptoms changed (i.e., effectiveness of trofinetide) was then used to develop models to predict symptom responses in the observed population. Researchers found that as the blood levels of trofinetide increased the symptom improvement also increased. When the blood levels were at the recommended level that was achieved in the LAVENDER study, the model predicted that symptom improvement was up to seven times greater with trofinetide than having no treatment (i.e., placebo). This study shows a positive relationship between trofinetide blood levels and improvement in the symptoms of Rett syndrome. Trofinetide was effective within the recommended blood level range in the LAVENDER study using the approved weight-based dosing.

Trofinetide Treatment Demonstrates a Benefit Over Placebo for the Ability to Communicate in Rett Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Trofinetide was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of Rett syndrome (RTT) in March 2023. Benefiting the ability to communicate in RTT is often identified as the most important caregiver goal for new therapies. This analysis reports the communication-related end points from the phase 3 LAVENDER study of trofinetide in RTT. METHODS: Females with RTT, aged five to 20 years, were randomized 1:1 to trofinetide or placebo for 12 weeks. Secondary efficacy end points related to communication were based on change from baseline to week 12 and included the caregiver-rated Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile™ Infant-Toddler Checklist (CSBS-DP-IT) Social Composite score (key secondary end point; scores ranged from 0 to 26 [higher scores indicated better communication]) and novel clinician rating scales (0 [normal] to 7 [severe impairment]) measuring the ability to communicate choices nonverbally (RTT-COMC) and verbally (RTT-VCOM). RESULTS: Trofinetide demonstrated a statistically significant difference versus placebo for the CSBS-DP-IT Social Composite score (least squares mean [LSM] difference = 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3 to 1.7; P = 0.0064; Cohen's d effect size = 0.43) and a nominally significant difference for the RTT-COMC (LSM difference: -0.3; 95% CI, -0.6 to -0.0; P = 0.0257; Cohen's d effect size = 0.36). As expected, there was no difference for the RTT-VCOM. CONCLUSIONS: Significant treatment benefit for trofinetide versus placebo was observed in scales measuring the ability to communicate. These scales may be appropriate for future clinical studies in RTT and other neurodevelopmental disorders.

Trofinetide for the treatment of Rett syndrome: Results from the open-label extension LILAC study.

BACKGROUND: Trofinetide was approved for the treatment of Rett syndrome based on the results of the phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, 12-week LAVENDER study. Rett syndrome is a chronic disorder requiring long-term treatment. We report the efficacy and safety results of LILAC, a 40-week, open-label extension study of LAVENDER. METHODS: Females with Rett syndrome aged 5-21 years received open-label treatment with trofinetide for 40 weeks. The primary endpoint was long-term safety of trofinetide; secondary endpoints included the change from baseline at week 40 in the Rett Syndrome Behaviour Questionnaire score and the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement score at week 40. FINDINGS: Overall, 154 participants were enrolled and treated with trofinetide in LILAC. The most common adverse events in LILAC were diarrhea (74.7%), vomiting (28.6%), and COVID-19 (11.0%). Diarrhea was the most common adverse event leading to treatment withdrawal (21.4%). The Rett Syndrome Behaviour Questionnaire mean score (standard error) improvement from the LAVENDER baseline to week 40 in LILAC was -7.3 (1.62) and -7.0 (1.61) for participants treated with trofinetide and placebo in LAVENDER, respectively. Mean Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scores (standard error) at week 40 rated from the LILAC baseline were 3.1 (0.11) and 3.2 (0.14) for participants treated with trofinetide and placebo in LAVENDER, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with trofinetide for ≤40 weeks continued to improve symptoms of Rett syndrome. Trofinetide had a similar safety profile in LILAC as in LAVENDER. FUNDING: The study was supported by Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (San Diego, CA, USA). This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04279314).

Trofinetide for the treatment of Rett syndrome: Long-term safety and efficacy results of the 32-month, open-label LILAC-2 study.

BACKGROUND: Trofinetide was approved for the treatment of Rett syndrome (RTT) in patients aged ≥2 years based on the results of the 12-week, randomized, phase 3 LAVENDER study. In LILAC, a 40-week, open-label extension study of LAVENDER, trofinetide continued to improve the symptoms of RTT, with a similar safety profile as LAVENDER. Here, we report long-term safety and efficacy results of LILAC-2, a 32-month, open-label extension study. METHODS: Females aged 5-22 years who completed LILAC were eligible to enter LILAC-2. Safety and tolerability were assessed with the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Efficacy was assessed with Rett Syndrome Behaviour Questionnaire (RSBQ) and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scores. Caregiver interviews explored the patient's experience with RTT and the efficacy of trofinetide during study participation. FINDINGS: In total, 77 participants were enrolled in LILAC-2. The most common AEs were diarrhea (53.2%), COVID-19 (27.3%), and vomiting (19.5%). The mean (standard error [SE]) change in RSBQ score from LAVENDER baseline to week 104 of LILAC-2 was -11.8 (2.45). The mean (SE) CGI-I score from LILAC baseline to week 12 of LILAC-2 was 3.1 (0.10). Most caregivers (96%; n = 24/25) were satisfied or very satisfied with the benefits of trofinetide. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with trofinetide continued to improve RTT symptoms, without new safety concerns. Caregivers reported satisfaction with trofinetide related to improvements that were meaningful for their child and themselves. FUNDING: The study was supported by Acadia Pharmaceuticals (San Diego, CA, USA). This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04776746.

Development of trofinetide for the treatment of Rett syndrome: from bench to bedside.

Rett syndrome (RTT) is rare neurodevelopmental disorder caused by mutations in the MECP2 gene that encodes methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MeCP2), a DNA-binding protein with roles in epigenetic regulation of gene expression. Functional loss of MeCP2 results in abnormal neuronal maturation and plasticity, characterized by loss of verbal communication and loss of fine and gross motor function, among others. Trofinetide, a synthetic analog of glycine-proline-glutamate, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of RTT in adult and pediatric patients aged 2 years and older. Here, we present the development of trofinetide from bench research to clinical studies and emphasize how the collaboration between academia, the pharmaceutical industry, and patient advocacy led to the recent approval. The bench-to-bedside development of trofinetide underscores the value of collaboration between these groups in the development and approval of treatments for rare diseases.