Assessing the impact of adaptations to the clinical workflow in radiotherapy using transit in vivo dosimetry.

Background and Purpose: Currently in-vivo dosimetry (IVD) is primarily used to identify individual patient errors in radiotherapy. This study investigated possible correlations of observed trends in transit IVD results, with adaptations to the clinical workflow, aiming to demonstrate the possibility of using the bulk data for continuous quality improvement. Materials and methods: In total 84,100 transit IVD measurements were analyzed of all patients treated between 2018 and 2022, divided into four yearly periods. Failed measurements (FM) were divided per pathology and into four categories of causes of failure: technical, planning and positioning problems, and anatomic changes. Results: The number of FM due to patient related problems gradually decreased from 9.5% to 6.6%, 6.1% and 5.6% over the study period. FM attributed to positioning problems decreased from 10.0% to 4.9% in boost breast cancer patients after introduction of extra imaging, from 9.1% to 3.9% in Head&Neck patients following education of radiation therapists on positioning of patients' shoulders, from 6.1% to 2.8% in breast cancer patients after introduction of ultrahypofractionated breast radiotherapy with daily online pre-treatment imaging and from 11.2% to 4.3% in extremities following introduction of immobilization with calculated couch parameters and a Surface Guided Radiation Therapy solution. FM related to anatomic changes decreased from 10.2% to 4.0% in rectum patients and from 6.7% to 3.3% in prostate patients following more patient education from dieticians. Conclusions: Our study suggests that IVD can be a powerful tool to assess the impact of adaptations to the clinical workflow and its use for continuous quality improvement.

The use of in-vivo dosimetry to identify head and neck cancer patients needing adaptive radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients experiencing anatomical changes during their radiotherapy (RT) course may benefit from adaptive RT (ART). We investigated the sensitivity of an electronic portal imaging device (EPID)-based in-vivo dosimetry (EIVD) system to detect patients that require ART and identified its limitations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted for 182 HNC patients: laryngeal cancer without elective lymph nodes (group A), postoperative RT (group B) and primary RT including elective lymph nodes (group C). The effect of anatomical changes on the dose distribution and volumetric changes was quantified. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to obtain the optimal cut-off value for the gamma passing rate (%GP) with a dose difference of 3% and a distance to agreement of 3 mm. RESULTS: Fifty HNC patients receiving ART were analyzed: 1 in group A, 10 in group B and 39 in group C. Failed fractions (FFs) occurred in 1/1, 6/10 and 23/39 cases before ART in group A, B and C respectively. In the four cases in group B without FFs, only minor dosimetric changes were observed. One of the cases in group C without FFs had significant dosimetric changes (false negative). Three cases received ART because of clinical reasons that cannot be detected by EIVD. The optimal cut-off value for the %GP was 95%/95.2% for old/new generation machines respectively. CONCLUSION: EIVD combined with 3D imaging techniques can be synergistic in the detection of anatomical changes in HNC patients who benefit from ART.

Comparing treatment uncertainty for ultra- vs. standard-hypofractionated breast radiation therapy based on in-vivo dosimetry.

Background and purpose: Postoperative ultrahypofractionated radiation therapy (UHFRT) in 5 fractions (fx) for breast cancer patients is as effective and safe as conventionally hypofractionated RT (HFRT) in 15 fx, liberating time for higher-level daily online Image-Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) corrections. In this retrospective study, treatment uncertainties occurring in patients treated with 5fx (5fx-group) were evaluated using electronic portal imaging device (EPID)-based in-vivo dosimetry (EIVD) and compared with the results from patients treated with conventionally HFRT (15fx-group) to validate the new technique and to evaluate if the shorter treatment schedule could have a positive effect on the treatment uncertainties. Materials and methods: EPID-based integrated transit dose images were acquired for each treatment fraction in the 5fx-group (203 patients) and on the first 3 days of treatment and weekly thereafter in the 15fx-group (203 patients). A total of 1015 EIVD measurements in the 5fx-group and 1144 in the 15fx-group were acquired. Of the latter group, 755 had been treated with online IGRT correction (i.e., Online-IGRT 15fx-group). Results: In the 15fx-group 12.0% of fractions failed (FFs) compared to 3.8% in the 5fx-group and 6.9% in the online-IGRT 15fx-group. Causes for FFs in the 15fx-group compared with the 5fx-group were patient positioning (7.4% vs. 2.2%), technical issues (3.1% vs. 1.2%) and breast swelling (1.4% vs. 0.5%). In the online-IGRT 15fx-group, 2.5% were attributed to patient positioning, 3.8% to technical issues and 0.5% to breast swelling. Conclusions: EIVD demonstrated that UHFRT for breast cancer results in less FFs compared to standard HFRT. A large proportion of this decrease could be explained by using daily online IGRT.

Evaluation of automated pre-treatment and transit in-vivo dosimetry in radiotherapy using empirically determined parameters.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: First reports on clinical use of commercially automated systems for Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID)-based dosimetry in radiotherapy showed the capability to detect important changes in patient setup, anatomy and external device position. For this study, results for more than 3000 patients, for both pre-treatment verification and in-vivo transit dosimetry were analyzed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For all Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans, pre-treatment quality assurance (QA) with EPID images was performed. In-vivo dosimetry using transit EPID images was analyzed, including causes and actions for failed fractions for all patients receiving photon treatment (2018-2019). In total 3136 and 32,632 fractions were analyzed with pre-treatment and transit images respectively. Parameters for gamma analysis were empirically determined, balancing the rate between detection of clinically relevant problems and the number of false positive results. RESULTS: Pre-treatment and in-vivo results depended on machine type. Causes for failed in-vivo analysis included deviations in patient positioning (32%) and anatomy change (28%). In addition, errors in planning, imaging, treatment delivery, simulation, breath hold and with immobilization devices were detected. Actions for failed fractions were mostly to repeat the measurement while taking extra care in positioning (54%) and to intensify imaging procedures (14%). Four percent initiated plan adjustments, showing the potential of the system as a basis for adaptive planning. CONCLUSIONS: EPID-based pre-treatment and in-vivo transit dosimetry using a commercially available automated system efficiently revealed a wide variety of deviations and showed potential to serve as a basis for adaptive planning.

In vivo dosimetry for patients with prostate cancer to assess possible impact of bladder and rectum preparation.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: In all treatment sites of our radiotherapy network, in vivo dosimetry (PerFRACTION™) was fully implemented in February 2018. We hypothesized that additional help with bladder and rectum preparation by home nursing would improve patients' preparation and investigated if this could be assessed using in vivo dosimetry (IVD). MATERIALS/METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted with a test group who received additional help with bladder and rectum preparation by home nurses and a control group who only received information on bladder and rectum preparation according to the standard protocol. Patients were treated with a 6 MV Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) technique. Electronic portal imaging device (EPID)-based integrated transit dose images were acquired on the first 3 days of treatment and weekly thereafter or more if failed fractions (FF) occurred. Results were analyzed using a global gamma analysis with a threshold of 20%, tolerance of 5% (dose difference) and 5 mm (distance to agreement), and a passing level of 95%. RESULTS: Data of 462 prostate patients was analyzed: 39 and 423 in a test and control group respectively with a comparable number of measurements (on average 8.0 (σ = 4.8) and 7.1 (σ = 4.5) respectively per treatment course). Of the FF, 39% and 31% were related to variations in bladder and rectum filling for the test and control group respectively. Subgroups were created based on the number of FF, no statistically significant differences were observed. CONCLUSION: Two dimensional EPID-based IVD successfully detected deviations due to variations in bladder and rectum filling, however it could not confirm the hypothesis.