Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
BJOG ; 115(13): 1676-87, 2008 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19035942

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of the use of cardiotocography (CTG) complemented with fetal electrocardiography and ST analysis compared with the use of CTG alone in term deliveries when a decision has been made to use fetal monitoring with a scalp electrode. DESIGN: A cost-effectiveness analysis based on a probabilistic decision model incorporating relevant strategies and lifelong outcomes. SETTING: Maternity wards in Sweden. POPULATION: Women with term fetuses after a clinical decision had been made to apply a fetal scalp electrode for internal CTG. METHODS: A decision model was used to compare the costs and effects of two different treatment strategies. Baseline estimates were derived from the literature. Discounted costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were simulated over a lifetime horizon using a probabilistic model. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: QALYs, incremental costs, and cost per QALY gained expressed as incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). RESULTS: The analysis found an incremental effect of 0.005 QALYs for ST analysis compared with CTG; the ST analysis strategy was also moreover associated with a euro56 decrease in costs, thus dominating the CTG strategy. The probability that ST analysis is cost-effective in comparison with CTG is high, irrespective of the willingness-to-pay value for a QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with CTG alone, ST analysis is cost-effective when used in term high-risk deliveries in which there is a need for internal fetal monitoring.


Asunto(s)
Cardiotocografía/economía , Parálisis Cerebral/prevención & control , Hipoxia Fetal/diagnóstico , Parálisis Cerebral/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Parto Obstétrico , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Hipoxia Fetal/economía , Humanos , Esperanza de Vida , Pronóstico , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Análisis de Supervivencia
2.
Bone Joint J ; 100-B(4): 527-534, 2018 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29629586

RESUMEN

Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of treatment with an osseointegrated percutaneous (OI-) prosthesis and a socket-suspended (S-) prosthesis for patients with a transfemoral amputation. Patients and Methods: A Markov model was developed to estimate the medical costs and changes in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) attributable to treatment of unilateral transfemoral amputation over a projected period of 20 years from a healthcare perspective. Data were collected alongside a prospective clinical study of 51 patients followed for two years. Results: OI-prostheses had an incremental cost per QALY gained of €83 374 compared with S-prostheses. The clinical improvement seen with OI-prostheses was reflected in QALYs gained. Results were most sensitive to the utility value for both treatment arms. The impact of an annual decline in utility values of 1%, 2%, and 3%, for patients with S-prostheses resulted in a cost per QALY gained of €37 020, €24 662, and €18 952, respectively, over 20 years. Conclusion: From a healthcare perspective, treatment with an OI-prosthesis results in improved quality of life at a relatively high cost compared with that for S-prosthesis. When patients treated with S-prostheses had a decline in quality of life over time, the cost per QALY gained by OI-prosthesis treatment was considerably reduced. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:527-34.


Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica/rehabilitación , Miembros Artificiales/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Oseointegración , Implantación de Prótesis/economía , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Adulto , Amputación Quirúrgica/economía , Femenino , Fémur/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Cadenas de Markov , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos , Implantación de Prótesis/instrumentación , Calidad de Vida , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Suecia
3.
Prosthet Orthot Int ; 32(1): 93-102, 2008 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18330808

RESUMEN

Evidence-based practice has become somewhat of a catchphrase over the past ten years. In this paper evidence-based practice is defined and its importance for the development of the prosthetics and orthotics profession is highlighted. The authors suggest that evidence-based practice needs to be prioritized within the profession and that a cultural change needs to be initiated which supports clinicians in incorporating research findings into their daily practice. In addition, the authors highlight the need for prosthetists/orthotists to become more active in generating research rather than relying on other professional groups to contribute to their professional body of knowledge.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Rehabilitación , Humanos , MEDLINE , Aparatos Ortopédicos , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto , Prótesis e Implantes
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda