The individualisation of glycaemic targets in response to patient characteristics in type 2 diabetes: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Evidence and guidelines increasingly support an individualised approach to care for people with type 2 diabetes and individualisation of glycaemic targets in response to patient factors. METHODS: We undertook a scoping review of the literature for evidence of factors impacting upon glycated haemoglobin target individualisation in adults with type 2 diabetes. Data were analysed thematically with the themes inductively derived from article review. FINDINGS: Evidence suggests that presence of cardiovascular disease, hypoglycaemia unawareness, severe hypoglycaemia, limited life expectancy, advanced age, long diabetes duration, frailty, cognitive impairment, disability, extensive comorbidity, diabetes distress and patient preference should inform the setting of glycaemic targets. CONCLUSION: The management of people with diabetes is complex. In clinical practice, many patients will have a variety of factors that should be considered when personalising their care. Approaches to personalised care and glycaemic treatment targets should be undertaken as part of a shared decision-making process between physician and patient. Use of electronic records might enable greater efficiency and more widespread use of personalised care plans for people with diabetes.

Screening for hypogonadism in diabetes 2008/9: results from the Cheshire Primary Care cohort.

AIM: There is increasing awareness of hypogonadism in men with type 2 diabetes but limited data from Primary Care. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The anonymised records of 6457 male patients aged 18-80 years with diabetes were accessed. Within the last 2 years 391 men (6.0% of total) underwent measurement of serum testosterone. Data search was performed through the centralised data facility afforded by EMIS®, the majority GP systems provider in Cheshire. RESULTS: 4.4% of type 2 diabetes men screened were frankly hypogonadal with a serum total testosterone of less than 8.0 nmol/l. For borderline hypogonadism (serum total testosterone 8-11.99 nmol/l) the proportion of type 2 diabetes men rose to 32.1%. Age adjusted mean (geometric) testosterone was lower in men with type 2 diabetes (13.6 nmol/l 95%CI: 13.1-14.2) vs type 1 diabetes (17.9 nmol/l; 95%CI 15.2-21.0), F=10.3; p=0.0014. For those screened age adjusted body mass index (BMI) was greater in type 2 diabetes at 30.7 (30.1-31.3) vs 28.4 (26.1-30.6)kg/m(2) in type 1 diabetes (F=4.3; p=0.04). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that there was a statistically significant interaction (P=0.014) between BMI and diabetes type in their relation with log testosterone. For persons with type 1 DM and type 2 DM, testosterone can be expected to decrease by 6% (P=0.002) and by 1% (P=0.002) respectively, for every one unit increment in BMI. CONCLUSIONS: There is manifestly a subset of men with diabetes and androgen deficiency who could benefit from testosterone replacement. BMI has an independent influence on androgen status.