Reliability of the penetration aspiration scale with flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing.

OBJECTIVES: The Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS), although designed for videofluoroscopy, has been utilized with flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in both research and clinical practice. The purpose of this investigation was to determine inter- and intrarater reliability of the PAS with FEES as a function of clinician FEES experience and retest interval. METHODS: Three groups of 3 clinicians (N=9) with varying FEES experience (beginning, intermediate, and advanced) assigned PAS scores to 35 swallows. Initial ratings were repeated following short-term (ie, 1 day) and long-term (ie, 1 week) retest intervals. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to assess interrater reliability on the first rating for each group. The coefficients were .91, .82, and .89 for the beginning, intermediate, and advanced clinicians, respectively. Overall interrater reliability across all 9 clinicians, irrespective of experience, was .85. Intraclass correlation coefficients were also calculated to assess intrarater reliability. The intrarater reliability for short- and long-term ratings was .90, .94, and .96 and .96, .97, and .94 for the beginning, intermediate, and advanced clinicians, respectively. Overall intrarater reliability across all 9 clinicians and all 3 ratings was .94. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent inter- and intrarater reliability was evidenced with the application of the PAS for FEES regardless of clinician experience and retest interval.

Use of topical nasal anesthesia during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in dysphagic patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the effect of topical lidocaine on Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores and patient comfort and tolerance of flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) examinations in dysphagic patients. METHODS: Adults with dysphagia referred for swallowing evaluation were recruited to participate in consecutive nonanesthetized and then anesthetized FEES examinations. Under endoscopic visualization, participants consumed 6 swallows consisting of graduated volumes of milk, pudding, and cracker in each condition and recorded their discomfort and tolerance in the 2 conditions. Penetration-Aspiration Scale scores were assigned in blinded fashion for each swallow. RESULTS: Twenty-five adults participated in the study. Although there was no statistically significant effect of anesthesia on PAS scores (P=.065), the odds of a higher PAS score were 33% higher during anesthetized swallows. The anesthetized condition yielded significantly less discomfort and pain during the examination, significantly less pain and discomfort during insertion and removal of the endoscope, and significantly greater overall tolerance than the nonanesthetized condition. CONCLUSION: The use of topical lidocaine during FEES may impair swallowing ability in patients with dysphagia, but this result does not achieve statistical significance. Topical nasal anesthesia significantly reduces subjective pain and discomfort and improves tolerance during FEES.

Effect of Lidocaine on Swallowing During FEES in Patients With Dysphagia.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to assess the effects of 0.2 mL of 4% atomized lidocaine on swallowing and tolerability during Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES). METHODS: A single blinded study was conducted with 17 dysphagic patients, who received 4 standardized boluses in 2 sequential FEES exams under 2 conditions: non-anesthetized (decongestant only) and anesthetized (lidocaine 4%+decongestant). After each procedure, patients rated their pain on the Wong Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. Clinicians scored each swallow with the Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) and an author-developed Residue Rating Scale. Because the assessments were ordinal, a series of Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were conducted to detect differences between the 2 conditions. RESULTS: No significant differences were detected between groups on PAS or residue in the 4 boluses. Pain scores, however, were significantly lower in the anesthetized condition than the decongested-only condition (P=.035). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicated that 0.2 mL of 4% lidocaine enhanced exam tolerability and did not impair the swallow in dysphagic patients.

Stability of aspiration status in healthy adults.

OBJECTIVES: In multiple separate studies, we consistently found that approximately 30% of asymptomatic healthy older adults silently aspirated liquids during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). We subsequently questioned whether aspiration status remained stable in healthy older adults over time. The purpose of this study was to determine the stability of aspiration status in healthy older adults over time. METHODS: Eighteen healthy older participants, comprising of 9 aspirators and 9 nonaspirators whose aspiration status was identified in a previous study, underwent a second FEES approximately 6 to 21 months later. The participants contributed 36 swallows, comprising 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-mL boluses of milk (ie, 1 bolus of each volume of skim, 2%, whole, and soy milk) and water via cup and straw delivery, during the original FEES. An abbreviated protocol was administered for the repeat FEES. The Penetration-Aspiration Scale was used to rate all swallows. RESULTS: A McNemar test demonstrated no change in aspiration status among participants between the initial test and the retest (p > 0.999). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, the aspiration status was stable over about 12 months. This finding lends credence to the premise that trace aspiration of liquids may be a normal and consistent finding in some healthy older adults.

Effects of liquid type, delivery method, and bolus volume on penetration-aspiration scores in healthy older adults during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing.

OBJECTIVES: The type of liquid (eg, water or milk) that should be used during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) has received little investigation. Aspiration may vary as a function of the thin liquid type used during FEES. METHODS: We measured the effects of liquid type (water, skim milk, 2% milk, and whole milk; all dyed with green food coloring), delivery method (cup and straw), and bolus volume (5, 10, 15, and 20 mL) on Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores in 14 healthy older adults (mean, 75 years; range, 69 to 85 years). Each participant generated 32 swallows. RESULTS: The PAS scores differed significantly by liquid type (p = 0.003) and by bolus volume (p = 0.017), but not by delivery method (p = 0.442). The PAS scores were significantly greater for 2% milk and whole milk than for skim milk and water (p < 0.05), and for 20 mL versus smaller volumes. Penetration and aspiration were observed on 113 (25%) and 15 (3%) of 448 swallows, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that both milk and water should be used during FEES for an accurate assessment of aspiration status.

The effects of aspiration status, liquid type, and bolus volume on pharyngeal peak pressure in healthy older adults.

The reasons for aspiration in healthy adults remain unknown. Given that the pharyngeal phase of swallowing is a key component of the safe swallow, it was hypothesized that healthy older adults who aspirate are likely to generate less pharyngeal peak pressures when swallowing. Accordingly, pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter pressures were examined as a function of aspiration status (i.e., nonaspirator vs. aspirator), sensor location (upper vs. lower pharynx), liquid type (i.e., water vs. milk), and volume (i.e., 5 vs. 10 ml) in healthy older adults. Manometric measurements were acquired with a 2.1-mm catheter during flexible endoscopic evaluation. Participants (N = 19, mean age = 79.2 years) contributed 28 swallows; during 8 swallows, simultaneous manometric measurements of upper and lower pharyngeal and upper esophageal pressures were obtained. Pharyngeal manometric peak pressure was significantly less for aspirators (mean = 82, SD = 31 mmHg) than for nonaspirators (mean = 112, SD = 20 mmHg), and upper pharyngeal pressures (mean = 85, SD = 32 mmHg) generated less pressure than lower pharyngeal pressures (mean = 116, SD = 38 mmHg). Manometric measurements vary with respect to aspiration status and sensor location. Lower pharyngeal pressures in healthy older adults may predispose them to aspiration.

Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in healthy young and older adults.

OBJECTIVES: Scant data exist on normal swallowing as assessed endoscopically. A lack of understanding for the range of normal swallowing may lead to inaccurate diagnoses and overly aggressive management of patients with dysphagia. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to determine the effects of age (i.e., young versus older), gender, bolus volume (i.e., 5 versus 10 mL), and bolus condition (i.e., water versus milk) on Penetration-Aspiration Scale scores, bolus dwell time, pharyngeal closure duration, and residue in healthy adults. METHODS: Twenty-three young adults (mean, 30.0 years of age) and 21 older adults (mean, 75.0 years of age) participated. Measurements were acquired during manoendoscopic swallowing assessments. The participants contributed 8 swallows, affording a study total of 352 swallows for analysis. RESULTS: The older adults demonstrated penetration on 19 swallows and aspiration on 11 swallows out of 168 swallows. There was a significant difference in the proportion of Penetration-Aspiration Scale scores across age and gender groups. Longer bolus dwell times were seen in older adults and with milk boluses, whereas residue severity was less in young adults and with water boluses. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic data on normal swallowing physiology were generated. These data may serve as an accurate benchmark for clinicians and researchers in the interpretation of dysphagia.

Penetration and aspiration in healthy older adults as assessed during endoscopic evaluation of swallowing.

OBJECTIVES: A previous article from our group presented data on normal swallowing as assessed during simultaneous manometry and flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). Because penetration and aspiration events were identified in healthy adults, the question arose, could the presence of the manometric catheter confound normal FEES findings? Thus, a follow-up study was designed to address the effects of catheter condition on healthy older adults as assessed during FEES. METHODS: Twenty older adults (mean, 78.9 years of age) participated. The participants each contributed 28 swallows, affording a study total of 560 swallows for analyses. RESULTS: The older adults demonstrated penetration on 82 (15%) and aspiration on 18 (3%) of 545 swallows. The numbers of participants who had penetration and aspiration during the study protocol were 75% and 30%, respectively. The older adults demonstrated both penetration and aspiration events irrespective of the presence of a catheter; whether they were drinking milk, water, or barium; whether the bolus was 5 or 10 mL; and whether they took the bolus via syringe or self-administered the bolus with a cup. However, significantly more aspiration was found on thin liquids than on puree or solids. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic data on normal swallowing physiology were generated. These may serve as an accurate benchmark for clinicians and researchers in the interpretation of dysphagia.

Effects of age, gender, bolus condition, viscosity, and volume on pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter pressure and temporal measurements during swallowing.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of trial (i.e., Trial 1 vs. Trial 2); viscosity (i.e., saliva, thin, nectar-thick, honey-thick, and pudding-thick water); volume (i.e., 5 mL vs. 10 mL); age (i.e., young vs. older adults); and gender on pharyngeal (i.e., upper and lower) and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressures, durations, and onsets (i.e., onset of upper pharyngeal pressures relative to onsets of UES relaxations and onset of lower relative to upper pharyngeal pressures). METHOD: Twenty-three young adults (M=30 years) and 21 older healthy adults (M=75 years) participated. Measurements were acquired with a 2.1-mm catheter during simultaneous manometric and endoscopic swallowing assessment. Participants contributed 18 swallows, affording a study total of 792 swallows for analyses. RESULTS: There was no significant effect of trial on any measurement of pressure, duration, and onset (ps=.63, .39, and .71, respectively). It was found that viscosity, volume, age, and gender affected pressure, duration, and onset measurements (e.g., onset of upper pharyngeal pressures relative to onsets of UES relaxations) but in varying degrees relative to the location in the pharynx or UES and the type of measurement (e.g., pressure, onset). CONCLUSIONS: Manometric measurements vary with respect to age, gender, and bolus variables and interactions of each. Consideration of these variables is paramount in understanding normal and pathological swallowing if manometry is to develop as a quantitative adjunct to videofluoroscopic and endoscopic swallowing tools.

Swallowing and dysphagia rehabilitation: translating principles of neural plasticity into clinically oriented evidence.

PURPOSE: This review presents the state of swallowing rehabilitation science as it relates to evidence for neural plastic changes in the brain. The case is made for essential collaboration between clinical and basic scientists to expand the positive influences of dysphagia rehabilitation in synergy with growth in technology and knowledge. The intent is to stimulate thought and propose potential research directions. METHOD: A working group of experts in swallowing and dysphagia reviews 10 principles of neural plasticity and integrates these advancing neural plastic concepts with swallowing and clinical dysphagia literature for translation into treatment paradigms. In this context, dysphagia refers to disordered swallowing associated with central and peripheral sensorimotor deficits associated with stroke, neurodegenerative disease, tumors of the head and neck, infection, or trauma. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The optimal treatment parameters emerging from increased understanding of neural plastic principles and concepts will contribute to evidence-based practice. Integrating these principles will improve dysphagia rehabilitation directions, strategies, and outcomes. A strategic plan is discussed, including several experimental paradigms for the translation of these principles and concepts of neural plasticity into the clinical science of rehabilitation for oropharyngeal swallowing disorders, ultimately providing the evidence to substantiate their translation into clinical practice.

Aspiration as a Function of Age, Sex, Liquid Type, Bolus Volume, and Bolus Delivery Across the Healthy Adult Life Span.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this investigation was to examine, via flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), factors that affect penetration and aspiration during swallowing across the adult lifespan. METHODS: Healthy adults (N = 203) across the third to ninth decades of life participated. Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores were assessed during FEES as a function of age, sex, liquid type (water and skim, 2%, and whole milk), volume (5, 10, 15, and 20 ml), and delivery (cup and straw). RESULTS: The PAS scores differed significantly by liquid type ( P < .0001) and age group ( P < .0001). In general, PAS scores were higher for milk versus water swallows and for older age groups. Significant interactions of liquid type by age ( P = .0042) and sex by volume ( P = .020) were also evidenced. In addition, the odds of penetration and aspiration increased significantly with milks compared to water and age ( P < .05). Increased bolus volume also increased the odds of aspiration ( P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Aspiration may be an underappreciated phenomenon in healthy adults. The inclusion of both water and milk test boluses of various volumes during FEES may be important for the appropriate assessment of adult penetration and aspiration.

Laryngopharyngeal abnormalities in hospitalized patients with dysphagia.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of laryngopharyngeal (LP) abnormalities in hospitalized patients with dysphagia referred for flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, blinded review by two otolaryngologists of 100 consecutive FEES studies performed and video-recorded by a speech-language pathologist (SLP). METHODS: Two otolaryngologists reviewed videos of 100 consecutive FEES studies on hospitalized patients with dysphagia for the presence of abnormal LP findings. RESULTS: Sixty-one male and 38 female patients comprised the hospital dysphagia cohort. The mean age was 62. One subject could not be evaluated because of the severity of the retained secretions, leaving 99 subjects in the cohort. Seventy-six percent had been previously intubated, with a mean intubation duration of 13 days. The overall prevalence of abnormal LP findings was 79%. Forty-five percent of the patients presented with two or more findings, which included arytenoid edema (33%), granuloma (31%), vocal fold paresis (24%), mucosal lesions (17%), vocal fold bowing (14%), diffuse edema (11%), airway stenosis (3%), and ulcer (6%). There was a significant difference in LP findings between those individuals who had or had not been intubated. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized patients with dysphagia are at high risk for LP abnormalities, particularly if they have been intubated, and may benefit from either 1) an initial joint examination by the SLP and otolaryngologist or 2) an otolaryngologist's review of the recorded examination conducted by the SLP. Such otolaryngology involvement could identify airway stenosis patients at an earlier stage, initiate granuloma treatment sooner, enable earlier biopsy of unexpected lesions, and allow follow-up of mucosal and neuromuscular findings that do not respond to medical management.

Intraobserver and interobserver reliability in laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination thresholds: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: Laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination threshold (LPSDT) testing is a method used to detect sensory deficits in patients in whom swallowing disorders are suspected. LPSDTs have been used to stratify patient risk status with regard to aspiration and to guide dietary management. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of LPSDT testing among a group of examiners with differing levels of testing experience. METHODS: Twenty-seven healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study to elicit LPSDTs for intraobserver and interobserver reliability measurements. The examiners represented 3 levels of testing experience: an attending laryngologist, a laryngology fellow, and an otolaryngology resident. With the examiners blinded to test results, each subject was examined twice by one examiner and once by a different examiner in an alternating fashion. RESULTS: Six subjects were unable to tolerate the examinations because of coughing and gagging. Spearman rank correlations revealed strong intraobserver reliability for the experienced endoscopists (ie, attending and fellow) but poor reliability for the novice endoscopist (ie, resident). Poor interobserver reliability regardless of endoscopy experience was found. Eighteen percent of the participants demonstrated LPSDTs of more than 4.0 mm Hg (above normal). CONCLUSIONS: 1) Intraobserver reliability was good for experienced endoscopists. 2) Interobserver LPSDT agreement between endoscopists was poor. 3) Eighteen percent of the subjects demonstrated elevated LPSDT thresholds of more than 4 mm Hg.

Ultrasonographic evaluation of geniohyoid muscle and hyoid bone during swallowing in young adults.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The geniohyoid muscle plays an important role in hyoid bone movement. Adequate hyoid bone movement during swallowing is important for effective bolus flow and pharyngeal clearing. The aim of this study was to estimate the relationship between the geniohyoid muscle size and function and hyoid bone movement during swallowing in healthy young adults, as measured via ultrasound, in different body positions. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Forty young (20-40 years old) adults (20 male and 20 female) participated. The cross-sectional area of the geniohyoid muscle at rest (seated position), the geniohyoid muscle contraction velocity, and the hyoid bone displacement during swallowing 10 mL of mineral water were measured by ultrasound in seated, supine, and right lateral decubitus positions. RESULTS: The size of the geniohyoid muscle correlated with body height. Males had larger geniohyoid cross-sectional area than females and greater maximal and anterior hyoid displacement during swallowing than females, and maximal and anterior hyoid bone displacement during swallowing correlated with the size of geniohyoid muscle only when the body was in the supine position; these two movements were positively correlated to each other. CONCLUSIONS: Genders vary in hyoid bone movement during swallowing, and the correlation between geniohyoid muscle size and hyoid bone displacement varies among different body positions during swallowing. This investigation also illuminates the use of ultrasound in providing quantitative measures of geniohyoid muscle and hyoid bone displacement during swallowing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c.

