Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País como asunto
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 23(1): e19-e26, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36396583

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Ruxolitinib is widely used in myelofibrosis (MF). However, some patients do not optimally respond and require more efficacious treatment. Our analysis aimed to establish predictors of ruxolitinib response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We designed a multicenter, retrospective analysis of the efficacy of ruxolitinib treatment in patients with MF in 15 Polish hematology centers. As responses to ruxolitinib occur within the first 6 months, we used this point to evaluate the efficacy of treatment. Symptoms response was defined as ≥50% reduction of the MF constitutional symptoms assessed by Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score (MPN-SAF TSS). Spleen response was defined as ≥50% reduction of the difference between the spleen's baseline length and the upper limit norm measured by ultrasonography. RESULTS: 320 MF patients were enrolled. At 6 months of therapy, the spleen response was detected in 140 (50%) patients, and symptoms response in 241 patients (76%). Multivariable analysis identified leukocytosis <25 G/L (OR 2.06, 95%CI: 1.12-3.88, P = .0200), and reticulin fibrosis MF 1 (OR 2.22, 95%CI: 1.11-4.46, P = .0249) contributed to better spleen response. The time interval between MF diagnosis and ruxolitinib administration shorter than 3 months, and platelets ≥150 G/L (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.01-2.83, P = .0466) influenced symptoms response. CONCLUSION: Establishing predictive factors for ruxolitinib response is particularly important given the potential for new therapies in MF. In patients with a low likelihood of responding to ruxolitinib, using other JAK inhibitors or adding a drug with a different mechanism of action to ruxolitinib may be of clinical benefit.


Asunto(s)
Leucemia , Mielofibrosis Primaria , Humanos , Adulto , Mielofibrosis Primaria/diagnóstico , Mielofibrosis Primaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Polonia , Sistema de Registros
2.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 61(3): 588-603, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31661339

RESUMEN

We present the results of a prospective, non-randomized phase 2 trial in which 253 AML patients (pts) under 60 years old received DAC (Daunorubicin + AraC + Cladribine) as first induction followed by CLAM (Cladribine + AraC + Mitoxantrone) as early second induction on day 16 based on bone marrow (BM) blasts on day 14 (D14). The CR/CRi rate after a single course of DAC was 83% for pts with D14 BM blasts less than 10%. Forty-six pts had >10% BM blasts on D14, of whom 35 received CLAM with rates of CR/CRi 60% and early death (ED) 23%. The remaining 11 pts were not fit to receive CLAM, with rates of CR/CRi 28%, PR 18%, and ED 18%. Median OS was 7.2 versus 7.5 months, respectively. The overall CR/CRi rate was 77% after the first induction, with final CR/CRi rate 80% after DAC reinduction for pts who achieved PR with initial DAC course. CLAM used as early second induction might improve CR/CRi rates for younger AML pts with poor early response to DAC induction, but may be associated with higher mortality.


Asunto(s)
Cladribina , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Cladribina/uso terapéutico , Citarabina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mitoxantrona/uso terapéutico , Polonia , Estudios Prospectivos , Inducción de Remisión
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda