Clinical outcomes and mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients: a 10-year retrospective analysis in a single center.

AIM: To evaluate the clinical outcome, identify predictors of patient and technique survival in our peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients in the western region of Turkey. METHODS: We included all patients who initiated therapy between 2001 and 2010. Socio-demographic characteristics such as who helped to administer the PD as well as conditions under which PD was chosen by patients were investigated from patients' files. Hemodialysis (HD) history and duration, additional systemic diseases, and end-stage renal disease etiologies of all patients were recorded. Clinical data such as blood pressure, amount of ultrafiltration, and laboratory parameters were evaluated before initiation of PD and during the last monitoring period. Infectious complications and their incidences were investigated. Patient and technique survival were investigated for every patient. RESULTS: 322 patients started PD treatment during the study period. 23 patients were excluded. Data from the remaining 299 patients (167 female, mean follow-up time 38.5 ± 26.8 months, mean age 44.7 ± 15.9 years) were evaluated retrospectively. It was determined that 87.3% of the patients made their PD exchanges without help from anyone. 79.9% of patients chose PD as their personal preference. 48 patients had HD history before PD. Peritonitis incidences and catheter exit site/tunnel infection attacks were 27 ± 23 and 32.3 ± 24.9 patient-months, respectively. During the follow-up period, 199 patients (80 patients transferred to HD, 78 patients died and, 41 patients had transplantation) were withdrawn from PD. The most frequent causes of death were cardiovascular events and peritonitis and/or sepsis, whereas most frequent causes of transfer to HD were peritonitis and/or sepsis. Mean survival time was 49.9 ± 2.6 months. The estimation of survival rate was 85.2%, 66.5% and 45.3% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Preference for PD (RR: 4.77, p < 0.001), presence of HD history (RR: 2.08, p = 0.04), presence of diabetes mellitus (RR: 2.13, p = 0.01), low pretreatment serum albumin (RR: 0.32, p < 0.001), and low serum parathormone levels at last visit (RR: 0.99, p = 0.04) were predictors of mortality. Mean technique survival duration was 48.5 ± 2.4 months. The estimation of technique survival by Kaplan-Meier analyses was 92%, 67% and 43% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Technique survival was associated with preference for PD (RR: 0.45, p < 0.001), presence of diabetes mellitus (RR: 1.92, p = 0.003), and pretreatment serum albumin levels (RR: 0.58, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Patient survival in the presented institute is similar to that reported in Western countries. Compulsory choice of PD, presence of HD history, presence of diabetes, low pretreatment serum albuminm, and low serum parathormone levels at last visit were the strongest predictors of death. Risk factors for technique failure were compulsory choice of PD, presence of diabetes, low pretreatment serum albumin.

Effects of AA amyloidosis on survival in peritoneal dialysis.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the effects of ESRD etiologies on mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients. METHODS: We included patients who initiated therapy between 2001-2011 and classified them according to etiologies including amyloidosis, diabetes mellitus, chronic glomerulonephritis and polycistic renal disease. Socio-demographic data, clinical courses and infectious complications were compared between groups, and the reasons for peritoneal dialysis withdrawal were recorded. Patient and technique survival analysis were performed. RESULTS: 354 patients were included to the study. Thereafter, 154 patients were excluded. Totally, 29 patients with AA-amyloidosis (mean age 37.9±16.4 years, follow-up time 21.7±20.2 months), 78 patients with diabetes mellitus (mean age 56.9±13.6 years, follow-up time 35±28.6 months), 68 patients with chronic glomerulonephritis (mean age 37.2±12 years, follow-up time 47.7±29.9 months), 29 patients with polycystic renal disease (mean age 35.6±13.8 years, follow-up time 45.4±36.8 months) were evaluated. Albumin level was lower in patients with amyloidosis at initiation and the end of study (for both p<0.001). Incidence of peritonitis and catheter exit site/tunnel infection attacks were higher in patients with amyloidosis (p=0.002 and 0.018 respectively). There was statistical difference among groups with respect to the last status of patients (p<0.001). Deaths were frequent in amyloidotic and diabetic patients. The majority of deaths were due to peritonitis and/or sepsis and, cardiovascular reasons. The mortality rate was found higher in patients with amyloidosis (log rank=0.005), especially at first 2-3 years. Presence of anyone helping to administer peritoneal dialysis (OR:6.244, p=0,025), initial serum albumin level (OR:0.352, p=0,034) and presence of catheter exit site/tunnel infection(OR:0.250, p=0,015) were independent predictors of patient survival. CONCLUSION: Renal failure etiology has effects on peritoneal dialysis patients' survival. Patients with amyloidosis have the worst survival. Because of loss of PD survival advantage seen in first years of therapy in patients with amyloidosis, peritoneal dialysis may not be suitable as first choice therapy in this group.