Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 70
Filtrar
1.
Annu Rev Immunol ; 33: 227-56, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25581310

RESUMEN

The diverse microbial populations constituting the intestinal microbiota promote immune development and differentiation, but because of their complex metabolic requirements and the consequent difficulty culturing them, they remained, until recently, largely uncharacterized and mysterious. In the last decade, deep nucleic acid sequencing platforms, new computational and bioinformatics tools, and full-genome characterization of several hundred commensal bacterial species facilitated studies of the microbiota and revealed that differences in microbiota composition can be associated with inflammatory, metabolic, and infectious diseases, that each human is colonized by a distinct bacterial flora, and that the microbiota can be manipulated to reduce and even cure some diseases. Different bacterial species induce distinct immune cell populations that can play pro- and anti-inflammatory roles, and thus the composition of the microbiota determines, in part, the level of resistance to infection and susceptibility to inflammatory diseases. This review summarizes recent work characterizing commensal microbes that contribute to the antimicrobial defense/inflammation axis.


Asunto(s)
Resistencia a la Enfermedad/inmunología , Gastroenteritis/inmunología , Gastroenteritis/microbiología , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/inmunología , Mucosa Intestinal/inmunología , Mucosa Intestinal/microbiología , Inmunidad Adaptativa , Animales , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/inmunología , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/metabolismo , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/microbiología , Biología Computacional , Dieta , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Gastroenteritis/metabolismo , Interacciones Huésped-Patógeno/inmunología , Humanos , Inmunidad Innata , Inmunidad Mucosa , Mucosa Intestinal/metabolismo , Metaboloma , Neoplasias/etiología , Vitaminas/metabolismo
2.
Nature ; 633(8031): 878-886, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39294375

RESUMEN

Persistent colonization and outgrowth of potentially pathogenic organisms in the intestine can result from long-term antibiotic use or inflammatory conditions, and may perpetuate dysregulated immunity and tissue damage1,2. Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae gut pathobionts are particularly recalcitrant to conventional antibiotic treatment3,4, although an emerging body of evidence suggests that manipulation of the commensal microbiota may be a practical alternative therapeutic strategy5-7. Here we isolated and down-selected commensal bacterial consortia from stool samples from healthy humans that could strongly and specifically suppress intestinal Enterobacteriaceae. One of the elaborated consortia, comprising 18 commensal strains, effectively controlled ecological niches by regulating gluconate availability, thereby re-establishing colonization resistance and alleviating Klebsiella- and Escherichia-driven intestinal inflammation in mice. Harnessing these activities in the form of live bacterial therapies may represent a promising solution to combat the growing threat of proinflammatory, antimicrobial-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infection.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae , Enterobacteriaceae , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Simbiosis , Animales , Humanos , Ratones , Enterobacteriaceae/crecimiento & desarrollo , Enterobacteriaceae/patogenicidad , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/prevención & control , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/terapia , Escherichia/crecimiento & desarrollo , Escherichia/patogenicidad , Heces/microbiología , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/fisiología , Gluconatos/metabolismo , Inflamación/microbiología , Inflamación/prevención & control , Inflamación/terapia , Intestinos/microbiología , Klebsiella/crecimiento & desarrollo , Klebsiella/patogenicidad , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Simbiosis/fisiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana
3.
Nature ; 572(7771): 665-669, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31435014

RESUMEN

Intestinal commensal bacteria can inhibit dense colonization of the gut by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE), a leading cause of hospital-acquired infections1,2. A four-strained consortium of commensal bacteria that contains Blautia producta BPSCSK can reverse antibiotic-induced susceptibility to VRE infection3. Here we show that BPSCSK reduces growth of VRE by secreting a lantibiotic that is similar to the nisin-A produced by Lactococcus lactis. Although the growth of VRE is inhibited by BPSCSK and L. lactis in vitro, only BPSCSK colonizes the colon and reduces VRE density in vivo. In comparison to nisin-A, the BPSCSK lantibiotic has reduced activity against intestinal commensal bacteria. In patients at high risk of VRE infection, high abundance of the lantibiotic gene is associated with reduced density of E. faecium. In germ-free mice transplanted with patient-derived faeces, resistance to VRE colonization correlates with abundance of the lantibiotic gene. Lantibiotic-producing commensal strains of the gastrointestinal tract reduce colonization by VRE and represent potential probiotic agents to re-establish resistance to VRE.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriocinas/metabolismo , Bacteriocinas/farmacología , Enterococcus faecium/efectos de los fármacos , Lactococcus lactis/metabolismo , Probióticos , Resistencia a la Vancomicina/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Antibacterianos/biosíntesis , Antibacterianos/aislamiento & purificación , Antibacterianos/metabolismo , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Bacteriocinas/genética , Bacteriocinas/aislamiento & purificación , Enterococcus faecium/crecimiento & desarrollo , Enterococcus faecium/aislamiento & purificación , Heces/microbiología , Femenino , Tracto Gastrointestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Tracto Gastrointestinal/microbiología , Vida Libre de Gérmenes , Bacterias Grampositivas/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Grampositivas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Humanos , Lactococcus lactis/química , Lactococcus lactis/crecimiento & desarrollo , Lactococcus lactis/fisiología , Ratones , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Microbiota/genética , Nisina/química , Nisina/farmacología , Simbiosis/efectos de los fármacos , Vancomicina/farmacología , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/crecimiento & desarrollo , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/aislamiento & purificación
4.
Support Care Cancer ; 32(1): 67, 2023 Dec 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38150163

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The ADAURA trial demonstrated the superiority of osimertinib over a placebo with regard to disease-free survival, showing it to be indicated as an adjuvant therapy for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer with mutated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The aim of the present study was to conduct a cost-utility analysis and an analysis of the budgetary impact of adjuvant therapy with osimertinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR who had undergone resection surgery with curative intent. METHODS: Analyses were based on the outcomes of the ADAURA clinical trial and were conducted through a Spanish National Health Service perspective. The outcome measures used were quality-adjusted life years (QALY). RESULTS: The average overall cost of adjuvant treatment with osimertinib over a period of 100 months in the overall sample of trial patients (stages IB-IIIA) was 220,961 €, compared with 197,849 € in the placebo group. Effectiveness, estimated according to QALY, was 6.26 years in the osimertinib group and 5.96 years in the placebo group, with the incremental cost-utility ratio being 77,040 €/QALY. With regard to the budgetary impact, it was estimated that, in 2021, approximately 1130 patients would be subsidiaries to receive osimertinib. This pertains to a difference of 17,375,330 € over 100 months to fund this treatment relative to no treatment. CONCLUSION: Taking into account a Spanish threshold of 24,000 €/QALY, the reduction in the acquisition cost of osimertinib will have to be greater than 10%, to obtain a cost-effective alternative.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas , Humanos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Medicina Estatal , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Receptores ErbB/genética
5.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 29(1): 155-161, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34846221

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: There is subgroup analysis suggesting a lack of benefit of daratumumab use in multiple myeloma (MM) and hepatic disease (HD). The objectives of this study were to conduct a systematic review and interpretation of daratumumab-based regimen efficacy in transplant-ineligible patients with untreated MM and HD. METHODS: A systematic search in Pubmed® database about randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with subgroup analysis regarding hepatic function for overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) were developed. Two methodologies were applied. One of them considered statistical interaction, prespecification, biological support and consistency of subgroup results. Second methodology was two-part validated tool: preliminary questions to reject subset analysis without minimal relevance, and a checklist relating a recommendation for applicability in clinical practice. RESULTS: It was included three records. About first methodology, statistical interaction among subgroups was found for PFS in one RCT. Subsets were prespecified in all RCTs. Biological support of efficacy differences could be reasonable. Inconsistent results were found. Second methology directly rejected applicability of subset analysis in two records. Checklist recommended "null" application of results in the remaining RCT. CONCLUSIONS: No consistent heterogeneity for daratumumab-based regimen efficacy was observed among subgroups regarding hepatic function in transplant-ineligible patients with untreated MM. Patients with normal hepatic function and HD could benefit from these treatments.


Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Progresión
6.
Eur J Haematol ; 105(1): 56-65, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32145104

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a complex disease. Lack of direct comparisons among treatments and incorporation of new alternatives make it necessary to perform studies that allow for clinical decision-making. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was developed to evaluate the comparative efficacy among different therapeutic alternatives in newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible MM patients. METHODS: MEDLINE® and EMBASE® were systematically searched up for these drugs: lenalidomide, thalidomide, bortezomib, and daratumumab. Comparative phase II-III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included. Progression-free survival (PFS) was selected as efficacy outcome. The NMA was developed using Bayesian methods. Fixed- and random-effects models were assessed using deviance information criteria. RESULTS: The systematic search yielded 593 results. Ten RCTs were included. No differences were observed between fixed- and random-effects models. The combination of daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone showed the best HR in PFS (reference treatment). Along with this scheme, the best PFS results were obtained by combination of daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (HR 1.2, 95% CrI 0.64-2.4) and bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (HR 1.6, 95% CrI 0.81-3.0). CONCLUSIONS: Schemes with the best PFS results were daratumumab treatments and combination of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone, although the latter scheme has been analyzed in heterogeneous populations.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Inducción , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 45(3): 530-538, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31854128

RESUMEN

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Subgroup analysis plays an important role in clinical decision-making. Correct management of subgroup analysis is necessary to optimize effectiveness, safety and efficiency of treatments. No homogeneous criteria have been developed for interpretation of subgroup analysis. In this study, the researcher develops a checklist to evaluate the reliability and applicability of the results of subset analyses. METHODS: With a review of previous literature, three main criteria were included in the checklist: statistical association, biological plausibility and consistency among studies. Statistical association considered interaction probability, prespecification of analysis, number of subgroups analysed, sample size and positive/negative result in global analysis. Each item was given an indicative score. Total score was related to a level of applicability for the results in clinical practice. Checklist validation included interinvestigator concordance and assessment about utility. Three drug examples were used to validate the tool. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Twenty-six evaluators showed adequate interinvestigator concordance (kappa 0.79, 1 and 0.83 for each drug example regarding applicability). Kappa values increased to 0.94, 1 and 1 after group discussion. Checklist utility score was greater than 4.7/5 in three drug examples. In pre-analysis, inter-researcher agreement on global applicability recommendation of subgroup results to practice was 92.3% (ramucirumab), 96% (nivolumab) and 100% (mepolizumab). In post-analysis, inter-researcher agreement on applicability recommendation of subgroup results was 100%, 94.45% and 100%, respectively. The checklist validation shows a high interindividual agreement of the results, both with respect to the evaluation of the applicability of subgroup analysis and concerning clinical decision-making. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: We have developed the first validated tool for interpretation of subgroup analyses. The checklist contributes to the adoption of homogeneous criteria for subgroup analyses, thereby allowing discussion and evaluation of the effects of a health intervention.


Asunto(s)
Lista de Verificación , Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Nivolumab/uso terapéutico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Ramucirumab
8.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 44(3): 384-396, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30729557

RESUMEN

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized primarily by inflammation and pain in the joints. Tofacitinib is an oral drug recently approved for RA treatment; it inhibits Janus protein kinases (JAK) that reduces RA symptoms when conventional DMARDs do not trigger a response. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of biological DMARDs in monotherapy or combined with methotrexate in RA patients and compare the treatments. METHODS: We reviewed the literature for articles published up to June 2017, evaluating the efficacy and safety of the biological DMARDs indicated for RA in patients with inadequate responses to conventional DMARDs and naïve to biological DMARDs, in similar populations, considering ACR50 as the efficacy variable. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for each drug combination, and these parameters were transformed into differences in responses to assess the effectiveness of the alternative medicines. Equivalence therapeutic alternatives (ETA) were ensured to assess the possibility of considering these medications with equivalent efficacy. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed using Bayesian approaches and the fixed-effects model. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Twenty-seven randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that met the pre-established criteria were identified. The 95% CI of biological DMARDs was higher than that of placebo without methotrexate, except for certolizumab, golimumab-m, anakinra-m and adalimumab monotherapy. These DMARDs performed significantly better than the placebo, except for etanercept, certolizumab, tofacitinib and golimumab. Certolizumab-m was better than anakinra-m and adalimumab, and tocilizumab alone or combined with methotrexate was superior to adalimumab. Etanercept-m yielded a higher difference in responses compared with the other biological DMARDs, which presented more homogeneous responses, except for adalimumab and anakinra-m, which yielded worse results. None of the biological DMARDs displayed ETA to etanercept-m; however, they displayed ETA with certolizumab-m, except for adalimumab and anakinra-m. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: All biological DMARDs used in combination with methotrexate, except for etanercept, anakinra, certolizumab and tocilizumab without methotrexate, were displayed ETA on using ACR50 at week 24 in patients naïve to biological DMARDs. Etanercept displayed a greater difference in responses, although the high uncertainty of the comparative results prevented the confirmation of the increased efficacy of this drug.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Metaanálisis en Red , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
9.
J Mater Sci Mater Med ; 30(1): 6, 2018 Dec 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30594987

RESUMEN

Bone substitute fabrication is of interest to meet the worldwide incidence of bone disorders. Physical chitosan hydrogels with intertwined apatite particles were chosen to meet the bio-physical and mechanical properties required by a potential bone substitute. A set up for 3-D printing by robocasting was found adequate to fabricate scaffolds. Inks consisted of suspensions of calcium phosphate particles in chitosan acidic aqueous solution. The inks are shear-thinning and consist of a suspension of dispersed platelet aggregates of dicalcium phosphate dihydrate in a continuous chitosan phase. The rheological properties of the inks were studied, including their shear-thinning characteristics and yield stress. Scaffolds were printed in basic water/ethanol baths to induce transformation of chitosan-calcium phosphates suspension into physical hydrogel of chitosan mineralized with apatite. Scaffolds consisted of a chitosan polymeric matrix intertwined with poorly crystalline apatite particles. Results indicate that ink rheological properties could be tuned by controlling ink composition: in particular, more printable inks are obtained with higher chitosan concentration (0.19 mol·L-1).


Asunto(s)
Fosfatos de Calcio/química , Quitosano/química , Impresión Tridimensional , Andamios del Tejido/química , Materiales Biocompatibles , Reología
10.
PLoS Pathog ; 11(9): e1005132, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26334306

RESUMEN

Antibiotic resistance among enterococci and γ-proteobacteria is an increasing problem in healthcare settings. Dense colonization of the gut by antibiotic-resistant bacteria facilitates their spread between patients and also leads to bloodstream and other systemic infections. Antibiotic-mediated destruction of the intestinal microbiota and consequent loss of colonization resistance are critical factors leading to persistence and spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. The mechanisms underlying microbiota-mediated colonization resistance remain incompletely defined and are likely distinct for different antibiotic-resistant bacterial species. It is unclear whether enterococci or γ-proteobacteria, upon expanding to high density in the gut, confer colonization resistance against competing bacterial species. Herein, we demonstrate that dense intestinal colonization with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) does not reduce in vivo growth of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Reciprocally, K. pneumoniae does not impair intestinal colonization by VRE. In contrast, transplantation of a diverse fecal microbiota eliminates both VRE and K. pneumoniae from the gut. Fluorescence in situ hybridization demonstrates that VRE and K. pneumoniae localize to the same regions in the colon but differ with respect to stimulation and invasion of the colonic mucus layer. While VRE and K. pneumoniae occupy the same three-dimensional space within the gut lumen, their independent growth and persistence in the gut suggests that they reside in distinct niches that satisfy their specific in vivo metabolic needs.


Asunto(s)
Enteritis/microbiología , Enterococcus faecium/fisiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Mucosa Intestinal/microbiología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/microbiología , Klebsiella pneumoniae/fisiología , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/fisiología , Ampicilina/efectos adversos , Animales , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Enteritis/patología , Enteritis/prevención & control , Enterococcus faecium/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococcus faecium/crecimiento & desarrollo , Enterococcus faecium/aislamiento & purificación , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal , Heces/microbiología , Femenino , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/patología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/prevención & control , Interacciones Huésped-Patógeno , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Mucosa Intestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Mucosa Intestinal/patología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/patología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/prevención & control , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/crecimiento & desarrollo , Klebsiella pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Interacciones Microbianas , Organismos Libres de Patógenos Específicos , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/crecimiento & desarrollo , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/aislamiento & purificación
12.
Farm Hosp ; 48(2): 75-78, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37735004

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To adapt the GHEMA report of abemaciclib, an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6. European Medicines Agency authorization (April 2022) includes, in combination with endocrine therapy, the adjuvant treatment of adult patients with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, node-positive, early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. METHOD: The efficacy and safety of abemaciclib were evaluated in a randomized, open-label, and multicenter phase III study. A total of 5637 patients diagnosed with early breast cancer with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, node positive, and high risk of recurrence were included. High risk was defined as patients with 4 or more positive axillary lymph nodes, or 1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes and at least one of the following: tumor size ≥5 cm, histologic grade 3, or Ki-67≥20%. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive adjuvant abemaciclib+endocrine therapy (n = 2808) or endocrine therapy alone (n = 2829) for 2 years, with endocrine therapy prescribed for at least 5 years. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 15.5 months, abemaciclib+endocrine therapy demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival versus endocrine therapy alone [HR = 0.747 (95% CI 0.598-0.932), P = 0.0096]; achieving an absolute improvement of 3.5% invasive disease-free survival rate at 2-years. These results were maintained, with a median follow-up of 27.7 months: absolute improvement of 2.7% and 5.4% in invasive disease-free survival rate at 2 and 3 years, respectively. All-causality grade 3 or 4 adverse events were 45.9% for abemaciclib and 12.9% for endocrine therapy, and included neutropenia (19.6% vs. 0.8%), leukopenia (11.4% vs. 0.4%), and diarrhea (7.8% vs. 0.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the pivotal trial are sufficient to consider abemaciclib as adjuvant treatment for high-risk early breast cancer in highly selected patients. However, in order to the efficacy results present less uncertainty, we must wait for a evaluation later, in which we can have a mature determination at 3 years (with more patients at risk).


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Aminopiridinas/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bencimidazoles/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Receptor ErbB-2
13.
Farm Hosp ; 48(2): T75-T78, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38114413

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To adapt the GHEMA report of abemaciclib, an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6. European Medicines Agency authorisation (April 2022) includes, in combination with endocrine therapy, the adjuvant treatment of adult patients with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, node-positive, early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. METHOD: The efficacy and safety of abemaciclib were evaluated in a randomized, open-label and multicenter phase III study. A total of 5,637 patients diagnosed with early breast cancer with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, node positive and high risk of recurrence were included. High risk was defined as patients with 4 or more positive axillary lymph nodes, or 1-3positive axillary lymph nodes and at least one of the following: tumor size ≥5 cm, histologic grade 3 or Ki-67 ≥ 20%. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive adjuvant abemaciclib + endocrine therapy (n = 2,808) or endocrine therapy alone (n = 2,829) for 2 years, with endocrine therapy prescribed for at least 5 years. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 15.5 months, abemaciclib + endocrine therapy demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival versus endocrine therapy alone (HR = 0.747 [95% CI 0.598-0.932], p = 0.0096); achieving an absolute improvement of 3.5% invasive disease-free survival rate at 2-years. These results were maintained, with a median follow-up of 27.7 months: absolute improvement of 2.7% and 5.4% in invasive disease-free survival rate at 2 and 3-years, respectively. All-causality grade 3 or 4 adverse events were 45.9% for abemaciclib and 12.9% for endocrine therapy, and included neutropenia (19.6% vs. 0.8%), leukopenia (11.4% vs. 0.4%) and diarrhea (7.8% vs. 0.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the pivotal trial are sufficient to consider abemaciclib as adjuvant treatment for high-risk early breast cancer in highly selected patients. However, in order to the efficacy results present less uncertainty, we must wait for a evaluation later, in which we can have a mature determination at 3 years (with more patients at risk).