Effects of viscosity, taste, and bolus volume on swallowing apnea duration of normal adults.

OBJECTIVE: The effects of viscosity, taste, and nectar-thick liquid bolus volume on swallowing apnea duration (SAD) were examined. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Twenty-two adults, comprised of 10 males and 12 females, participated. SAD was assessed via nasal airflow during swallow conditions of viscosity (thin liquid, thick liquid, and puree), taste (water, apple juice, lemon concentrate), and nectar-thick liquid bolus volumes (5, 10, 15, and 20 mL) across three trials. RESULTS: A significant main effect of nectar-thick liquid bolus volume was found (P < 0.05). Viscosity and taste were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: SAD increased with increases in bolus volume; however, neither changes in bolus viscosity nor changes in taste affected SAD. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings indicate that since viscosity was not significant, the normative data previously published (by this PI) with 60 healthy adults stratified by age and gender can be utilized for comparison to disordered swallowing without regard to the bolus viscosity being used. EBM RATING: D.

Computed tomography pulmonary findings in healthy older adult aspirators versus nonaspirators.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: In previous studies, we consistently found that approximately 30% of asymptomatic healthy older adults silently aspirated liquids during a flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and that their aspiration status was stable for the following year. However, no studies have systematically evaluated effects of silent aspiration on lung parenchyma and airways. We used computed tomography (CT) to compare lungs of healthy older adult aspirators versus nonaspirators. We hypothesized that CT images would show pulmonary differences in healthy older adult aspirators versus nonaspirators. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. METHODS: Fifty healthy older adults (25 aspirators and 25 nonaspirators) who participated in a previous FEES were randomly selected. CT scans were performed; on inspiration, lung views were taken at 1.25 mm and 2.5 mm windows, and on expiration, lung views were taken at 2.5 mm. CT scans were reviewed by radiologists blinded to group assignment. Outcomes included bronchiectasis, bronchiolectasis, bronchial wall thickening, parenchymal band, fibrosis, air trapping, intraluminal airway debris, and tree-in-bud pattern. RESULTS: χ(2) analyses between aspirators and nonaspirators found no statistically significant differences between aspirators and nonaspirators for any outcomes (P > .05). Logistic regression analyses adjusted for smoking did not change the results. CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in pulmonary CT findings between healthy older adult aspirators and nonaspirators. This study adds to the evidence that some aspiration may be within the range of normal for older adults, or at least does not contribute to a change in pulmonary appearance on CT images. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3b.

Age-related changes of hyoid bone position in healthy older adults with aspiration.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Aspiration, the passage of a bolus below the vocal folds, increases morbidity and mortality in the elderly by increasing the risk of aspiration pneumonia and other conditions. We hypothesized that altered position of the hyoid bone associated with aging may negatively affect airway protection during swallowing (i.e., aspiration) in older adults. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: We re-reviewed computed tomography (CT) scans of the head from 40 older adults (65-80 years old), comprised of 20 aspirators and 20 nonaspirators, obtained from a previous cohort study. In addition, CT scans of the head from 40 young adults (20-40 years old) were retrieved from a medical records database. Three-dimensional reconstruction and 2-dimensional sagittal views were used to measure the distance between the mandible and hyoid bone. Comparisons between age groups, genders, and aspiration status were made. RESULTS: Older adults had a larger distance between the hyoid and mandible in both latitude and longitudinal positions compared to the young adults. Among older males, there was evidence that the hyoid bone in the aspirators tended to be positioned more posterior compared to the nonaspirators. CONCLUSIONS: The distance between the hyoid and mandible is increased with aging, and a more posterior position of the hyoid bone is correlated with aspiration in older males. These findings suggest that age-related changes in hyoid bone position may be a component of decreased swallowing safety and aspiration in older adults and warrant further investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Isometric and swallowing tongue strength in healthy adults.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The tongue contributes to a safe swallow. It facilitates bolus control during mastication, maintains a bolus in the oral cavity to prevent premature entry of the bolus into the hypopharynx, and helps generate pressure in the hypopharynx during swallowing. This study examined isometric tongue strength and tongue pressure measured during swallowing in healthy young and older adults. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective group design. METHODS: One hundred twenty-six healthy individuals who were recruited as part of a larger study on swallowing participated in this study. Participants were divided into three age groups: 20 to 40 years, 41 to 60 years, and ≥61 years. A KayPentax Digital Swallowing Workstation with an air-filled bulb array was placed on the tongue of each participant (anterior to posterior). Participants completed three isometric tongue presses and three swallows. RESULTS: Repeated measures analyses of variance revealed a significant main effect of age (P = .01) and gender by tongue bulb location interaction (P = .02) for isometric tongue strength. That is, older adults had lower isometric tongue strength than young adults, and females had a greater difference between anterior and posterior tongue strength than males. Tongue strength during swallowing yielded significantly greater anterior versus posterior tongue pressure. CONCLUSIONS: This study comprises one of the largest in terms of number of healthy participants reported to date and confirms previous findings that isometric tongue strength decreases with age. Furthermore, given young and older adults generate similar swallowing pressures, swallowing is a submaximal strength activity, yet older adults have less functional reserve. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Aging-related geniohyoid muscle atrophy is related to aspiration status in healthy older adults.

BACKGROUND: Age-related muscle weakness due to atrophy and fatty infiltration in orofacial muscles may be related to swallowing deficits in older adults. An important component of safe swallowing is the geniohyoid (GH) muscle, which helps elevate and stabilize the hyoid bone, thus protecting the airway. This study aimed to explore whether aging and aspiration in older adults were related to GH muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration. METHOD: Eighty computed tomography scans of the head and neck from 40 healthy older (average age 78 years) and 40 younger adults (average age 32 years) were analyzed. Twenty aspirators and 20 nonaspirators from the 40 older adults had been identified previously. Two-dimensional views in the sagittal and coronal planes were used to measure the GH cross-sectional area and fatty infiltration. RESULTS: GH cross-sectional area was larger in men than in women (p < .05). Decreased cross-sectional area was associated with aging (p < .05), and cross-sectional area was significantly smaller in aspirators compared with nonaspirators, but only among the older men (p < .01). Increasing fatty infiltration was associated with aging in the middle (p < .05) and posterior (p < .01) portions of the GH muscle. There was no significant difference in fatty infiltration of the GH muscle among aspirators and nonaspirators. CONCLUSION: GH muscle atrophy was associated with aging and aspiration. Fatty infiltration in the GH muscle was increased with aging but not related to aspiration status. These findings suggest that GH muscle atrophy may be a component of decreased swallowing safety and aspiration in older adults and warrants further investigation.

The effects of topical anesthetic on swallowing during nasoendoscopy.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To assess the effects of a typical otolaryngologic dose of 1 mL of 4% lidocaine on penetration aspiration scale scores and participant discomfort during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective pilot study. METHODS: Twenty healthy participants consumed 12 swallows consisting of graduated volumes of milk, water, pudding, and cracker in anesthetized and nonanesthetized conditions. Each participant was randomly selected to begin with the anesthetized or nonanesthetized condition. Each participant returned within 7 days to repeat the study in the other condition. Digital recordings of their evaluations were scored via the penetration-aspiration scale in a blinded fashion. Participants recorded their discomfort and tolerance of each flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. RESULTS: The anesthetized condition yielded significantly worse swallowing function (P = .001) than the nonanesthetized condition. The nonanesthetized condition yielded greater discomfort and pain during the procedure (P = .006, .018), greater pain during insertion and removal of the endoscope (P = .002, .003) and less overall tolerance (P = .016) than the anesthetized condition. CONCLUSIONS: A typical otolaryngologic anesthetic dose of 1 mL of 4% lidocaine during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing predisposed healthy young adults to higher penetration aspiration scale scores (less safe swallowing) than the nonanesthetized condition; however, the anesthetic reduced discomfort and provided better overall tolerance. Future studies need to evaluate the effects of lower doses of lidocaine (0.2 and 0.5 mL) on swallowing function and comfort.