Clinical outcomes and return to play in softball players following SLAP repair or biceps tenodesis.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain due to labral tears and biceps tendonitis is commonly found in softball players. Surgical options include labral repair and biceps tenodesis. Although past studies are limited by heterogeneous study groups from multiple sports, this is the first study that assesses clinical outcomes and return to play rates for fast-pitch softball players. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and return to play for fast-pitch softball players treated for a superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) tear and recalcitrant biceps tendonitis with a biceps tenodesis compared with a traditional SLAP repair. We hypothesized that the biceps tenodesis would have comparable outcomes with a faster return to play compared with SLAP repair. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis on fast-pitch softball players treated surgically for SLAP tear, recalcitrant biceps tendonitis, or a combination between 2001 and 2019 at our institution. Inclusion criteria were fast-pitch softball players who underwent biceps tenodesis or a SLAP repair with greater than 2-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria involved slow-pitch softball players, patients with less than 2-year follow-up, and patients who had undergone concomitant procedures on the ipsilateral shoulder at the time of SLAP repair or biceps tenodesis. Follow-up was either self-reported through OBERD, a patient-reported outcomes (PRO)-managing software, or achieved over the phone. Follow-up data included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form score, Andrews Carson Score, Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow Score, Numeric Rating Scale for Pain, and our institution-specific return-to-play questionnaire. We statistically compared players who underwent biceps tenodesis or a SLAP repair, and compared pitchers with position players using Student t tests and Fisher exact test with statistical significance determined to be P < .05. RESULTS: From 60 eligible patients identified, follow-up outcome data were successfully captured for 47 (78%). Of the 18 SLAP repair patients, 17 (94%) returned to full competition at an average of 7.9 months. Of the 29 patients who underwent biceps tenodesis, 27 (93%) returned to full competition at an average of 7.1 months. Statistical analysis of PRO scores for each group found no significant differences between any of the measures used to evaluate patient outcomes, including no statistical difference in pitchers compared with position players. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study demonstrated comparable outcomes between SLAP repairs and biceps tenodesis procedures among our study group of fast-pitch softball players. There was no significant difference between RTP times between the 2 groups.

Clinical outcomes of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the capitellum treated with arthroscopy with a mean follow-up period of 8.3 years.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Although numerous studies exist evaluating the short-term clinical outcomes of patients who have undergone elbow arthroscopy for osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the capitellum, the literature on minimum 2-year clinical outcomes in a large cohort of patients is limited. We hypothesized that the clinical outcomes of patients treated arthroscopically for OCD of the capitellum would be favorable, with improved postoperative subjective functional and pain scores and with an acceptable return-to-play rate. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected surgical database was performed to identify all patients treated surgically for OCD of the capitellum at our institution from January 2001 to August 2018. The inclusion criteria for this study included a diagnosis of OCD of the capitellum treated arthroscopically with a minimum 2-year follow-up period. The exclusion criteria included any prior surgical treatment on the ipsilateral elbow, missing operative reports, and cases in which any portion of the surgical procedure was performed in an open manner. Follow-up was performed by telephone using multiple patient-reported outcome questionnaires: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons-Elbow (ASES-e), Andrews-Carson, and Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow Score (KJOC) questionnaires and our institution-specific return-to-play questionnaire. RESULTS: After the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to our surgical database, 107 eligible patients were identified. Of these, 90 were successfully contacted, for a follow-up rate of 84%. The mean age was 15.2 years, and the mean follow-up time was 8.3 years. A subsequent revision procedure was performed in 11 patients, for a 12% failure rate in these patients. The ASES-e pain score was an average of 4.0 on a maximum pain scale of 100, the ASES-e function score was an average of 34.5 of a maximum of 36, and the surgical satisfaction score was an average of 9.1 of 10. The average Andrews-Carson score was 87.1 of 100, and the average KJOC score for overhead athletes was 83.5 of 100. Additionally, of the 87 patients evaluated who played sports at the time of their arthroscopy, 81 (93%) returned to play. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated an excellent return-to-play rate and satisfactory subjective questionnaire scores with a 12% failure rate following arthroscopy for OCD of the capitellum with a minimum 2-year follow-up period.

The Effect of Humeral and Ulnar Bone Tunnel Placement on Achieving Ulnar Collateral Ligament Graft Isometry: A Cadaveric Study.

PURPOSE: To assess simulated ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) graft length change, using surgically dissected anatomic landmarks, between multiple combinations of humeral and ulnar bone tunnels. METHODS: Three equidistant humeral and ulnar tunnels were created at each UCL footprint of 10 cadaveric elbows. Suture was passed between 9 possible tunnel combinations for each elbow and affixed to an isometry gauge. Each elbow was moved through an arc of 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120° for each tunnel combination. Changes in isometry gauge spring displacement (and, in effect, tension) were recorded. RESULTS: There was an overall significant effect (P < .0001) of tunnel placement at all degrees of flexion. Pairwise comparisons revealed increases in displacement between the central and posterior tunnel positions of the medial epicondyle, with significant differences (P = .0009) occurring when paired with both the central and posterior aspect of the sublime tubercle. Significant differences (P < .0001) were noted between the anterior and posterior humeral tunnel positions. CONCLUSIONS: Simulated UCL graft isometry is dependent upon optimal bone tunnel placement. No significant differences were noted between ulnar tunnel locations when paired with any given humeral tunnel. Conversely, deviation anterior or posterior from the centroid of the UCL footprint on the medial epicondyle significantly affected isometry at all degrees of flexion recorded with the greatest amount of displacement occurring with pairi4ng of posterior tunnels on both the humeral and ulnar footprints. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This anatomic study highlights the importance of medial elbow bone tunnel placement and its effect on simulated UCL graft isometry.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Baseball Players.

PURPOSE: To determine common mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in baseball players and to quantify the rate of return to play after primary surgical reconstruction and review intermediate clinical outcomes. METHODS: Surgical injuries involving the ACL in youth, high school, collegiate, and professional baseball players were queried for an 11-year period (2001 to 2011). Over the study period, 42 baseball players were identified who had undergone arthroscopically assisted primary ACL reconstruction by 1 of 3 attending surgeons. Retrospective chart review was performed for all 42 patients to evaluate variables of age, level of competition, position, mechanism of injury, graft choice, and associated meniscal injuries. Twenty-six patients were reached for telephone survey and International Knee Documentation Committee questionnaire and they answered questions about their original injury and playing history. RESULTS: The most common mechanism of injury was fielding, followed by base running. Infielders and outfielders (32% each) were the most commonly injured position, followed by pitchers (29%). Among the 32 players for whom it could be determined, 30 (94%) were able to return to playing baseball at a mean follow-up of 4.2 years (range 1.0 to 9.9 years). The mean International Knee Documentation Committee score was 84.0 (range 63 to 91). Among the 26 patients contacted for telephone interview, no one required revision ACL surgery, but 3 required a subsequent procedure for meniscal tear. Twenty-five patients (96%) denied any episodes of instability in the knee after reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: The overwhelming majority of baseball players that sustain ACL injuries do so while fielding or base running. Outfielders are significantly more likely than infielders to suffer ACL injuries while fielding versus base running. The results with respect to return to play are promising, as nearly all patients were able to return to baseball and none required a revision ACL surgery at a mean follow-up of 4.2 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Technique and Outcomes of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Repair With Augmentation.

Background: Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries to the knee are uncommon, and ideal surgical management of these injuries is unclear. Current surgical techniques include PCL reconstruction with remnant debridement, remnant-preserving techniques, and primary PCL repair. Augmentation of PCL repairs and reconstructions has been proposed to protect repairs or grafts in the postoperative period. Purpose: To describe PCL repair with the hamstring autograft augmentation technique and examine our preliminary midterm outcomes from a sequential cohort of patients. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The authors identified patients at their institution who underwent remnant-preserving primary PCL repair with hamstring autograft augmentation for both isolated tears and tears associated with multiligament knee injury (MLKI). Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated at a minimum 2-year follow-up using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form, the 12-item Short Form Survey, and a custom return-to-play questionnaire. Patient-reported outcomes data were summarized, and the predictors of outcomes from the descriptive data and clinical measures were further examined. Results: A total of 23 patients with a mean follow-up of 5.3 years met the inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 87% were associated with MLKI. The mean IKDC score was 87.7. Approximately 83% of patients were able to successfully return to their sport or occupation. Among 19 athletes, only 2 reported being unable to return to their preinjury level of sport because of limitations from their PCL surgery. Patient-reported outcome scores and return to sport or occupation did not have a statistically significant association with age, sex, body mass index, time from injury to surgery, or follow-up time. Conclusion: Outcomes of our cohort with remnant-preserving primary PCL repairs with hamstring autograft augmentation demonstrated comparable clinical outcomes to previously published PCL data. The advantages of remnant preservation, primary repair, and augmentation with an independent hamstring autograft reconstruction are combined within this technique.

Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Suture Tape Augmentation: Can You Overtighten?

BACKGROUND: There has been a renewed interest and, recently, wider implementation of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) repair in throwing athletes because of improvement in ligament repair technology and corresponding outcome data. PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanical parameters and failure mode between 2 brace-tightening techniques for UCL repair. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Eleven matched pairs of cadaveric arms were procured. One limb from each pair underwent UCL repair with suture tape augmentation with either (1) attempted restoration of physiologic ligament tension or (2) maximal tension. Each specimen was subjected to 10 cycles of subfailure valgus torque at 90º of flexion in the intact state after UCL avulsion and then after UCL repair. Specimens were then torqued to failure. Articular contact mechanics, linear gap distance, angular displacement, failure torque, failure stiffness, and suture tape pull-through length were recorded. Two-way analysis of variance and paired t tests were used to test for statistical differences. RESULTS: There was a significant effect (P = .01) of tightening on joint contact area. There was a significant decrease in gap distance (P = .03) and angular displacement (P = .004) from the torn condition to the repaired condition for the maximum tension group, without a significant difference in gap distance from the intact condition. Failure torque and stiffness were not significantly different between groups, although there was a significant difference (P = .001) in the overall suture tape pull-through length. CONCLUSION: Although there are potential physiologic changes at time zero-including significant decreases in contact area, normalized gap distance, and normalized angular displacement with maximal tension repair-examination of failure biomechanics suggests that these effects may be mitigated over time within the construct by suture tape pull-through at the tape-anchor interface. Neither method of UCL repair with suture tape augmentation resulted in overconstraint of the elbow joint compared with the native ligament biomechanics. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As more long-term outcome data from UCL repair with suture tape augmentation emerge, there will be wider implementation with various techniques to tension the suture tape. Examining the potential biomechanical sequelae of the UCL repair construct applied under maximal tension will help further refine recommendations for surgeons who utilize this technique for UCL repair.

Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Multiligament Knee Injuries in a Cohort Including Competitive Athletes With Long-Term Follow-Up.

Background: There is a paucity of outcomes data on surgical reconstruction for multiligament knee injury (MLKI) in the orthopaedic literature. Purpose: To examine functional and return-to-sports (RTS) outcomes and revision rates after single-stage reconstruction for MLKIs in a cohort containing a large proportion of competitive athletes over a 20-year period. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: We identified all patients at our institution who underwent surgical reconstruction for an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) or bicruciate (ACL-posterior cruciate ligament) MLKI between 2001 and 2020 and had ≥2 years of postoperative outcome data. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, a surgical satisfaction survey, and questions about subsequent knee surgery and RTS administered via telephone. Summary statistics for all outcomes data were calculated, and predictors of IKDC scores at follow-up were examined using univariable linear regression. Results: Out of 151 patients eligible for this study, outcomes data were collected in 119 patients (79%). The mean follow-up time was 8.3 ± 4.4 years, and the mean IKDC score at follow-up was 79 ± 17. A total of 83 competitive athletes were included; 62 of these athletes attempted to return to preinjury sport. Among the 62 who attempted RTS, 50 (81%) were successful, and 12 were unable to return due to limitations from their surgery. At follow-up, 112 of the overall cohort of 119 patients (94%) were either satisfied or very satisfied with their surgical outcome, and 91% stated the surgery met or exceeded their expectations. In addition, 24% had subsequent ipsilateral knee operations after their index multiligament knee reconstruction. Older age at surgery and female sex were associated with worse IKDC scores at follow-up. Conclusion: Despite the severity of the injuries in our cohort, we found high levels of patient-reported function and a high rate of successful RTS in the competitive athletes. Older age and female sex were associated with worse patient-reported knee function at follow-up.

Long-term Outcomes of Multiligament Knee Injuries in American Football Players.

BACKGROUND: Long-term outcomes for isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions in competitive American football athletes are well reported in the literature, but little data currently exist regarding multiligament knee injury (MLKI) reconstruction outcomes. PURPOSE: To examine patient-reported and return-to-sport outcomes of competitive American football athletes who underwent primary, single-staged, multiligament knee reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: We identified patients from our institution's prospectively collected data repository between 2001 and 2020 who underwent single-staged surgical reconstruction of an MLKI sustained during competitive participation in American football. We assessed patient-reported outcomes at a minimum of 2 years after surgery using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form and questions regarding surgical satisfaction and return to sport. Successful return to sport was defined as a return to preinjury level of competition. We summarized all outcome data and compared outcomes between 2-ligament and >2-ligament groups and between ACL-only MLKI injury and bicruciate MLKI injury groups using independent t test for IKDC scores and chi-square test for return to sport. Additionally, we evaluated predictors of postoperative IKDC scores using linear regression and predictors of return to sport using logistic regression. RESULTS: Outcome data were successfully collected for 53 of 73 total eligible patients (73%; mean follow-up time, 7.7 ± 4.0 years; all male; mean age at surgery, 18.1 ± 2.7 years). The mean postoperative IKDC score was 84 ± 16. The most common level of preinjury competition was high school (n = 36; 68%), followed by college (n = 10; 19%). Seven patients did not return to sport competition at any level due to limitations from their knee surgery, and 82% of patients that attempted to return to preinjury level of sport were able to do so. A total of 50 patients (94%) were satisfied or very satisfied with their surgical outcome. The 2-ligament (n = 39) and >2-ligament (n = 14) groups did not significantly differ in IKDC scores (P = .96) or proportions with successful return to sport (P = .77). Similarly, the ACL-MLKI injury (n = 39) and bicruciate MLKI injury (n = 14) groups did not significantly differ in IKDC scores (P = .89) or proportions with successful return to sport (P = .77). Age and body mass index were not significantly associated with IKDC scores or successful return to sport at follow-up (all P > .05). CONCLUSION: This study may represent the largest cohort of competitive American football athletes evaluated for longitudinal outcomes after multiligament knee reconstruction. Despite the severity of these injuries, we found good knee-related function and that the large majority of athletes who attempted to return to sport were successful. The majority of athletes (94%) were satisfied with their operative treatment.

Open Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries.

Open reconstruction of the coracoclavicular (CC) and acromioclavicular (AC) ligaments results in excellent reduction of severely displaced AC dislocations, most commonly Grades III and V. Anatomic CC reconstruction through clavicular bone tunnels can prevent vertical instability, whereas the addition of an acromial limb of the graft can increase horizontal stability. Autograft tendon is preferred in the young athletic group of collision sports participants, although allograft has had acceptable results. Accessory fixation may be placed to protect the graft during healing, or for severe instability, especially for athletes involved in contact sports.

Biomechanical Basis of Interval Throwing Programs for Baseball Pitchers: A Systematic Review.

Background: Interval throwing programs are used in rehabilitation of throwing injuries, especially ulnar collateral ligament injuries. Athletes who are rehabilitating begin by throwing on flat ground progressing through increasing distances, number of throws, and intensity of throwing. If the athlete is a baseball pitcher, the flat-ground throwing phase is followed by pitching on a mound at progressively increased effort. The goal is to build back arm strength and capacity with an emphasis on proper mechanics. Purpose: To determine whether interval throwing progressively builds joint kinetics (specifically, elbow varus torque) to the level required during full-effort baseball pitching. A secondary purpose was to examine the kinematics produced during interval throwing compared to those seen during baseball pitching. Study Design: Systematic Review. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, and Google Scholar were systematically searched for biomechanical studies of flat-ground throwing and partial-effort pitching in baseball between 1987 and 2023. Studies that reported the biomechanics of either flat-ground throwing, or partial-effort pitching were included in this review. The AXIS tool was used to assess study quality. Results: Thirteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Ten studies were determined to be of moderate quality, while three studies were deemed high quality. Elbow varus torque during partial-effort pitching was less than during full-effort pitching. Elbow varus torque for most flat-ground throws did not exceed full-effort pitching torque. While most studies showed increased elbow varus torque with increased flat-ground throwing distance, the distance at which elbow varus torque matched or exceeded full-effort pitching elbow varus torque was not consistent.As flat-ground throwing distance increased, shoulder external rotation angle and shoulder internal rotation velocity increased. Arm slot (forearm angle above horizontal) decreased as flat-ground throwing distance increased. For varied effort pitching, shoulder external rotation angle, shoulder internal rotation velocity, elbow extension velocity, and ball velocity increased as effort increased. While the front knee extended slightly from foot contact to ball release in full-effort pitching, the front knee flexed slightly during partial-effort pitching. Conclusions: An interval throwing program progressively builds elbow varus torque up to levels produced in full-effort baseball pitching. While differences exist between interval throwing kinematics and pitching kinematics, the patterns are similar in general. Level of Evidence: 2.

The Clinician's Guide to Baseball Pitching Biomechanics.

CONTEXT: Improper baseball pitching biomechanics are associated with increased stresses on the throwing elbow and shoulder as well as an increased risk of injury. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Previous studies quantifying pitching kinematics and kinetics were reviewed. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 5. RESULTS: At the instant of lead foot contact, the elbow should be flexed approximately 90° with the shoulder at about 90° abduction, 20° horizontal abduction, and 45° external rotation. The stride length should be about 85% of the pitcher's height with the lead foot in a slightly closed position. The pelvis should be rotated slightly open toward home plate with the upper torso in line with the pitching direction. Improper shoulder external rotation at foot contact is associated with increased elbow and shoulder torques and forces and may be corrected by changing the stride length and/or arm path. From foot contact to maximum shoulder external rotation to ball release, the pitcher should demonstrate a kinematic chain of lead knee extension, pelvis rotation, upper trunk rotation, elbow extension, and shoulder internal rotation. The lead knee should be flexed about 45° at foot contact and 30° at ball release. Corrective strategies for insufficient knee extension may involve technical issues (stride length, lead foot position, lead foot orientation) and/or strength and conditioning of the lower body. Improper pelvis and upper trunk rotation often indicate the need for core strength and flexibility. Maximum shoulder external rotation should be about 170°. Insufficient external rotation leads to low shoulder internal rotation velocity and low ball velocity. Deviation from 90° abduction decreases the ability to achieve maximum external rotation, increases elbow torque, and decreases the dynamic stability in the glenohumeral joint. CONCLUSION: Improved pitching biomechanics can increase performance and reduce risk of injury. SORT: Level C.

Active range of motion of the shoulder: a cross-sectional study of 6635 subjects.

Background: Normative data for passive range of motion are well established, but daily living is comprised of active motion. The purpose of this study was to establish normative values for active range of motion of the shoulder across age, sex, and arm. Our hypotheses were that active range of motion of the shoulder (1) decreases with age group, (2) differs between males and females, and (3) differs between the right arm and left arm. Methods: Shoulder active range of motion was captured with an eight-camera markerless motion capture system. Data were collected for a heterogenous sample of 6635 males and females of all ages. For each subject, 6 shoulder motions were collected with maximum values measured: external rotation, internal rotation, flexion, extension, abduction, and horizontal abduction. Three-way repeated measures analyses were performed, with 2 between-subject factors (age group and sex) and 1 within-subject factor (arm). The unadjusted threshold for statistical significance was α = 0.05. Results: External rotation decreased with age (approximately 10° decrease from below 30 years to above 60 years). External rotation was approximately 5° greater in the right arm, whereas internal rotation was approximately 5° greater in the left arm. Flexion decreased with age (approximately 15° decrease from below 20 years to above 60 years). For age groups from 10 to 59 years, extension and horizontal abduction were approximately 5° to 10° greater in females than males. Abduction was greater for females than males. Abduction was also greater in younger people (aged 10-29 years) than older people. Conclusion: In general, active range of motion of the shoulder decreases with age. Sex (male/female) and arm side (right/left) also influence shoulder range of motion.

Outcomes of Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair Using a Novel All-Suture Soft Anchor Medial Row.

Background: Few studies have examined the short-term clinical outcomes of rotator cuff repair (RCR) with all-suture anchors for medial row anchor fixation. Purpose: To evaluate clinical outcomes of double-row suture bridge RCR using a novel all-suture medial row anchor. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: We enrolled 179 patients before double-row suture bridge RCR (mean age at surgery, 60.0 years; 63% male patients) at a single institution. All patients underwent RCR with all-suture anchor fixation for the medial row and solid anchor fixation for the lateral row. Preoperative (baseline) and follow-up (minimum follow-up time of 2 years; mean, 2.5 years) clinical outcomes were compared using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and a 10-point numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). We calculated the proportions of patients meeting previously published Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds for the ASES (≥78.0) and NPRS (≤1.7). We further compared baseline and follow-up outcome scores and the proportions of patients meeting PASS thresholds using paired t tests and McNemar tests, respectively, and calculated effect size to quantify the magnitude of change from baseline to follow-up. Results: Values significantly improved from baseline to follow-up for ASES (from 45.3 ± 19.8 to 87.3 ± 17.1) and NPRS (from 5.2 ± 2.5 to 1.4 ± 2.1). The proportion of patients meeting PASS thresholds also significantly improved for the ASES (from 6% to 77%) and the NPRS (from 7% to 72%). The magnitude of baseline to follow-up change for all measures was large (all effect sizes ≥1.5). Conclusion: Our study demonstrated excellent short-term clinical outcomes and substantial improvements for patients undergoing double-row suture bridge RCR with all-suture anchors for medial row fixation.

Intersurgeon Consistency of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Internal Brace: A Biomechanical Analysis.

Background: Injury to the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) of the medial elbow has been treated successfully with ligament repair augmented with internal brace. Previous work has shown that this procedure does not overconstrain the ulnohumeral joint; however, the procedures were conducted by a single surgeon, which controlled for anchor placement and graft tensioning. Purpose/Hypothesis: Our purpose was to evaluate the reproducibility of contact mechanics and joint torque after UCL repair with internal brace as performed by different surgeons compared with repair by a single surgeon. It was hypothesized that there would be no significant difference in elbow contact mechanics, valgus torque, or torsional stiffness between the 2 groups. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Nine pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric elbows were tested biomechanically under 3 conditions: UCL-intact (UCL-I), UCL-deficient (UCL-D), and UCL-repaired with internal brace augmentation (UCLR-IB). For each pair, 1 elbow was repaired by a single surgeon, and the contralateral elbow was repaired by 1 of 9 other surgeons. Testing consisted of valgus torsion between 0° and 5° with the elbow positioned at 90° of flexion. Ulnohumeral contact mechanics and overall joint torque and stiffness were measured and compared between surgeon groups. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the single-surgeon and multiple-surgeon groups regarding contact area (P = .83), contact force (P = .27), peak pressure (P = .26), or peak force (P = .30); however, contact pressure was significantly affected (P = .02) by surgeon group. Compared with UCL-I, both UCL-D and UCLR-IB conditions had a significant overall effect on contact area (P = .004) and contact force (P = .05); however, contact pressure (P = .56), peak pressure (P = .27), and peak force (P = .24) were not affected by injury condition. Measurements of elbow torque (P = .28) and stiffness (P = .98) were not significantly different between surgeon groups. Conclusion: UCL repair with internal brace provided consistent results among several surgeons when compared with a single surgeon. The procedure did not lead to joint overconstraint while also returning the ligament to near-intact levels of resisting valgus stress. Clinical Relevance: UCL repair with internal brace augmentation is a reproducible surgical technique that has good clinical outcomes in the literature.

Determinants of Biomechanical Efficiency in Collegiate and Professional Baseball Pitchers.

BACKGROUND: Biomechanical efficiency, defined as fastball velocity per unit of normalized elbow varus torque, is a relatively new metric applied to improving the performance and health of baseball pitching. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this work was to evaluate kinematic parameters influencing biomechanical efficiency among professional and collegiate pitchers. Kinematic differences were compared between pitchers of high and low biomechanical efficiency. We hypothesized that professional pitchers would have greater biomechanical efficiency than collegiate pitchers. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: A deidentified biomechanical database of 545 pitchers (447 professional, 98 collegiate) was analyzed. A multivariate linear regression model was used to evaluate significant findings a priori with α = .05. Additionally, biomechanical differences were identified between competition levels and between high and low biomechanical efficiency groups using Mann-Whitney U test (α = .05). RESULTS: Competition level and 11 (of 21) kinematic variables explained 27% of the variance in biomechanical efficiency, with most of the predictors being throwing arm kinematics (elbow flexion at stride foot contact [SFC]: ß, -1.47; SE, 0.26; shoulder abduction at SFC: ß, -1.78; SE, 0.39; shoulder external rotation at SFC: ß, 0.60; SE, 0.22; maximum external rotation [MER] angle: ß, 1.82; SE, 0.42; shoulder horizontal adduction at MER: ß, -3.42; SE, 0.71) (all P≤ .05). Professional pitchers had greater biomechanical efficiency than collegiate pitchers (711.0 ± 101.0 vs 657.0 ± 99.3, respectively; P < .001; d = 0.53). Compared with the low-efficiency group, the high-efficiency group had significantly lower normalized elbow varus torque with greater weight and height (high: 0.047 ± 0.004 %wt*ht vs. low: 0.063 ± 0.006 %wt*ht, P <.001; d = 3.20). At the instant of SFC, the high-efficiency group demonstrated greater shoulder external rotation and less elbow flexion, shoulder abduction, and pelvic rotation. The high-efficiency group also had greater MER and less shoulder horizontal adduction at MER, trunk side tilt at ball release, and knee excursion from foot contact to ball release. CONCLUSION: Professional pitchers had greater biomechanical efficiency than collegiate pitchers. Biomechanical efficiency was also affected by 11 kinematic variables identified in this study. Pitchers with higher efficiency had distinct differences in arm position, trunk side tilt, and lead-knee extension range of motion in the delivery. Thus, pitchers and baseball organizations should focus on these factors to lower normalized elbow varus torque relative to ball velocity.