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Bencimidazoles/efectos adversos , Aminopiridinas/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Receptor ErbB-2 , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos
14.
Farm Hosp ; 48(1): T9-T15, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37845105

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to perform an adjusted indirect treatment comparison, according to the cytogenetic profile, in terms of efficacy between different Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors used as first-line monotherapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Safety outcomes considered of interest were also evaluated to establish whether these options can be considered equivalent therapeutic alternatives. METHOD: A literature search was conducted in Pubmed and Embase on November 10, 2022 for phase III clinical trials studying Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors in monotherapy in the first-line setting for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Results were filtered according to whether the combination of bendamustine and rituximab was used as comparator and whether they had similar populations and follow-up times. Subgroup results were meta-analyzed according to mutational characteristics by classifying patients into high and low cytogenetic risk. An adjusted indirect comparison was developed using Bucher's method. Possible therapeutic equivalence was determined by applying the guide to equivalent therapeutic alternatives. RESULT: Of the 39 studies obtained in the review, 2 clinical trials were selected: 1 for zanubrutinib and 1 for ibrutinib. The remaining studies were not included because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. The results obtained in the adjusted indirect treatment comparison for both cytogenetic risk subgroups showed no statistically significant differences. The most relevant safety differences were atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and cardiovascular events in patients treated with ibrutinib and higher incidence of secondary cancers in patients treated with zanubrutinib. Applying the equivalent therapeutic alternatives guideline criteria, both treatments cannot be considered equivalent therapeutic alternatives. CONCLUSIONS: Assuming the uncertainty associated with the adjusted indirect comparison, zanubrutinib could be considered equivalent in efficacy to ibrutinib, however, the presence of differentiating safety features precludes assigning the 2 alternatives as equivalent therapeutic alternatives.


Asunto(s)
Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B , Humanos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenina , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos
15.
Farm Hosp ; 48(1): 9-15, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37612185

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to perform an adjusted indirect treatment comparison, according to the cytogenetic profile, in terms of efficacy between different Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors used as first-line monotherapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Safety outcomes considered of interest were also evaluated to establish whether these options can be considered equivalent therapeutic alternatives. METHOD: A literature search was conducted in Pubmed and Embase on 10 November 2022 for phase III clinical trials studying Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors in monotherapy in the first-line setting for CLL. Results were filtered according to whether the combination of bendamustine and rituximab was used as comparator and whether they had similar populations and follow-up times. Subgroup results were meta-analyzed according to mutational characteristics by classifying patients into high and low cytogenetic risk. An adjusted indirect comparison was developed using Bucher's method. Possible therapeutic equivalence was determined by applying the guide to equivalent therapeutic alternatives. RESULT: Of the 39 studies obtained in the review, two clinical trials were selected: one for zanubrutinib and one for ibrutinib. The remaining studies were not included because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. The results obtained in the adjusted indirect treatment comparison for both cytogenetic risk subgroups showed no statistically significant differences. The most relevant safety differences were auricular fibrillation, hypertension and cardiovascular events in patients treated with ibrutinib and higher incidence of secondary cancers in patients treated with zanubrutinib. Applying the ATE guideline criteria, both treatments cannot be considered equivalent therapeutic alternatives. CONCLUSIONS: Assuming the uncertainty associated with the adjusted indirect comparison, zanubrutinib could be considered equivalent in efficacy to ibrutinib, however, the presence of differentiating safety features precludes assigning the two alternatives as equivalent therapeutic alternatives.


Asunto(s)
Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B , Humanos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenina , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos
16.
J Infect ; 89(2): 106216, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38964511

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effect of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) on the clearance of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) carriage. METHODS: We performed a prospective, multi-center study, conducted among patients who received a single dose of FMT from one of four healthy donors. The primary endpoint was complete clearance of CPE carriage two weeks after FMT with a secondary endpoint at three months. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing was performed to assess gut microbiota composition of donors and recipients before and after FMT. RESULTS: Twenty CPE-colonized patients were included in the study, where post-FMT 20% (n = 4/20) of patients met the primary endpoint and 40% (n = 8/20) of patients met the secondary endpoint. Kaplan-Meier curves between patients with FMT intervention and the control group (n = 82) revealed a similar rate of decolonization between groups. Microbiota composition analyses revealed that response to FMT was not donor-dependent. Responders had a significantly lower relative abundance of CPE species pre-FMT than non-responders, and 14 days post-FMT responders had significantly higher bacterial species richness and alpha diversity compared to non-responders (p < 0.05). Responder fecal samples were also enriched in specific species, with significantly higher relative abundances of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Parabacteroides distasonis, Collinsella aerofaciens, Alistipes finegoldii and Blautia_A sp900066335 (q<0.01) compared to non-responders. CONCLUSION: FMT administration using the proposed regimen did not achieve statistical significance for complete CPE decolonization but was correlated with the relative abundance of specific bacterial taxa, including CPE species.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal , Heces , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto , Heces/microbiología , Anciano , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Proteínas Bacterianas/metabolismo , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/terapia , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , beta-Lactamasas/genética , Portador Sano/microbiología , Portador Sano/terapia , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/genética , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/aislamiento & purificación , Biodiversidad
17.
Eur J Health Econ ; 2024 Apr 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38647974

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Abemaciclib is an oral inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6). Data from the clinical trial monarchE (2023) showed improved survival from invasive disease. The aim of the present article was to conduct an economic assessment of adjuvant treatment with abemaciclib in women with luminal, HER2- and node-positive breast cancer. METHODS: A Markov model was constructed with four mutually exclusive health states (disease-free, local recurrence, distal recurrence and death). Analyses were based on the clinical trial monarchE which compared an intervention group (abemaciclib + hormone therapy [HT]) with HT alone. The effectiveness measure used was quality-adjusted life years (QALY), with unit costs and utilities being obtained from existing literature. The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was used to compare the two treatment strategies. RESULTS: Total costs were €98,765 and €17,935 for the abemaciclib plus HT group and the HT alone group, respectively. The health outcome was 10.076QALY for the intervention group and 9.495QALY for the control group, with the ICUR being€139,173/QALY. CONCLUSION: Despite the significant gains of abemaciclib as adjuvant treatment in terms of progression-free survival, this treatment is not cost-effective for the Spanish National Health System at published prices. It may be cost-effective with an appropriate discount on the official price.

18.
Farm Hosp ; 2024 Jul 19.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39033073

RESUMEN

The objective of regulatory authorities is to ensure a favorable risk-benefit balance for medicines in their licensed indication, without seeking to establish their place in the therapeutic armamentarium beyond that. The licensed indication covers heterogeneous subpopulations and often does not sufficiently specify the characteristics of the patients who may benefit. The regulatory information does not always show the benefit over the standard treatments; moreover, it only reacts to the conditions specified in the developer's application, and lacks an assessment of the clinical relevance of the benefit and its uncertainties. Many cases highlight the need to establish a more specific therapeutic benefit scenario than the licensed indication. For example, abemaciclib was approved in the adjuvant setting for high-risk patients with early breast cancer, but the appropriate level of risk and how to assess it needs to be specified. Also, pembrolizumab is approved for neoadjuvant plus adjuvant treatment in lung cancer; but it remains to be analyzed whether it is superior to nivolumab in neoadjuvant treatment alone, which involves less treatment and economic burden. As therapeutic positioning is always a necessary decision, whether made at a national, regional, local or individual level, it must be made in the most appropriate way. The absence of a multidisciplinary discussion and consensus, relying only on individual decisions to determine positioning from the outset, underestimates information gaps, inter-individual variability and the influence of drug promotion. It can be harmful and costly. To properly manage the introduction of new medicines, it is essential to establish their benefit scenario in a multidisciplinary way. This, together with consideration of the clinical benefit provided versus the appropriate alternatives and the uncertainties of the benefit, constitutes the objective of the clinical assessment and the basis for designing a well-focused economic analysis. This allows policy makers to make the most appropriate decisions on pricing and funding new treatments. In an ideal situation, the benefit scenario considered for the new medicine would coincide with the one established for funding, but costs that are difficult to bear may lead to restrictions and affect the final positioning after the economic and budgetary impact assessment.

