Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am ; 27(1): 85-94, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30420075

RESUMEN

Tissue inelasticity and the hair-bearing nature of the scalp and forehead pose unique challenges during reconstruction. A thorough understanding of the surgical anatomy of the scalp and forehead is paramount for optimal reconstructive outcomes. Primary wound closure is usually preferred over secondary intention healing and skin grafting. Use of dermal alternatives and tissue expansion are adjunctive therapies to facilitate scalp wound closure. Local skin and soft tissue flaps are commonly used for most small to medium defects; however, microsurgical free tissue transfer can be considered for large full-thickness skin defects of the forehead and scalp.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Dermatologicos/métodos , Neoplasias Faciales/cirugía , Frente , Cuero Cabelludo , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Colgajos Quirúrgicos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Dermatologicos/mortalidad , Neoplasias Faciales/patología , Humanos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Técnicas de Cierre de Heridas
2.
Laryngoscope ; 127(10): 2407-2412, 2017 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28271495

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors associated with the presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in surgical cultures taken from incision and drainage (I&D) of head and neck abscesses in the pediatric population. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: All patients under 18 years of age with a head and neck abscess requiring I&D from 2009 to 2015 were reviewed. MRSA nasal swab cultures were taken from all patients upon hospitalization. Surgical cultures were obtained from all patients and correlated with MRSA nasal swab results. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed, and odds ratios (ORs) along with descriptive statistics were analyzed. RESULTS: Of a total of 272 patients, there were 68 (25%) MRSA-positive abscesses. The majority (86.8%) of these abscesses were in children under 2 years of age. Overall, 12 (4.4%) presented with positive admission MRSA nasal swabs. Of these, 91.7% had MRSA-positive abscess cultures. Decreasing age in years showed an OR of 1.650 (P < 0.001) for MRSA-positive abscess, with children less than 1 year old having the highest OR of 10.74 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Younger age and MRSA nasal colonization were two statistically significant risk factors for developing an MRSA abscess of the head and neck. This study demonstrates a high positive predictive value for MRSA-positive neck abscesses when nasal swab screenings were MRSA-positive (91.7%). Children under 2 years of age-especially those under 1 year of age-or those with MRSA nasal colonization can be considered a high-risk population that may benefit from empiric antibiotics against MRSA for head and neck abscesses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 127:2407-2412, 2017.


Asunto(s)
Absceso/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Mucosa Nasal/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Absceso/diagnóstico , Absceso/cirugía , Niño , Preescolar , Drenaje/métodos , Femenino , Cabeza , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Cuello , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/cirugía
3.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 139(6): 574-8, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23680971

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: If not adequately cleaned, rigid nasal endoscopes (RNEs) have the potential to cause iatrogenic cross-contamination. OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of various disinfection methods in reducing bacterial load on RNEs in vitro. DESIGN AND SETTING: In vitro model. INTERVENTIONS: Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Haemophilus influenzae contamination was separately induced on RNEs in vitro. Two experimental sets were completed. The RNEs were disinfected using the following protocols: 30-second scrub with antimicrobial soap (ABS) and water, 30-second scrub with 70% isopropyl alcohol (IA), 30-second scrub with ABS followed by 30-second scrub with IA, 30-second scrub with germicidal cloth, isolated 5-minute soak in an enzymatic soap solution, 5- and 10-minute soaks in ortho-phthalaldehyde, 0.55%, solution (Cidex OPA), and isolated 30-second rinse with tap water, all with 30-second precleaning and postcleaning rinses with tap water. Two sets of experiments (experiment sets A and B) were carried out with a 30-second tap water rinse after inoculation of each RNE. This was followed by immediate cleaning in set A and a 1-hour air-dry delay in set B. Otherwise there were no differences in the disinfection protocols between sets for each method noted. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Effectiveness of various disinfection protocols in cleaning rigid nasal endoscopes experimentally inoculated with bacteria commonly found in the upper aerodigestive tract. Positive cultures following disinfection indicated ineffective or incomplete disinfection. RESULTS: Most cleaning methods were effective in eliminating S aureus, S pneumoniae, and H influenzae from the scopes following experimental contamination. Continued growth of P aeruginosa was found after all of the disinfection trials in experiment set A with the exception of a 10-minute immersion in Cidex OPA, and in set B except for the 10-minute Cidex OPA immersion and ABS plus IA trials. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Most cleaning methods used in our trials appear to properly disinfect RNEs after in vitro inoculation with S aureus, S pneumoniae, and H influenzae. However, it appears that disinfectants may be less effective in cleaning rigid scopes experimentally inoculated with P aeruginosa. There is a paucity of published data regarding cross-contamination during rigid nasal endoscopy, and these results should guide future studies and to some extent practice to avoid iatrogenic spread of contamination.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Desinfectantes/farmacología , Desinfección/métodos , Endoscopios/microbiología , Contaminación de Equipos/prevención & control , Glutaral/farmacología , Haemophilus influenzae/crecimiento & desarrollo , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/crecimiento & desarrollo , Jabones/farmacología , Staphylococcus aureus/crecimiento & desarrollo , Streptococcus pneumoniae/crecimiento & desarrollo , o-Ftalaldehído/farmacología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Nariz/microbiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda