Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of a new controlled-release formulation of metoprolol: a comparison with conventional tablets.

The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of a new multiple-unit, controlled-release (CR) formulation of metoprolol (metoprolol succinate, 95 mg once daily), which has almost constant (zero-order) release properties over most of a 24-h dose interval, have been compared with those of conventional metoprolol tablets (metoprolol tartrate, 100 mg once daily and 50 mg twice daily), in 12 healthy male volunteers. The steady-state plasma concentrations of metoprolol after five days of treatment varied less throughout the day with the CR than with the conventional formulation. This was associated with a considerably lower peak plasma concentration and the achievement of a significantly higher plasma concentration at the end of the dose interval. Similarly, the effect on exercise-induced tachycardia was maintained at a relatively constant level throughout the day after treatment with the CR formulation. A significantly greater effect 24 h after administration was achieved with the CR formulation, when compared with once-daily dosing with metoprolol tablets, 100 mg. Twice-daily dosing with metoprolol tablets, 50 mg, produced a similar beta 1-blocking effect at the end of the dose interval to that observed with metoprolol CR. Although the steady-state plasma concentrations indicated significantly lower systemic availability for the CR formulation, compared with both regimens of metoprolol tablets, the total effect over the dose interval, expressed as the area under the efficacy curve (AUEC), was similar for the three treatments. The relationship between steady-state plasma concentrations and the pharmacodynamic efficacy at corresponding times, indicated that plasma concentrations were more effectively utilized after the administration of the CR formulation than after the conventional tablet regimens.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Purification of membrane proteins from Acholeplasma laidlawii by agarose suspension electrophoresis in Tween 20 and polyacrylamide and dextran gel electrophoresis in detergent-free media.

Four of the membrane proteins from Acholeplasma laidlawii that are soluble in the nonionic detergent Tween 20 have been purified by preparative electrophoretic techniques utilizing different supporting media. The last purification step for two of the major proteins was a preparative polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis performed in the absence of any detergent. The proteins were recovered by continuous elution. The purity of the fractions was examined by analytical polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and crossed immunoelectrophoresis. Two of the minor proteins were purified by dextran gel electrophoresis as the final step, which was also performed in a detergent-free buffer. The separation was followed by scanning the dextran gel in ultraviolet light. The proteins were recovered by slicing the gel and degrading the gel slices with dextranase. The homogeneity of the fractions was checked by electroimmunoassay.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of controlled-release metoprolol: a comparison with atenolol.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of a new controlled-release (CR) formulation of metoprolol have been compared with those of atenolol. Metoprolol CR (100 mg and 200 mg), atenolol (50 mg and 100 mg) and placebo were each given once daily for four days in a double-blind, cross-over study to ten healthy men. The plasma concentration-time profiles were more even with metoprolol CR than with atenolol over the 24-h dose interval, shown by the lower fluctuation ratio and the longer time period during which the plasma concentration exceeded 50% of the maximum concentration. All four active treatment regimens reduced exercise heart rate over the 24-h period compared with placebo. However, the reduction in both exercise heart rate and systolic blood pressure (SBP) was more even with metoprolol CR than with atenolol. The remaining beta 1-blockade after 24 h, expressed as the percentage reduction in exercise heart rate in relation to placebo, was significantly greater after the administration of metoprolol CR, 200 mg, than after either dose of atenolol. At this time the beta 1-blockade with metoprolol CR, 100 mg, was similar to that with atenolol, 100 mg. At peak plasma concentrations, 4 h after the dose, the subjects experienced less fatigue during exercise with metoprolol CR than with atenolol.