RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the knowledge of stroke warning signs and risk factors among the general public, including what they would do if they were to develop such symptoms. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Population study of randomly selected members of the general public in Adelaide, South Australia. A simple survey assessed knowledge of stroke warning signs and gave four options for management. The survey was conducted on three separate occasions: before, immediately after and 3 months after the National Stroke Foundation's National Stroke Week in 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measures were the public perception of risk factors and warning signs of stroke and what the members of the public would do if presented with a range of warning signs. They were also asked about their knowledge of the Face, Arms, Speech, Time (FAST) test. RESULTS: The three surveys were completed by 251 members of the public. Hypertension and smoking were recognised as risk factors for stroke by 71% and 53% of respondents respectively. Before National Stroke Week, slurred speech was identified by 51% and both slurred speech and upper limb sensory loss was identified by 62% as warning signs to provoke presentation to an emergency department (ED). Amaurosis, upper limb sensory loss, upper limb numbness and upper limb weakness were correctly identified individually as warning signs to attend an ED by fewer than one-third of respondents. There was no significant difference in the survey results following National Stroke Week. CONCLUSIONS: Public awareness of the symptoms of stroke, and what to do about them, is limited. There was little improvement after the national week-long awareness campaign. The lack of public awareness about stroke warning signs must be addressed to reduce mortality and morbidity from stroke.
Asunto(s)
Concienciación , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Educación en Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Necesidades , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/efectos adversos , Australia del Sur/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Atherogenesis represents an active inflammatory process with leucocytes playing a major role. An elevated white blood cell count has been shown to be predictive of death in coronary artery disease patients. The aim of this study was to examine the predictive ability of neutrophil count and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio for predicting survival in patients with critical lower limb ischemia (CLI). METHODS: All patients admitted to a single vascular unit with CCLI were identified prospectively over a 2-year period starting from January 2005. Patient demographics, clinical history, comorbidity, and risk factors for peripheral vascular disease were documented. The white blood count and differential cell count at admission was recorded. Overall, patient mortality was studied as the primary outcome. RESULTS: One hundred forty-nine patients were identified, with a median age of 72 years (Interquartile range [IQR], 65.7-81). A neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of >or=5.25 was taken as the cutoff, based upon the receiver-operating-characteristic.The median follow up was 8.7 months (IQR, 3.1-16). During the follow-up period, there have been 62 deaths (43.4%). An elevated neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and a high troponin level (>0.1) were found to be the only two factors independently associated with shorter survival on multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that an elevated NLR can identify a poor-risk subset of patients among those being treated for critical limb ischemia. This simple, inexpensive test may, therefore, add to risk stratification of these high-risk patients.