A qualitative study of the meaning of oral health and self-care for 40 Dunedin residents living on lower incomes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This project extends studies of oral health cultures for lower income families by identifying the participants' meaning of oral health self-care, barriers to its attainment, and suggestions for its improvement. METHODS: Forty open-ended interviews were conducted with Dunedin residents purposively selected from a variety of ages, backgrounds and ethnicities. Transcribed interviews were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Five key themes emerged: (1) oral health understandings for self and wider family groups; (2) the complexity of understanding cost in relation to oral self-care; (3) oral self-care tools and daily oral health routines; (4) relationships with oral health workers and the meaning of good and bad care provision; and (5) the State's involvement in oral health. CONCLUSIONS: Participants valued good oral health and were knowledgeable about it, but cost was the primary barrier to care.

Evaluation of a method for grading late photographic change in breast appearance after radiotherapy for early breast cancer.

AIMS: Serial photographs have been collected prospectively to evaluate the effect of radiotherapy on normal tissues in the breast. The aim of this study was to compare two methods of scoring radiation-induced changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five-year photographs of 400 patients randomised to receive either 42.9 or 39 Gy in 13 fractions to the whole breast after tumour excision of early breast cancer were compared with a post-surgery baseline and scored for change in breast appearance on a three-point graded scale. Two alternative methods of scoring using three observers were compared: (a) scores allocated independently, with independent resolution of discrepancies, and (b) scores allocated by consensus. RESULTS: Treatment effects estimated from the consensus and independent scores were very similar (odds ratio 1.89, 95% confidence interval 1.21-2.96 vs 2.28, 95% confidence interval 1.50-3.47, respectively). Agreement between the scores obtained from each method was reasonable, and the repeatability of the consensus method was good. CONCLUSIONS: The consensus method of scoring photographic change in breast appearance seems to be no less sensitive to randomised dose as the independent method of assessment, but is much quicker to administer. The consensus method has been used to score over 3000 sets of photographs in the National Cancer Research Institute Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy trial.

The influence of breast size on late radiation effects and association with radiotherapy dose inhomogeneity.

A prospective assessment of late changes in breast appearance in 559 patients after tumour excision and radiotherapy for early breast cancer noted a strong association with breast size. Only 3/48 (6%) patients with small breasts developed moderate or severe late changes compared with 94/423 (22%) with medium sized breasts and 34/88 (39%) patients with large breasts (p < 0.001). One possibility is that greater radiation changes are related to greater dose inhomogeneity in women with large breasts. To explore this hypothesis, radiation dose distributions were assessed in a separate group of 37 women in whom three-level transverse computer tomographic images of the breast in the treatment position were available. A significant correlation was found between breast size and dose inhomogeneity which may account for the marked changes in breast appearance reported in women with large breasts.