Long-Term Stable Bone Mineral Density in HIV-Infected Men Without Risk Factors for Osteoporosis Treated with Antiretroviral Therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Most prospective studies of bone mineral density (BMD) in HIV-infected cohorts taking antiretroviral therapy (ART) have been of short duration, typically < 3 years. Such studies have reported short-term stable or increasing BMD. We assessed whether this BMD stability persists for > 10 years in middle-aged and older men established on ART. METHODS: A 12-year, prospective, longitudinal study in 44 HIV-infected men treated with ART who had measurements of BMD at the lumbar spine, proximal femur and total body at baseline, 2, 6 and 12 years. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean age of participants was 49 years, the mean duration of HIV infection was 8 years, and the mean duration of ART was 50 months. After 12 years, BMD increased by 6.9% (95% CI 3.4 to 10.3) at the lumbar spine, and remained stable (range of BMD change: - 0.6% to 0.0%) at the total hip, femoral neck and total body. Only two individuals had a decrease of > 10% in BMD at any site during follow-up and both decreases in BMD were explained by co-morbid illnesses. CONCLUSIONS: BMD remained stable over 12 years in middle-aged and older HIV-infected men treated with ART. Monitoring BMD in men established on ART who do not have risk factors for BMD loss is not necessary.

Stable bone mineral density over 6 years in HIV-infected men treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).

OBJECTIVE: Most longitudinal studies of bone mineral density (BMD) in HIV-infected cohorts have been of short duration, typically 1-2 years. Some studies, especially of cohorts treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), report short-term stable or increasing BMD, but other studies, often in cohorts initiating HAART, report short-term losses in BMD. We assessed BMD changes over the medium term in HIV-infected men already established on HAART at baseline. DESIGN: Six-year, prospective, longitudinal study. SUBJECTS: Forty-four HIV-infected men treated with HAART and 37 uninfected, healthy controls. MEASUREMENTS: Participants had measurements of BMD at baseline, 2 and 6 years. RESULTS: In the HIV-infected men at baseline, the mean age was 49 years, the mean duration of infection was 8 years, and the mean duration of HAART was 50 months. Over 6 years of follow-up, there was a greater increase in lumbar spine BMD (5·3%, 95% CI 3·8-6·5%) in the HIV-infected men compared with controls (0·3%, 95% CI -1·0 to 1·6%), P < 0·001. There was no difference between the groups in the change in BMD over time at the total hip (HIV group: -0·6%, 95% CI -1·7 to 0·4%, controls -1·0%, 95% CI -2·2 to 0%, P = 0·8) or at the total body (HIV group, 0·3%, 95% CI -0·3 to 1·0%; controls, 0·5%, 95% CI -0·2 to 1·1%, P = 0·15). Lean mass increased in the HIV group, but not in the controls. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of accelerated bone loss over 6 years in middle-aged, HIV-infected men treated with HAART. For such patients, routine monitoring of BMD is not necessary over the short/medium term.

Effects of Intravenous Zoledronate on Bone Turnover and Bone Density Persist for at Least 11 Years in HIV-Infected Men.

Previously we reported the results of a 4-year extension of a 2-year randomized placebo-controlled trial showing that the antiresorptive effects of two annual 4-mg doses of zoledronate in HIV-infected men persisted for at least 5 years after the second dose. We set out to determine whether the effects on BMD and bone turnover persist beyond 10 years. We invited all participants in the original trial known to be alive and living in New Zealand to attend an additional visit approximately 12 years after trial entry and 11 years after their second dose of study medication. The outcome measures were BMD at the lumbar spine, proximal femur, and total body, and markers of bone turnover. Twenty-five of the 43 men originally enrolled in the trial attended the final visit, representing 25 of 31 (81%) participants alive and residing in New Zealand at the time. The average duration of follow-up was 12.4 years. At the final visit, BMD remained higher in the zoledronate group than the placebo group (lumbar spine 3.7%, 95% CI, 0.1 to 7.3; total hip 3.7%, 95% CI, 1.2 to 6.2; femoral neck 5.0%, 95% CI, 2.1 to 7.9; total body 2.4%, 95% CI, 0.7 to 4.0), and the between-group differences in BMD remained stable between 6 and 12 years. Serum CTx remained lower in the zoledronate group than the placebo group between 6 and 12 years and, at the final visit, was 45% lower (95% CI, 25 to 64) than the placebo group. P1NP was 26% (95% CI, 4 to 48) lower in the zoledronate group than the placebo group at the final visit. In summary, two annual 4-mg doses of zoledronate have effects on bone turnover and BMD in men that persist for at least 11 years after the second dose. © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Annual zoledronate increases bone density in highly active antiretroviral therapy-treated human immunodeficiency virus-infected men: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: Recent studies have reported low bone mineral density (BMD) in HIV-infected patients. Annual iv administration of 4 mg zoledronate has been shown to increase BMD and suppress bone turnover in postmenopausal women. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine whether annual administration of 4 mg zoledronate will increase BMD in HIV-infected men receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy. DESIGN AND SETTING: A 2-yr randomized placebo-controlled trial was conducted in a clinical research center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 43 HIV-infected men were treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy for at least 3 months, with BMD T score less than -0.5. INTERVENTION: Participants received annual iv administration of 4 mg zoledronate or placebo. All participants took 400 mg/d calcium and 1.25 mg/month vitamin D. MEASUREMENTS: BMD at the lumbar spine, total hip and total body, and bone turnover markers were measured. RESULTS: At the lumbar spine, BMD increased by 8.9% over 2 yr in the zoledronate group compared with an increase of 2.6% in the control group (P<0.001). At the total hip, BMD increased by 3.8% over 2 yr in the zoledronate group compared with a decrease of 0.8% in the control group (P<0.001). At the total body, BMD increased by 2.3% over 2 yr compared with a decrease of 0.5% in the control group (P<0.001). Urine N-telopeptide decreased by 60% at 3 months in the zoledronate group and thereafter remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: Annual administration of zoledronate is a potent and effective therapy for the prevention or treatment of bone loss in HIV-infected men. The current data provide the first trial evidence of the BMD effects of annual zoledronate beyond 1 yr in any population, as well as being the first reported trial in men.

Effects of intravenous zoledronate on bone turnover and bone density persist for at least five years in HIV-infected men.

CONTEXT: In HIV-infected men, the antiresorptive effects of zoledronate persist for at least 2 yr after the second annual dose. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine the duration of action of zoledronate in men. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was 4-yr extension of a 2-yr, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial at an academic research center. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 43 HIV-infected men with bone mineral density (BMD) T score below -0.5, 35 of whom entered the extension study. INTERVENTION: Intervention was annual administration of 4 mg iv zoledronate or placebo at baseline and 1 yr and no intervention subsequently. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We evaluated changes in the bone turnover markers, serum osteocalcin and serum C-telopeptide (CTx), and changes in BMD at the lumbar spine, total hip, and total body. RESULTS: There was no time × treatment interaction between 1 and 5 yr after the second zoledronate dose for osteocalcin or CTx (P > 0.4) or any BMD site (P > 0.7). Between 1 and 5 yr after the second dose, on average, osteocalcin was 41% lower (95% confidence interval = 19-62%; P < 0.001), CTx 52% lower (33-71%; P < 0.001), lumbar spine BMD 3.7% greater (0.3-7.0%; P = 0.03), total hip BMD 2.3% greater (0.3-4.3%; P = 0.02), and total body BMD 2.5% greater (0.8-4.1%; P = 0.004) in the zoledronate group than the placebo group. Five years after the second dose, the between-groups differences were 38% (13-62%) for osteocalcin, 49% (20-77%) for CTx, 3.5% (0.7-6.7%) for lumbar spine BMD, 3.4% (1.4-5.4%) for total hip BMD, and 1.6% (0.2-3.1%) for total body BMD. CONCLUSION: The effects of two annual 4-mg doses of zoledronate in men persist for at least 5 yr after the second dose. Larger trials assessing the antifracture efficacy of less frequent dosing of zoledronate are justified.

Effects of intravenous zoledronate on bone turnover and BMD persist for at least 24 months.

The duration of the antiresorptive effects of the intravenous bisphosphonate, zoledronate, is not known. Recently, we reported that two annual 4-mg doses of zoledronate suppressed bone turnover and increased BMD in HIV-infected men over 24 mo. We set out to determine the persistence of these effects after two doses of zoledronate. Thirty-three HIV-infected men who completed a randomized trial of 4 mg annual zoledronate (n = 17) or placebo (n = 16) were studied for a further 12 mo, during which time no skeletal therapy was administered. Participants received calcium (400 mg/d) and vitamin D supplements (50,000 IU/mo) for the first 24 mo of the study only. Biochemical markers of bone turnover and BMD were measured every 6 mo. Bone turnover markers were stably suppressed at 24 and 36 mo (12 and 24 mo after the second annual dose of zoledronate, respectively). There were no significant within-group changes in urine N-telopeptide, serum C-telopeptide, and osteocalcin between 24 and 36 mo (p > 0.07), and at each time point, each of the turnover markers was significantly lower in the zoledronate group. There were also no significant between-group differences in the changes in BMD at each site between 24 and 36 mo (p > 0.5), and at each time point, BMD at each site was significantly higher in the zoledronate group. These results suggest that the antiresorptive effects of zoledronate last >12 mo and raise the possibility that zoledronate could be administered less frequently than annually. Randomized trials that address this issue should be performed.

Bone mineral density remains stable in HAART-treated HIV-infected men over 2 years.

OBJECTIVE: Recently we reported that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected Caucasian men treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) have normal weight-adjusted bone mineral density (BMD), in contrast to most other cross-sectional analyses, which have reported low BMD in HIV-infected patients. We have now addressed the question of whether there is accelerated BMD loss over time in HIV-infected men. DESIGN: A 2-year, prospective, longitudinal study. SUBJECTS: Twenty-three HAART-treated, HIV-infected men and 26 healthy controls. MEASUREMENTS: All participants had measurements of BMD and bone-related laboratory parameters at baseline, and a repeat measurement of BMD at 2 years. RESULTS: In the HIV-infected men the mean age was 47 years, the mean duration of infection was 8.2 years, and the mean duration of HAART was 54 months. Over 2 years of follow-up, BMD increased from baseline in the HIV-infected men by 2.6% at the lumbar spine (P = 0.05 vs. baseline), and remained stable at the total hip (mean change 0.1%, P > 0.99) and total body (mean change 0.6%, P = 0.39). Mean changes in BMD in the control group were 1.4% at the lumbar spine, -0.1% at the total hip, and -0.8% at the total body. The HIV-infected men lost less total body BMD than the control group (P = 0.01). In the HIV-infected men, body weight remained stable over 2 years while fat mass decreased and lean mass tended to increase, whereas in the controls, body weight and fat mass increased while lean mass remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated bone loss does not occur in HIV-infected men treated with HAART. Monitoring of BMD in HIV-infected men may not be necessary.

Bone mineral density is not reduced in HIV-infected Caucasian men treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have reported low bone mineral density (BMD) in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Frequently these findings have been attributed to treatment with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). We sought to determine whether BMD in HIV-infected men treated with HAART for at least 3 months is different from that in healthy controls, and, if so, what HIV-related factors might explain this finding. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. PATIENTS: Fifty-nine HIV-infected Caucasian men treated with HAART, and 118 healthy community-dwelling controls. Each HIV-infected man was age-matched (within 5 years) to two controls. MEASUREMENTS: All participants had measurements of BMD and bone-related laboratory parameters. RESULTS: The mean duration of known HIV infection was 8.5 years, and of treatment with HAART was 52 months. There was no significant difference in mean BMD between groups at the lumbar spine (HIV group: 1.23 g/cm2, controls: 1.25 g/cm2; P = 0.53) or total body (HIV group: 1.18 g/cm2, controls: 1.20 g/cm2; P = 0.09). At the total hip the HIV-infected group had significantly lower BMD than the control group (HIV group: 1.03 g/cm2, controls: 1.09 g/cm2; P = 0.01). The HIV-infected group were, on average, 6.3 kg lighter than the controls. After adjusting for this weight difference, HIV infection was not an independent predictor of BMD at any site (lumbar spine P = 0.79; total hip P = 0.18; total body P = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: HIV-infected men treated with HAART are lighter than healthy controls. This weight difference is responsible for a small decrement in hip BMD. Overall, BMD is not significantly reduced in HIV-infected Caucasian men treated with HAART.