Haemodynamic effects of metoprolol and intravenous nitroglycerin versus metoprolol alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Among the various treatments adopted to protect the acutely ischaemic myocardium, favourable results have been reported for beta-blockers. Nitrates can also reasonably be expected to exert favourable effects in acute myocardial infarction considering their haemodynamic action. In this study we compared the haemodynamic effect of metoprolol alone with the effect of metoprolol plus nitroglycerin. Fourteen patients, admitted within 12 hours from the clinical onset of acute myocardial infarction, were initially given intravenous metoprolol (5 + 5 + 5 mg) followed 15 minutes later by an additional 50 mg oral dose. Thereafter, they were randomly allocated to a treatment with metoprolol alone (Group 1) or metoprolol plus intravenous nitroglycerin (Group 2). The two groups were comparable with regard to age, sex, time to admission, time to therapy, site of necrosis, Killip class, and infarct size. Acute beta-blockade induced a marked decrease of cardiac output, systolic blood pressure and heart rate along with a small increase of pulmonary wedge pressure and a marked systemic vasoconstriction. In Group 1 patients these haemodynamic changes persisted up to twelve hours after randomization; in Group 2 patients the addition of nitroglycerin induced a prompt decrease of pulmonary wedge pressure and peripheral vascular resistance whereas the double product was unchanged. In conclusion, intravenous nitroglycerin induces a beneficial haemodynamic effect after early beta-blockade with metoprolol.

[Therapeutic objectives and strategies in NBIA 1 (Hallovorden-Spatz syndrome)]. / Obiettivi terapeutici raggiungibili e strategie terapeutiche utilizzabili, nella NBIA 1 (s. di Hallervorden-Spatz).

A 10 years old male patient, DG, was admitted in the ICU because of continuous uncontrolled movements due to a neurologycal degenerative disease (Hallervorden-Spatz syndrome) able to determine reduction of spontaneous breathing efficacy. At admission he presented acute ventilatory failure, because of a Staphylococcus aureus broncopneumonia, so he had a tracheal tube and mechanical ventilation (pressure support). During hospitalization (4 months in ICU and 2 months in Pediatric Department) DG received tracheotomy and percutaneous gastrostomy, to obtain adequate spontaneous ventilation and artificial enteral nutrition; a satisfactory pharmacological control of choreo-athetosic movements, with not great interference with original sleep-awake cycle, was obtained. Actually DG is living in his family (9 months follow-up); he has tracheotomy and percutaneous gastrostomy; he can relate with the environment; in a few months, he'll go to school again. He need 30 daily administrations of 8 different drugs; family, supported by an integrated multidisciplinary équipe, takes care of him. The role of Intensivist is essential not only in the management of acute phases in chronic diseases, but also in the longterm management of a homely care.