Extubation of patients undergoing extracorporeal life support. A retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: The use of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is increasing worldwide, in particular for the management of refractory cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock and post cardiopulmonary bypass ventricular failure. Extubation of patients under extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for respiratory failure is a growing practice for adult and pediatric patients, especially for lung transplantation candidates. Because of potential complications and, specifically, accidental arterial decannulation, extubation of patients under ECLS is not standard practice. Our goal was to evaluate the interest in patient extubation under ECLS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a monocentric, retrospective study of all ECLS cases between January 2014 and January 2016. We excluded patients who died within the first 48 hours of ECLS. RESULTS: We analyzed 57 of the initial 109 patients included in the study. The initial SOFA score was higher in the non-extubated group under ECLS, without significant difference (8.6 ± 2.8 vs 7.2 ± 2.1, p=0.065). Patients who were not extubated had a higher rate of acquired ventilator pneumonia (61.9% vs 26.7%, p=0.03). Moreover, patients who were extubated under ECLS had better 30-day survival rates (73.3% vs 40.5%, p=0.04). In multivariate analyses, the independent factors associated with mortality were age, duration of ECLS and the lack of extubation under ECLS. CONCLUSION: Extubation of patients under ECLS is safe and feasible. Furthermore, in extubated patients, we observed fewer cases of ventilator-associated pneumonia and better 30-day survival rates.

Comparable Outcome of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Treated With Extracorporeal Life Support.

Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) has shown benefits in the management of refractory in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) by improving survival. Nonetheless, the results concerning out-of-hospital refractory cardiac arrests (OHCA) remain uncertain. The aim of our investigation was to compare survival between the two groups. We realized a single-center retrospective, observational study of all patients who presented IHCA or OHCA treated with ECLS between 2011 and 2015. Multivariate analysis was realized to determine independent factors associated with mortality. Over the 4-year period, 65 patients were included, 43 in the IHCA group (66.2%), and 22 (33.8%) in the OHCA group. The duration of low flow was significantly longer in the OHCA group (60 vs. 90 min, P = 0.004). Survival to discharge from the hospital was identical in the two groups (27% in the OHCA group vs. 23% in the IHCA group, P = 0.77). All surviving patients in the OHCA group had a cerebral performance categories score of 1-2. In multivariate analysis, we found that the initial lactate level and baseline blood creatinine were independently associated with mortality. We found comparable survival and neurological score in patients who presented IHCA and OHCA treated with ECLS. We believe that appropriate selection of patients and optimization of organ perfusion during resuscitation can lead to good results in patients with OHCA treated with ECLS.

Cardiopulmonary bypass and renal cell carcinoma with level IV tumour thrombus: can deep hypothermic circulatory arrest limit perioperative mortality?

OBJECTIVE: • To review experience with nephrectomy/thrombectomy for a renal cell carcimoma (RCC) with a level IV tumour thrombus and to evaluate the benefit of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPBP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: • A multi-institutional retrospective database was created to assess the outcomes of surgery for RCC and associated level IV tumour thrombus from 1983 to 2007. Patients were identified based on radiographic records/operative findings. • Only cases using CPBP were analysed. Clinicopathological and operative characteristics including use of DHCA were recorded. • Overall survival (OS) for all patients and by use of DHCA was assessed. Comparisons of clinical and operative characteristics by use of DHCA were performed. • A Cox regression model determined predictors of perioperative/in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: • In all, 63 patients underwent resection with CPBP; overall perioperative mortality was 22.2%. • There were no significant differences in clinicopathological characteristics, operative duration, estimated blood loss, transfusions, and hospital stay by use of DHCA. • Perioperative mortality rate was lower in patients undergoing DHCA (8.3% vs 37.5%, P = 0.006). • The median OS was longer for the patients undergoing DHCA (15.8 vs 7.7 months); however, this failed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.357). • On multivariate analysis, age of > 60 years (hazard ratio [HR] 6.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-31.1, P = 0.015) and the use of DHCA (HR 0.13, 95% CI 0.036-0.51, P = 0.003) were independent predictors of perioperative mortality. CONCLUSIONS: • Radical nephrectomy and level IV tumour thrombectomy is associated with significant mortality. • The use of DHCA does not appear to adversely affect operative characteristics and may limit perioperative mortality. • Further prospective studies should be performed to confirm the benefit of DHCA.