What Is the Risk of Irrigation and Debridement Following Foot and Ankle Surgery? Development of a Risk Severity Scoring System.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) after foot and ankle surgery has serious negative effects on patient health and quality of life. While previous studies have looked at predisposing factors for SSI, to our knowledge, no study has proposed a risk severity score. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Can a risk severity score, based on patient demographic characteristics and surgical variables, be developed for preoperative use in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery that will calculate the risk of an irrigation and debridement (I&D) procedure within 90 days of surgery utilizing data from previous surgeries? METHODS: A retrospective chart study was performed on patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery. Data on demographic characteristics including age, sex, and BMI were recorded. Data on patient factors including diabetes and smoking history were also recorded. Surgical details including length of surgery, procedure type, surgeon, antibiotic delivery time, antibiotic type, and antibiotic dose were analyzed. Of 2979 procedures, 1% (36) of I&Ds were performed within 90 days. The mean age at surgery was 49 ± 17 years, and 57% (1702) of patients were female. The mean BMI was 28 ± 6 kg/m2. The primary outcome was I&D within 90 days postoperatively. Descriptive statistics of differences in patient characteristics between those who underwent I&D and those who did not were examined using chi-square tests and t-tests (p < 0.05 was taken as significant). Significant variables from a simple regression analysis were included in a multiple logistic regression model with a forward stepwise procedure for variable selection. We required all data in the model to be categorical; thus, continuous variables such as time were dichotomized. We factored odds ratios determined by multiple regression for significant variables into the final risk severity score, and an easy-to-use tool based on this risk severity score was created in Excel (Microsoft). RESULTS: Current tobacco use, diabetes, and longer operative times were the only factors associated with I&D within 90 days postoperatively. A risk severity score was developed using current tobacco use, diabetes, and length of surgery greater than 60 minutes as factors. A patient with a severity score of 0 (no risk factors) had a 0.6% chance of I&D within 90 days, while a severity score of 1 indicated a 1.1% chance, a score of 2 indicated a 2.1% chance, a score of 3 indicated a 4.0% chance, and a score of 4 (all risk factors) indicated a 7.5% chance of I&D within 90 days. A spreadsheet that can be used at the point of care was created based on these findings. CONCLUSION: Our risk severity score may help inform preoperative patient guidance and operative planning. Calculating the score in the office setting during preoperative visits can also improve communication between physician and patient. Future research should focus on validation of this risk severity score at multiple institutions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study.

Institutional Variability in Anesthesia Time for Mehta Casting in Early-Onset Scoliosis (EOS).

PURPOSE: Mehta casting is a potentially curative intervention for early-onset scoliosis (EOS) that typically requires multiple anesthetics. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reported that >3 hours of anesthesia under the age of 3 years old may alter brain development; however, no standard exists for the duration of anesthesia during casting. The purpose of this study is to quantify the variability in anesthesia during Mehta casting. We hypothesize that significant institutional variability exists and may be attributed to modifiable factors. METHODS: An EOS registry was used to identify patients who underwent at least one Mehta casting procedure. Anesthesia exposure was quantified, and site variability was assessed by patient characteristics, cast placement, procedure type, and equipment used. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 208 patients from 5 institutions (age 2.6±1.4 y). There were 1097 Mehta casting procedures, with 5.4±3.6 castings per patient. Of these patients, 106 (51%) were female, with an average age of 2.11±1.29 years old at the time casting was initiated. Patient etiologies included 154 idiopathic (74.0%), 22 syndromic (10.6%), 18 congenital (8.7%), 11 neuromuscular (5.3%), and 3 unknown (1.4%). Anesthesia time was 69±31 minutes and varied significantly between sites (59±14 to 117±46 min; P <0.001). Cumulative anesthesia time for patients under 3 years was 320±197 minutes with 120/161 (74.5%) patients exceeding 3 hours. Anesthesia time was lower after the FDA warning in 2016 compared with pre-2016 (71±30 vs. 66±32, P =0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing Mehta casting are at significant risk of exceeding 3 hours of anesthesia, which the FDA has stated may be harmful for children <3 years. Significant site variability indicates that standardization protocols should be developed to encourage best practices and minimize anesthetic times. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II.

Return to Play Criteria After Adult Lumbar Spinal Fractures: A Review of Current Literature and Expert Recommendations.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Understanding the management of lumbar spinal fractures and return to play (RTP) criteria is an essential component of care for adult athletes. Appropriate management of lumbar spinal fractures must balance minimizing time away from physical activity while also minimizing risk of reinjury. The purpose of this review is to summarize current recommendations on lumbar spinal fracture management and RTP guidelines and to provide expert opinion on areas of discrepancy in the field. RECENT FINDINGS: There is a paucity of high-level evidence on the management and return to play criteria for adult lumbar spine fractures in athletes. Much of the data and recommendations are based on expert opinion and studies in pediatric or osteoporotic patients, which may not be applicable to adult athletes. These data presented here may be used to aid patient-physician conversations and provide guidance on expectations for patients, coaches, and athletic trainers. In general, we recommend that patients be free of lumbar pain, neurologically intact, and have full strength and motion of the lumbar spine and lower extremities before returning to play. Adequate protective equipment is recommended to be worn at all times during practice and play.

Evaluation and Management of Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma in Pediatric Patients: A Critical Analysis Review.

¼ Pediatric thoracolumbar trauma, though rare, is an important cause of morbidity and mortality and necessitates early, accurate diagnosis and management.¼ Obtaining a detailed history and physical examination in the pediatric population can be difficult. Therefore, the threshold for advanced imaging, such as magnetic resonance imaging, is low and should be performed in patients with head injuries, altered mental status, inability to cooperate with examination, and fractures involving more than 1 column of the spine.¼ The classification of pediatric thoracolumbar trauma is based primarily on adult studies and there is little high-level evidence examining validity and accuracy in pediatric populations.¼ Injury pattern and neurologic status of the patient are the most important factors when determining whether to proceed with operative management.