Clinical Outcomes of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Surgery in Nonthrowing Athletes.

BACKGROUND: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) surgery continues to demonstrate excellent clinical outcomes and a high return-to-play (RTP) rate with a low complication rate. Recent studies have demonstrated similar clinical outcomes for baseball players who have undergone either UCL reconstruction or UCL repair. In comparison, few studies have assessed the clinical outcomes of UCL surgery for nonthrowing athletes. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The primary objective of this study is to provide clinical outcomes of UCL surgery performed in nonthrowing athletes at a single institution with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Our hypothesis was that these patients would have similar clinical outcomes, complication rates, and RTP rates when compared with throwing athletes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: From our longitudinal elbow registry, 40 nonthrowing athletes were identified who underwent UCL surgery (repair or reconstruction) between 2011 and 2019. Participant characteristics were recorded: age, sex, laterality, arm dominance, sport, level of competition, and type of surgery (UCL repair or reconstruction). Outcomes included RTP rate and average time, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, and complications. RESULTS: From the 40 patients eligible for inclusion in this study with a minimum 2-year follow-up, 37 (93%) were successfully contacted: 16 male (43%) and 21 female (57%). Mean ± standard deviation age at the time of surgery was 18.0 ± 3.7 years. From the 37 technical procedures, 28 (76%) were UCL repairs and 9 (24%) were UCL reconstructions. For these patients, 15 (41%) had partial tears, 20 (54%) had complete tears, 1 (3%) had a medial epicondyle avulsion, and 1 (3%) had an unspecified pathology. Sports included football (n = 11), gymnastics (11), cheerleading (7), wrestling (4), volleyball (2), basketball (1), and acrobatics (1). Quarterbacks were excluded from the football patients, as quarterbacks are throwing athletes. Level of competition included high school (n = 26), college (8), professional (2), and youth sports (1). The RTP rate was 93% (26/28) at a mean 7.4 months for UCL repair and 100% (9/9) at a mean 10.0 months for UCL reconstruction. Mean ASES scores were 94.4 and 98.7 for UCL repair and reconstruction, respectively. Complications were low, with 2 patients in the UCL repair group requiring ulnar nerve transposition for ulnar nerve paresthesia. CONCLUSION: In nonthrowing athletes, patients undergoing UCL repair and UCL reconstruction show favorable outcomes at minimum 2-year follow-up. RTP and clinical outcomes are consistent with previous studies in baseball players as well as a parallel ongoing study conducted on non-baseball throwing athletes.

MRI of the reconstructed ulnar collateral ligament.

OBJECTIVE: We are often asked to evaluate the postoperative elbow using MRI. In this article, we present both the normal appearance of the reconstructed ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) and a spectrum of UCL graft abnormalities at MR arthrography. CONCLUSION: The UCL is the primary medial stabilizer of the elbow during flexion and is susceptible to injury, particularly in overhead throwing athletes. In the setting of UCL injury, ligament reconstruction is the principal surgical procedure available to restore stability and function and to relieve pain with activity. We have found MR arthrography useful in assessing the reconstructed UCL.

Thromboembolic phenomena after arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to review a series of patients who experienced thromboembolic events after shoulder arthroscopy and attempt to identify possible risk factors or associations with thromboembolic phenomena after shoulder arthroscopy. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, a retrospective database review from 2 fellowship-trained surgeons over a 5-year consecutive period was conducted to identify all patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy (N = 1,908). Six patients were identified as sustaining thromboembolic events after shoulder arthroscopy (5 deep vein thromboses [DVTs] and 4 pulmonary embolisms [PEs]), but there were no deaths. Patient demographics (age, gender, significant medical history, and body mass index), operative detail (concomitant procedures, positioning, and DVT prophylaxis), and diagnosis and treatment of the thromboembolic events (Doppler ultrasound/chest computed tomography, hypercoagulability testing, and treatment with Coumadin [Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York, NY]) were recorded. RESULTS: Over a 5-year period, from 2002 to 2006, there were 6 patients known to have had thromboembolic events (5 documented DVTs and 4 PEs) after shoulder arthroscopy at the 2 institutions participating in the study. The total number of shoulder arthroscopies performed was 1,908. The mean patient age was 47 years (range, 18 to 71 years). All patients were evaluated with Doppler ultrasound, chest radiography, and chest computed tomography. Patients were treated with Coumadin, after bridging with low-molecular weight heparin. For the 5 documented DVTs, all lesions occurred on the same side as the operated extremity. There were 3 upper extremity lesions and 2 lower extremity lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative DVT and PE are unusual and potentially fatal consequences of arthroscopic shoulder surgery. We report a low prevalence (0.31%), but all patients in this series required hospitalization and subsequent anticoagulation. All patients who had arthroscopic shoulder surgery during this study period-those with and without thromboembolic events-were in the lateral decubitus position with arm traction. Thromboembolic complications included both ipsilateral upper and lower extremity DVTs, as well as a high percentage of PEs (4 of 6 patients). A wide age range was seen in the patients with thromboembolic complications, and 3 of the patients had known identifiable risk factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Fragment Excision With Flexor-Pronator Mass Repair for Chronic Medial Humeral Epicondyle Nonunions.

Athletes with medial epicondyle nonunions typically present with medial elbow pain, an elbow flexion contracture, and the inability to compete. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent medial epicondyle excision with ulnar collateral ligament and flexor-pronator mass repair for symptomatic medial epicondyle non-unions. Four patients with a mean age of 15 years (range, 11-19 years) diagnosed with symptomatic medial epicondyle nonunions were evaluated. All were treated with medial epicondyle excision with ulnar collateral ligament and flexor-pronator mass repair. Two of the patients were followed for 12 months, whereas the other 2 patients were followed for 18 months. All patients returned to their preinjury level of sports without difficulty. Two patients with preoperative flexion contracture had residual flexion contractures of 4° and 5° postoperatively, respectively, as measured by a goniometer. All other patients regained full elbow motion equal to that of the contralateral extremity at final follow-up. The patients with preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms had complete resolution postoperatively at a mean follow-up of 18 months. In overhead and upper extremity weight-bearing athletes who have symptomatic medial epicondyle nonunions, fragment excision with flexor-pronator mass repair can yield satisfactory results. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(3):e337-e342.].

The Effect of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Internal Brace Augmentation on Articular Contact Mechanics: A Cadaveric Study.

BACKGROUND: There has been renewed interest in ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) repair in throwing athletes because of a greater understanding of UCL injuries, improvement in ligament repair technology, and potentially expedited rehabilitation time and return to play relative to UCL reconstruction. PURPOSE: To evaluate elbow articular contact and overall joint torque after UCL reconstruction and repair augmented with a collagen-coated fiber tape, InternalBrace. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Ten matched pairs of cadaveric arms (mean age, 41 ± 11 years) were dissected to expose the UCL. Each specimen was secured into a custom test fixture at 90°, and 1 specimen from each pair underwent either a modified Jobe UCL reconstruction or UCL repair with InternalBrace. Each specimen underwent 10 cycles of elbow valgus angular displacement between 0° and 5° at a rate of 1 deg/s in the intact state, after UCL avulsion, and then after UCL reconstruction or repair. Articular contact mechanics and overall joint torque and stiffness were recorded. RESULTS: Contact mechanics of reconstructed and repaired specimens were not significantly different. Both reconstruction and repair procedures returned the overall resistance of the joint to valgus torsion to near-intact levels. UCL repair tended to restore joint torque more closely to the intact state than did reconstruction, given that reconstruction showed a nonsignificant trend toward lower torque than the intact state (P = .07). CONCLUSION: Neither UCL reconstruction nor UCL repair with InternalBrace overconstrained the elbow joint, as both groups had similar contact pressures compared with the native joint. Both procedures also restored elbow joint torque and stiffness to levels not statistically different from the intact state. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Given the sound biomechanical properties of UCL repair with InternalBrace, it may have a significant role as treatment for UCL injuries.