19.
Infect Immun ; 81(3): 965-73, 2013 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23319552

RESUMEN

Bacteria causing infections in hospitalized patients are increasingly antibiotic resistant. Classical infection control practices are only partially effective at preventing spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria within hospitals. Because the density of intestinal colonization by the highly antibiotic-resistant bacterium vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) can exceed 10(9) organisms per gram of feces, even optimally implemented hygiene protocols often fail. Decreasing the density of intestinal colonization, therefore, represents an important approach to limit VRE transmission. We demonstrate that reintroduction of a diverse intestinal microbiota to densely VRE-colonized mice eliminates VRE from the intestinal tract. While oxygen-tolerant members of the microbiota are ineffective at eliminating VRE, administration of obligate anaerobic commensal bacteria to mice results in a billionfold reduction in the density of intestinal VRE colonization. 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis of intestinal bacterial populations isolated from mice that cleared VRE following microbiota reconstitution revealed that recolonization with a microbiota that contains Barnesiella correlates with VRE elimination. Characterization of the fecal microbiota of patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation demonstrated that intestinal colonization with Barnesiella confers resistance to intestinal domination and bloodstream infection with VRE. Our studies indicate that obligate anaerobic bacteria belonging to the Barnesiella genus enable clearance of intestinal VRE colonization and may provide novel approaches to prevent the spread of highly antibiotic-resistant bacteria.


Asunto(s)
Bacteroidaceae/fisiología , Enterococcus faecium/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/terapia , Intestinos/microbiología , Resistencia a la Vancomicina , Animales , ADN Bacteriano , Femenino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , ARN Bacteriano/genética , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética
20.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 107(50): 21737-42, 2010 Dec 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21098263

RESUMEN

Many tumors contain heterogeneous populations of cells, only some of which exhibit increased tumorigenicity and resistance to anticancer therapies. Evidence suggests that these aggressive cancer cells, often termed "cancer stem cells" or "cancer stem-like cells" (CSCs), rely upon developmental signaling pathways that are important for survival and expansion of normal stem cells. Here we report that, in analogy to embryonic mammary epithelial biology, estrogen signaling expands the pool of functional breast CSCs through a paracrine FGF/FGFR/Tbx3 signaling pathway. Estrogen or FGF9 pretreatment induced CSC properties of breast cancer cell lines and freshly isolated breast cancer cells, whereas cotreatment of cells with tamoxifen or a small molecule inhibitor of FGFR signaling was sufficient to prevent the estrogen-induced expansion of CSCs. Furthermore, reduction of FGFR or Tbx3 gene expression was able to abrogate tumorsphere formation, whereas ectopic Tbx3 expression increased tumor seeding potential by 100-fold. These findings demonstrate that breast CSCs are stimulated by estrogen through a signaling pathway that similarly controls normal mammary epithelial stem cell biology.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Estrógenos/farmacología , Factores de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Células Madre Neoplásicas/efectos de los fármacos , Comunicación Paracrina , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Proteínas de Dominio T Box/metabolismo , Línea Celular Tumoral , Femenino , Factor 9 de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/genética , Factor 9 de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Factores de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/genética , Humanos , Células Madre Neoplásicas/fisiología , Receptor Tipo 3 de Factor de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/genética , Receptor Tipo 3 de Factor de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Proteínas de Dominio T Box/genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda