Breast Augmentation Patient Satisfaction in an Appalachian Region.

The prevalence of cosmetic plastic surgeries, including breast augmentation, has risen significantly, with breast augmentation being among the most sought-after procedures. However, there's a dearth of research on patient outcomes and satisfaction, particularly in rural areas like the Appalachian region. This retrospective study aimed to fill this gap by examining patient satisfaction and complications following breast augmentation surgery among rural Appalachian patients in the tri-state (West Virginia, Kentucky, and Ohio) area. A total of 63 patients who underwent primary breast augmentation at a regional referral center from June 2014 to December 2022 were included in the study. Patient records were reviewed and data on demographics, complications, re-operations, and satisfaction scores were analyzed. Results revealed no significant differences between rural and urban populations in terms of demographic characteristics, complication rates, re-operation rates, or satisfaction scores. Logistic regression models confirmed that rural/urban status did not significantly influence the likelihood of complications, re-operations, or satisfaction. Despite the study's limitations, including a small sample size and single-center design, the results indicate that rural Appalachian patients receive surgical care comparable to their urban counterparts and experience similar benefits from breast augmentation surgery. Recognizing the distinctive healthcare needs and obstacles faced by rural communities is essential for mitigating healthcare disparities and enhancing overall health outcomes. Future research and healthcare initiatives should prioritize improving access to care, fostering patient-centered approaches, and addressing systemic challenges in healthcare delivery across rural Appalachia.

Age-Related Patterns of Traumatic Facial Fractures in the Appalachian Tri-state Area: A Five-Year Retrospective Study.

Introduction Traumatic facial injuries, leading to facial fractures represent a significant subset of traumatic events, with age emerging as a crucial determinant influencing both their etiology and outcomes. Understanding the age-related patterns of traumatic facial fractures is essential for developing targeted prevention and management strategies. In this context, the Appalachian tri-state area stands as an underexplored region concerning this issue, necessitating comprehensive research to elucidate the nuances of age-related traumatic facial fractures within this geographic context. Methods This retrospective study delves into the age-related patterns of traumatic facial fractures within the Appalachian tri-state area, drawing upon patient records from Cabell Huntington Hospital and Saint Mary's Medical Center spanning a five-year period. The study cohort encompasses 623 patients categorized into three age groups: individuals aged <22 years, those aged 22-65 years, and individuals over 65 years. Data analysis involves meticulous examination of mechanisms of injury, injury severity scores (ISSs), hospital length of stay, and the prevalence of surgical interventions across different age cohorts. Results Out of 623 patients, 104 (16.7%) were under 22 years old, 367 (58.9%) were between 22 and 65 years old, and 152 (24.4%) were over 65 years old. The majority were male (70%). Falls were the most common cause of facial fractures in patients over 65 (78%), while assaults were predominant in the 22-65 age group (24%), and motor vehicle collisions (MCVs) in those under 22 (34%). The median ISS and hospital stay durations were similar across age groups. 28% of patients underwent surgery, with significant variation among age groups (p<0.001): 38% for <22 years, 33% for 22-65 years, and 11% for >65 years. Mandibular fractures were more prevalent in younger patients, with rates of 12% for <22 years compared to 5.3% for >65 years. Logistic regression analysis revealed that patients aged 22-65 had 4.10 times higher odds (95% CI=2.38, 7.45, p<0.001) of undergoing surgery, while those under 22 had 5.14 times higher odds (95% CI=2.73, 10.0, p<0.001) compared to those over 65. Significant associations were found for mandibular and bilateral mandibular outcomes in patients aged 22-65 years. Discussion These findings underscore the imperative for tailored prevention strategies and age-specific treatment protocols to optimize patient outcomes. Fall prevention initiatives for the elderly and interventions addressing sports-related injuries for younger individuals are paramount. Moreover, the study highlights the necessity of specialized care protocols for elderly patients to minimize hospital stay durations and manage age-related comorbidities effectively. Moving forward, further research should address limitations, validate findings, and explore the efficacy of specific interventions, thereby paving the way for enhanced preventive measures and management strategies tailored to the diverse age cohorts affected by traumatic facial fractures in the Appalachian region.

A Comparative American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) Performance Analysis Between International vs. Domestic Graduates and Doctor of Medicine (MD) vs. Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO) Medical Degrees.

Introduction The American Board of Surgery (ABS) plays a pivotal role in certifying surgeons in the United States, with the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) serving as a critical assessment tool for general surgery residents aspiring for certification. The aim of this study is to compare the performance of international medical graduates (IMGs) to their domestic counterparts and assess the impact of different medical degrees on ABSITE scores. Notably, ABSITE scores often dictate the trajectory of a surgical career, including opportunities for fellowship placements in specialized fields such as plastic surgery. Methods This study focused on general surgery residents enrolled at Marshall University from 2014 to 2022. Data encompassing ABSITE scores, TrueLearn quiz percentages, and TrueLearn mock exam results were collected for analysis. Descriptive statistics summarized sample characteristics, and linear mixed models were employed to address correlations. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA), with significance defined by a two-sided test with p < 0.05. Results Among the 48 participants, comprising 24 non-international medical graduates (nIMGs) and 24 IMGs, IMGs demonstrated superior performance across various metrics. They exhibited higher quiz percentages (67% vs. 61%; p = 0.0029), mock Exam 1 scores (64% vs. 58%; p = 0.0021), mock Exam 2 scores (66% vs. 58%; p = 0.0015), ABSITE scores (560 vs. 505; p = 0.010), and ABSITE percentages (74% vs. 68%; p = 0.0077) compared to nIMGs. Analysis between Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO) and Doctor of Medicine (MD) participants revealed no statistically significant differences in performance metrics, highlighting the comparability of these medical degrees in the context of ABSITE scores and related assessments. Discussion/conclusion This study underscores the superior performance of IMGs over nIMGs in ABSITE examinations, shedding light on the critical role of ABSITE scores in shaping surgical careers. Higher scores correlate with enhanced opportunities for coveted fellowship placements, particularly in specialized fields like plastic surgery. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for resident training and navigating the competitive landscape of surgical sub-specialization. Future research endeavors can delve deeper into the factors influencing ABSITE performance, thereby facilitating the development of targeted interventions to support residents in achieving their career aspirations.

Navigating the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) Success: Insights From Pre-assessment Practices in Preparing Surgical Residents for Competitive Sub-specialties.

Introduction The American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) is a critical tool in assessing surgical residents' readiness for board certification and clinical practice. While various factors influencing ABSITE performance have been examined, the impact of innovative educational resources, such as TrueLearn, remains underexplored. TrueLearn's adaptive learning algorithms and comprehensive question banks offer a promising adjunct to traditional study methods. This study investigates the relationship between TrueLearn utilization and ABSITE performance among general surgery residents. Methods This retrospective study, ethically approved by the Marshall University Institutional Review Board (IRB No. 2097669-1), analyzed the performance of general surgery residents at Marshall University from 2014 to 2022. Data were collected on ABSITE scores. Additionally, quiz percentages (Quiz %) and scores from two mock exams (Exam 1 and Exam 2), all provided by the TrueLearn platform, were included in the analysis. Descriptive statistics summarized the sample characteristics. Linear mixed models were employed to examine the associations between TrueLearn engagement and ABSITE performance, accounting for the correlated nature of the data and addressing any missing data at random. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS, version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC), with significance defined as a p-value < 0.05. Results The study cohort included 58 residents from 2016 to 2022. Linear mixed model analysis revealed significant positive correlations between TrueLearn Quiz %, Exam 1 scores, and Exam 2 scores with ABSITE performance. A 1% increase in Quiz % was associated with a 0.77-point rise in ABSITE scores (95% CI: 0.65, 0.89; p < 0.0001). For Exam 1, each point increase corresponded to a 6.36-point increase in ABSITE scores (95% CI: 5.01, 7.7; p < 0.0001), while Exam 2 scores showed a 3.8-point increase per point (95% CI: 2.74, 4.86; p < 0.0001). Discussion and conclusion Our findings underscore the significant impact of TrueLearn engagement on ABSITE performance, with higher quiz percentages and mock exam scores predictive of better ABSITE outcomes. This suggests that regular use of TrueLearn's educational resources enhances residents' knowledge and exam readiness. These results advocate for the integration of innovative educational tools such as TrueLearn into surgical training programs to optimize study strategies and improve exam performance. However, the study's retrospective design and single-institution focus limit the generalizability of the findings. Future research should explore these relationships in diverse settings and specialties and consider additional factors influencing ABSITE performance. This study highlights the positive association between TrueLearn utilization and ABSITE performance among general surgery residents, emphasizing the importance of innovative educational resources in surgical training. By enhancing engagement with platforms such as TrueLearn, surgical programs can improve residents' readiness for high-stakes examinations, ultimately contributing to the development of proficient surgical practitioners.

Burn Mortality in an Appalachian Referral Center: An Examination of Mortality Prediction Scores in a 13-Year Retrospective Study.

Introduction Burn injuries have profound implications, prompting the use of various mortality scoring systems. This study aimed to evaluate their effectiveness within our Appalachian burn referral center, which serves as the sole burn center in the state of West Virginia. Given this unique status, understanding the efficacy of mortality scoring systems within our center is crucial for resource allocation and optimizing patient outcomes in our region. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients admitted to Cabell Huntington Hospital Burn Intensive Care Unit (BICU) from January 2010 to June 2023 was conducted, assessing Baux (B), revised Baux (rB), Belgian Outcome in Burn Injury (BOBI), and Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI) scores. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analysis were employed to examine survival status and determine optimal cut points. Results Among 1,104 patients, 57 died (5% mortality rate). Deceased patients had significantly higher B/rB/BOBI scores (mean: 98/98/92) than survivors (45/46/4.19) (p < 0.001), with ABSI showing no significance (p = 0.079). Each one-point increase in B/rB/BOBI scores correlated with a 1.09/1.09/2.34 times higher mortality risk (p < 0.001). The AUC for B score in predicting mortality was 0.926 (95% CI: 0.890, 0.962), with sensitivity and specificity values of 0.789 and 0.92, respectively, and an optimal cutoff point of 79. The AUC for the rB score was 0.927 (95% CI: 0.892, 0.962), with sensitivity and specificity values of 0.789 and 0.926, respectively, and an optimal cutoff point of 80. The AUC for the BOBI score was 0.901 (95% CI: 0.865, 0.937), with sensitivity and specificity values of 0.895 and 0.775, respectively, and an optimal cutoff point of 2. For patients with B scores above 79, their odds of mortality were 42.6 times higher than those with B scores of 79 or lower (95% CI: 22.6, 85.6, p < 0.001). Similarly, for patients with rB scores exceeding 80, their odds of mortality were 42.9 times higher than those with rB scores of 80 or lower (95% CI: 22.9, 84.8, p < 0.001). Finally, for patients with BOBI scores greater than 2, their odds of mortality were 17.8 times higher than those with BOBI scores of 2 or lower (95% CI: 9.88, 33.4, p < 0.001). Conclusion Our study underscores the vital role of mortality scoring systems in guiding clinical decision-making and resource allocation for burn patients, particularly within the Appalachian region served by the Cabell Huntington Hospital BICU. By leveraging tools such as the Baux, revised Baux, and BOBI scores, healthcare providers can identify high-risk patients early in their treatment course, facilitating personalized interventions and improving overall patient outcomes. Moreover, our findings highlight the significance of age and total body surface area burned as key determinants of mortality risk, emphasizing the need for tailored approaches to care for elderly patients and those with extensive burns. Continued research and refinement of mortality scoring systems are essential to further enhance their effectiveness and ensure optimal patient care in the challenging field of burn management.